Historically, one of the central concerns that has plagued the field of teacher education is the observation that fragmentation characterizes the experience of learning to teach. Too often, university-based teacher education programs consist of a set of disconnected individual courses; separate clinical work from coursework; and lack a vision of teaching and learning. Therefore, some teacher educators have argued that creating structurally and conceptually coherent programs will result in more powerful learning for prospective teachers. Yet, although empirical work on such programs is growing, there is little research on the nature of coherence and on how it might develop. To that end, this article documents one teacher education program's efforts to become more coherent, focusing on the ways in which the program tries to become more coherent and on the challenges of coherence. The article concludes with implications for teacher education program design and evaluation, with a focus on the power, complexity, and problems of coherence.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BransfordJ., BrownA., and CockingR. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
2.
BrunerJ. (1977). The process of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (Original work published 1960).
3.
BrunerJ. S. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4.
BuchmannM., and FlodenR. E.Program coherence in teacher education: A view from the USA. Oxford Review of Education. 1991, 17, 65—72.
5.
Carnegie ForumT. (1986). A nation prepared: Teachers for the 21st century. A report of the task on teaching as a profession. New York: Carnegie Forum on Education and the Economy.
6.
Darling-HammondL., BransfordJ., LePageP., HammernessK., and DuffyH. (Eds.). (2005). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
7.
Darling-HammondL., and MacdonaldM. (2000). Where there is learning there is hope: The preparation of teachers at the Bank Street College of Education. In and and Darling-HammondL. (Ed.), Studies of excellence in teacher education: Preparation at the graduate level (pp. 1—95). Washington, DC: American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education.
8.
EricssonK. A., KrampeR. T., and Tesch-RomerC. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100, 363—406.
9.
Feinam-NemserS. (1990). Teacher preparation: Structural and conceptual analysis. In HoustonW.R., HabermanM., and SikulaJ. (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 212—233). New York: Macmillan.
GoodladJ. I., SoderK., and SirotnikK. A. (Eds.). (1990). Places where teachers are taught. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
12.
GraberK. (1996). Influencing student beliefs: The design of a “high-impact” teacher education program. Teaching and Teacher Education, 12, 451—466.
13.
GrossmanP., ValenciaS., EvansK., ThompsonC., MartinS., and PlaceN. (2000). Transitions into teaching: Learning to teach writing in teacher education and beyond. Journal of Literacy Research, 32, 631—662.
14.
HammernessK., Darling-HammondL., and ShulmanL. S. (2002). Toward expert thinking: How curriculum case-writing prompts the development of theory-based professional knowledge in student-teachers. Teaching Education, 13, 219—243.
15.
The Holmes Group. (1986). Tomorrow's teachers. East Lansing, MI: Author.
16.
HonigM., and HatchT. (2004). Crafting coherence: How schools strategically manage multiple, external demands. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 16—30.
17.
HoweyK., and ZimpherN. (1989). Profiles of preservice teacher education. Albany: State University of New York Press.
18.
KesselsJ., KosterB., LagerwerfB., WubbelsT., and KorthagenF. A. J. (2001). Linking practice and theory: The pedagogy of realistic teacher education. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
19.
KoppichJ. (1999). Trinity University: Preparing teachers for tomorrow's schools. In and and Darling-HammondL. (Ed.), Studies of excellence in teacher education: Preparation in a five-year program (pp. 1—48). Washington, DC: American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education.
20.
KorthagenF. A., and KesselsJ. P. (1999). Linking theory and practice: Changing the pedagogy of teacher education. Educational Researcher, 28(4), 4—17.
21.
Ladson-BillingsG. (1994). The dreamkeepers: Successful teachers of African American children. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
22.
LanierJ. E., and LittleJ. W. (1986). Research on teacher education. In and and WittrockM.C. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 527—569). New York: Macmillan.
23.
McDonaldM. A. (2005). The integration of social justice in teacher education: Dimensions of prospective teachers’ opportunities to learn. Journal of Teacher Education, 56(5), 418—435.
24.
MersethK., and KoppichJ. (1999). Teacher education at the University of Virginia: A study of English and mathematics preparation. In and and Darling-HammondL. (Ed.), Studies of excellence in teacher education: Preparation in a five-year program (pp. 49—81). Washington, DC: American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education.
25.
MillerL., and SilvernailD. (1999). Learning to become a teacher: The Wheelock way. In and and Darling-HammondL. (Ed.), Studies of excellence in teacher education: Preparation in the undergraduate years (pp. 67—107). Washington, DC: American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education.
26.
MollL. C., AmantiC., NeffD., and GozalezN. (1992). Funds of Knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory into Practice, 31(1), 132—141.
27.
National Commission on Excellence in Teacher Education. (1985). A call for change in teacher education. Washington, DC: American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education.
28.
National Commission on Teaching and America's Future. (1996). What matters most: Teaching for America's future. New York: Author.
RoeserR. (2002). Bringing a “whole adolescent” perspective to secondary teacher education: A case study of the use of an adolescent case study. Teaching Education, 13, 155—178.
32.
ShulmanL. S. (1996). Just in case: Reflections on learning from experience. In ColbertK.T.J., and DesbergP. (Eds.), The case for education: Contemporary approaches for using case methods (pp. 197—217). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
33.
SmagorinskyP., CookL. S., and JohnsonT. S. (2003). The twisting path of concept development in learning to teach. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
34.
SnyderJ. (2000). Knowing children–understanding teaching: The developmental teacher education program at the University of California-Berkeley. In and and Darling-HammondL. (Ed.), Studies of excellence in teacher education: Preparation at the graduate level (pp. 97—172). Washington, DC: American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education.
35.
TattoM. (1996). Examining values and beliefs about teaching diverse students: Understanding the challenges for teacher education. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 18, 155—180.
36.
TomA. R. (1997). Redesigning teacher education. Albany: State University of New York Press.
37.
ValdesG. (1999). The world outside and inside schools: Language and immigrant children. Educational Researcher, 27(6), 4—18.
38.
WhitfordB., RuscoeG., and FickelL. (2000). Knitting it all together: Collaborative teacher education in southern Maine. In and and Darling-HammondL. (Ed.), Studies of excellence in teacher education: Preparation at the graduate level (pp. 173—257). Washington, DC: American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education.
39.
WigginsG., and McTigheJ. (1998). Understanding by design. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
40.
ZeichnerK., GrantC., GayG., GilletteM., ValliL., and VillegasA. M. (1998). A research-informed vision of good practice in multicultural education: Design principles. Theory Into Practice, 37, 163—171.
