Although there is extensive documentation of minority overrepresentation in special education, knowledge of the factors that create the context within which disproportionality occurs is limited. To gain an understanding of the local processes that may contribute to special education disproportionality, we interviewed 66 educators about their perspectives on urban education, special education, available and needed resources, and the specific topics of diversity and disproportionality. A number of clear themes emerged. Teachers and schools feel unprepared to meet the needs of economically disadvantaged students. Classroom behavior appears to be an especially challenging issue for many teachers, and cultural gaps and misunderstandings may intensify behavioral challenges. Special education is perceived by many teachers as the only resource available for helping students who are not succeeding. Finally, there was a surprising reticence among many respondents to discuss issues of race. These results paint a surprisingly complex picture of the factors that may cause and maintain minority disproportionality in special education. Together, they suggest that successful remediation efforts will avoid simplistic or linear solutions, increase resources to address learning and behavior problems in general education, and seek methods to use data on racial disparity as a stimulus toward reflection and action.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BowlesS., and GintisH. (1976). Schooling in capitalist America. New York: Basic Books.
2.
CarspeckenP. H. (1996). Critical ethnography in educational research: A theoretical and practical guide. New York: Routledge.
3.
ChirmP. C., and HughesS. (1987). Representation of minority students in special education classes. Remedial and Special Education, 8, 41—46.
4.
CoulterW. A. (1996). Alarming or disarming?: The status of ethnic differences within exceptionalities. Paper presented at the annual convention of the Council for Exceptional Children, Orlando, FL. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED394257)
5.
CoutinhoM. J., and OswaldD. P. (2000). Disproportionate representation in special education: A synthesis and recommendations. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 9, 135—156.
6.
CreswellJ. W. (2002). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
7.
DelgadoR., and StefancicJ. (2002). Critical race theory: The cutting edge (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
8.
DunnL. (1968). Special education for the mildly retarded: Is much of it justifiable?Exceptional Children, 35, 5—22.
9.
EntwisleD. R., and AlexanderK. L. (1993). Entry into school: The beginning school transition and educational stratification in the United States. Annual Review of Sociology, 19, 401—423.
10.
FinnJ. D. (1982). Patterns in special education as revealed by the OCR surveys. In HellerK.A., HoltzmanW.H., and MessickS. (Eds.), Placing children in special education: A strategy for equity (pp. 322—381). Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences National Academy Press.
11.
FinnC., RotherhamA. J., and HokansonC. R. (2001). Rethinking special education for a new century. Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Foundation.
12.
GaltonF. (1869). Hereditary genius: An inquiry into its laws and consequences. London: Macmillan.
13.
GerberM. M., and SemmelM. I. (1984). Teacher as imperfect test: Reconceptualizing the referral process. Educational Psychologist, 19, 137—148.
14.
HabermanM. (1991). The pedagogy of poverty versus good teaching. Phi Delta Kappan, 73, 290—294.
15.
HarryB. (1994). The disproportionate representation of minority students in special education: Theories and recommendations. Alexandria, VA: National Association of State Directors of Special Education.
16.
HarryB., and AndersonM. G. (1994). The disproportionate placement of African American males in special education programs: A critique of the process. Journal of Negro Education, 63, 602—619.
17.
HarryB., KlingnerJ., SturgesK. M., and MooreR. F. (2002). Of rocks and soft places: Using qualitative methods to investigate disproportionality. In LosenD.J., and OrfieldG. (Eds.), Racial inequality in special education (pp. 71—91). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
18.
HellerK. A., HoltzmanW. H., and MessickS. (Eds.) (1982). Placing children in special education: A strategy for equity. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences National Academy Press.
19.
HenzeR., LucasT., and ScottB. (1998). Dancing with the monster: Teachers discuss racism, power, and White privilege in education. Urban Review, 30, 187—210.
20.
HerrnsteinR. J., and MurrayC. (1994). The Bell Curve: Intelligence and class structure in American life. New York: Free Press.
21.
HeubertJ. P. (2001). Disability, race, and high stakes testing of students. In LosenD.J., and OrfieldG. (Eds.), Racial inequity and special education (pp. 137—165). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
22.
HospJ. L., and HospM. K. (2002). Behavior differences between African-American and Caucasian students: Issues for assessment and intervention. Education and Treatment of Children, 24, 336—350.
23.
JensenA. R. (1969). How much can we boost IQ and scholastic achievement?Harvard Educational Review, 39, 1—123.
24.
KingJ. E. (1991). Dysconscious racism: Ideology, identity, and the miseducation of teachers. Journal of Negro Education, 60, 133—146.
25.
LadnerM., and HammonsC. (2001). Special but unequal: Race and special education. In FinnC.E.Jr., RotherhamA.J., and HokansonC.R.Jr. (Eds.), Rethinking special education for a new century (pp. 85—110). Washington, DC: The Progressive Policy Institute & The Thomas B. Fordham Foundation.
26.
Larry, P.v. Riles, 495 F. Supp. 926 (N.D. Cal. 1979).
27.
LosenD. J., and OrfieldG. (2002). Racial inequality in special education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
28.
MadausG., and ClarkeM. (2001). The adverse impact of high-stakes testing on minority students: Evidence from one hundred years of test data. In OrfieldG., and KornhaberM.L. (Eds.), Raising standards or raising barriers: Inequality and high-stakes testing in public education (pp. 85—106). New York: Century Foundation Press.
29.
