Getting Things Right at the Classroom Level

Abedi J. , Lord C. , Hofstetter C. , and Baker E. (2000). Impact of accommodation strategies on English language learners. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 19(3), 16—26.

American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education (AERA, APA, & NCME). (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

Assembly of Alaska Native Educators (AANE). (1998). Alaska standards for culturally-responsive schools. Anchorage: Alaska Native Knowledge Network.

Assembly of Alaska Native Educators (AANE). (1999). Guidelines for preparing culturally responsive teachers for Alaska's schools. Anchorage: Alaska Native Knowledge Network.

Assembly of Alaska Native Educators (AANE). (2002). Guidelines for culturally-responsive school boards. Anchorage: Alaska Native Knowledge Network.

Black P. J. , and Wiliam D. (2004a). Classroom assessment is not (necessarily) formative assessment (and vice versa). In and and Wilson M. (Ed.), Towards coherence between classroom assessment and accountability. The 103rd yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II (pp. 183—188). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.

Black P. J. , and Wiliam D. (2004b). The formative purpose: Assessment must first promote learning. In and and Wilson M. (Ed.), Towards coherence between classroom assessment and accountability. The 103rd yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II (pp. 20—50). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.

Darling-Hammond L. (1994). Performance-based assessment and educational equity. Harvard Educational Review, 64(1), 5—30.

Far West Laboratory [now WestEd]. (1995). Effective assessments: Making use of local context (videotape). San Francisco: Author.

Farr B. P. , and Trumbull E. (1997). Assessment alternatives for diverse classrooms. Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon.

Fashola O. S. , Drum P. A. , Mayer R. E. , and Kang S. (1996). A cognitive theory of orthographic transitioning: Predictable errors in how Spanish-speaking children spell English words. American Educational Research Journal, 33(4), 825—843.

Fritzberg G. J. (2001). From rhetoric to reality: Opportunity-to-learn standards and the integrity of American public school reform. Teacher Education Quarterly, 28(1), 169—188.

Gajria M. , Salend S. J. , and Hemrick M. A. (1994). Teacher acceptability of testing modifications for mainstream students. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 9, 236—243.

García G.E. , and Pearson P. D. (1994). Assessment and diversity. In and and Darling-Hammond L. (Ed.), Review of research in education (pp. 337—391). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

Gay G. (1997). Forward. In Farr B.P. , and Trumbull E. (Eds.), Assessment alternatives for diverse classrooms (pp. xiii—xix). Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon.

Goh D. S. (2004). Assessment accommodations for diverse learners. San Francisco: Allyn and Bacon.

Grobe W. J. , and McCall D. (2004). Valid uses of student testing as part of authentic and comprehensive student assessment, school reports, and school system accountability. California Journal of Science Education, 5(1), 53—69.

Haertel E. H. (1990). Form and function in assessing science education. In Champagne A.B. , Lovitts B.E. , and Calinger B.J. (Eds.), This year in school science 1990: Assessment in the service of instruction (pp. 15—28). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.

Hamilton L. (2004). Assessment as a policy tool. In and and Floden R.E. (Ed.), Review of research in education (pp. 69—108). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

Haney W. (1993). Testing and minorities. In Weiss L. , and Fine M. (Eds.), Beyond silenced voices: Class, race, and gender in United States schools (pp. 45—74). Albany: State University of New York Press.

Hilliard A. G. (2002). Language, culture, and the assessment of African American children. In Delpit L. , and Dowdy J.K. (Eds.), The skin that we speak (pp. 87—106). New York: The New Press.

Hodgkinson H. (1985). All one system: Demographics of education, kindergarten through graduate school. Washington, DC: Institute for Educational Leadership.

Hodgkinson H. (1999). All one system: A second look. Washington, DC: Institute for Educational Leadership and the National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education.

Jayanthi M. , Epstein M. H. , Polloway E. A. , and Bursuck W. D. (1996). A national survey of general education teachers’ perceptions of testing adaptations. Journal of Research of Special Education, 30(1), 99—115.

Johnson R. (2002). Using data to close the achievement gap: How to measure equity in our schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

Johnstone C. J. (2003). Improving validity of large-scale tests: Universal design and student performance (Technical Report 37). Minneapolis, MN: National Center on Educational Outcomes. Retrieved September 15, 2004, from http://education.umn.edu/NCEO/OnlinePubs/Technical37.htm

Kopriva R. , and Saez S. (1997). Guide to scoring LEP student responses to open-ended mathematics items. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.

