In this study, we aimed to develop a framework that could be used to describe the value of the learning portfolio for the learning process of individual student teachers. Retrospective interviews with 21 student teachers were used, as were their portfolio-evaluation reports on their experiences of working on a portfolio. Seven functions of the learning portfolio in the student teachers’ learning process emerged from the data. It was possible to distinguish between product and process functions: with product functions, the production of a portfolio was seen as working on a tangible end product; with process functions, it was the interplay between reflecting on the learning process and the learning process itself that was the key. Two subgroups of process functions of the learning portfolio were also distinguished, based on the type of learning they facilitated. Different views were expressed by the student teachers about the value of the portfolio, and it seems worthwhile to take these differences into account by making more diverse use of portfolios in teacher-education courses.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AirasianP. W., GullicksonA. R., HahnL., and FarlandD. (1995). Teacher self-evaluation: The literature in perspective. Kalamazoo, MI: Western Michigan University, Center for Research on Educational Accountability and Teacher Evaluation.
2.
AntonekJ. L., McCormickD. E., and DonatoR. (1997). The student teacher portfolio as autobiography: Developing a professional identity. The Modern Language Journal, 81, 15—27.
3.
BainJ. D., BallantyneR., PackerJ., and MillsC. (1999). Using journal writing to enhance student teachers’ reflectivity during field experience placements. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and practice, 5(1), 51—73.
4.
BarnesD. (1992). The significance of teachers’ frames for teaching. In RussellT., and MunbyH. (Eds.), Teachers and teaching: From classroom to reflection (pp. 9—32). London, New York: The Falmer Press.
5.
BartonJ., and CollinsA. (1993). Portfolios in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 44(3), 200—210.
6.
BeijaardD., DriessenE. W., van TartwijkJ., and van der VleutenC.P.M. (2002). Portfolio verder uitgewerkt [Portfolio further elaborated]. In BeijaardD., DriessenE.W., van TartwijkJ., and van der VleutenC.P.M. (Eds.), Portfolio's (pp. 119—138). Groningen, Houten, The Netherlands: Wolters-Noordhoff bv.
7.
BengtssonJ. (1995). What is reflection? On reflection in the teaching profession and teacher education. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and practice, 1(1), 23—32.
8.
van der BergG. M. (1987). HOMALS voor beginners [HOMALS for beginners]. Leiden, The Netherlands: Rijksuniversiteit Leiden, Vakgroep Datatheorie en Vakgroep Sociaal-Wetenschappelijke Informatica.
9.
BoekaertsM., and SimonsP. R. J. (1995). Leren en instructie [Learning and instruction]. The Netherlands: Van Gorcum.
10.
BolhuisS. (2000). Naar zelfstandig leren: Wat doen en denken docenten? [Towards independent learning: What do teachers do and think?]. Leuven, Belgium, Apeldoorn, The Netherlands: Garant.
11.
BorkoH., MichalecP., TimmonsM., and SiddleJ. (1997). Student teaching portfolios: A tool for promoting reflective practice. Journal of Teacher Education, 48(5), 345—357.
12.
BoudD., KeoghR., and WalkerD. (1985). Promoting reflection in learning: A model. In BoudD., KeoghR., and WalkerD. (Eds.), Reflection: Turning experience into learning (pp. 18—40). London: Kogan Page.
13.
DarlingL. F. (2001). Portfolio as practice: The narratives of emerging teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 107—121.
14.
Darling-HammondL., and SnyderJ. (2000). Authentic assessment of teaching in context. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16, 523—545.
15.
DenzinK., and LincolnY. S. (Eds.) (1994). Handbook of Qualitative Research. London: Sage Publications.
16.
FreidusH. (1998). Mentoring portfolio development. In and and LyonsN. (Ed.), With portfolio in hand: Validating the new teacher professionalism (pp. 51—68). New York: Teachers College Press.
17.
GifiA. (1983). HOMALS user's guide. Leiden, The Netherlands: Department of Data Theory, Leiden University.
GreenJ. E., and SmyserS. O. (1996). The teacher portfolio: A strategy for professional development and evaluation. Lancaster, PA: Technomic Publishing Company, Inc.
20.
GriffithsV. (2000). The reflective dimension in teacher education. International Journal of Educational Research, 33, 539—555.
21.
GrimmettP. P. (1988). The nature of reflection and Schön's conception in perspective. GrimmettP.P., and EricksonG.L. (Eds.), Reflection in teacher education (pp. 5—15). New York: Teachers College Press.
22.
de HeusP., van der LeedenR., and GazendamB. (1995). Toegepaste data-analyse: Technieken voor niet-experimenteel onderzoek in de sociale wetenschappen [Applied data analysis: Techniques for non-experimental research in social sciences]. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Lemma.
23.
HoferB. K., and PintrichP. R. (1997). The development of epistemological beliefs: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67(1), 88—140.
24.
JohnsonN., and RoseL. M. (1997). Portfolios: Clarifying, constructing and enhancing. Lancaster: Technomic Publishing Company, Inc.
25.
