Today, school principals are asked to lead in a new world marked by unprecedented responsibilities, challenges, and managerial opportunities. Are principal preparation programs equipping their students for this new role? This study examines the content of instruction at a stratified sample of the nation's principal preparation programs. The analysis looks at preparation at the programs training the most candidates, the programs regarded as most prestigious, and more typical programs. We surveyed 56 programs and were able to collect 31 sets of syllabi that met the standards permitting systematic coding. The syllabi yielded 2,424 course weeks in the 210 syllabi analyzed. Overall, we found surprising similarities across the various types of programs. Just 2% of course weeks addressed accountability in the context of school management or school improvement. Eleven percent of course weeks made reference to statistics, data, or empirical research in some context. Only 12% of course weeks focused upon norms and values, but within those weeks there was evidence of normative bias in the topic descriptions and assigned readings. The evidence raises questions about whether principal preparation has kept pace with changes in the larger world of schooling.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BaginD., and GallagherD. R. (2001). The school and community relations. 7th edition. New York: Allyn and Bacon.
2.
BozemanW. C., and SpuckD. (1991). Technological competence: Training educational leaders. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 23(4), 514.
3.
ButinD. W. (2004). The foundations of preparing teachers: Are education schools really “intellectually barren” and ideological?Teachers College Record July 24.
4.
Cochran-SmithM. (2004). Walking the road: Race, diversity, and social justice in teacher education. New York: Teachers College Press.
5.
CollinsJ. C., and PorrasJ. I. (1997). Built to last: Successful habits of visionary companies. New York: Harper Collins.
6.
CreightonT. (2001). Data analysis and the principalship. Principal Leadership, 1(9), 52—57.
7.
DareshJ. C., GantnerM., DunlapK., and HvizdakM. (2000). Words from “The Trenches”: Principals’ perspectives on effective school leadership characteristics. Journal of School Leadership, 10(1), 69—83.
8.
DuFourR. (2002) The learning-centered principal. Educational Leadership, 59(8), 12—15.
9.
DukeD., GroganM., and TuckerP. (2003). Educational leadership in an age of accountability. In DukeD., GroganM., TuckerP., and HeineckeW. (Eds.), Educational Leadership in an Age of Accountability. New York: State University of New York Press.
10.
Leading for Learning. (2004). Education Week, 24(3), S1—S7.
11.
ElmoreR. (2000). Building a new structure for school leadership. New York: The Albert Shanker Institute.
12.
FarkasS., JohnsonJ., and DuffettA. (2003) Rolling up their sleeves: Superintendents and principals talk about what's needed to fix public schools. New York: Public Agenda.
FullanM., and HargreavesA. (1996). What's worth fighting for in your school?New York: Teachers College Press.
15.
GarlandV. E. (1990). Planning for the 1990′s: Computer use in programs preparing school administrators. Planning and Changing, 20(4), 231—236.
16.
GlasmanN., CibulkaJ., and AshbyD. (2002). Program self-evaluation for continuous improvement. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38(2), 257—288.
17.
GonzalezM., GlasmanN., and GlasmanL. (2002). Daring to link principal preparation programs to student achievement in schools. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 1(3), 265—283.
18.
GroganM., and AndrewsR. (2002). Defining preparation and professional development for the future. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38(2), 233—256.
19.
HallingerP., and HeckR. (1998). Exploring the principal's contribution to school effectiveness: 1980–1995. School effectiveness and school improvement, 9(2), 157—191.
20.
HeckR., LarsonT. J., and MarcoulidesG. (1990). Principal instructional leadership and school achievement: Validation of a causal model. Educational Administration Quarterly, 26(2), 94—125.
21.
HerrityV. A., and GlasmanN. S. (1999). Training administrators for culturally and linguistically diverse school populations: Opinions of expert practitioners. Journal of School Leadership, 9(4), 235—253.
22.
HessF. M. (2003). A license to lead? A new leadership agenda for America's schools. Washington, DC: Progressive Policy Institute.
23.
HessF. M. (2004). Treating principals like leaders. American School Board Journal, 191(5), 32—35.
24.
HirthM. A., and ValeskyT. C. (1990). Survey of universities: Special education knowledge requirements in school administrator preparation programs. Planning and Changing, 21(3), 165—172.
25.
HoyW. K., and MiskelC. (2005). Educational administration: Theory, research, and practice, 7 Edition. New York: McGraw Hill.
26.
JacksonB., and KelleyC. (2002). Exceptional and innovative programs in educational leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38(2), 192—212.
27.
JamentzK. (2002). Isolation is the enemy of improvement: Instructional leadership to support standards-based practice. San Francisco: WestEd.
28.
KellerB. (2003). Education school courses faulted as intellectually thin. Education Week, 23(11), 8.
29.
KingD. (2002). The changing shape of leadership. Educational Leadership, 59(8), 61—63.
30.
KrugS., AhadiS., and ScottC. K. (1991). Current issues and research findings in the study of school leadership. In ThurstonP., and ZodhiatesP. (Eds.), Advances in educational administration, Volume 2. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
31.
KowalskiT. (1995). Keepers of the flame: Contemporary urban superintendents. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
32.
KowalskiT. (2004). The ongoing war for the soul of school administration. Better leaders for America's schools: Perspectives on the manifesto (pp. 92—114). Columbia, MO: University Council for Educational Administration.
