The impact of schools on student achievement has been of great interest in school effects research the last four decades. This study examines trends of school effects on student achievement, employing three national probability samples of high school seniors: NLS:72, HSB:82, and NELS:92. Hierarchical linear models are used to investigate school effects. The findings reveal that the substantial proportion of the variation in student achievement lies within schools, not between schools. There is also considerable between-school variation in achievement, which becomes larger over time. Schools are more diverse and more segregated in the 1990s than in the 1970s. In addition, school characteristics such as school region, school socioeconomic status, and certain characteristics of the student body of the school, such as students’ daily attendance, students in college preparatory classes, and high school graduates enrolled in colleges are important predictors of average student achievement. The school predictors explained consistently more than 50% of the variation in average student achievement across surveys. We also find considerable teacher heterogeneity in achievement within schools, which suggests important teacher effects on student achievement. Teacher heterogeneity in student achievement was larger than school heterogeneity, which may indicate that teacher effects have a relatively larger impact on mathematics and science student achievement than do school effects.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BrykA. S., and RaudenbushS. W. (1988). Toward a more appropriate conceptualization of research on school effects: A three-level hierarchical linear model. American Journal of Education, 97, 65—108.
2.
BrykA. S., LeeV. E., and HollandP. B. (1993). Catholic schools and the common good. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3.
CardD., and KruegerA. (1992). Does school quality matter? Returns to education and the characteristics of public schools in the United States. Journal of Political Economy, 100, 1—40.
4.
ColemanJ. S. (1969). Equality and achievement in education. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
5.
ColemanJ. S., CampbellE. Q., HobsonC. J., McPartlandJ., MoodA. M., and WeinfeldF. D.. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
6.
ColemanJ. S., and HofferT. B. (1987). Public and private schools: The impact of communities. New York: Basic Books.
7.
ConstantA., and KonstantopoulosS. (2003). School effects and labor market outcomes for young adults in the 1980s and 1990s. Applied Economics Quarterly, 49, 5—22.
8.
D'AgostinoJ. V. (2000). Instructional and school effects on students’ longitudinal reading and mathematics achievements. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 11, 197—235.
9.
ClickJ. E., and WhiteM. J. (2003). The academic trajectories of immigrant youths: Analysis within and across cohorts. Demography, 40, 759—783.
10.
GreenP., DugoniB. L., and IngelsS. J. (1995). Trends among high school seniors 1972–1992. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
11.
GreenwaldR., HedgesL. V., and LaneR. D. (1996). The effects of school resources on student achievement. Review of Educational Research, 66, 361—396.
12.
HanushekE. A. (1986). The economics of schooling: Production and efficiency in public schools. Journal of Economic Literature, 24, 1141—1177.
13.
HanushekE. A. (1989). The impact of differential expenditures on school performance. Educational Researcher, 18, 45—51.
14.
HedgesL. V., and HedbergE. (2004, April). The variance structure of academic achievement in America. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
15.
HedgesL. V., LaineR., and GreenwaldR. (1994). Does money matter? A meta-analysis of studies of the effects of differential school inputs on student outcomes. Educational Resercher, 23, 5—14.
16.
HedgesL. V., and NowellA. (1995). Sex differences in mental test scores, variability, and numbers of high-scoring individuals. Science, 269, 41—45.
17.
HedgesL. V., and NowellA. (1999). Changes in the Black-White gap in achievement test scores. Sociology of Education, 72, 111—135.
18.
HollandP. W., and RubinD. B. (1982). Test equating. New York: Academic Press.
19.
JencksC. S., BartlettS., CorcoranM., CrouseJ., EaglesfieldD., and JacksonG.. (1979). Who gets ahead? The determinants of economic success in America. New York: Basic Books.
20.
KolenM. J., and BrennanR. L. (1995). Test equating: Methods and practices. New York: Springer.
21.
