Part Four: Moving to Better Practice

Abedi J. , and Dietel R. (2004, Winter). Challenges in the No Child Left Behind Act for English language learners (CRESST Policy Brief 7). Los Angeles: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.

Abedi J. , and Lord C. (2001). The language factor in mathematics tests. Applied Measurement in Education, 14, 219—234.

American Educational Research Association (AERA). (2000, July). AERA position statement concerning high-stakes testing in PreK-12 Education. Retrieved August 18, 2004, from http://www.aera.net/about/policy/stakes.htm

American Educational Research Association (AERA). (2003, Spring). Standards and tests: Keeping them aligned. Research Points, 1(1). Retrieved from http://aera.net/upload-edFiles/Journals_and_Publications/Research_Points/RP_Spring03.pdf

American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education (AERA, APA, & NCME). (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

Bailey A. L. , and Butler F. A. (2004). Ethical considerations in the assessment of the language and content knowledge of U.S. school-age English learners. Language Assessment Quarterly, 1(2&3), 177—193.

Baker E. L. (2001). Testing and assessment: A progress report. Educational Assessment, 7(1), 1—12.

Baker E. L. (2003). From usable to useful assessment knowledge: A design problem (CSE Technical Report 612). Los Angeles: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.

Baker E. L. , Linn R. L. , Herman J. L. , and Koretz D. (2002, Winter). Standards for educational accountability systems (CRESST Policy Brief 5). Los Angeles: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.

Bernhardt V. L. (1998). Data analysis for comprehensive schoolwide improvement. Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education.

Black P. , Harrison C. , Lee C. , Marshall B. , and Wiliam D. (2003). Assessment for learning: Putting it into practice. New York: Open University Press.

Black P. , and Wiliam D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 5(1), 7—73.

Black P. , and Wiliam D. (2004). The formative purpose: Assessment must first promote learning. In and and Wilson M. (Ed.), Towards coherence between classroom assessment and accountability. 103rd yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II (pp. 20—50). Chicago: The National Society for the Study of Education.

Cawelti G. , and Protheroe N. (2001). High student achievement: How six school districts changed into high-performance systems. Arlington, VA: Educational Research Service.

Chen E. , Heritage M. , Danish J. , Choi S. , and Lee J. (2003, August). Evaluating the web-based quality school portfolio: Year two research report (CSE deliverable). Los Angeles: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.

Chen E. , Heritage M. , La Torre D. , and Lee J. (2005, January). Evaluating the web-based quality school portfolio: Final Report (CSE deliverable). Los Angeles: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.

Choppin J. (2002, April). Data use in practice: Examples from the school level. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA. Retrieved April 22, 2002, from http://www.wcer.wisc.edu/mps/AERA2002/data_use_in_practice.html

Cizek G. J. (2000). Pockets of resistance in the assessment revolution. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practices, 19(2), 16—23.

Cromey A. (2000). Using student assessment data: What can we learn from schools? Policy Issues, Issue 6. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service ED452593).

Cross L. H. , and Frary R. B. (1999). Hodgepodge grading: Endorsed by students and teachers alike. Applied Measurement in Education, 12(1), 53—72.

Doolittle F. , Herlily F. , and Snipes J. (2002). Foundations for success: How urban school systems improve student achievement. New York: MDRC.

DuFour R. , and Eaker R. (1998). Professional learning communities at work: Best practices for enhancing student achievement. Bloomington, IN: National Education Service.

Feiler R. , Heritage M. , and Gallimore R. (2000, April). Teachers leading teachers. Educational Leadership, 57(7), 66—69.

Heritage H. M. (2003). Web-based training for the Quality School Portfolio: Module 3. Los Angeles: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST).

Herman J. L. , Aschbacher P. R. , and Winters L. (1992). A practical guide to alternative assessment. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD).

Herman J. , and Gribbons B. (2001). Lessons learned in using data to support school inquiry and continuous improvement: Final report to the Stuart Foundation (CSE Technical Report 535). Los Angeles: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.

Herman J. L. , Webb N. , and Zuniga S. (2003). Alignment and college admissions: The match of expectations, assessments, and educator perspectives (CSE Technical Report 593). Los Angeles: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.