33.
LampeR. E. (1985). Principals’ training in counseling and development: A national survey. Counselor Education and Supervision, 25(1), 44—47.
34.
LashwayL. (2003). Transforming principal preparation. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
35.
LashwayL. (2002). Developing instructional leaders. ERIC Digest, 160 (July).
36.
LevineA. (2005). Educating school leaders. New York: Teachers College, The Education Schools Project.
37.
LymanL., and VillaniC. (2002). The complexion of poverty: A missing component of educational leadership programs. Journal of School Leadership, 11(4), 246—280.
38.
MeierD., and WoodG. (2004). Many children left behind: How the No Child Left Behind Act is damaging our children and our schools. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
39.
MeierD. (1995). The power of their ideas, lessons to America from a small school in Harlem. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
40.
MurphyJ. (2001a). The changing face of leadership preparation. School Administrator, 58(10), Web edition.
41.
MurphyJ. (2001b). Reculturing the Profession of Educational Leadership: New Blueprints. Paper presented at the annual conference of the University Council for Educational Administration, November 3, Cincinnati, OH.
42.
MurphyJ., and VriesengaM. (2004). Research in preparation programs in educational administration: An analysis. Monograph prepared for the University Council for Educational Administration.
43.
NicolaidesN., and GaynorA. K. (1992). The knowledge base informing the teaching of administrative and organizational theory in UCEA universities: A descriptive and interpretive survey. Educational Administration Quarterly, 28(2), 237—265.
44.
NortonM. S., and LevanF. (1987). Doctoral studies in educational administration programs in UCEA member institutions. Educational Considerations, 13(1), 21—24.
45.
ParkerL., and ShapiroJ. P. (1992). What is the discussion of diversity in educational administration programs? Graduate students’ voices addressing an omission in their preparation. Journal of School Leadership, 2(1), 7—33.
46.
PetersonK., and DealT. (1999). Shaping school culture: The heart of leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
47.
PortinB., SchneiderP., DeArmondM., and GrundlachL. (2003). Making sense of leading schools: A study of the principalship. Seattle, WA: Center on Reinventing Public Education.
48.
ReboreR. W. (2004). Human resources administration in education: A management approach, 7 Edition. New York: Pearson-Allyn and Bacon.
49.
RobertsJ. (1991). In preparation for the principalship: Initiates’ problems in conducting instructional conferences. Journal of Educational Administration, 29(2), 38—49.
50.
RyanK., and BohlinK. E. (1999). Building character in schools. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
51.
SchlechtyP. C. (2000). Leading a school system through change: Key steps for moving reform forward. In and and FullanM. (Ed.), The Jossey-Bass Reader on Educational Leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. 182—201.
52.
SchmeiderJ. H., McGrevinC., and TownleyA. H. (1994). Keys to success: Critical skills for novice principals. Journal of School Leadership, 4(3), 272—293.
53.
SergiovanniT. (1992). Moral leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
54.
SergiovanniT. (1996). Leadership for the schoolhouse. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
55.
SirotnikK A., and KimballK. (1994). The unspecial place of special education in programs that prepare school administrators. Journal of Educational Administration, 4(6), 598—630.
56.
SmartB. D. (1999). Topgrading: How leading companies win by hiring, coaching, and keeping the best people. New York: Prentice Hall.
57.
SmithR. M., MontelloP. A., and WhiteP. E. (1992) Investigation of interpersonal management training for educational administrators. Review of Educational Research, 85(4), 242—245.
58.
Southern Regional Education Board (SREB). (2003). Good principals are the key to successful schools: Six strategies to prepare more good principals. Atlanta, GA: Southern Regional Education Board.
59.
SteinerD. M., and RozenS. (2004). Preparing tomorrow's teachers: An analysis of syllabi from a sample of America's schools of education. In HessF.M., RotherhamA.J., and WalshK. (Eds.), A qualified teacher in every classroom? Appraising old answers and new ideas (pp. 119—148). Cambridge MA: Harvard Education Press.
60.
MediaSuntop, and PublishingBloomsbury. (2003). Thinkers 50 2003. London: Bloomsbury Publishing. Retrieved on September 1, 2004 from http://www.thinkers50.com/.
61.
SupovitzJ. A., and PoglincoS. M. (2001). Instructional leadership in a standards-based reform. Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
62.
SweeneyJ., and MoellerL. (2001). “Decision training – The use of a decision curriculum with in basket simulation. Education, 104(4), 414—418.
63.
Thomas B. Fordham Foundation. (2003). Better leaders for America's schools: A manifesto. Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Foundation.
64.
TuckerM. (2003). Out With the Old. Education Next, 3(4), 20—24.
65.
TuckerM., and CoddingJ. B. (Eds.) (2002). The principal challenge: Leading and managing schools in an era of accountability. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
66.
WelchJ. (2001). Jack: Straight from the gut. New York: Warner Books.
67.
YoungM., and KochanF. (2004). UCEA leaders respond: Supporting leadership for America's schools. Better Leaders for America's Schools: Perspectives on the Manifesto (pp. 115—129). Columbia, MO: University Council for Educational Administration.
68.
YoungM., PetersonG., and ShortP. (2002). The complexity of substantive reform: A call for interdependence among key stakeholders. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38(2), 130—136.