KonstantopoulosS., and HedgesL. V. (2004). Meta-analysis. In and and KaplanD. (Ed.), The SAGE Handbook of quantitative methodology for the social sciences (pp. 281—297). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22.
KonstantopoulosS., ModiM., and HedgesL. V. (2001). Who are America's gifted?American Journal of Education, 109, 344—382.
23.
LeeV. E. (2000). Using hierarchical linear modeling to study social contexts: The case of school effects. Educational Psychologist, 35, 125—141.
24.
LeeV. E., and BrykA. S. (1989). A multilevel model of the social distribution of high school achievement. Sociology of Education, 62, 172—192.
25.
LeeV. E., and CroningerR. G. (1994). The relative importance of home and school in the development of literacy skills for middle-grade students. American Journal of Education, 102, 286—329.
26.
LeeV. E., and SmithJ. B. (1996). Collective responsibility for learning and its effects on gains in achievement for early secondary school students. American Journal of Education, 104, 103—145.
27.
MorganS. L. (1996). Trends in Black-White differences in educational expectations: 1980–1992. Sociology of Education, 69, 308—319.
28.
MostellerF., and MoynihanD. P. (1972). A pathbreaking report. In MostellerF., and MoynihanD.P. (Eds.), On equality of educational opportunity (pp. 3—66). New York: Random House.
29.
NeffW. S. (1938). Socioeconomic status and intelligence. Psychological Bulletin, 35, 727—757.
30.
NyeB. A., HedgesL. V., and KonstantopoulosS. (2000). The effects of small classes on academic achievement: The results of the Tennessee class size experiment. American Educational Research Journal, 37, 123—151.
31.
NyeB. A., KonstantopoulosS., and HedgesL. V. (2004). How large are teacher effects?Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 26, 237—257.
32.
PetersenN. S., CookL. L., and StockingM. L. (1983). IRT versus conventional equating methods: A comparative study of scale stability. Journal of Educational Statistics, 8, 137—156.
33.
PetersenN. S., KolenM. J., and HooverH. D. (1989). Scaling, norming, and equating. In and and LynnR.L. (Ed.), Educational measurement (pp. 221—262). New York: American Council on Education.
34.
PetersenN. S., MarcoG. L., and StewartE. E. (1982). A test of the adequacy of linear score equating models. In HollandP.W., and RubinD.B. (Eds.), Test equating (pp. 71—136). New York: Academic Press.
35.
RaudenbushS. W., and BrykA. S. (1986). A hierarchical model for studying school effects. Sociology of Education, 59, 1—17.
36.
RaudenbushS. W., and BrykA. S. (1989). Methodological advances in analyzing the effects of schools and classrooms on student learning. Review of Research in Education, 15, 423—475.
37.
RaudenbushS. W., and BrykA. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
38.
RaudenbushS. W., and WilmsJ. D. (1995). The estimation of school effects. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 20, 307—335.
39.
RockD. A., HiltonT. L., PollackJ. M., EkstromR. B., and GoertzM. E. (1985). Psychometric analysis of the NLS-72 and the High School and Beyond Test Batteries. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
40.
RumbergerR. W., and PalardyG. J. (2005). Test scores, dropout rates, and transfer rates as alternative indicators of high school performance. American Educational Research Journal, 42, 3—42.
41.
RumbergerR. W., and ThomasS. L. (2000). The distribution of dropout and turnover rates among urban and suburban high schools. Sociology of Education, 73, 39—67.
42.
WhiteK. R. (1982). The relation between socioeconomic status and academic achievement. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 461—181.
43.
WhiteS. W., ReynoldsP. D., ThomasM. M., and GitzlaffN. J. (1993). Socioeconomic status and achievement revisited. Urban Education, 28, 328—343.
44.
WongM., and RosenbaumJ. E. (2004, August). Changes in the educational attainment process over the past three decades: How have things changed? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, San Francisco, CA.
45.
ZiglerE., and StyfcoS. J. (1994). Is the Perry Preschool Project better than Head Start?Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 9, 269—287.
