Responding to the challenges of the demographic imperative and calls for greater program coherence, social justice teacher education programs aim to integrate social justice in the professional preparation of teachers. Such programs intend to improve the preparation of teachers to teach students from diverse backgrounds, and in doing so they strive to keep the moral and ethical purposes of teaching and schooling at the center of teachers’ preparation.
Purpose
This study examines two social justice teacher education programs to explore teacher educators’ conceptions of social justice and the conditions that appear to support their joint enterprise.
Research Design
Findings presented are based on a year-long qualitative case study. Data sources include interviews with teacher education faculty and a review of program and course documents.
Findings
Grounded in communities of practice theory and a theory of social justice, I found that faculty conceptions of justice varied from an emphasis on meeting the needs of individuals to a concern with broader structural inequities. The mutual engagement of faculty appeared to be supported by external resources that provided structure and expertise, the selection of faculty with commitments to social justice and collaboration, and formal and informal opportunities to collaborate.
Conclusions/Recommendations
This study has implications for both practice and research in teacher education. In terms of practice, this study suggests that social justice teacher education relies on more than the efforts of individual teacher educators. Teacher education programs aiming to integrate social justice may benefit from implementing structures that enable faculty to work together in both defining and enacting such a vision of teaching and learning. The dimensions of social justice articulated by Mills and SJSU faculty offer teacher educators with a way of conceptualizing justice that attends to a core concept in the field—the goal of attending to individual student's needs—and to a less common concept of justice as tied to alleviating oppression.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Association of Colleges of Teacher Education. (1999). Teacher education pipeline IV: Schools, colleges, and departments of education. Washington, DC: American Association of Colleges of Teacher Education.
2.
AndersonE. S. (1999). What is the point of equality?Ethics, 287—337.
3.
BanksJ. (1995). Multicultural education: Historical development, dimensions, and practice. In BanksJ., and BanksC. (Eds.), Handbook of research on multicultural education (pp. 3—24). New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
4.
BanksJ. A. (2002). An introduction to multicultural education (3rd Ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
5.
BritzmanD. (1986). Cultural myths in the making of a teacher: Biography and social structure in teacher education. Harvard Educational Review, 56(4), 442—456.
6.
California Commission on Teacher Credentialing (CCTC). (1997). California standards for the teaching profession. Retrieved on January 9, 2003 from www.ctc.ca.gov/cstppublication/cstpreport.html
7.
ChrispeelsJ. H. (1997). Educational policy implementation in a shifting political climate: The California experience. American Educational Research Journal, 34(3), 453—481.
8.
Cochran-SmithM., AlbertL., DimattiaP., FreedmanS., JacksonR., MooneyJ., NeislerO. J., PeckA., and ZollersN. (1999). Seeking social justice: a teacher education faculty's self-study. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 2(3), 229—253.
9.
Cochran-SmithM., DavisD., and FriesM. K. (2003). Multicultural teacher education: Research, practice, and policy. In BanksJ., and BanksC.M. (Eds.), The handbook of research on multicultural education (2nd Ed.) (pp. 931—975). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
10.
Cochran-SmithM. (2004). Walking the road: Race, diversity, and social justice in teacher education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
11.
Darling-HammondL. (1995). Inequality and access to knowledge. In BanksJ., and BanksC. (Eds.), Handbook of research on multicultural education (pp. 465—483). New York, NY: McMillan.
12.
Darling-HammondL. (2004). What happens to a dream deferred? The continuing quest for equal educational opportunity. In BanksC., and BanksJ. (Eds.), Handbook of research on multicultural education (pp. 607—630). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
13.
Darling-HammondL. (2006). Powerful teacher education: Lessons from exemplary programs. San Francisco, CAJossey-Bass.
14.
Darling-HammondL., and McLaughlinM. (1999). Investing in teaching as a learning profession. In Darling-HammondL., and SykesG. (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
15.
DelpitL. D. (1995). Other people's children: Cultural conflict in the classroom. New York, NY: New Press.
16.
DilworthM. (Ed.). (1992). Diversity in teacher education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
17.
Education Data Partnership (2003). Fiscal, demographic, and performance data on California's K-12 schools. Retrieved on March 14, 2003, from www.ed-data.k12.ca.us
18.
EngeströmY. (1996). Developmental studies of work as a testbench of activity theory: The case of primary care medical practice. In ChaiklinS., and LaveJ. (Eds.), Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context (pp. 64—103). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
19.
Feiman-NemserS. (1990). Teacher preparation: Structural and conceptual analysis. In HoustonR., HabermanM., and SikulkaJ. (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education. New York, NY: Mcmillan.
20.
FineM. (1986). Why urban adolescents drop into and out of public high schoolTeacher College Record, 87(3), 393—409.
21.
FraserN. (1998). From redistribution to recognition? Dilemmas of justice in a “post-socialist” age. In and and WilletC. (Ed.), Theorizing multiculturalism: A guide to the current debate. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
22.
GayG. (1993). Building cultural bridges: A bold proposal for teacher education. Education and Urban Society, 25(3), 285—289.
23.
