In the last several decades, a college education, in particular the bachelor's degree, has become the key to higher earnings, and overall, to a middle-class lifestyle in the United States. In an increasingly globalized economy, privileging information and communication technologies, it is more than likely that this emphasis on higher education in the American labor market will continue in the future. While we know much about the increasing link between a college education and social mobility, writ large, we know considerably less about who actually makes the transition to college, how this occurs, and why. Despite the strides made, large numbers of individuals are not making the transition to college. Among those who are, there are important differences in the kinds of postsecondary institutions they are attending, and in completion rates, with attendant implications for social mobility.
Purpose
This article has two purposes: (1) to synthesize the key facets of our knowledge base of how to expand the college pipeline and relatedly, to outline particular areas that have been under-examined across the disciplines; (2) to provide future directions that will allow us to better address this important inquiry along substantive and methodological lines.
Research Design
This article draws on disciplinary papers commissioned by the Social Science Research Council's Transitions to College Committee. The discussion of preparation is framed around the contributions from the fields of anthropology, and political science; access vis-à-vis history, sociology, and demography; paying for college vis-à-vis economics; and completion vis-à-vis the field of higher education.
Conclusions/Recommendations
The article calls for an overall integrative model, e.g., K-16 and interdisciplinary, improved coverage in large-scale datasets, and a more refined mixed methods approach to attend to notable gaps in our understandings of the transition to college. Across disciplines, a key substantive gap is variation along the lines of race, ethnicity, immigrant status, gender, and age across domains, which needs to be illuminated.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlbaR., and NeeV. (2003). Remaking the American mainstream: Assimilation and contemporary immigration. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
2.
AlexanderK. L., PallasA. M., and HolupkaS. (1987). Consistency and change in educational stratification: Recent trends regarding social background and college access. In and and RobinsonR.V. (Ed.), Research in social stratification and mobility. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
3.
AllenW. R., TeranishiR., DinwiddieG., and GonzalezG. (2000). Knocking at freedom's door: Race, equity and affirmative action in U.S. higher education. The Journal of Negro Education, 69, 3—11.
4.
AttinasiL. C. (1989). Getting in: Mexican Americans’ perceptions of University attendance and the implications for freshman year persistence. Journal of Higher Education, 60, 247—277.
5.
AveryC., and HoxbyC. (2004). Do and should financial aid packages affect students’ college choices? In and and HoxbyC. (Ed.), College choices: The economics of which college, when college, and how to pay for it. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
6.
BaumS. (2003). The role of student loans in college access. New York: National Dialogue on Student Financial Aid, College Board.
7.
BeanF. D., and StevensG. (2003). America's newcomers and the dynamics of diversity. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
8.
BowenW., and BokD. (1998). The shape of the river: Long-term consequences of considering race in college and university admissions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
9.
BrintS., and KarabelJ. (1989). The diverted dream: community colleges and the promise of educational opportunity in America, 1900–1985. New York: Oxford University Press.
10.
BrittainC. (2002). Transnational messages: Experiences of Chinese and Mexican immigrants in American schools. New York: LBF Scholarly Publishing.
11.
ButterfieldS.2004. “We're just Black:” The racial and ethnic identities of second generation West Indians in New York. In KasinitzP., MollenkopfJ., and WatersM. (Eds.). Becoming New Yorkers: Ethnographies of the new second generation (pp. 288—312). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
12.
Deil-AmenR., and López TurleyR. N.A review of the transition to college literature in sociology. Teacher's College Record.
13.
DoughertyK. (1987). The effects of community colleges: Aid or hindrance to socioeconomic attainment?Sociology of Education, 60(2), 86—103.
14.
DoughertyK. (2002). The evolving role of the community college policy: Issues and research questions. In J. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research.
15.
EckertP. (1989). Jocks and burnouts. New York: Columbia University Press.
16.
EvansN. (1994). Experiential learning for all. London, New York: Cassell.
GándaraP. (2002). Meeting common goals: Linking K-12 and college interventions. In TierneyW.G., and HagedornL.S. (Eds.), Increasing access to college: Extending possibilities for all students (pp. 81—103). Albany: State University of New York Press.
19.
GandertonP. T. (1992). The effect of subsidies in kind on the choice of a college, Journal of Public Economics, 48(3), 269—292.
20.
GelberS.Pathways in the past: Historical perspectives on access to higher education. Teacher's College Record.
21.
GibsonM. A., BejínezL. F., HidalgoN., and RolónC. (2004). Belonging and school participation: Lessons from a migrant student club. In GibsonM.A., GándaraP., and KoyamaJ.P. (Eds.), School connections: U. S. Mexican youth, peers, and school achievement (pp. 129—149). New York: Teachers College Press.
