BaroneT. (2000). Aesthetics, politics, and educational inquiry: Essays and examples.New York: Peter Lang.
2.
BochnerA. (2005). Interpretive and narrative. In PaulJ. (Ed.), Introduction to the philosophies of research and criticism in education and the social sciences (pp. 65–68). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
3.
KozolJ. (1992). Savage inequalities: Children in America's schools (1st PerennialHarper ed.). New York: HarperPerennial.
4.
PaulJ. (Ed.). (2005). Introduction to the philosophies of research and criticism in education and the social sciences.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
5.
SchwandtT. A. (2000). Three epistemological stances for qualitative inquiry; Interpretivism, hermeneulics, and social constructionism. In DenzinN. K. & LincolnY. S. (Eds.). The handbook of qualitative inquiry (pp. 189–213). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6.
ShavelsonR. J., & TowneL.Committee on Scientific Principles for Education Research, & National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Center for Education. (2002). Scientific research in education.Washington, DC: National Academy Press.