Kopriva R. , and Sexton U. (1999). Guide to scoring LEP student responses to open-ended science items. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.

Kozol J. (1991). Savage inequalities: Children in America's schools. New York: Harper Perennial.

Ladson-Billings G. (1994). The dreamkeepers: Successful teachers of African American children. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Lee J. (2004). Multiple facets of inequity in racial and ethnic achievement gaps. Peabody Journal of Education, 79(2), 51—73.

Love N. (2001). Using data/getting results: A practical guide for school improvement in mathematics and science. Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon.

Meisels S. J. , Dorfman A. , and Steele D. (1995). Equity and excellence in group-administered and performance-based assessments. In Nettles M.T. , and Nettles A.L. (Eds.), Equity and excellence in educational testing and assessment (pp. 243—261). Boston: Kluwer Academic.

National Council for the Social Studies. (1994). Curriculum standards for social studies. Washington, DC: Author.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.

National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academies of Sciences.

National Research Council. (2001). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

North Central Regional Educational Laboratory. (1992). Interview with Charlotte Higuchi. Excerpted from Schools that work: The research advantage, videoconference 4. Alternatives for measuring performance. Oak Brook, IL: Author. Retrieved September 15, 2004, from http://www.ncrel.org/sdrs/areas/issues/methods/assment/as8higuc.htm

Oakes J. (1990). Multiplying inequalities: The effects of race, social class, and tracking on opportunities to learn math and science. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.

O'Connor M.C. (1989). Aspects of differential performance by minorities on standardized tests: Linguistic and sociocultural factors. In and and Gifford B. (Ed.), Test policy and test performance: Education, language, and culture (pp. 129—182). Boston: Kluwer Academic.

Putnam M. L. (1992). The testing practices of mainstream secondary classroom teachers. Remedial and Special Education, 13(5), 11—21.

Sandholtz J. H. , Ogawa R. T. , and Scribner S. P. (2004). Standards gaps: Unintended consequences of local standards-based reform. Teachers College Record, 106(6), 1177—1202.

Shaw J. M. (1997). Threats to the validity of performance assessments for English language learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(7), 721—743.

Shepard L. A. (2000). The role of classroom assessment in teaching and learning (Technical Report 517). Los Angeles: Center for the Study of Evaluation, University of California.

Shepard L. A. (2004). Curricular coherence in assessment design. In and and Wilson M. (Ed.), Towards coherence between classroom assessment and accountability. The 103rd yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II (pp. 239—249). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.

Siskind T. G. (1993). Teachers’ knowledge about test modifications for students with disabilities. Diagnostique, 18(2), 145—157.

Spencer R. , Porche M. V. , and Tolman D. L. (2003). We've come a long way–maybe: New challenges for gender equity in education. Teachers College Record, 105(9), 1174—1807.

Stephens S. (2000). Handbook for culturally responsive science curriculum. Fairbanks: Alaska Science Consortium and the Alaska Rural Systemic Initiative.

Stiggins R. J. (2002). Assessment crisis: The absence of assessment FOR learning. Phi Delta Kappan, June, 758—765.

Stiggins R. J. (2004). Student-involved assessment FOR learning. Columbus, OH: Pearson Prentice Hall.

Suter L. E. (2004). Tools for two masters: Classroom assessment and school system assessment. In and and Wilson M. (Ed.), Towards coherence between classroom assessment and accountability. The 103rd yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II (pp. 169—182). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.

Thompson S. J. , Johnstone C. J. , and Thurlow M. L. (2002). Universal design applied to large scale assessments (Synthesis Report 44). Minneapolis, MN: National Center on Educational Outcomes.

Tindal G. , and Fuchs L. S. (1999). A summary of research on test changes: An empirical basis for defining accommodations. Lexington: University of Kentucky, Mid-South Regional Center.

Valdés G. , and Figueroa R. A. (1994). Bilingualism and testing: A special case of bias. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Valencia S. W. , and Wixson K. K. (2001). Inside English/language arts standards: What's in a grade? Reading Research Quarterly, 36, 202—217.

Vaughn S. , Schumm J. S. , and Kouzekanani K. (1993). What do students with learning disabilities think when their general teachers make adaptations? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26(8), 545—555.

Wolf D. , Bixby J. , Glenn J. , and Gardner H. (1991). To use their minds well: Investigating new forms of student assessment. In and and Grant G. (Ed.), Review of research in education (pp. 31—74). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.