American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1993). Benchmarks for Scientific Literacy Project 2061. New York: Oxford University Press. Retrieved July 12, 2004, from http://www.project2061.org/tools/benchol/ch1/ch1.htm
2.
American Association of Colleges and Universities. (2002). Greater expectations: A new vision for learning as a nation goes to college. National panel report. Washington, DC: Author.
BoisvertR. D. (1998). John Dewey: Rethinking our time. Albany: State University of New York Press.
5.
BrownJ. S. (2000, March/April). Growing up digital: How the web changes work, education, and the ways people learn. Change, 11—20. Retrieved from http://www.aahe.org/change/digital.pdf
6.
BrownJ. S., and DuguidP. (2000). The social life of information. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
7.
Brown v. Board of Education. 347 U.S. 483 (1954).
8.
BrunerJ. (1960/1977). The process of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
9.
BrunerJ. (1996). The culture of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10.
Business-Higher Education Forum. (1999, September). Spanning the chasm: A blueprint for taking action. Washington, DC: American Council on Education and National Alliance of Business.
11.
Business-Higher Education Forum. (2003). Building a nation of learners: The need for changes in teaching and learning to meet global challenges. Retrieved November 13, 2004, from http://www.acenet.edu/bookstore/pdf/2003_build_nation.pdf
12.
BybeeR. W. (1997). Achieving scientific literacy: From purposes to practices. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
13.
DowneyG., HeggS., and LucenaJ. (1993, June). Weeded out: Critical reflection in engineering education. Paper presented at the American Anthropological Association, Washington, DC.
14.
EisenhartM., FinkelE., and MarionS. F. (1996). Creating the conditions for scientific literacy: A re-examination. American Educational Research Journal, 33(2), 261—295.
15.
FeltovichP. J., CoulsonR. L., and SpiroR. J. (2001). Learners’ (mis)understanding of important and difficult concepts. In ForbesK.D., and FeltovichP.J. (Eds.), Smart machines in education: The coming revolution in educational technology AAAI (pp. 349—375). Menlo Park, CA: MIT Press.
16.
FlowersM. (2000, Summer). Unsettling science literacy. Liberal Education, 86(3), 36—45.
17.
GrahamP. A. (1995). Assimilation, adjustment and access: An antiquarian view of American education. In RavitchD., and VinovskisM.A. (Eds.), Learning from the past (pp. 3—24). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
18.
Hart-Rudman Report. (2001). The Phase III Report of the U.S. Commission on National Security/21st Century. Retrieved August 25, 2004, from http://www.rense.com/general10/roadmap.htm
19.
Harvard Committee. (1945). General education in a free society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
20.
HollandB. A. (2001). Toward a definition and characterization of the engaged campus: Six cases. Metropolitan Universities, 12(3), 20—29.
21.
HollandB. A., and RamaleyJ. A. (1998). What partnership models work to link education and community building? Proceedings of the Joint Forum of U.S. Department of Education and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
22.
HoltonG. (2003, April 25). An insider's view of “A Nation at Risk” and why it still matters. The Chronicle of Higher Education, pp. B13—15.
23.
LatourB. (2004). Politics of nature: How to bring the sciences into democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24.
LeeS., and RothW. (2003). Science and the “good citizen”: Community-based scientific literacy. Science, Technology and Human Values, 28(3), 403—424.
25.
LevittN. (1999). Prometheus bedeviled: Science and the contradictions of contemporary culture. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
26.
LevyF., and MurnaneR. J. (2004). The new division of labor: How computers are creating the next job market. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
27.
LinN. K., CookK., and BurtR. J. (2001). Social Capital: Theory and research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
28.
LovelessT. (2001). The great curriculum debate: How should we teach reading and math. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution Press.
29.
MoschkovichJ. N. (1996). Moving up and getting steeper: Negotiating shared descriptions of linear graphs. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 5(3), 239—277.
30.
MurnaneR. J., and LevyF. (1996). Teaching the new basic skills: Principles for educating children to thrive in a changing economy. New York: The Free Press.
31.
NorrisS. P., and PhillipsL. M. (2002). How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy. Science Education, 87(2), 224—241.
32.
NovakJ. (1998). The pursuit of a dream: Education can be improved. Teaching science for understanding: A human constructivist view. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
33.
NussbaumM. (2004, Winter). Liberal education and global community. Liberal Education, 90(1), 42—47.
34.
Plessy v. Ferguson. 163 U.S. 537 (1896).
35.
RamaleyJ. A. (2002). Meeting the needs of the market. Universities Project Final Report, Salzburg, Austria: Salzburg Seminar.
36.
RavitchD. (2000). Left back: A century of battles over school reform. New York: Simon and Schuster.
37.
RestivoS. (1988). Modern science as a social problem. Social Problems, 35, 206—225.
38.
RiceR. E. (2003, Fall). Rethinking scholarship and engagement: The struggle for new meanings. Campus Compact Reader, 1—9.
39.
RichR. F. (2002). Social science information and public policy making. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
40.
RothW., and DesautelsJ. (2004). Educating for citizenship: Reappraising the role of science education. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology, 4(2), 149—169.
41.
ShamosM. H. (1995). The myth of scientific literacy. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
42.
TyackD., and CubanL. (1995). Tinkering toward utopia: A century of public school reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
43.
VygotskyL. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
44.
ZinserE. (2004, Winter). Making the case for liberal education. Change, 90(1), 38—41.