MaheadyL. (1983). Minority overrepresentation: A case for alternative practices prior to referral. Learning Disability Quarterly, 6, 448—456.
30.
McNeilL., and ValenzuelaA. (2001). The harmful impact of the TAAS system of testing in Texas: Beneath the accountability rhetoric. In OrfieldG., and KornhaberM.L. (Eds.), Raising standards or raising barriers? Inequality and high-stakes testing in public education (pp. 127—150). New York: Century Foundation.
31.
MehanH. (1992). Understanding inequality in schools: The contribution of interpretive studies. Sociology of Education, 65, 1—20.
32.
MehanH., HertweckA., and MeihlsJ. L. (1986). Handicapping the handicapped: Decision making in students’ educational careers. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
33.
MercerJ. (1973). Labeling the mentally retarded. Berkeley: University of California Press.
34.
MilesM., and HubermanA. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35.
MorrisonP., WhiteS. H., and FeuerM. J. (1996). The use of IQ tests in special education decision making and planning: A summary of two workshops. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
36.
National Alliance of Black School Educators (NABSE) and ILIAD Project (2002). Addressing over-representation of African American students in special education: The prereferral intervention process–An administrator's guide. Arlington, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
37.
National Research Council. (2002). Minority students in special and gifted education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
38.
NatrielloG., and PallasA. M. (2001). The development and impact of high stakes testing. In OrfieldG., and KornhaberM.L. (Eds.), Raising standards or raising barriers? Inequality and high-stakes testing in public education (pp. 19—38). New York: Century Foundation.
39.
NietoS. (2000). The sociopolitical context of multicultural education (3rd ed.). NewYork: Longman.
40.
OakesJ. (1982). The reproduction of inequity: The content of secondary school tracking. Urban Review, 14, 107—120.
41.
OswaldD. P., CoutinhoM. J., and BestA. M. (2002). Community and school predictors of over-representation of minority children in special education. In LosenD.J., and OrfieldG. (Eds.), Racial inequality in special education (pp. 1—13). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
42.
OswaldD. P., CoutinhoM. J., BestA. M., and SinghN. N. (1999). Ethnic representation in special education. Journal of Special Education, 32, 194—206.
43.
ParrishT. (2002). Racial disparities in the identification, funding, and provision of special education. In LosenD.J., and OrfieldG. (Eds.), Racial inequality in special education (pp. 15—37). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
44.
PASE (Parents in Action on Special Education) v. Joseph P. Hannon, 506 F. Supp. 831 (N.D. Ill. 1980).
45.
PattonM. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
46.
PayneR. K. (2001). A framework for understanding poverty. Highlands, TX: aha! Process.
47.
PhillipsM., Brooks-GunnJ., DuncanG. J., KlebanovP., and CraneJ. (1998). Family background, parenting practices, and the Black-White test score gap. In JencksC., and PhillipsM. (Eds.), The Black-White test score gap (pp. 103—145). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
48.
President's Commission on Excellence in Special Education. (2002). A new era: Revitalizing special education for children and their families. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
49.
Public Education Network & Public Agenda (2000). Quality now! Results of national conversations on education and race. Washington, DC: Public Education Network.
50.
ReschlyD. J. (1997). Disproportionate minority representation in general and special education programs: Patterns, issues, and alternatives. Des Moines, IA: Mountain Plains Regional Resource Center.
51.
RockM., and ZigmondN. (2001). Intervention assistance: Is it substance or symbolism?Preventing School Failure, 45, 153—168.
52.
SarasonS. B. (1996). Revisiting the culture of the school and the problem of change. New York: Teachers College Press.
53.
SkibaR. J., BushL. D., and KnestingK. K. (2002). Culturally competent assessment: More than non-biased tests. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 11, 61—78.
54.
SkibaR. J., ChungC. G., WuT., SimmonsA., and St. JohnE. (2000). Minority overrepresentation in Indiana's special education programs: A status report. Bloomington: Indiana Education Policy Center.
55.
SkibaR. J., McLeskeyJ., WaldronN. L., GrizzleK., and BartleyJ. (1993). The context of failure in the primary grades: Risk factors in low and high referral rate classrooms. School Psychology Quarterly, 8(2), 81—98.
56.
SkibaR. J., WuT. C., KohlerK., ChungC. G., and SimmonsA. B. (2001). Disproportionality and discipline among Indiana's students with disabilities. Bloomington: Indiana Education Policy Center.
57.
SpearmanC. (1927). The abilities of man: Their nature and measurement. New York: Macmillan.
58.
Stanton-SalazarR. D. (1997). A social capital framework for understanding the socialization of racial minority children and youths. Harvard Educational Review, 67, 1—40.
59.
TatumB. (2002). Breaking the silence. In and and RothenbergP.S. (Ed.), White privilege: Essential readings on the other side of racism (pp. 115—120). New York: Worth.
60.
TownsendB. (2000). Disproportionate discipline of African American children and youth: Culturally responsive strategies for reducing school suspensions and expulsions. Exceptional Children, 66, 381—391.
61.
TrepagnierB. (2001). Deconstructing categories: The exposure of silent racism. Symbolic Interaction, 24, 141—163.
62.
WhittenE., and DiekerL. (1995). Intervention assistance teams: A broader vision. Preventing School Faliure, 40, 41—50.
63.
ZhangD., and KatsiyannisA. (2002). Minority representation in special education: A persistent challenge. Remedial and Special Education, 23, 180—187.
