The Consequences of Student Testing for Teaching and Teacher Quality

Advocates for Children. (2002). Pushing out at-risk students: An analysis of high school discharge figures–A joint report by AFC and the Public Advocate. Retrieved April 4, 2005, from http://www.advocatesforchildren.org/pubs/pushout-11-20-02.html

Allington R. L. , and McGill-Franzen A. (1992).Unintended effects of educational reform in New York. Educational Policy, 6(4), 397—414.

American Psychological Association. (2004). Appropriate use of high-stakes testing in our nation's schools: How should student learning and achievement be measured? Retrieved November 22, 2004, from http://www.apa.org/pubinfo/testing.html

Amrein A. , and Berliner D. (2002). High-stakes testing, uncertainty, and student learning. Educational Policy and Analysis Archives, 10(8). Retrieved November 21, 2003, from http://www.epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v10n18

Anagnostopoulos D. (2003). The new accountability, student failure, and teachers’ work in urban high schools. Educational Policy, 17(3), 291—316.

Appalachia Educational Laboratory. (1996, February). Five years of reform in rural Kentucky. Notes from the field: Educational reform in rural Kentucky, Vol. 5, No. 1. Charleston, WV: Author.

Arenson K. W. (2004, May 15). More youths opt for G.E.D., skirting high-school hurdle. The New York Times, p. A14.

Baron J. B. (1999). Exploring high and improving reading achievement in Connecticut. Washington, DC: National Educational Goals Panel.

Black P. , and Wiliam D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2), 139—148.

Borko H. , Elliott R. , and Uchiyama K. (1999). Professional development: A key to Kentucky's reform effort. Los Angeles: University of California at Los Angeles National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.

Borko H. , and Stetcher B. M. (2001, April). Looking at reform through different methodological lenses: Survey and case studies of the Washington state education reform. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA.

Brown D. F. (1992, April). Altering curricula through state-mandated testing: Perceptions of teachers and principals. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.

Carnoy M. , and Loeb S. (2002). Does external accountability affect student outcomes? A cross-state analysis. Education and Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(4), 305—332.

Cavalluzzo L. (2004).Online education: District, state, or charter school? Retrieved November 18, 2004, from http://www.the-atec.org/docDownload.asp?docID=48

Center on Education Policy (CEP). (2004). State high school exit exams: A maturing reform. Washington, DC: Center on Education Policy.

Chapman C. (1991, June). What have we learned from writing assessment that can be applied to performance assessment? Presentation at ECS/CDE Alternative Assessment Conference, Breckenbridge, CO.

Clarke M. , Madaus G. , Pedulla J. , and Shore A. (2000, January). Statements: An agenda for research on educational testing. Boston: National Board on Educational Testing and Public Policy.

Clotfelter C. T. , Ladd H. F. , Vigdor J. L. , and Diaz R. A. (2004). Do school accountability systems make it more difficult for low performing schools to attract and retain high quality teachers? Journal of Policy and Management, 23(2), 251—272.

Corbett H. , and Wilson B. (1991). The central office role in instructional improvement. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 3(1), 45—68.

Darling-Hammond L. (1997a). Toward what end? The evaluation of student learning for the improvement of teaching. In and and Millman J. (Ed.), Grading teachers, grading schools: Is student achievement a valid evaluation measure? (pp. 248—263). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Darling-Hammond L. (1997b). The right to learn: A blueprint for creating schools that work. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Darling-Hammond L. (2004). From “separate but equal” to “No Child Left Behind”: The collision of new standards and old inequalities. In Meier D. , and Wood G. (Eds.), Many children left behind. New York: Beacon Press.

Darling-Hammond L. , and Ancess J. (1994). Authentic assessment and school development. New York: National Center for Restructuring Education, Schools, and Teaching, Teachers College, Columbia University.

Darling-Hammond L. , Ancess J. , and Falk B. (1995). Authentic assessment in action. New York: Teachers College Press.

Darling-Hammond L. , and Berry B. (1988). The evolution of teacher policy. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.

Darling-Hammond L. , and Wise A. E. (1985). Beyond standardization: State standards and school improvement. The Elementary School Journal, 85(3), 315—336.

DeBard R. , and Kubow P. K. (2002). From compliance to commitment: The need for constituent discourse in implementing testing policy. Education Policy, 16(3), 387—405.

DeBray E. , Parson G. , and Woodworth K. (2001). Patterns of response in four high schools under state accountability policies in Vermont and New York. In and and Fuhrman S. (Ed.), From the capitol to the classroom: Standards-based reform in the states. The one hundredth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II (pp. 170—192). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.

DeVise D. (1999, November 5). A+ plan prompts teacher exodus in Broward County. The Miami Herald, p. 1B.

