A Theoretical and Empirical Investigation of Teacher Collaboration for School Improvement and Student Achievement in Public Elementary Schools

Abstract

Background/Context

A review of the literature demonstrates that schools are frequently called upon to improve by developing high levels of teacher collaboration. At the same time, there is a paucity of research investigating the extent to which teachers’ collaborative school improvement practices are related to student achievement.

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to review the literature and empirically test the relationship between a theoretically driven measure of teacher collaboration for school improvement and student achievement.

Setting

The data for this study were drawn from students and teachers in a large urban school district located in the midwestern United States.

Population

The population for this study came from the elementary schools in one large midwestern school district. Survey data were drawn from a sample of 47 elementary schools with 452 teachers and 2,536 fourth-grade students.

Research Design

Hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) was the primary analytic method. Survey data were collected approximately 2 months before students took the mandatory state assessments, which provided the scale scores that served as dependent variables in this research. HLM accounted for the nested nature of the data (students nested in schools).

This was a naturalistic study that employed secondary data analysis. There was no intervention, treatment, or randomization. Naturally occurring differences in teachers’ levels of collaboration were measured, and statistical controls for school social context were employed. At the student level, the study employed controls for children's social and academic backgrounds.

Data Collection and Analysis

Data were obtained from teachers and students in the sampled schools. Teacher data were obtained via a survey assessing teacher collaboration. Student data were obtained from the central administrative office of the school district for all students who attended sampled schools during the year in which we surveyed teachers.

Results

Results of HLM analyses indicate that fourth-grade students have higher achievement in mathematics and reading when they attend schools characterized by higher levels of teacher collaboration for school improvement.

Conclusions

The authors suggest that the results provide preliminary support for efforts to improve student achievement by providing teachers with opportunities to collaborate on issues related to curriculum, instruction, and professional development. The authors also discuss the need for more research on the effects of different types of collaborative practices using more representative samples.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Armor

, Conry-Oseguera

, Cox

, King

, McDonnell

, and Pascal

. (1976). Analysis of the school preferred reading program in selected Los Angeles minority schools. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.

Ashton

P. T.

, and Webb

R. B.

(1986). Teachers’ sense of efficacy, classroom behavior, and student achievement. In Ashton

P.T.

, and Webb

R.B.

(Eds.), Teachers’ sense of efficacy and student achievement (pp. 125—144). New York: Longman.

Bolman

L. G.

, and Deal

T. E.

(2003). Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice, and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Brownell

M. T.

, Yeager

, Rennells

M. S.

, and Riley

(1997). Teachers working together: What teacher educators and researchers should know. Teacher Education and Special Education, 20, 340—359.

Cohen

, and Hill

(2001). Learning policy: When state education reform works. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Conley

S. C.

, Schmidle

, and Shedd

J. B.

(1988). Teacher participation in the management of school systems. Teachers College Record, 90, 259—280.

Crow

, and Pounder

D. G.

(1997, April). Faculty teams: Work group enhancement as a teacher involvement strategy. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.

Englert

C. S.

, Tarrant

K. L.

, and Rozendal

M. S.

(1993). Educational innovations: Achieving curricular change through collaboration. Education and Treatment of Children, 16, 441—473.

Erb

T. O.

(1995). Teamwork in middle school education. In and and Garner

H.G.

(Ed.), Teamwork models and experience in education (pp. 175—198). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

10.

Evans-Stout

(1998). Implications for collaborative instructional practice. In and and Pounder

D.G.

(Ed.), Restructuring schools for collaboration: Promises and pitfalls (pp. 121—134). Albany: State University of New York Press.

11.

Finley

C. J.

(1995). Review of the Metropolitan Achievement Test, seventh edition. In Conoley

J.C.

, and Impara

J.C.

(Eds.), The 12th mental measurements yearbook (pp. 603—606). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

12.

Friend

, and Cook

(2000). Interactions: Collaboration skills for school professionals (3rd ed.). New York: Addison Wesley Longman.

13.

Goddard

R. D.

, Hoy

W. K.

, and Woolfolk Hoy

(2000). Collective teacher efficacy: Its meaning, measure, and impact on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 37, 479—508.

