Racialized Space: Framing Latino and Latina Experience in Public Schools

Abstract

Background

Educational research shows differences in experience, access, and outcomes across racial groups with some groups advantaged and others disadvantaged. One of the concepts used to explain racial differences, racialization, is a taken-for-granted term that is yet to be fully defined in the context of the school. We differentiate the term from racism and show how the organizational space of a school is racialized. Taking a cue from feminist research on gendered organizational space (Acker, 1989; Pierce, 1995) and research on white space (Feagin, 1996; Lipsitz, 1998), we define space as physical space and the implicit and explicit dialogue, processes, and practices that define relationships between structures and agents. Thus, space includes not only physical space but also the meanings and ideologies that mediate the relationship between social structures and agents.

Purpose of Study

We suggest that school spaces are racialized; that is, taken-for-granted notions of race mediate the relationship between the school and the actors that comprise it. Furthermore, we consider how racialization determines power in these relationships, and ultimately, how that power determines how policy is practiced in a school space.

Research Design

Our data comes from a qualitative case study focused on evaluating what factors influenced Latino college students’ success. Data was collected over a two year period through a mentor program at a large U.S. research university and includes both fieldwork and interview data.

Findings

We found that racialization occurred in school organizational spaces that invested in whiteness as a purportedly neutral category. In actuality, relationships and practices often delineated along racialized lines, distinguishing what it means to be white in such a space, and what it means not to be white in that space.

Conclusions

Conceptualizing school organizational spaces as a racialized white space allows us to examine and understand differences in the school along racial lines outside the limitations of individual prejudice or color-blind approaches—recognizing race is not the problem. The problem is being willing to recognize what we are doing, and then creating relationships that support a socially just educational organization.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Acker

(1989). Doing comparable work: Gender, class and pay equity. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

Barajas

H. L.

(2000). Is developmental education a racial project? Considering race relations in developmental education spaces. In Lundell

D.B.

, and Higbee

J.L.

(Eds.), Theoretical perspectives for developmental education (pp. 29—37). Minneapolis, MN: Center for Research on Developmental Education and Urban Literacy, General College, University of Minnesota.

Barajas

H. L.

, and Pierce

(2001). The significance of race and gender in school success for Latinos and Latinas in college. Gender and Society, 15, 859—878.

Burawoy

, Burton

, Ferguson

A. A.

, and Fox

K. J.

(1991) Ethnography unbound: Power and resistance in the modern metropolis. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Blau

J. R.

(2003). Race in the schools: Perpetuating white dominance? Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

Clawson

, Neustadtl

, and Weller

(1998). Dollars and votes: How business campaign contributions subvert democracy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

Cookson

P. W.

, and Persell

C. H.

(1985). Preparing for power: America's elite boarding schools. New York: Basic Books.

Doane

A. W.

(1997). Dominant group ethnic identity in the United States: The role of “hidden” ethnicity in intergroup relations. In and and Yetman

(Ed.), Majority and minority: The dynamics of race and ethnicity in American life (pp. 72—85). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Doane

A.W.

, and Bonilla-Silva

(2003). White out. New York: Routledge.

10.

Feagin

J. R.

(1996). The agony of education: Black students at white colleges and universities. New York: Routledge.

11.

Feagin

J. R.

(2001). Racist America: Roots, current realities, & future reparations. New York: Routledge.

12.

Frankenberg

(1993). White women, race matters: The social construction of Whiteness. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

13.

Franklin

(1991). Shadows of race and class. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

14.

Gans

(1979). Symbolic ethnicity: The future of ethnic groups and cultures in America. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 2, 1—18.

15.

hooks

. (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. New York: Routledge.

16.

Lewis

A. E.

(2003). Race in the schoolyard: Negotiating the color line in classrooms and communities. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press.

17.

Lipsitz

(1998). The possessive investment in whiteness: How white people profit from identity politics. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

18.

Omi

, and Winant

(1994). Racial formation in the United States. New York: Routledge.

19.

National Education Trust. (2004, May). A matter of degrees: Improving graduation rates in four-year colleges and universities. Retrieved January 30, 2005, from http://www,edtrust.org

20.

Pierce

J. L.

(1995). Gender trials: Emotional lives in contemporary law firms. Berkeley: University of California Press.

21.

Sadker

, and Sadker

(1994). Failing at fairness: How America's schools cheat girls. New York: C. Scribner's Sons.

22.

Sleeter

, and Grant

C. A.

(1993). Making choices for multicultural education (2nd ed.). Columbus, OH: Macmillan.

23.

Sleeter

, and McLaren

P. L.

(1995). Multicultural education, critical pedagogy, and the politics of difference. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

24.

Valdés

(2001). Learning and not learning English: Latino students in American schools. New York: Teachers College Press.

25.

Waters

(1990). Ethnic options: Choosing identities in America. Berkeley: University of California Press.

26.

Williams

C. L.

(1992). The glass escalator: Hidden advantages for men in the “female” professions. Social Problems, 39(3), 253—67.