The issue of why so many young adolescents around the world are disengaging from school and making the choice to drop out is one of the most intractable, vexed, perplexing, and controversial issues confronting educators. Tackling it requires courage and a radical rethinking of school reform around issues of power, ownership of learning, and the relevance of schooling and curriculum for young lives. This means a heightened institutional capacity to “listen.” This article describes an instance of a disadvantaged urban Australian government school that realized it had little alternative but to try new approaches; “old ways” were not working. The article describes an ensemble of school reform practices, philosophies, and strategies that give young adolescents genuine ownership of their learning. This school stands out as a beacon that school reform is possible, even for young adolescents from the most difficult of circumstances. However, such approaches look markedly different from where mainstream educational reform is taking us at the moment.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AncessJ. (2003). Beating the odds: High schools as communities of commitment. New York: Teachers College Press.
2.
BessantJ. (2002). Risk and nostalgia: The problem of education and youth unemployment in Australia: A case study. Journal of Education and Work, 15(1), 31—51.
3.
BurgessR. (1988). Conversations with a purpose: The ethnographic interview in educational research. Studies in Qualitative Methodology, 1, 137—155.
4.
Carnegie Council on Adolescent Development. (1989). Turning points: Preparing American youth for the 21st century: New York: Carnegie Corporation.
ConnellR. (1998). Social change and curriculum futures. Change: Transformations in Education, 1(1), 84—90.
7.
CroningerR., and LeeV. (2001). Social capital and dropping out of high school: Benefits to at-risk students of teachers’ support and guidance. Teachers College Record, 103, 548—581.
8.
DavisJ. (1997). Perspective taking: Discovery and development. In Lawrence-LightfootS., and DavisJ. (Eds.), The art and science of portraiture (pp. 21—38). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
9.
EricksonF. (1987). Transformation and school success: the politics and culture of school achievement. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 18, 335—356.
10.
FennoR. (1978). Home style: House members in their districts. Boston: Little, Brown.
11.
FitzgeraldT. (1976). Poverty and education in Australia: Commission of inquiry into poverty, 5th main report: Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
12.
FreebodyP., LudwigC., and GunnS. (1994). Everyday literacy practices in and out of schools in low socio-economic urban communities (Vol. 1). Melbourne, Australia: Curriculum Corporation.
13.
HartleyJ. (1996). Popular reality: Journalism, modernity, popular culture. London: Arnold.
14.
HattamR., SmythJ., and LawsonM. (1998). Schooling for a fair go: (Re)making the social fabric. In SmythJ., HattamR., and LawsonM. (Eds.), Schooling for a fair go (pp. 1—14). Sydney, Australia: Federation Press.
15.
KatzM., FineM., and SimonE. (1997). Poking around: Outsiders view Chicago school reform. Teachers College Record, 99, 117—157.
16.
Lawrence-LightfootS. (1983). The good high school. New York: Basic Books.
17.
Lawrence-LightfootS. (1997) A view of the whole: origins and purposes. In Lawrence-LightfootS., and DavisJ. (Eds.). The Art and Science of Portraiture (pp. 3—16), San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
18.
Lawrence-LightfootS., and DavisJ. (1997). The art and science of portraiture. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
19.
LevinsonB. (1992). Ogbu's anthropology and critical ethnography of education: A reciprocal interrogation. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 5, 205—225.
20.
MadenM. (Ed.). (2001). Success against the odds: Five years on. London and New York: Routledge/Falmer.
21.
MarcusG. (1998). Ethnography through thick and thin. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
22.
McLaughlinT. (1996). Street smarts and critical theory: Listening to the vernacular. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
23.
McQuillanP. (1997). Humanizing the comprehensive high school: A proposal for reform. Educational Administration Quarterly, 33(Suppl. December), 644—682.
24.
MeierD. (1995). The power of their ideas: Lessons for America from a small school in Harlem. Boston: Beacon Press.
25.
National Commission on Education. (1996). Success against the odds: Effective schools in disadvantaged areas. London: Routledge.
26.
NatrielloG., McDillE., and PallasA. (1990). Schooling disadvantaged children: Racing against catastrophe. New York: Teachers College Press.
27.
OgbuJ. (1982). Cultural discontinuities and schooling. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 13, 290—307.
28.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation & Development. (2000). Education at a glance: Highlights. Paris: Author.
29.
OstermanK. (2000). Students’ need for belonging in the school community. Review of Educational Research, 70, 323—367.
30.
PopeD. (2001). Doing school: How we are creating a generation of stressed out, materialistic, and miseducated students. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
31.
SadowskiM. (Ed.). (2003). Adolescents at school: Perspectives on youth, identity, and education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Publishing Group.
32.
CouncilSchools. (1993). In the middle: Schooling for young adolescents. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
33.
SizerT. (2004). What we all want for each of our children. In and and GlickmanC. (Ed.), Letters to the next president: What we can do about the real crisis in public education (pp. 207—210). New York & London: Teachers College Press.
34.
SmythJ. (2004). Social capital and the “socially just school.” British Journal of Sociology of Education, 25(1), 19—33.
35.
SmythJ., and HattamR. (with Cannon, J., Edwards, J., Wilson, N., & Wurst, S.). (2004). “Dropping out,” drifting off, being excluded: Becoming somebody without school. New York: Peter Lang.
36.
SmythJ., HattamR., CannonJ., EdwardsJ., WilsonN., and WurstS. (2000). Listen to me, I'm leaving: Early school leaving in South Australian secondary schools. Adelaide, Australia: Flinders Institute for the Study of Teaching; Department of Employment, Education and Training; and South Australian Senior Secondary Assessment Board.
37.
SmythJ., HattamR., and LawsonM. (Eds.). (1998). Schooling for a fair go. Sydney, Australia: Federation Press.
38.
SmythJ., McInerneyP., and HattamR. (2003). Towards a profile for improving numeracy for all students (Research report for the Department of Education, Science and Technology). Adelaide, Australia: Flinders Institute for the Study of Teaching.
39.
Stanton-SalazarR. (1997). A social capital framework for understanding the socialization of racial minority children and youths. Harvard Educational Review, 67, 1—40.
40.
ThomsonP. (2002). Schooling the Rustbelt kids: Making the difference in changing times. Crowsnest, Australia: Allen & Unwin.
41.
ValenciaR. (Ed.). (1997). The evolution of deficit thinking: Educational thought and practice. London: Falmer Press.
42.
ValenzuelaA. (1999). Subtractive schooling: U. S.-Mexican youth and the politics of caring. New York: State University of New York Press.
43.
WebbS., and WebbB. (1932). Methods of social study. London: Longman Green.
44.
WillisP. (1977). Learning to labour: How working class kids get working class jobs. Westmead, England: Gower.
45.
WillmsJ. (2003). Student engagement at school: A sense of belonging and participation: Results from PISA 2000. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.