Jamentz K. (2001). Beyond data-mania. Leadership Magazine, 31(2). Retrieved August 24, 2004, from http://www.acsa.org/publications/pub_detail.cfm?leadershipPubID=1023

Jandris T. P. (2002). Data-based decision-making: Essentials for principals. Alexandria, VA: National Association of Elementary School Principals.

Katz S. , Sutherland S. , and Earl L. (2002). Developing an evaluation habit of mind. The Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 17(2), 103—119.

Marzano R. J. (2000). Transforming classroom grading. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD).

Mason S. A. (2001, Spring). Turning data into knowledge: Lessons from six Milwaukee public schools. Using Data for Educational Decision-Making, 6(1), 3—6.

National Research Council (NRC). (2001). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425 (2002).

No Child Left Behind. Archived information. (n.d.) Retrieved August 10, 2004, from http://www.ed.gov/nclb/overview/intro/presidentplan/proposal.pdf

Porter A. C. (2002). Measuring the content of instruction: Uses in research and practice. Educational Researcher, 31(7), 3—14.

Rothman R. , Slattery J. B. , Vranek J. L. , and Resnick L. B. (2002, May). Benchmarking and alignment of standards and testing (CSE Technical Report 566). Los Angeles: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.

Salinger T. (2001). Assessing the literacy of young children: The case for multiple forms of evidence. In Neuman S.B. , and Dickinson D.K. (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (pp. 390—418). New York: Guilford Press.

Secada W. G. (2001, Spring). From the director: Data/decision making. Using Data for Educational Decision-Making, 6(1), 1—2.

Shepard L. A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7), 4—14.

Shepard L. A. (2004). Curricular coherence in assessment design. In and and Wilson M. (Ed.), Towards coherence between classroom assessment and accountability. 103rd yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II (pp. 239—249). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.

Snipes J. , Doolittle F. , and Herlihy C. (2002). Foundations for success: Case studies of how urban school systems improve student achievement. Washington, DC: Council of the Great City Schools. Retrieved January 18, 2005, from http://www.cgcs.org/pdfs/Foundations.pdf

Stecher B. M. , and Barron S. (2002). Unintended consequences of test-based accountability when testing in “milepost” grades. Educational Assessment, 7(4), 259—282.

Stecher B. M. , and Hamilton L. S. (2002). Putting theory to the test: Systems of “educational accountability” should be held accountable. RAND Review, 26(1), 17—23.

Stiggins R. J. (2002, June). Assessment crisis: The absence of assessment for learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 83(10), 758—765. Retrieved August 25, 2004, from http://www.pdkintl.org/kappan/k0206sti.htm

Teddlie C. , and Reynolds D. (2000). The international handbook of school effectiveness research. London: Falmer.

Thorn C. A. (2001, November 19). Knowledge management for educational information systems: What is the state of the field? Education Policy Analysis Archives, 9(47). Retrieved August 25, 2004, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v9n47/

Thorndike E. L. (1922). Intelligence tests and their use: The nature, history, and general principles of intelligence testing. The twenty-first yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part I (pp. 1—9). Bloomington, IL: Public School Publishing Company.

Tognieri W. , and Anderson S. E. (2003). Beyond islands of excellence: What districts can do to improve instruction and achievement in all schools. Washington, DC: Learning First Alliance. Retrieved from http://www.learningfirst.org/publications/districts/

Wayman J. C. , Stringfield S. , and Yakimowski M. (2004). Software enabling school improvement through analysis of student data (Report 67). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University, Center for Research on the Education of Students Placed at Risk (CRESPAR).

Webb N. L. (1997). Determining alignment of expectations and assessments in mathematics and science education. NISE Brief, 1(2). Retrieved from http://www.wcer.wisc.edu/nise/Publications/Briefs/Vol_1_No_2/

Webb N. L. (1999). Alignment of science and mathematics standards and assessments in four states. (Research Monograph 18). Madison: University of Wisconsin-Madison, National Institute for Science Education.

Wilson M. (Ed.) (2004). Towards coherence between classroom assessment and accountability: 103rd yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II (pp. 1—19). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.