KelchtermansG. (2000). Reflectief ervaringsleren voor leerkrachten: Een werkboek voor opleiders, nascholers en stagebegeleiders [Reflective experiential learning: A workbook for teacher trainers, in-service trainers, and mentors]. Cahiers voor Didactiek, 10. Deurne, Belgium: Wolters Plantyn.
26.
KlenowskiV. (2002). Developing portfolios for learning and assessment: Processes and principles. London, New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
27.
KorthagenF. A. J. (2001). Linking practice and theory: The pedagogy of realistic teacher education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
28.
KrauseS. (1996). Portfolios in teacher education: Effects of instruction on preservice teachers’ early comprehension of the portfolio process. Journal of Teacher Education, 47(2), 130—138.
29.
Kremer-HayonL. (1997, August). Student teachers’ and mentors’ professional development through cooperative learning of portfolios. Paper presented at the Biennial Meeting of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction, Athens.
30.
Kubler LaBoskeyV. (1993). A conceptual framework for reflection in preservice teacher education. In CalderheadJ., and GatesP. (Eds.), Conceptualizing reflection in teacher development (pp. 23—38). London: The Falmer Press.
31.
KwakmanC. H. E. (1999). Leren van docenten tijdens de beroepsloopbaan [Teachers’ learning on the job]. Doctoral dissertation. Nijmegen, The Netherlands: Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen.
LoughranJ., and CorriganD. (1995). Teaching portfolios: A strategy for developing learning and teaching in preservice education. Teaching & Teacher Education, 11(6), 565—577.
34.
LyonsN. (1998a). Constructing narratives for understanding: Using portfolio interviews to scaffold teacher reflection. In and and LyonsN. (Ed.). With portfolio in hand: Validating the new teacher professionalism (pp. 103—119). New York: Teachers College Press.
35.
LyonsN. (1998b). Portfolios and their consequences: Developing as a reflective practitioner. In and and LyonsN. (Ed.). With portfolio in hand: Validating the new teacher professionalism (pp. 247—264). New York: Teachers College Press.
36.
MabryL. (1999). Portfolios plus: A critical guide to alternative assessment. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
37.
Mansvelder-LongayrouxD., BeijaardD., and VerloopN. (in press). The portfolio as a tool for stimulating reflection by student teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education.
38.
MartonF., and BoothS. (1997). Learning and awareness. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
39.
MeyerD. K., and TusinL. F. (1999). Preservice teachers’ perceptions of portfolios: Process versus product. Journal of Teacher Education, 50(2), 131—139.
40.
MezirowJ. (1997). Transformative learning: Theory to practice. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 74, 5—12.
41.
NewtonD. P. (2000). Teaching for understanding: What it is and how to do it. London, New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
42.
OosterheertI. (2001). How students learn: A psychological perspective on knowledge construction in learning to teach. Doctoral dissertation. Groningen, The Netherlands: Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.
43.
OosterheertI. E., and VermuntJ. D. (2001). Individual differences in learning to teach. Learning and Instruction, 11(2), 133—156.
44.
PutnamR. T., and BorkoH. (1997). Teacher learning: Implications of new views of cognition. In BiddleB.J., GoodT.L., and GoodsonI.F. (Eds.), International handbook of teachers and teaching (Vol. 2, pp. 1223—1296). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
45.
RichardsonV. (1996). The role of attitudes and beliefs in learning to teach. In and and SikulaJ. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 102—119). New York: Macmillan.
46.
RichertA. E. (1990). Teaching teachers to reflect: A consideration of program structure. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 22(6), 509—527.
47.
SeldinP. (1993). Successful use of teaching portfolios. Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing Company, Inc.
48.
SeldinP. (1997). The teaching portfolio: A practical guide to improved performance and promotion/tenure decisions (2 ed.). Bolton, MA: Anker.
49.
SmithK., and TillemaH. (1998). Evaluating portfolio use as a learning tool for professionals. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 42(2), 193—205.
50.
TannerR., LongayrouxD., BeijaardD., and VerloopN. (2000). Piloting portfolios: Using portfolios in pre-service teacher education. ELT Journal, 54(1), 20—30.
51.
UhlenbeckA. M., VerloopN., and BeijaardD. (2002). Requirements for an assessment procedure for beginning teachers: Implications from recent theories on teaching and assessment. Teachers College Record, 104(2), 242—272.
52.
VermettenY. J., VermuntJ. D., and LodewijksH. G. (2002). Powerful learning environments? How students differ in their response to instructional measures. Learning and Instruction, 12(3), 263—284.
53.
VermuntJ. D. (1998). The regulation of constructive learning processes. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 149—171.
54.
VermuntJ. D., and VerloopN. (1999). Congruence and friction between learning and teaching. Learning and Instruction, 9, 257—280.
55.
Von WrightJ. (1992). Reflections on reflection. Learning and Instruction, 2, 59—68.
56.
WadeR. C., and YarbroughD. B. (1996). Portfolios: A tool for reflective thinking in teacher education?Teaching & Teacher Education, 12(1), 63—79.
57.
WolfK., and DietzM. (1998). Teaching portfolios: Purposes and possibilities. Teacher Education Quarterly, 25(1), 9—22.
58.
ZeichnerK., and WrayS. (2001). The teaching portfolio in US teacher education programs: What we know and what we need to know. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 613—621.
