ArgyrisC., and SchonD. A. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
2.
BennettN., WiseC., WoodsP., and HarveyJ. (2003). Distributed leadership (full report). Oxford: National College for School Leadership.
3.
BernhardtV. L. (1998). Data analysis for comprehensive schoolwide improvement. Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education.
4.
BolmanL., and DealT. E. (1997). Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice, and leadership (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5.
BransfordJ., BrownA., and CockingR. (Eds.). (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
6.
BurchP. (2005). The new educational privatization: Educational contracting and high-stakes accountability. Teachers College Record, 108(12), 2582—2610.
7.
CelioM. B., and HarveyJ. (2005). Buried treasure: Developing a management guide from mountains of school data. Seattle, WA: Center on Reinventing Public Education.
8.
CoburnC. E. (2006). District evidence use: An analysis of instructional decision making. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
9.
CoburnC. E., and TalbertJ. E. (2006). Conceptions of evidence use in school districts: Mapping the terrain. American Journal of Education, 112(4), 469—495.
10.
CoplandM. A. (2003). The Bay Area School Collaborative: Building the capacity to lead. In MurphyJ., and DatnowA. (Eds.), Leadership lessons from comprehensive school reform (pp. 159—184). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
11.
CoplandM. A., and KnappM. S. (2006). Connecting leadership with learning: A framework for reflection, planning, and action. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
12.
CubanL. (1990). Problem-finding: Problem-based learning project. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University School of Education.
13.
CubanL. (1998). How schools change reforms: Redefining reform success and failure. Teachers College Record, 99(3), 453—477.
14.
EarlL., and KatzS. (2002). Leading schools in a data-rich world. In LeithwoodK., and HallingerP. (Eds.), Second international handbook of educational leadership and administration (pp. 1003—1022). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
15.
ElmoreR. (2000). Building a new structure for school leadership. New York: The Albert Shanker Institute.
16.
FullanM. (1999). Change forces: The sequel. London: Falmer Press.
17.
FullanM. (2001). Leading in a culture of change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
18.
HallingerP., and HeckR. H. (1996). Reassessing the principal's role in school effectiveness: A review of empirical research, 1980–1995. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32(1), 5—44.
19.
HattieJ. A. (1992). Self-concept. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
20.
HessR. (2003). Refining or retreating? High-stakes accountability in the states. In PetersonP., and WestM. (Eds.), No child left behind? The politics and practice of school accountability (pp. 55—79). Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
21.
HolcombE. (1999). Getting excited about data: How to combine people, passion and proof. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
22.
HonigM. I. (2006). Policy implementation and learning: How organizational and socio-cultural learning theories elaborate district central office roles in complex educational improvement efforts. Occasional paper. Seattle, WA: University of Washington, Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy.
23.
HonigM., and CoburnC. E. (2005, Winter). When districts use evidence for instructional improvement: What do we know and where do we go from here?Urban Voices in Education, 6, 22—26.
24.
HuberG. P. (1991). Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures. Organization Science, 2(1), 88—115.
25.
IngramD., LouisK. S., and SchroederR. G. (2004). Accountability policies and teacher decision making: Barriers to the use of data to improve practice. Teachers College Record, 106(6), 1258—1287.
26.
KerrK. A., MarshJ. A., IkemotoG. S., and BarneyH. (2006). Strategies to promote data use for instructional improvement: Actions, outcomes, and lessons from three urban districts. American Journal of Education, 112(4), 496—520.
27.
KnappM. S., CoplandM. A., SwinnertonJ. A., and Monpas-HuberJ. (2006). Data-informed leadership. Seattle, WA: University of Washington, Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy.
28.
KnappM. S., CoplandM., and TalbertJ. E. (2003). Leading for learning: Reflective tools for school and district leaders. Seattle, WA: University of Washington, Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy.
29.
LeithwoodK. A., and RiehlC. (2003). What do we already know about successful school leadership? Paper prepared for AERA Division A Task Force on Developing Research in Educational Leadership.
30.
LemonsR., LuscheiT. F., and SiskinL. S. (2003). Leadership and the demands of standards-based accountability. In CarnoyM., ElmoreR., and SiskinL.S. (Eds.), The new accountability: High schools and high-stakes testing (pp. 99—127). New York: Routledge Falmer.
31.
MarzanoR. J., WatersT., and McNultyB. A. (2005). School leadership that works. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
32.
McLaughlinM., and TalbertJ. (2002). Bay Area School Reform Collaborative: Phase one (1996–2001) evaluation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University, Center for Research on the Context of Teaching.
33.
McNeilL. M. (2000). Contradictions of school reform: Educational costs of high-stakes testing. New York: Routledge.
34.
MielesT., and FoleyE. (2005). From data to decisions: Lessons from school districts using data warehousing. Providence, RI: Annenberg.
35.
PortinB., BeckL., KnappM. S., and MurphyJ. (2003). The school and self-reflective renewal: Taking stock and moving on. In PortinB., BeckL., KnappM.S., and MurphyJ. (Eds.), Taking stock and moving on: Local lessons from a national school renewal initiative (pp. 179—199). Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group.
36.
SchwartzD. L., BransfordJ., and SearsD. (2005). Efficiency and innovation in transfer. In and and MestreJ. (Ed.), Transfer of learning: Research and perspectives (pp. 1—51). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
37.
ScribnerJ. P., CockrellK. S., CockrellD. H., and ValentineJ. W. (1999). Creating professional communities in school through organizational learning: An evaluation of a school improvement process. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35(1), 130—160.
38.
SergiovanniT. (1992). Moral leadership: Getting to the heart of the matter. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
39.
SpillaneJ. P. (2006). Distributed leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
40.
SpillaneJ. P., DiamondJ. B., BurchP., HallettT., JitaL., and ZoltnersJ. (2002). Managing in the middle: School leaders and the enactment of accountability policy. Educational Policy, 16(5), 731—762.
41.
SpillaneJ. P., ReiserB. J., and ReimerT. (2002). Policy implementation and cognition: Reframing and refocusing implementation research. Review of Educational Research, 72(3), 387—431.
42.
StollL., FinkD., and EarlL. (2003). It's about learning (and it's about time): What's in it for schools?London & New York: Routledge Falmer.
43.
StreiferP. A. (2002). Using data to make better educational decisions. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.
44.
StringerE. (2004). Action research in education. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
45.
StringfieldS., WaymanJ. C., and YakimowskiM. (2005). Scaling up data use in classrooms, schools and districts. In DedeC., HonanJ.P., and PetersL.C. (Eds.), Scaling up success: Lessons learned from technology-based, educational innovation (pp. 133—152). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
46.
SupovitzJ., and KleinV. (2003). Mapping a course for improved student learning: How innovative schools use student performance data to guide improvement. Philadelphia: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
47.
WeickK. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
48.
WeissC. (1995). Nothing as practical as a good theory: Exploring theory-based evaluations for comprehensive community-based initiatives for children and families. In ConnellJ., KubischA., SchorrL., and WeissC. (Eds.), New approaches to evaluating community initiatives (pp. 65—92). Washington, DC: The Aspen Institute.
49.
WengerE. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
50.
WitherspoonP. D. (1997). Communicating leadership: An organizational perspective. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.