This article reports on an evaluation of a virtual schooling innovation in an Australian context. The Virtual Schooling Service Pilot uses online technologies to deliver senior school subjects in both synchronous and asynchronous modes of delivery. The purpose of the study was to analyze the organizational, pedagogical, and technological efficacy of the innovation for the purpose of exploring the feasibility of main-streaming virtual delivery for secondary schooling. Although the Virtual Schooling Service was important in maintaining curricular provision, application of the Productive Pedagogies framework showed that the innovation held pedagogical potential that remained unrealized.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BarkerK. (2000). E-learning: Studying Canada's virtual secondary schools. Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada: Society for the Advancement of Excellence in Education. Retrieved September 4, 2002, from http://www.saee.ca/vschoolsum.html
2.
BelangerF., and JordanD. H. (2000). Evaluation and implementation of distance learning: Technologies, took and techniques. Hershey, PA: Idea Group.
3.
BolterJ. D., and GrusinR. (2000). Remediation: Understanding new media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
ChuteA. G., ThompsonM. M., and HancockB. W. (1999). The McGraw-Hill handbook of distance learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.
6.
ColeR. A. (Ed.). (2000). Issues in Web-based pedagogy: A critical primer. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
7.
Education Queensland. (1999). Towards a networked learning community: Executive summary of Education Queensland's direction in learning technologies. Brisbane, Australia: Office of Strategic Planning & Portfolio Services.
8.
Education Queensland. (2000). Queensland State Education–2010. Brisbane, Australia: Office of Strategic Planning & Portfolio Services.
9.
HusmannD., and MillerM. (2001). Improving distance education: Perceptions of program administrators. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 4(1) [On-line]. Retrieved September 5, 2002, from http://www.westga.edu/∼distance/ojdla/spring41/husmann41.html
10.
JonassenD., DavidsonM., CollinsM., CampbellJ., and HaagB. B. (1995). Constructivism and computer-mediated communication in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 9(2), 7—26.
11.
JonassenD., PeckK., and WilsonB. (1999). Learning with technology: A constructivist perspective. Columbus, OH: Merril.
12.
LingardR., LadwigJ., MillsM., AilwoodJ., GoreJ., HayesD., and LukeA. (2001). The Queensland School Reform Longitudinal Study supplementary material. Brisbane, Australia: Education Queensland.
13.
LockwoodF., and GooleyA. (Eds.). (2000). Innovation in open and distance learning: Successful development of online and Web-based learning. London: Kogan Page.
14.
LundinR., ElliottB., and RichardsonA. (2000). The Queensland Virtual Schooling Service: An evaluation of the pilot project, January–June 2000. Brisbane, Australia: Department of Education.
15.
MorphewV. N. (2000). Web-based learning and instruction: A constructivist approach. In and and LauL.K. (Ed.), Distance learning technologies: Issues, trends and opportunities (pp. 1—15). Hershey, PA: Idea Group.
16.
NewmannF. M.. (1996). Authentic achievement: Restructuring schools for intellectual quality. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
17.
NewmannF. M., and WehlageG. G. (1995). Successful school restructuring: A report to the public and educators. Madison: University of Wisconsin, Wisconsin Center for Education Research, Center on Organization and Restructuring of Schools.
18.
NguyenD., and KiraD. S. (2000). Summative and formative evaluations of Internet-based teaching. In and and LauL.K. (Ed.), Distance learning technologies: Issues, trends and opportunities (pp. 22—38). Hershey, PA: Idea Group.
19.
OblingerD. G., BaroneC. A., and HawkinsB. L. (2001). Distributed education and its challenges: An overview. Washington, DC: American Council on Education, Center for Policy Analysis.
20.
PalloffR., and PrattK. (2001). Lessons from the cyberspace classroom: The realities of online teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
21.
PendergastD., KapitzkeC., LandR., BahrM., and LukeA. (2002). Virtual Schooling Service Pilot: Two year review. Brisbane, Australia: Education Queensland.
22.
PiccianoA. G. (2001). Distance learning: Making connections across virtual space and time. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
23.
RockwellK., FurgasonJ., and MarxD. B. (2000). Research and evaluation needs for distance education: A Delphi study. Online Journal of Distance Education Administration, 3(3) [On-line]. Retrieved September 6, 2002, from http://www.westga.edu/∼distance/ojdla/fall33/rock-well33.html
24.
TaitA., and MillsR. (1999). The convergence of distance and conventional education: Patterns of flexibility for the individual learner. In TaitA., and MillsR. (Eds.), The convergence of distance and conventional education: Patterns of flexibility for the individual learner (pp. 1—4). London: Routledge.
25.
Van DusenG. C. (2000). Digital dilemma: Issues of access, cost, and quality in media-enhanced and distance education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
