Exploring Models of School Performance: From Theory to Practice

Aitkin M. , and Longford N. (1986). Statistical modeling issues in school effectiveness studies. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 149(1), 1—43.

Alliance for Fair and Effective Accountability. (2004, October 21). Joint Organizational Statement on No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act. Message posted to http://www.childrensdefense.org/education/NCLB_joint_statement.pdf

Ballou D. , Sanders W. , and Wright P. (2004). Controlling for student background in value-added assessment of teachers. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29(1), 37—65.

Bryk A. S. , and Weisberg H. I. (1976). Value-added analysis: A dynamic approach to the estimation of treatment effects. Journal of Educational Statistics, 1, 127—155.

Bryk A. S. , Thum Y. M. , Easton J. Q. , and Luppescu S. (1998). Assessing school academic productivity: The case of Chicago school reform. Social Psychology of Education, 2, 103—142.

Campbell D. T. , and Stanley J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand McNally.

Choi K. , and Seltzer M. (2004). Modeling heterogeneity in relationships between initial status and rates of change: Treating latent variable regression coefficients as random coefficients in a three-level hierarchical model. Manuscript submitted for publication.

Choi K. , Seltzer M. , Herman J. , and Yamashiro K. (2004). Children left behind in AYP and non-AYP schools: Using student progress and the distribution of student gains to validate AYP. CSE Technical Report. Los Angeles: Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing, University of California Los Angeles.

Choi K. , Yamashiro K. , Seltzer M. , and Herman J. (2004, September). Comparing like with like: The role of student and school characteristics in value-added models. Paper presented at the Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST) Annual Conference, Los Angeles, CA.

Council of Chief State School Officers. (2004, November). Brain trust on value added growth models. Washington, DC, Author.

Darling-Hammond L. (2000, January). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1). Retrieved October 10, 2004, from http://olam.ed.asu.edu/epaa/v8n1/

Elmore R. F. , Abelmann C. H. , and Fuhrman S. H. (1996). The new accountability in state education reform: From process to performance. In and and Ladd H.F. (Ed.), Holding schools accountable: Performance-based reform in education (pp. 65—98). Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.

Fuhrman S. H. , and Elmore R. F. (Eds.) (2004). Redesigning accontability systems for education. New York: Teacher's College Press.

Goals 2000: Educate America Act of 1994, Pub. L. 103-227, 108 Stat. 125 (1994).

Goldschmidt P. , Choi K. , and Martinez-Fernandez F. (2003). Using hierarchical growth models to monitor school performance over time: Comparing NCE to scale score results. CSE Technical Report. Los Angeles: Center for the Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing, University of California Los Angeles.

Goldstein H. , and Spiegelhalter D. J. (1996). League tables and their limitations: Statistical issues in comparisons of institutional performance. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, 159, 384—443.

Good T. L. , Biddle B. J. , and Brody J. E. (1975). Teachers make a difference. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.

Griliches Z. , and Mason W. (1972). Education, income, and ability. Journal of Political Economy, 80(3), Part 2 (May–June), S74—S103.

Hambleton R. K. , and Swaminathan H. (1987). Item response theory: Principles and applications. Boston: Kluwer.

Hanushek E. A. (1979). Conceptual and empirical issues in the estimation of education production functions. Journal of Human Resources, 14(3), 351—388.

Improving America's Schools Act of 1994 (IASA), Pub. L. No. 103-382, 108 Stat. 4056 (1994).

Izumi L. , and Doran H. (2004). Putting education to the test: A value-added model for California. San Francisco: Pacific Research Institute.

Koretz D. (1996). Using student assessments for educational accountability. In Hanushek E.A. , and Jorgenson D.W. (Eds.), Improving America's schools: The role of incentives (pp. 171—195). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

Linn R. L. (2000). Assessments and accountability. Educational Researcher, 29(2).

Linn R. L. , and Slinde J. A. (1977). The determination of the significance of change between pre- and post-periods. Review of Educational Research, 47, 121—150.

Lockwood J. R. , Lewis T. A. , and McCaffrey D. (2002). Uncertainty in rank estimation: Implications for value-added modeling accountability systems. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 27, 255—270.