14.

Goddard

Y. L.

, and Heron

T. E.

(2001). The consultation process. In Heron

T.E.

, and Harris

K.C.

, The educational consultant: Helping professionals, parents, and mainstreamed students (4th ed., pp. 3—37). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.

15.

Hambleton

R. K.

(1995). Review of the Metropolitan Achievement Test, seventh edition. In Conoley

J.C.

, and Impara

J.C.

(Eds.), The 12th mental measurements yearbook (pp. 606—610). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

16.

Hart

A. W.

(1998). Marshalling forces: Collaboration across educator roles. In and and Pounder

D.G.

(Ed.), Restructuring schools for collaboration: Promises and pitfalls (pp. 89—120). Albany: State University of New York Press.

17.

Hausman

C. S.

, and Goldring

E. B.

(2001). Sustaining teacher commitment: The role of professional communities. Peabody Journal of Education, 76(2), 30—51.

18.

Hughes

(1994). Back to basics: Does consultation work? Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 5(1), 77—84.

19.

Lortie

D. C.

(1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

20.

Louis

K. S.

, Marks

H. M.

, and Kruse

(1996). Teachers’ professional community in restructuring schools. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 757—798.

21.

Marks

H. M.

, and Louis

K. S.

(1997). Does teacher empowerment affect the classroom? The implications of teacher empowerment for instructional practice and student academic performance. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19, 245—275.

22.

Melnick

S. A.

, and Witmer

J. T.

(1999). Team-based professional development: A new model for professional growth. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Quebec.

23.

Moore

W. P.

, and Esselman

M. E.

(1992, April). Teacher efficacy, power, school climate and achievement: A desegregating district's experience. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.

24.

Morse

W. C.

(2000). Foreword. In Friend

, and Cook

, Interactions: Collaboration skills for school professionals (3rd ed., pp. xi—xii). New York: Addison Wesley Longman.

25.

Nitko

A. J.

(1994). Review of the Metropolitan Achievement Test, sixth edition. In Impara

J.C.

, and Murphy

L.L.

(Eds.), Buros desk reference: Psychological assessment in the schools (pp. 31—35). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

26.

Pounder

D. G.

(1998). Teacher teams: Redesigning teachers’ work for collaboration. In and and Pounder

D.G.

(Ed.), Restructuring schools for collaboration: Promises and pitfalls (pp. 65—88). Albany: State University of New York Press.

27.

Putnam

R. T.

, and Borko

(1997). Teacher learning: Implications of new views of cognition. In Biddle

, Good

T.L.

, and Goodson

I.F.

(Eds.), The international handbook of teachers and teaching (pp. 1223—1296). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

28.

Rogers

B. G.

(1994). Review of the Metropolitan Achievement Test, sixth edition. In Impara

J.C.

, and Murphy

L.L.

(Eds.), Buros desk reference: Psychological assessment in the schools (pp. 35—40). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

29.

Rosenholtz

S. J.

(1989a). Teachers’ workplace: The social organization of schools. New York: Longman.

30.

Rosenholtz

S. J.

(1989b). Workplace conditions that affect teacher quality and commitment: Implications for teacher induction programs. Elementary School Journal, 89, 421—439.

31.

Ross

J. A.

(1992). Teacher efficacy and the effects of coaching on student achievement. Canadian Journal of Education, 17, 51—65.

32.

Sarason

(1996). Revisiting the culture of school and the problem of change. New York: Teachers College Press.

33.

Shachar

, and Shmuelevitz

(1997). Implementing cooperative learning, teacher collaboration and teachers’ sense of efficacy in heterogeneous junior high schools. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22, 53—72.

34.

Smylie

M. A.

, Lazarus

, and Brownlee-Conyers

(1996). Instructional outcomes of school-based participative decision making. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 18, 181—198.

35.

Tschannen-Moran

(2001). Collaboration and the need for trust. Journal of Educational Administration, 39, 308—331.

36.

Welch

, Brownell

, and Sheridan

S. M.

(1999). What's the score and game plan on teaming in schools? A review of the literature on team teaching and school-based problem-solving teams. Remedial and Special Education, 20, 36—49.