Diamond J. , and Spillane J. (2002). High stakes accountability in urban elementary schools: Challenging or reproducing inequality? Institute for Policy Research Working Paper. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Institute for Policy Research.

Trust Education . (2004). Measured progress achievement rises and gaps narrow, but too slowly. Retrieved November 23, 2004, from http://www2.edtrust.org/NR/rdonlyres/F1C402F7-AB53-49ED-A9DC-27A41AA6E7E5/0/MeasuredProgressSumma99F.pdf

Week Education . (2001, January 11) Quality Counts 2001: A better balance. Bethesda, MD: Editorial Projects in Education.

Falk B. , and Ort S. (1997, April). Sitting down to score: Teacher learning through assessment. Presentation at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.

Firestone W. , and Mayrowetz D. (2000). Rethinking “high stakes”: Lessons from the United States and England and Wales. Teachers College Record, 102(4), 724—749.

Firestone W. A. , Mayrowetz D. , and Fairman J. (1998, Summer). Performance-based assessment and instructional change: The effects of testing in Maine and Maryland. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 20(2), 95—113.

Goldberg G. L. , and Rosewell B. S. (2000). From perception to practice: The impact of teachers’ scoring experience on the performance based instruction and classroom practice. Educational Assessment, 6(4), 257—290.

Goldhaber D. , and Anthony E. (2004). Can teacher quality be effectively assessed? Retrieved November 16, 2004, from http://www.urban.org/url.cfm?ID=410958

Greene J. , and Winters M. (2004). Pushed out or pulled up? Exit exams and dropout rates in public high schools. New York: Manhattan Institute for Policy Research.

Haney W. (2000). The myth of the Texas miracle in education. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(41), Retrieved February 19, 2005, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v8n41/

Haney W. (2002). Lake Wobegauranteed: Misuse of test scores in Massachusetts, part 1. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 10(24). Retrieved September 3, 2004, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v10n24/

Hassell B. C. (2002). Better pay for better teaching: Making teacher compensation pay off in the age of accountability. Progressive Policy Institute 21st Century Schools Project. Retrieved November 18, 2004, from http://www.broadfoundation.org/investments/education-net.shtml

Herman J. L. (2002). Black-white-other test score gap: Academic achievement among mixed race adolescents. Institute for Policy Research Working Paper. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Institute for Policy Research.

Herman J. L. , Brown R. S. , and Baker E. L. (2000). Student assessment and student achievement in the California public school system. Retrieved November 18, 2004, from http://cresst96.cse.ucla.edu/CRESST/Reports/TECH519.pdf

Herman J. L. , and Golan S. (1993). Effects of standardized testing on teaching and schools. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 12(4), 20—25, 41–42.

Herman J. L. , Klein D. C. D. , Heath T. M. , and Wakai S. T. (1995). A first look: Are claims for alternative assessment holding up? CSE Technical Report. Los Angeles: UCLA National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.

Heubert J. , and Hauser R. (Eds.). (1999). High stakes: Testing for tracking, promotion, and graduation. A report of the National Research Council. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

Hoffman J. V. , Assaf L. C. , and Paris S. G. (2001). High stakes testing in reading: Today in Texas, tomorrow? The Reading Teacher, 54(5), 482—492.

Jacob B. A. (2001). Getting tough? The impact of high school graduation exams. Education and Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(2), 99—122.

Jones B. D. , and Egley R. J. (2004). Voices from the frontlines: Teachers’ perceptions of high-stakes testing. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 12(39). Retrieved August 10, 2004, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v12n39/

Jones M. G. , Jones B. D. , Hardin B. , Chapman L. , and Yarbrough T. M. (1999). The impact of high-stakes testing on teachers and students in North Carolina. Phi Delta Kappan, 81(3), 199—203.

Klein S. P. , Hamilton L. S. , McCaffrey D. F. , and Stetcher B. M. (2000). What do test scores in Texas tell us? Santa Monica, CA: The RAND Corporation.

Koretz D. , and Barron S. I. (1998). The validity of gains on the Kentucky Instructional Results Information System (KIRIS). Santa Monica, CA: RAND, MR-1014-EDU.

Koretz D. , Linn R. L. , Dunbar S. B. , and Shepard L. A. (1991, April). The effects of high-stakes testing: Preliminary evidence about generalization across tests. In R.L. Linn (Chair) (Ed.), The effects of high stakes testing. Symposium presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association and the National Council on Measurement in Education, Chicago.

Koretz D. , Mitchell K. J. , Barron S. I. , and Keith S. (1996). Final report: Perceived effects of the Maryland school performance assessment program. CSE Technical Report. Los Angeles: UCLA National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.

