High School Exit Examinations: When Do Learning Effects Generalize?

Amerein A. L. , and Berliner D. C. (2002). The impact of high-stakes tests on student academic performance. Educational Policy Studies Laboratory, Arizona State University. Retrieved from http://asu.edu/educ/epsl/EPRU/documents/EPSL-0211-125-EPRU.pdf

Association of Secondary Teachers of Ireland. (1990). Information sheet opposing changes in Examination Systems, 1990.

Becker W. , and Rosen S. (1992). The learning effect of assessment and evaluation in high school. Economics of Education Review, 11(2), 107—118.

Betts J. , and Costrell R. (2001). Incentives and equity under standards-based reform. In and and Ravitch D. (Ed.), Brookings papers on education policy, 2001 (pp. 9–74). Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.

Bishop J. H. (1996). The impact of curriculum-based external examinations on school priorities and student learning. International Journal of Education Research, 23(8), 653—752.

Bishop J. H. (1997). The effect of national standards and curriculum-based external exams on student achievement. American Economic Review, 87(2), 260—264.

Bishop J. H. (1999a). Are national exit examinations important for educational efficiency? Swedish Economic Policy Review, 6(2), 349—401.

Bishop J. H. (1999b). Nerd harassment, incentives, school priorities and learning. In Mayer S. , and Peterson P. (Eds.), Earning and learning (pp. 231—280). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

Bishop J. H. (2003). What is the appropriate role of student achievement standards? In and and Kodrzycki Y. (Ed.), Education in the 21st century: Meeting the challenge of a changing world (pp. 250—278). Boston: Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.

Bishop J. H. , and Mane F. (2001). The impacts of minimum competency exam graduation requirements on high school graduation, college attendance and early labor market success. Labour Economics, 8(2), 203—222.

Bishop J. H. , and Mane F. (2004, September). Educational reform and disadvantaged students: Are they better off or worse off? Paper presented at CES-IFO conference in Munich, Germany.

Bishop J. H. , Mane F. , Bishop M. , and Moriarty J. (2001). The role of end-of-course exams and minimum competency tests in standards-based reforms. In and and Ravitch D. (Ed.), Brookings papers on education policy, 2001 (pp. 267–346). Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.

Bishop J. H. , Moriarty J. , and Mane F. (2000). Diplomas for learning, not seat time. Economics of Education Review, 19(3), 333—349.

Board of Admissions and Relations with Schools. (2002). The use of admissions tests by the University of California. University of California office of the president. Retrieved October 10, 2004, from http://www.ucop.edu/news/sat/boars.pdf

Braswell J. S. , Daane M. C. , and Grigg W. S. (2004). The nation's report card: Mathematics highlights 2003. Report No. NCES 2004-451. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education.

Braun H. (2004, January 5). Reconsidering the impact of high-stakes testing, Education Policy Analysis Archives, 12(1). Retrieved November 12, 2004, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v12n1/

Brooks-Cooper C. (1993). The effect of financial incentives on the standardized test performance of high school students. Master's Thesis, Cornell University.

Carnoy M. , Elmore R. , and Siskin L. S. (2003). The new accountability. New York: Routledge Falmer.

Carnoy M. , and Loeb S. (2003). Does external accountability affect student outcomes? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(4), 305—331.

Center on Education Policy (Gayler, K., Chudowsky, N., Hamilton, M., Kober, N., & Yeager, M.) (2004). State high school exit exams: A maturing reform. Washington, DC: Center on Education Policy.

Coleman J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Coleman J. , Schneider B. , Plank S. , Schiller K. , Shouse R. , and Wang H. (1997). Redesigning American education. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

College Board. (2005). Advanced Placement report to the nation 2005. Retrieved January 4, 2005, from http://www.collegeboard.com/prod_downloads/about/news_info/ap/2005/ap-report-nation.pdf

Competitiveness Policy Council. (1993, March). Reports of the subcouncils. Washington, DC: Competitiveness Policy Council.

Costrell R. (1994). A simple model of educational standards. American Economic Review, 84(4), 956—971.

Count me in. (2004, January 8). Quality counts 2004. Education Week, 23(17), 7.

Dee T. (2003). The “first wave “ of accountability. In West M. , and Peterson P. (Eds.), No Child Left Behind? The politics and practice of school accountability (pp. 292—323). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

Figlio D. , and Lucas M. (2000, October). Do high grading standards affect student performance? NBER Working Paper 7985. University of Florida and National Bureau of Economic Research.

Finn C. E. (1991). We must take charge: Our schools and our future. New York: The Free Press.

Fleming M. , and Chambers B. (1983). Teacher-made tests: Windows on the classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Fredericksen N. (1994). The influence of minimum competency tests on teaching and learning. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Fuchs T. , and Wößmann L. (2004). What accounts for international differences in student performance? A re-examination using PISA data. CESifo Working Paper 1235. Munich, Germany: CESifo.

Graham A. , and Husted T. (1995).Understanding state variation in SAT scores. Economics of Education Review, 12(3), 197—202.

Gummere R. (1943). The independent school and the post war world. Independent School Bulletin, 4(April).

