One of the intractable aspects of the so-called achievement gap between Black and White students lies in our failure to identify viable ways to increase science achievement and participation among African American students living in our inner cities. However, there has been little research that attempts to understand how the social and cultural experiences of these African American students affect what happens in science classrooms. Using lenses from cultural sociology, the research presented in this paper begins to describe the nature of communalism as a cultural disposition and a component of their repertoires of practice. While recognizing the complex and contradictory nature of culture, we argue that communalism is common among African American experiences and has particular significance in interactions among urban teens, and that it permeates urban classrooms as well. By focusing on a pair of African American male students, we answer important questions of how communal practices afford the generation of social and symbolic capital along with positive emotional energy, as shared goals are addressed and science participation and understanding are enhanced. In addition, we offer suggestions on how teachers can employ an understanding of the role of communalism, capital, and emotional energy in improving science teaching and learning in their classrooms.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllenB., and BoykinA. W. (1992). African American children and the educational process: Alleviating cultural discontinuity through prescriptive pedagogy. School Psychology Review, 21, 586—596.
2.
AndersonE. (1999). Code of the street: Decency, violence, and the moral life of the inner city. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
3.
BartonA. C. (1998). Reframing “science for all” through the politics of poverty. Educational Policy, 12, 525—541.
4.
BourdieuP. (1992). The practice of reflexive sociology (The Paris workshop). In BourdieuP., and WacquantL.J.D., An invitation to reflexive sociology (pp. 216—260). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5.
BourdieuP. (1986). The forms of capital. In and and RichardsonJ.G. (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241—258). New York: Greenwood.
6.
BoykinA. W. (1986). The triple quandary and the schooling of Afro-American children. In and and NeisserU. (Ed.), The school achievement of minority children: New perspectives (pp. 57—92). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7.
Howard University and Johns Hopkins University, Center for Research on the Education of Students Placed at Risk (CRESPAR). (2000). The role of cultural factors in school relevant cognitive functioning: Synthesis of findings on cultural contexts, cultural orientations and individual differences (Report 42). Washington, DC and Baltimore, MD: Boykin, A. W., & Bailey, C.
8.
Johns Hopkins University, Center for Research on the Education of Students Placed at Risk (CRESPAR). (2004). Building on children's cultural assets in simulated classroom performance environments: Research vistas in the communal learning paradigm (Report 68). Baltimore: Boykin, A. W., Coleman, S. T., Lilja, A. J., & Tyler, K. M.
9.
CollinsR. (2004). Interaction ritual chains. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
10.
DillE. M., and BoykinW. (2000). The comparative influence of individual peer tutoring, and communal learning contexts on the text recall of African American children. Journal of Black Psychology26, 65—78.
11.
ElmeskyR., and SeilerG. (2007, in press). Movement expressiveness, solidarity and the (re)shaping of African American students’ scientific identities. Cultural Studies in Science Education.
12.
ElmeskyR., and TobinK. (2005). Expanding our understandings of urban science education by expanding the roles of students as researchers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 807—828.
13.
FergusonA. A. (2001). Bad boys: Public schools in the making of black masculinity. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
14.
GutiérrezK. D., and RogoffB. (2003). Cultural ways of learning: Individual traits or repertoires of practice. Educational Researcher, 32, 19—25.
15.
Hale-BensonJ. (1986). Black children: Their roots, culture, and learning styles. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
16.
HallS. (1990). Cultural identity and diaspora: In and and RutherfordJ. (Ed.), Identity: Community, culture, difference. (pp. 222–237). London: Lawrence & Wishart.
17.
HeathS. B. (1983). Ways with words: Language, life, and work in communities and classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18.
HordF. L., and LeeJ. S. (1995). I am because we are: Readings in Black philosophy. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
19.
KeyS. G. (2003). Enhancing the science interest of African American students using cultural inclusion. In and and HinesM. (Ed.), Multicultural Science Education: Theory, Practice, and Promise (pp. 87—102). New York: Peter Lang.
20.
KoberN. (2001). It takes more than testing: Closing the achievement gap. Washington, DC: Center on Education Policy.
21.
Ladson-BillingsG. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465—491.
22.
Ladson-BillingsG. (1994). The dreamkeepers: Successful teachers of African American children. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
MacLeodJ. (1987). Ain't no makin’ it: Leveled aspirations in a low-income neighborhood. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
25.
MichaelsS. (1981). “Sharing time”: Children's narrative styles and differential access to literacy. Language in Society, 10, 423—442.
26.
MurrellP. (2001). The community teacher. New York: Teachers College Press.
27.
National Center for Educational Statistics. (2000). The nation's report card: Science 2000. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
28.
NietoS. (2004). Affirming diversity: The sociopolitical context of multicultural education. New York: Pearson.
29.
SeilerG. (2005). All my life I been po’: Orality as a resource for science teaching and learning. In TobinK., ElmeskyR., and SeilerG. (Eds.), Improving urban science education: New roles for teachers, students and researchers (pp. 113—130). Boulder, CO: Rowman and Littlefield.
30.
SeilerG. (2002). Understanding social reproduction: The recursive nature of agency and structure in a science class. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
31.
SeilerG. (2001). Reversing the “standard” direction: Science emerging from the lives of African American students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 1000—1014.
32.
SeilerG., TobinK., and SokolicJ. (2003). Reconstituting resistance in urban science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 101—103.
33.
SewellW. H. (1999). The concept(s) of culture. In BonnellV.E., and HuntL. (Eds.), Beyond the cultural turn: New directions in the study of society and culture (pp. 35—61). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
34.
SewellW. H. (1992). A theory of structure: Duality, agency, and transformation. In American Journal of Sociology, 98, 1—29.
35.
SwartzD. (1997). Culture and Power: The Sociology of Pierre Bourdieu. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
36.
TateW. (2001). Science education as a civil right: Urban schools and opportunity to learn considerations. Journal for Research in Science Teaching, 38, 1015—1028.
37.
TateW. (1995). Returning to the root: A culturally relevant approach to mathematics pedagogy. Theory into Practice, 3, 166—173.
38.
TobinK. (2005). Urban science as culturally and socially adaptive practice. In TobinK., ElmeskyR., and SeilerG. (Eds.), Improving urban science education: New roles for teachers, students and researchers (pp. 21—42). Boulder, CO: Rowman and Littlefield.