GayG. (1994). NCREL monograph: A synthesis of scholarship in multicultural education. Washington, DC: North Central Regional Education Laboratory.
24.
GollnickD. (1995). National and state initiatives for multicultural education. In BanksJ., and BanksC. (Eds.), Handbook of research on multicultural education (pp. 44—64). New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
25.
GoodladJ. (1990). Teachers for our nation's schools. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
26.
GoodwinA. L. (1997). Historical and contemporary perspectives on multicultural teacher education: Past lessons, new directions. In KingJ., HollinsE., and HaymanW. (Eds.), Preparing teachers for cultural diversity. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
27.
GrantC. (1994). Best practices in teacher education for urban schools: Lessons from the multicultural teacher education literature. Action in Teacher Education, XVI(3), 2—18.
28.
GraueE., and WalshD. (1998). Studying children in context: Theories, methods and ethics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29.
GrossmanP., SmagorinskyP., and ValenciaS. (1999). Appropriating tools for teaching English: A theoretical framework for research on learning and teaching. American Journal of Education, 1(108), 1—29.
30.
HollinsE., and GuzmanM. (2005). Research on preparing teachers for diverse populations. In Cochran-SmithM., and ZeichnerK. (Eds.), Studying teacher education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
31.
HoweyK., and ZimpherN. (1989). Profiles of preservice teacher education. Albany, NY: SUNY
32.
JacobsenJ., OlsenC., Rice, SweetlandJ. K., and RalphJ. (2001). Educational achievement and black and white inequality (No. 2001061). Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics.
33.
KaufmanP., KwanJ., KleinS., and ChapmanC. (1999). Dropout rates in the United States: 1998 (No. 2000-022). Washington, DC. National Center for Educational Statistics.
34.
KrollL., DonahueD., GalgueraT., LaboskeyV., RichertA., TucherP., and CosseyR. (2005). Teaching as principled practice: Managing complexity for social justice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35.
Ladson-BillingsG. (1994). The dreamkeepers: Successful teachers of African American children. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
36.
Ladson-BillingsG. (1995). Multicultural teacher education: Research, practice, and policy. In BanksJ., and BanksC.M. (Eds.), Handbook of research on multicultural education (pp. 747—759). New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
37.
Ladson-BillingsG. (1999). Preparing teachers for diverse student populations: A critical race perspective. In Iran-NejadA., and PearsonC.D. (Eds.), Review of research in education (Vol. 24, pp. 211—248). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
38.
Ladson-BillingsG. (2001). Crossing over to canaan: The journey of new teachers in diverse classrooms. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
39.
LankfordH., LoebS., and WyckoffJ. (2002). Teacher sorting and the plight of urban schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(1), 37—62.
40.
MarchJ. (1994). A primer on decision making: How decisions happen. New York, NY: The Free Press.
41.
MarkowitzN., SwansonP., WhitakerA., and McDonaldM. (2005). A portrait of time and context: The TE Collaborative 20% Internship Program. In JenlinkP., and JenlinkK. (Eds.), Portraits of teacher education (pp. 155–174). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
McDonaldM. (2005). The integration of social justice in teacher education: Dimensions of prospective teachers’ opportunities to learn. Journal of Teacher Education, 56, 418—435.
44.
MerriamS. (1988). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
45.
MilesM., and HubermanA. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
46.
Mills College (2001/2002). Student handbook. Oakland, CA: Mills College.
47.
National Board of Professional Teaching Standards (2003). Early childhood generalists standards, Retrieved on March 14, 2003, from www.nbpts.org/standards/
48.
NietoS. (2000). Placing equity front and center: Some thoughts on transforming teacher education for a new century. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(3), 180—187.
49.
RaginC. (1987). The comparative method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
50.
RawlsJ. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
ScottR. W. (1998). Organizations: Rational, natural, and open systems (4th Ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
53.
SnyderJ. (2000). University of California - Berkeley. In and and Darling-HammondL. (Ed.), Studies of excellence in teacher education: Preparation at the graduate level. New York, NY: National Commission on Teaching & America's Future.
54.
SturmanA. (1997). Social justice in education (Vol. 40). Melbourne, Australia: The Australian Council for Educational Research.
VavrusM. (2002). Transforming the multicultural education of teachers. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
57.
VillegasA., and LucasT. (2002). Preparing culturally responsive teachers: A coherent approach. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
58.
WengerE. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning meaning and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
59.
WideenM., Mayer-SmithJ., and MoonB. (1998). A critical analysis of the research on learning to teach: Making the case for an ecological perspective on inquiry. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 130—178.
60.
YinR. K. (2003). Designing case studies. In Case study research: Design and methods (pp. 19—56). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
61.
YoungI. M. (1990). Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
62.
ZeichnerK. (2000). Alverno College. In and and Darling-HammondL. (Ed.), Studies of excellence in teacher education: Preparation in the undergraduate years. New York, NY: National Commission on Teaching & America's Future.
63.
ZumwaltK., and CraigE. (2005). Teachers’ characteristics: Research on the demographic profile. In Cochran-SmithM., and ZeichnerK. (Eds.), Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA panel on research in teacher education (pp. 157—260). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