22.
Goldrick-RabS., CarterD. F., and Winkle WagnerR.What higher education has to say about the transition to college. Teacher's College Record.
23.
GrissmerD. (2005, May 12). Closing the Nation's Racial Achievement Gaps. Paper presented on panel, Harvard University, Graduate School of Education.
24.
HilmerM. J. (1998). Post-secondary fees and the decision to attend a university or a community college. Journal of Public Economics, 67(3), 329—348.
25.
HochschildJ. (1995). Facing up to the American Dream: Race, class, and the soul of the nation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
26.
HoldawayJ. (2005, May 4–5. Ethnic Diversity. Paper presented at the ETS Achievement Gap Symposium on the Progress and Challenges of Women and Girls in Education and Work. Princeton, N.J.
27.
KaneT. (1999). The price of admission. Washington, DC: Brookings Institutional Press.
28.
KaoG. (2004). Social capital and its televance to minority and immigrant populations. Sociology of Education77(2), 172—175.
29.
KarabelJ. (1999). The rise and fall of affirmative action at the University of California. The Journal of Blacks in Higher Education, 25, 109—112.
30.
KarenD. (1991). The politics of class, race, and gender: Access to higher education in the United States, 1960–1986. American Journal of Education, 75, 208—237.
31.
KoyamaJ. P. (2006) Transitions to college: Anthropological and ethnographic accounts. Teacher's College Record.
32.
JohnstoneB. D. (2003). Fundamental assumptions and aims underlying the principles of federal financial aid to students. New York: National Dialogue on Student Financial Aid, College Board.
33.
LareauA. (1987). Social class differences in family-school relationships: The importance of cultural capital. Sociology of Education, 60(2), 73—85.
34.
LareauA. (2000). Home advantage. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
35.
LareauA., and HorvatE. M. (1999). Moments of social inclusion and exclusion: Race, class, and cultural capital in family-school relationships. Sociology of Education, 72(1), 37—53.
36.
LavinD. E., and HyllegardD. (1996). Changing the odds: Open admissions and the life chances of the disadvantaged. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
37.
LongB. T. (Forthcoming). How have college decisions changed overtime? An application of the conditional logistic choice model. Journal of Econometrics.
38.
LongB. T. (2006). Contributions from the field of economics to the study of college access and success. Teacher's College Record.
39.
LongB. T. (2004). Does the format of an aid program matter? The effect of in-kind tuition subsidies. Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(3), 767—782.
40.
LópezN. (2003). Hopeful girls, troubled boys: Gender and race disparity in urban education. New York: Routledge Press.
41.
LouieV. (2004). Compelled to excel: Immigration, education and opportunity among Chinese Americans. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
42.
LouieV. (2005). Immigrant student populations and the pipeline to college: Current considerations and future lines of inquiry. Review of Research in Education, 29. 69—106.
43.
LouieV. (in press, Fall 2006). Second generation pessimism and optimism: How Chinese and Dominicans understand education and mobility through ethnic and transnational orientations. International Migration Review, 40(3), 537—572.
44.
ManskiC., and WiseD. (1983). College choice in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
45.
MaralaniV. (2006). The transition to college from a demographic perspective: Past findings and future possibilities. Teacher's College Record.
46.
MaralaniV. (2004). From GED to college: The role of age and timing in educational stratification (working paper #005-03). California Center for Population Research. Retrieved June 28, 2006, from http://www.ccpr.ucla.edu/ccprwpseries/ccpr_005_03.pdf
47.
MattinglyP., AndersonJ., ChurchR., CurranE., and TobiasM. (2004). Renegotiating the historical narrative: The case of American higher education. History of Education Quarterly, 44(4), 577—596.
48.
McDonoughP. M. (1997). Choosing colleges: How social class and schools structure opportunity. Albany: State University of New York Press.
49.
McLanahanS., and SandefurG.. (1994). Growing up with a single parent. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
50.
MollenkopfJ., WatersM., HoldawayJ., and KasinitzP. (2005). The ever-winding path: Ethnic and racial diversity in the transition to adulthood. In SetterstenR.A., FurstenbergF.F., and RumbautR.G. (Eds.), On the frontier of adulthood: Theory, research, and public policy (pp. 454—497). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
51.
MorganS. L. (1996). Trends in black-white differences in educational expectations: 1980–92. Sociology of Education, 69, 308—319.
52.
NewmanK.1999. No shame in my game: The working poor in the inner city. New York: Alfred A. Knopf and the Russell Sage Foundation.
53.
NogueraP. A. (2004). Social capital and the education of immigrant students: Categories and generalizations. Sociology of Education, 77, 180—183.
54.
