AdamsK. L., and BrinkD. T. (Eds.). (1990). Perspectives on official English: The campaign for English as the official language of the USA. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
2.
BaileyK. D. (1975). Cluster analysis. Sociological Methodology, 6, 59—128.
3.
Bilingual Education Act. (reauthorization of ESEA; P.L. 90-247). (1968).
4.
Bilingual Education Improvement and Reform Act of 1980. (Ed. Code 52163-52170). (CAC 3934-4310).
5.
Border Protection, Antiterrorism and Illegal Immigration Act of 2005. H.R. 4437 (proposed).
6.
BrysonK. R., and PhillipsD. P. (1975). Methods for classifying interval-scale and ordinal-scale data. Sociological Methodology, 6, 171—190.
7.
ButlerY. G., OrrJ. E., Bousquet GutierrezM., and HakutaK. (2000). Inadequate conclusions from an inadequate assessment: What can SAT-9 scores tell us about the impact of Proposition 227 in California?Bilingual Research Journal, 24(1–2), 141—154.
8.
CarrollS. J., KropC., ArkesJ., MorrisonP. J., and FlanaganA. (2005). California's K-12 public schools: How are they doing?Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
9.
Chacon-Moscone Bilingual-Bicultural Education Act of 1976. (Ed. Code, § 52160 et seq.).
10.
Civil Rights Act of 1964, PL 88-352. 88th Congress, H.R. 7152. (1964).
11.
Consentino de CohenC., DeterdingN., and ClewellB. C. (2005). Who's left behind? Immigrant children in high and low LEP schools. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
12.
Constitution of the State of California. Annotated by D. L. Hearing. Los Angeles. Chas. W. Palm, 1985.
13.
CrawfordJ. (Ed.). (1992a). Language loyalties: A source book on the official English controversy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
14.
CrawfordJ. (1992b). Hold your tongue: Bilingualism and the politics of English only. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
15.
FrankenbergE., and LeeC. (2002). Race in American public schools: Rapidly resegregating school districts. Cambridge, MA: The Civil Rights Project.
16.
FrankenbergE., LeeC., and OrfieldG. (2003). A multiracial society with segregated schools: Are we losing the dream?Cambridge, MA: The Civil Rights Project.
17.
GarciaE. E., and Curry-RodriguezJ.E. (2000). The education of limited English proficient students in California schools: An assessment of the influence of Proposition 227 in selected districts and schools. Bilingual Research Journal, 24(1–2), 15—35.
18.
GibbsJ. T., and BankheadT. (2001). Preserving privilege: California politics, propositions, and people of color. Westport, CT: Praeger.
19.
HaasL. (1995). Conquests and historical identities in California 1769–1936. Berkeley: University of California Press.
20.
HerreraL. Q. (1995). Majority will v. minority rights: Proposition 187 and the Latino community. Unpublished honors thesis in Political Science, Stanford University, CA.
21.
HillL. E., and HayesJ. M. (Eds.). (2003). California's newest immigrants (2nd ed., Vol. 5, No. 2), p. 20. San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California.
22.
Lau v. Nichols, No. 72-6520, 414 U.S. 56 (1974).
23.
MacíasR. (2001). Minority languages in the United States with a focus on California. In ExtraG., and GorterD. (Eds.), The other languages of Europe: Demographic, sociolinguistic, and educational perspectives (pp. 332—354). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
24.
MapesK. A. (1992). Race and class in nineteenth century California. Unpublished master's thesis, Michigan State University, Lansing, MI.
25.
Mar-MolineroC. (2000). The politics of language in the Spanish-speaking world: From colonization to globalization. London and New York: Routledge.
26.
McLaughlinK., KramerP., and LegonJ. (1995). Judge guts core of Prop. 187. San Jose Mercury News, p. 1A.
27.
WestminsterMendez v.. (1946). 64 F. Supp. 544.
28.
NazarioS. (2006). Enrique's journey: The story of a boy's dangerous odyssey to reunite with his mother. New York: Random House.
29.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425 (2002).
30.
PasselJ. S. (2006). The size and characteristics of the unauthorized migrant population in the U. S. Washington, DC: PEW Hispanic Center.
31.
PittL. (1998). The decline of the Californios: A social history of the Spanish-speaking Californians, 1846–1890. Berkeley: University of California Press.
PortesA., and RumbautR. G. (1996). Immigrant America: A portrait (2nd ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press.
35.
ReardonS. F., and FirebaughG. (2002). Measures of multigroup segregation. Sociological Methodology, 32, 33—67.
36.
RedekerB. (2005). “Minutemen” volunteer to watch U.S. border. ABC News, World News Tonight. Retrieved March 20, 2006, from http://abcnews.go.com/WNT/US/story
37.
SchiffmanH. F. (1996). Linguistic culture and language policy. London: Routledge.
38.
ThornburghN. (2006). Inside the life of the migrants next door. Time, 167, 34—45.
39.
TiendaM., and MitchellF. (2006a). Multiple origins, uncertain destinies: Hispanics and the American future. Committee on Transforming Our Common Destiny: Hispanics in the United States. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
40.
TiendaM., and MitchellF. (Eds.). (2006b). Hispanics and the future of America. National Research Council. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
41.
TyackD. (2003). Seeking common ground: Public schools in a diverse society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
ValdésG. (2004). Between support and marginalization: The development of academic language in linguistic minority children. International Journal of Bilingualism and Bilingual Education, 7(2&3), 102—132.
44.
ValdésG., FishmanJ. A., ChavezR., and PerezW. (in press). The development of language resources: Lessons from the case of California. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
WollenbergC. (1976). All deliberate speed. Berkeley: University of California.
47.
YunJ. T., and MorenoJ. E. (2006). College access, K-12 concentrated disadvantage, and the next 25 years of educational research. Educational Researcher, 35(1), 12—19.