Koretz D. , Stetcher B. , and Deibert E. (1992). The Vermont portfolio program: Interim report on implementation and impact, 1991–1992 school year. Santa Monica, CA: The RAND Corporation.

Kornhaber M. , and Gardner H. (1993). Varieties of student excellence. New York: National Center for Restructuring Education, Schools, and Teaching (NCREST), Teachers College, Columbia University.

Ladd H. F. , and Walsh R. (2002, February). Implementing value-added measures of school effectiveness: Getting the incentives right. Economics of Education Review, 21(1), 1—17.

Ladd H. F. , and Zelli A. (2002). School-based accountability in North Carolina: The responses of school principals. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38(4), 494—529.

Lane S. , Stone C. A. , Parke C. S. , Hansen M. A. , and Cerrillo T. L. (2000, April). Consequential evidence for MSPAP from the teacher, principal and student perspective. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, New Orleans, LA.

Lee V. E. , Smith J. B. , and Croninger R. G. (1995, Fall). Another look at high school restructuring. Issues in Restructuring Schools. Madison: University of Wisconsin-Madison, Center on Organization and Restructuring of Schools.

Lilliard D. , and DeCicca P. (2001). Higher standards, more dropouts? Evidence within and across time. Economics of Education Review, 20(5), 459—473.

Linn R. L. (2000). Assessments and accountability. Educational Researcher, 29(2), 4—16.

Linn R. L. , Graue M. E. , and Sanders N. M. (1990). Comparing state and district test results to national norms: The validity of claims that “everyone is above average.” Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 9(3), 5—14.

Loeb S. , Darling-Hammond L. , and Luczak J. (in press). Teacher turnover: The role of working conditions and salaries in recruiting and retaining teachers. Stanford: Stanford University School of Education.

Madaus G. , West M. M. , Harmond M. C. , Lomax R. G. , and Vator K. A. (1992). The influence of testing on teaching math and science in grades 4–12. Chestnut Hill, MA: Center of Study of Testing, Evaluation, and Educational Policy, Boston College.

McNight C. , Crosswhite F. J. , Dossey J. A. , Kifer E. , Swafford J. O. , Travers K. J. , and Conney T. J. (1987). Underachieving curriculum: Assessing U.S. school mathematics from an international perspective. Champaign, IL: Stipes Publishing.

Milanowski A. T. , Kimball S. M. , and White B. (2004). The relationship between standards-based teacher evaluation scores and student achievement: Replication and extensions at three sites. University of Wisconsin: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.

Mintrop H. (2003, January 15). The limits of sanctions in low-performing schools: A study of Maryland and Kentucky schools on probation. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 11(3). Retrieved November 15, 2004, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v11n3.html

Mitchell R. (1992). Testing for learning. New York: Free Press.

Moll L. C. , Amanti C. , Neff D. , and Gonzalez N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory into Practice, 31(1), 132—141.

Murnane R. , and Cohen D. (1986). Merit pay and the evaluation problem: Why do most merit pay plans fail and a few survive? Harvard Educational Review, 56(1), 1—17.

Murnane R. , and Levy F. (1996). Teaching the new basic skills. New York: The Free Press.

National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). (1982). The condition of education– 1982. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

National Commission on Teaching and America's Future (NCTAF). (1996). What matters most: Teaching for America's future. New York: Author.

National Commission on Teaching and America's Future (NCTAF). (2003). No dream denied: A pledge to America's children. Washington, DC: Author.

National Research Council. (2000). How people learn. New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.

Neill M. (2003). Leaving children behind: How No Child Left Behind will fail our children. Phi Delta Kappan, 85(3), 225—228.

Neill M. , and Gayler K. (2001). Do high-stakes graduation tests improve learning outcomes? Using state-level NAEP data to evaluate the effects of mandatory graduation tests. In Orfield G. , and Kornhaber M. (Eds.), Raising standards or raising barriers?: Inequality and high stakes testing in public education (pp. 107—125). New York: Century Foundation Press.

Newmann F. M. , Marks H. M. , and Gomoran A. (1995). Authentic pedagogy: Standards that boost student performance. Issue Report No. 8. Madison, WI: Center on Organization and Restructuring of Schools.

No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425 (2002).

O'Day J.A. (2002). Complexity, accountability, and school improvement. Harvard Educational Review, 72(3), 293—329.