McCaffrey D. , Lockwood J. R. , Koretz D. , Louis T. , and Hamilton L. (2004). Models for value-added modeling of teacher effects. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29(1), 67—101.

McNeil L. M. (2000). Contradictions of school reform: Educational costs of standardized testing. New York: Routledge.

Meyer R. H. (1996). Value-added indicators of school performance. In Hanushek E.A. , and Jorgenson D.W. (Eds.), Improving America's schools: The role of incentives (pp. 197—223). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

Muthen B. , and Curran P. (1997). General longitudinal modeling of individual differences in experimental designs: A latent variable framework for analysis and power. Psychological Methods, 2, 371—402.

National Conference of State Legislatures. (2004). NCLB Task Force Meeting, Portland, Oregon, October 10–11.

No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425 (2002).

Novak J. , and Fuller B. (2003). Penalizing diverse schools? Similar test scores, but different students, bring federal sanction. PACE policy brief. Berkeley: Policy Analysis for California Education.

Oakes J. (1989, Summer). What educational indicators? The case for assessing the school context. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11(2), 181—199.

O'Day J. , and Smith M. (1993). Systemic reform and educational opportunity. In and and Fuhrman S. (Ed.), Designing coherent education policy: Improving the system (pp. 250—312). New York: Jossey-Bass.

Porter A. (1988, March). Indicators: Objective data or political tool? Phi Delta Kappan, 69(7), 503—508.

Raudenbush S. W. (2004a). What are value-added models estimating and what does this imply for statistical practice? Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29(1), 121—129.

Raudenbush S. W. (2004b). School, statistics, and poverty: Can we measure school improvement? Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service, Policy Evaluation and Research Center.

Raudenbush S. W. , and Bryk A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Press.

Raudenbush S. , Bryk A. , Cheong Y. , and Congdon R. (2004). HLM6: Hierarchical linear and non-linear modeling. Homewood, IL: Scientific Software International.

Raudenbush S. W. , and Wilms J. D. (1995). The estimation of school effects. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 20, 307—335.

Rogosa D. R. (1995). Myths and methods: Myths about longitudinal research, plus supplemental questions. In and and Gottman J.M. (Ed.), The analysis of change (pp. 3—65). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Rogosa D. R. , Brandt D. , and Zimowski M. (1982). A growth curve approach to the measurement of change. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 726—774.

Rubin D. , Stuart E. , and Zanutto E. (2004). A potential outcomes view of value-added assessment in education. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29(1), 103—116.

Rumberger R. W. , and Palardy G. J. (2004). Multilevel models for school effectiveness research. In and and Kaplan D. (Ed.), Handbook of quantitative methodology for the social sciences (pp. 235—258). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Russell M. (2000). Summarizing change in test scores: Shortcomings of three common methods. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7(5). Available at http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=7&n=1

Sanders W. L. , Saxton A. M. , and Horn S. P. (1997). The Tennessee Value-Added Assessment System: A quantitative, outcomes-based approach to educational assessment. In and and Millman J. (Ed.), Grading teachers, grading schools. Is student achievement a valid evaluation measure? (pp. 137—162). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

Seltzer M. , Choi K. , and Thum Y. M. (2003). Examining relationships between where students start and how rapidly they progress: Implications for conducting analyses that help illuminate the distribution of achievement within schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(3), 263—286.

Shavelson R. J. , and Towne L. (2004). What drives scientific research in education? American Psychological Society, 17(4), 27—30.

Thum Y. M. (2003a). Measuring progress toward a goal: Estimating teacher productivity using a multivariate multilevel model for value-added analysis. Sociological Methods and Research, 32(2), 153—207.

Thum Y. M. (2003b). No Child Left Behind: Methodological challenges and recommendations for measuring adequate yearly progress. CSE Technical Report. Los Angeles: Center for the Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing, University of California Los Angeles.

Wilms J. D. , and Raudenbush S. W. (1989). A longitudinal hierarchical linear model for estimating school effects and their stability. Journal of Educational Measurement, 26(3), 209—232.

Yen W. M. (1986). The choice of scale for educational measurement: An IRT perspective. Journal of Educational Measurement, 23(4), 299—325.