AdamsJ. E., and KirstM. W. (1999). New demands and concepts for educational accountability: Striving for results in an era of excellence. In MurphyJ., and LouisK.S. (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational administration (2nd ed., pp. 463—490). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
2.
ArgyrisC., and SchonD. (1996). Organizational learning II: Theory, method, and practice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
3.
BlackP., and WiliamD. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7—74.
4.
BoudettK. P., CityE. A., and MurnaneR. J. (2006). Data wise: A step-by-step guide to using assessment results to improve teaching and learning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
5.
BulkleyK., FairmanJ., MartinezC., and HicksJ. (2004). The district and test preparation. In FirestoneW.A., and SchorrR.Y. (Eds.), The ambiguity of test preparation (pp. 113—141). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates.
6.
BurnsJ. M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.
7.
Cross City Campaign for Urban School Reform (2005). A delicate balance: District policies and classroom practice. Chicago: Author.
8.
DillonS. (2006, March 26). Schools cut back subjects to push reading and math. The New York Times, p. 1.
9.
EarlL. D., and KatzS. (2006). Leading schools in a data-rich world: Harnessing data for school improvement. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
10.
ElmoreR. F., and BurneyD. (1999). Investing in teacher learning: Staff development and instructional improvement. In Darling-HammondL., and SykesG. (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 263—291). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
11.
FairmanJ., and FirestoneW. A. (2001). The district role in state assessment policy: An exploratory study. In and and FuhrmanS.H. (Ed.), From the capitol to the classroom: Standards-based reform in the states. The one-hundredth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II (pp. 124—147). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
12.
FirestoneW. A., and LouisK. S. (1999). Schools as cultures. In MurphyJ., and LouisK.S. (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational administration (2nd ed., pp. 297—323). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
13.
FirestoneW. A., and ShippsD. (2005). How do leaders interpret conflicting accountabilities to improve student learning? In FirestoneW.A., and RiehlC.J. (Eds.), A new agenda: Directions for research on educational leadership. New York: Teachers College Press.
14.
FirestoneW. A., SchorrR. Y., and MonfilsL. (2004). The ambiguity of teaching to the test. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15.
FullanM. (1982). The meaning of educational change. New York: Teachers College Press.
16.
HatchT. (2001). Incoherence in the system: Three perspectives on the implementation of multiple initiatives in one district. American Journal of Education, 109(4), 407—437.
17.
HuberG. P. (1996). Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literature. In CohenM.D., and SproullL.S. (Eds.), Organizational learning (pp. 124—162). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18.
IvoryG. (2005). How good does information have to be to justify a press conference?Journal of Cases in Educational Leadership, 8(1), 18—28.
19.
KoretzD. (2005). Alignment, high stakes, and the inflation of test scores. In HermanJ.L., and HaertelE. (Eds.), Uses and misuses of data for educational accountability and improvement. The 104th yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II (pp. 99—118). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
20.
LeithwoodK., and LouisK. S. (1998). Organizational learning in schools. Lisse, Switzerland: Swets & Zeitlinger.
21.
LeithwoodK., LouisK. S., AndersonS. E., and WahlstromK. (2004). Review of research: How leadership influences student learning. New York: Wallace Foundation.
22.
LockeE. A. (2003). Leadership: Starting at the top. In PearceC.L., and CongerJ.A. (Eds.), Shared leadership: Reframing the hows and whys of leadership (pp. 271—284). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
23.
LouisK. S., and KruseS. D. (1995). Professionalism and community: Perspectives on reforming urban schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
24.
LouisK. S., and KruseS. D. (1996). Creating community in reform: Images of organizational learning in inner-city schools. In LeithwoodK., and LouisK.S. (Eds.), Organizational learning in schools (pp. 17—45). Lisse, Switzerland: Swets & Zeitlinger.
25.
MarchJ. G. (1996). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. In CohenM.D., and SproullL.S. (Eds.), Organizational learning (pp. 101—123). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
26.
MarshJ. A., KerrK. A., IkemotoG. S., DarilekH., SuttorpM., and ZimmerR. W.. (2005). The role of districts in fostering instructional improvement. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
27.
McLaughlinM. W., and TalbertJ. E. (2002). Reforming districts. In HightowerA., KnappM.S., MarshJ.A., and McLaughlinM.W. (Eds.), School districts and instructional renewal (pp. 173—192). New York: Teachers College Press.
28.
McNeilL. M. (2000). Contradictions of school reform: Educational costs of standardized testing. New York: Routledge.
29.
MetzM. H. (1990). Real school: A universal drama amid disparate experiences. In MitchellD.E., and GoertzM.E. (Eds.), Education politics for the new century (pp. 75—92). London: Falmer Press.
30.
PetersT. J., and WatermanR. H. (1982). In search of excellence: Lessons from America's best-run companies. New York: Harper and Row.
31.
SpillaneJ. P. (1998). State policy and the non-monolithic nature of the local school district: Organizational and professional considerations. American Educational Research Journal, 35(1), 33—63.
32.
SpillaneJ. P., HalvorsonR., and DiamondJ. (2004). Theory of leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36(1), 3—34.
33.
SteinM. K., and D'AmicoL. (2002). The district as a professional learning laboratory. In HightowerA., KnappM.S., MarshJ.A., and McLaughlinM.W. (Eds.), School districts and instructional renewal (pp. 61—75). New York: Teachers College Press.
34.
TogneriW., and AndersonS. E. (2003). Beyond islands of excellence: What districts can do to improve instruction and achievement in all schools–A leadership brief. Baltimore, MD: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development and the Learning First Alliance.
35.
WeissC. H. (1998). Evaluation (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
36.
WengerE. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.