Orfield G. , and Ashkinaze C. (1991). The closing door: Conservative policy and black opportunity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Orfield G. , Losen D. , Wald J. , and Swanson C. B. (2004). Losing our future: How minority youth are being left behind by the graduation rate crisis. Retrieved April 4, 2005, from http://www.urban.org/url.cfm?ID=410936

Pedulla J. J. , Abrams L. M. , Madaus G. F. , Russell M. K. , Ramos M. A. , and Miao J. (2003). Perceived effects of state-mandated testing programs on teaching and learning: Findings from a national survey of teachers. Boston: National Board on Testing and Public Policy, Boston College.

Plitt B. (2002). Teacher dilemmas in a time of standards and testing. Phi Delta Kappan, 85(10), 745—748.

Popham W. J. (1999). Why standardized test scores don't measure educational quality. Educational Leadership, 56(6), 8—15.

Public Education Network. (2002). Using NCLB to improve student achievement: An action guide to community and parent leaders. Retrieved November 21, 2004, from http://www.publiceducation.org/pdf/NCLBBook.pdf

Resnick L. (1987). Education and learning to think. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

Roderick M. , Bryk A. S. , Jacob B. A. , Easton J. Q. , and Allensworth E. (1999). Ending social promotion: Results from the first two years. Chicago: Consortium on Chicago School Research.

Roderick M. , and Engel M. (2001). The grasshopper and the ant: Motivational responses of low-achieving students to high-stakes testing. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(3), 197—227.

Rumberger R. , and Larson K. (1998). Student mobility and the increased risk of high school dropout. American Journal of Education, 107(1), 1—35.

Russell M. , and Abrams L. (2004). Instructional uses of computers for writing: The impact of state testing programs. Teachers College Record, 106(6), 1332—1357.

Rustique-Forrester E. (2005). Accountability and the pressures to exclude: A cautionary tale from England. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 13(26). Retrieved April 18, 2005, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v13n26/

Schiller K. , and Muller C. (2000). External examinations and accountability, educational expectations, and high school graduation. American Journal of Education, 108(2), 73—102.

Shepard L. A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7), 4—14.

Smith M. L. (1991). Put to the test: The effects of external testing on teachers. Educational Researcher, 20(5), 8—11.

Smith F. (1986). High school admission and the improvement of schooling. New York: New York City Board of Education.

Southeast Center for Teaching Quality. (2004). High-stakes accountability in California: A view from the teacher's desk. Teaching Quality RESEARCH MATTERS, 12, 1—2. Retrieved September 2, 2004, from http://www.teachingquality.org/Research-Matters/issues/2004/issue12-Aug2004.pdf

Stecher B. , and Barron S. (1999). Quadrennial milepost accountability testing in Kentucky. CSE Technical Report. Los Angeles: UCLA National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.

Stecher B. , Barron S. , Chun T. , and Ross K. (2000). The effects of the Washington state education reform on schools and classroom. CSE Technical Report. Los Angeles: UCLA National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.

Stecher B. M. , Barron S. , Kaganoff T. , and Goodwin J. (1998). The effects of standards-based assessment on classroom practices: Results of the 1996–1997 RAND survey of Kentucky teachers of mathematics and writing. CSE Technical Report. Los Angeles: UCLA National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.

Sykes G. (1983). Public policy and the problem of teacher quality. In Shulman L.S. , and Sykes G. (Eds.), Handbook of teaching and policy (pp. 97—125). New York: Longman.

Vandevoort L. G. , Amrein-Beardsley A. , and Berliner D. (2004). National board certified teachers and their students’ achievement. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 12(46), Retrieved October 10, 2004, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v12n46/

Watson B. C. (1996). Testing: Its origins, use, and misuse. New York: National Urban League.

Wheelock A. (2003). School awards programs and accountability in Massachusetts: Misusing MCAS scores to assess school quality. Retrieved March 3, 2005, from http://www.fairtest.org/arn/Alert%20June02/Alert%20Full%20Report.html

Whitford B. L. , and Jones K. (2000). Kentucky lesson: How high stakes accountability undermines a performance-based curriculum vision. In Whitford B.L. , and Jones K. (Eds.) Accountability, assessment, and teacher commitment: Lessons from Kentucky's reform efforts (pp. 9—24). Albany: State University of New York Press.

Wilson S. , Darling-Hammond L. , and Berry B. (2001). A case of successful teaching policy: Connecticut's long-term efforts to improve teaching and learning. Seattle: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy, University of Washington.

Wolf S. , Borko H. , McIver M. , and Elliott R. (1999). “No excuses”: School reform efforts in exemplary schools of Kentucky. Los Angeles: University of California at Los Angeles National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.

Woody E. L. , Buttles M. , Kafka J. , Park S. , and Russell J. (2004, February). Voices from the field: Educators respond to accountability. Berkeley. Policy Analysis for California Education. Retrieved November 19, 2004, from http://pace.berkeley.edu/ERAP_Report-WEB.pdf