O'BrienP. M. (1992). Enrollment in higher education: The role of information about college costs and financial aid. Unpublished qualifying paper, Harvard University.
55.
PersellC. H., and CooksonP. W. (1985). Chartering and bartering–Elite education and social reproduction. Social Problems, 33, 114—129.
56.
PortesA., and RumbautR. (1980). Immigrant America. Berkeley: University of California Press.
57.
PortesA., and RumbautR. (2001). Legacies: The story of the immigrant second generation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
58.
PortesA., and ZhouM. (1993). The new second generation: Segmented assimilation and its variants. Annals of the American Academy, 520, 74—96.
59.
PowellB., and SteelmanL. C. (1989). The liability of having brothers–Paying for college and the sex composition of the family. Sociology of Education, 62, 134—147.
60.
PriceD. (2005). “Fifth-sector” reports on the transition from high school to college: 1998–2004. Report to the Social Science Research Council.
61.
ReubenJ. A. (2001). Merit, mission, and minority students: The history of debate over special admissions programs. In and and JohanekM.C. (Ed.), A faithful mirror: Reflections on the College Board and education in America (pp. 195—243). New York: College Board.
62.
RimerS., and ArensonK. W. (2004, June 24). Top colleges take more Blacks, but which ones?New York Times, Section A, p. 1.
63.
RodriguezS. (2001). Giants among us: First-generation students who lead activist lives. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.
64.
RongX. L., and PreissleJ. (1997). Educating immigrant students: What we need to know to meet the challenge. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
65.
RouseC. (1994). What to do after high school? Two-year vs. four-year college enrollment decisions. In and and EhrenbergR.G. (Ed.), Choices and consequences: Contemporary policy issues in education (pp. 59—88). Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.
66.
SchneiderB., and StevensonD. (1999). The ambitious generation: America's teenagers, motivated but directionless. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
67.
ScottJ., and LeonhardtD. (2005, May 15). Class in America: Shadowy lines that still divide. New York Times, Section 1, p. 1.
68.
SewellW. H. (1971). Inequality of Opportunity for Higher Education. American Sociological Review, 36, 793—809.
69.
SewellW. H., and HauserR. M. (1975). Education, occupation, and earnings: Achievement in the early career. New York: Academic Press.
70.
SingerJ. D., and WillettJ. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: modeling change and event occurrence. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
71.
Stanton-SalazarR. (2001). Manufacturing hope and despair: The school and kin support networks of U.S.-Mexican youth. New York: Teachers College Press.
72.
StepickA., StepickC., EugeneE., TeedD., and LabisierreY. (2001). Shifting identities and intergenerational conflict: Growing up Haitian in Miami. In RumbautR., and PortesA. (Eds.), Ethnicities: Children of immigrants in America (pp. 229—266). Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
73.
Suárez-OrozcoC., and Suárez-OrozcoM. (1995). Transformations: Immigration, family life & achievement motivation among Latino adolescents. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
74.
Suárez-OrozcoC., and Suárez-OrozcoM. (2001). Children of immigration. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
75.
Suárez-OrozcoC., and Qin-HillardD. B. (2004). The cultural psychology of academic engagement: Immigrant boys’ experiences in U.S. schools. In WayN., and ChuJ. (Eds.), Adolescent boys: Exploring diverse cultures of boyhood. New York: New York University Press.
76.
Suárez-OrozcoC., and QinD. B. (2006). Gendered perspectives in psychology: Immigrant origin youth. International Migration Review: Special Issue on Gender and Migration Revisited, 40(1), 165—198.
77.
TiendaM., LeichtK. T., SullivanT., MalteseM., and LloydK. (2003). Closing the gap? Admissions & enrollments at the Texas public flagships before and after affirmative action. Princeton, NJ, Texas Higher Education Opportunity Project.
78.
TiendaM., and NiuS. (2004). Capitalizing on segregation, pretending neutrality: College admissions and the Texas top 10% law. Princeton, NJ: Texas Higher Education Opportunity Project.
79.
TintoV. (1987). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
80.
TintoV. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition (2nd ed.). Chicago; London: University of Chicago Press.
81.
TrilloA. (2004). Somewhere between Wall Street and El Barrio: Community college as a second chance for second-generation Latino students. In KasinitzP., MollenkopfJ., and WatersM. (Eds.), Becoming New Yorkers: Ethnographies of the new second generation (pp. 57—78). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
82.
ValenzuelaA. (1999). Subtractive schooling: U. S.-Mexican youth and the politics of caring. Albany: State University of New York Press.
83.
VeneziaA., KirstM., and AntonioA. L. (2003). Betraying the college dream. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
84.
WatersM. (1999). Black identities: West Indian immigrant dreams and American realities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