Hanushek E. A. , and Raymond M. (2003a). Improving educational quality: How best to evaluate our schools? In and and Kodrzycki Y. (Ed.), Education in the 21st century: Meeting the challenge of a changing world (pp. 193—224). Boston: Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.

Hanushek E. A. , and Raymond M. (2003b). Shopping for evidence against school accountability. Education Next, 3(3), 1—13.

Hanushek E. A. , and Raymond M. (2005). Does school accountability lead to improved student performance? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 24(2), 297—327.

Hart Research Associates. (1995). Valuable views: A public opinion research report on the views of AFT teachers on professional issues. Washington, DC: American Federation of Teachers.

Hess F. (2003). Breaking the mold: Charter schools, contract schools and voucher plans. In Boyd W.L. , and Miretzky D. (Eds.), American educational governance on trail: Change and challenges. The 102nd Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (pp. 114—135). Chicago: The National Society for the Study of Education.

Jacobs B. A. (2001). Getting tough? The impact of high school graduation exams. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(2), 99—122.

Jencks C. , and Crouse J. (1982). Aptitude versus achievement: Should we replace the SAT? The Public Interest, 67, 21—35.

Jurges H. , Schneider K. , and Buchel F. (2003). The effect of central examinations on student achievement: Quasi-experimental evidence from TIMSS. Munich, Germany: CESifo Working Paper 939.

Koretz D. , McCaffrey D. , and Hamilton L. (2001). Toward a framework for validating gains under high-stakes conditions. CSE Technical Report 551. Los Angeles: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.

Lee V. E. , Smith J. B. , and Croninger R. G. (1995, Fall). Another look at high school restructuring. Issues in restructuring schools. Madison: University of Wisconsin-Madison, Center on Organization and Restructuring of Schools.

Lillard D. , and DeCicca P. (2001). Higher standards, more dropouts? Evidence within and across time. Economics of Education Review, 20(5), 459—473.

Linn R. (2000). Assessments and accountability. Educational Researcher, 29(2), 4—16.

Linn R. L. (2003). Accountability: Responsibility and responsible expectations. Educational Researcher, 32(7), 3—13.

Loveless T. (2001). The 2001 Brown Center report on American education: How well are American students learning? Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.

Madaus G. (1991, June). The effects of important tests on students: Implications for a national examination or system of examinations. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Invitational Conference on Accountability as a State Reform Instrument, Washington, DC.

Mathews J. (2002, August 6). AP, IB to be the next SATs? The Washington Post.

Mullis I. V. S. , Martin M. O. , Beaton A. E. , Gonzalez E. J. , Kelly D. L. , and Smith T. A. (1998). Mathematics and science achievement in the final years of secondary school: IEA's third international mathematics and science report. Retrieved October 4, 2004, from http://isc.bc.edu/timss1995i/MathScienceC.html

No small change. (2005, January 5). Quality Counts 2005. Education Week, 24(17).

North Carolina Board of Education. (1999, fall). Understanding the North Carolina end-of-course tests. Assessment Brief, 6(5), 1—4.

North Carolina Board of Education. (2004, May). Understanding the North Carolina end-of-course tests. Assessment Brief, 9(4), 1—2.

Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2002). Education at a glance. Paris: OECD.

Powell A. (1996). Motivating students to learn: An American dilemma. In Fuhrman S. , and O'Day J. (Eds.), Rewards and reform (pp. 1—59). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Ravitch D. (1995). National standards in American education: A citizen's guide. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.

Reardon S. (1996). Eighth grade minimum competency testing and early high school drop out patterns. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association conference, New York.

Resnick L. (1987). Education and learning to think. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

Rohwer W. D. , and Thomas J. W. (1987). Domain specific knowledge, cognitive strategies, and impediments to educational reform. In and and Pressley M. (Ed.), Cognitive strategy research. New York: Springer-Verlag.

Rosenshine B. (2003, August 4). High-stakes testing: Another analysis. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 11(24). Retrieved November 13, 2004, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v11n24/

Steinberg L. , Brown B. , and Dornbusch S. (1996). Beyond the classroom. New York: Simon and Schuster.

Takahira S. , Gonzales P. , Frase M. , and Salganik L. H. (1998). Pursuing excellence: A study of U.S. twelfth-grade mathematics and science achievement in international context (NCES 98-049). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.

The teacher gap. (2003, January 8). Quality Counts 2003. Education Week, 22(16), 10.

Thomas J. W. (1991). Expectations and effort: Course demands, students study practices and academic achievement. Paper presented at the Office of Educational Research and Improvement Conference on Student Motivation, Washington, DC.

Wößmann L. (2000). Schooling resources, educational institutions, and student performance: The international evidence. Kiel Working Paper 983. Kiel Institute of World Economics, Germany. Retrieved February 19, 2005, from http://www.uni-kiel.de/ifw/pub/kap/2000/kap983.htm

Wößmann L. (2003a). Central exit exams and student achievement: International evidence. In West M. , and Peterson P. (Eds.), No Child Left Behind? The politics and practice of school accountability (pp. 292—323). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

Wößmann L. (2003b). Central exams as the “currency of school systems”: International evidence on the complementarity of school autonomy and central exams. Journal for Institutional Comparisons, 1(4), 46—56.