AthanasesS. Z., and AchinsteinB. (2003). Focusing new teachers on individual and low performing students: The centrality of formative assessment in the mentor's repertoire of practice. Teachers College Record, 105(8), 1486—1520.
2.
BallD. L., and CohenD. K. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice-based theory of professional education. In Darling-HammondL., and SykesG. (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 3—32). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
3.
BoalerJ., and StaplesM. (2005). Transforming students’ lives through an equitable mathematics approach: The case of Railside School. Unpublished paper: Graduate School of Education, Stanford University.
4.
BrunerJ. (2004). Life as narrative. Social Research, 71(3), 691—710.
5.
Cochran-SmithM., and LytleS. L. (1993). Inside/outside: Teacher research and knowledge. New York: Teachers College Press.
6.
CohenE., and LotanR. (1997). Working for equity in heterogeneous classrooms: Sociological theory in practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
7.
DrewP., and HeritageJ. (Eds.). (1992). Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings. New York: Cambridge University Press.
8.
EngestromY., and MiddletonD. (Eds.). (1998). Cognition and communication at work. New York: Cambridge University Press.
9.
FernandezC. (2002). Learning from Japanese approaches to professional development: The case of lesson study. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(5), 393—405.
10.
GrossmanP., WineburgS., and WoolworthS. (2001). Toward a theory of teacher community. Teachers College Record, 103(6), 942—1012.
11.
HammersleyM. (1984). Staffroom news. In HargreavesA., and WoodsP. (Eds.), Classrooms and staffrooms: The sociology of teachers and teaching (pp. 203—214). Milton Keynes, England: Open University Press.
12.
HargreavesA. (1984). Experience counts, theory doesn't: How teachers talk about their work. Sociology of Education, 57(October), 244—254.
13.
HollingsworthS., and SockettH. (Eds.). (1994). Teacher research and educational reform. 93rd yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education. The ninety-third yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part I. Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
14.
HornI. S. (2004). Through their students’ eyes: Reflecting on classroom practice in teachers’ collegial conversations. Paper presented at the Psychology in Mathematics Education North America Conference, Toronto, Ontario.
15.
HornI. S. (2005). Learning on the job: A situated account of teacher learning in high school mathematics departments. Cognition & Instruction, 23(2), 207—236.
16.
HornI. S. (2006, August). Teaching replays, teaching rehearsals, and principled re-visions: Learning from colleagues in a mathematics teacher community. Paper presented at the biennial conference of the European Association for Research on Learning, SIG on Teaching and Teacher Education, Garryvoe, Ireland.
17.
HubermanM. (1993). The model of the independent artisan in teachers’ professional relations. In LittleJ.W., and McLaughlinM.W. (Eds.), Teachers’ work: Individuals, colleagues, and contexts (pp. 11—50). New York: Teachers College Press.
18.
JacksonP. (1968). Life in classrooms. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
19.
JordanB., and PutzP. (2004). Assessment as practice: Notes on measures, tests, and targets. Human Organization, 63(3), 346—358.
20.
KazemiE., and FrankeM. L. (2004). Teacher learning in mathematics: Using student work to promote collective inquiry. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 7, 203—235.
21.
LampertM., and GrazianiF. (2005, February). Making ambitious teaching routine: Individual challenges and organizational resources. A report presented to the Directorate of Italiaidea Center for Italian Language and Culture Studies, Rome, Italy.
22.
LeFevreD. (2004). Designing for teacher learning: Video-based curriculum design. In and and BrophyJ. (Ed.), Using video in teacher education (pp. 235—258). London: Elsevier.
23.
LewisC. (2000). Lesson study: The core of Japanese professional development. Invited address, Special Interest Group in Mathematics Education, American Educational Research Association annual meeting, New Orleans, LA.
24.
LittleJ. W. (1982). Norms of collegiality and experimentation: Workplace conditions of school success. American Educational Research Journal, 19(3), 325—340.
25.
LittleJ. W. (2003). Inside teacher community: Representations of classroom practice. Teachers College Record, 105(6), 913—945.
26.
LittleJ. W., and CurryM. (in press). Structuring talk about teaching and learning: The use of evidence in protocol-based conversation. In EarlL.M., and TimperleyH.S. (Eds.), Professional learning conversations: Challenges in using evidence. New York: Springer.
27.
LittleJ. W., and HornI. S. (2007). “Normalizing” problems of practice: Converting routine conversation into a resource for learning in professional communities. In StollL., and LouisK.S. (Eds.), Professional learning communities: Divergence, detail and difficulties (pp. 79—92). Maidenhead, England: Open University Press.
28.
LortieD. (1975). Schoolteacher. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
29.
McDonaldJ. P. (2001). Students’ work and teachers’ learning. In LiebermanA., and MillerL. (Eds.), Teachers caught in the action: Professional development that matters (pp. 209—235). New York: Teachers College Press.
30.
McLaughlinM. W., and TalbertJ. E. (2001). Professional communities and the work of high school teaching. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
31.
McLaughlinM. W., and TalbertJ. E. (2006). Building school-based teacher learning communities: Professional strategies to improve student achievement. New York: Teachers College Press.
32.
OchsE. (1979). Transcription as theory. In OchsE., and SchieffelinB. (Eds.), Developmental pragmatics (pp. 43—72). New York: Academic Press.
33.
OrrJ. E. (1996). Talking about machines: An ethnography of a modern job. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
34.
RoseberyA. S., and WarrenB. (1998). Interanimation among discourses: One approach to studying learning in teacher research communities. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
35.
RosenholtzS. (1989). Teachers’ workplace. New York: Longman.
36.
RosenholtzS., and KyleS. (1984). Teacher isolation: Barrier to professionalism. American Educator, 8(4), 10—15.
37.
RyuA. J. (2006). A study of teacher learning and professional development through collaborative reflection on artifacts of practice. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Berkeley: University of California.
38.
SherinM. G., and HanS. Y. (2004). Teacher learning in the context of a video club. Teacher and Teaching Education, 20, 163—183.
39.
SiskinL. S. (1994). Realms of knowledge: Academic departments in secondary schools. London: Falmer Press.
40.
SiskinL. S., and LittleJ. W. (1995). The subject department: Continuities and critiques. In SiskinL.S., and LittleJ.W. (Eds.), The subjects in question: Departmental organization and the high school (pp. 1—22). New York: Teachers College Press.
41.
SpillaneJ. P., and MieleD. (2007). Evidence in practice: A framing of the terrain. In and and MossP.A. (Ed.), Evidence and decision making. The 106th yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part I (pp. 46—73). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
42.
StodolskyS., and GrossmanP. (2000). Changing students, changing teaching. Teachers College Record, 102(1), 125—172.
43.
StokesL. (2001). Lessons from an inquiring school: Forms of inquiry and conditions for teacher learning. In LiebermanA., and MillerL. (Eds.), Teachers caught in the action: Professional development that matters (pp. 141—158). New York: Teachers College Press.
44.
TalbertJ. E. (1995). Boundaries of teachers’ professional communities in U.S. high schools: Power and precariousness of the subject department. In SiskinL.S., and LittleJ.W. (Eds.), The subjects in question: Departmental organization and the high school (pp. 68—94). New York: Teachers College Press.