This article examines the politics of educational transfer in a rural Alaskan school district with schools in two Alaska Native villages and one non-Native community. The author examines why and how the district imported standards-based education. While the district presented its reform as a rational, consensus-driven policy process, this conventional version of the reform was disrupted by the superintendent's utilization of political strategies that promoted his personal agenda.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdamsD. W. (1988). Fundamental considerations: The deep meaning of Native American schooling, 1880–1900. Harvard Educational Review, 58(1), 1—28.
2.
AdamsD. W. (1995). Education for extinction: American Indians and the boarding school experience, 1875–1928. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
Alaska Department of Education and Early Development. (2002). Education reform: History of Alaska school reform 1991–2002. Retrieved March 5, 2002, from http://www.eed.state.ak.us/pubnstats.html
6.
AndersonJ. D. (1988). The education of black in the South: 1860–1935. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
7.
Baldrige National Quality Program. (2001). Education criteria for performance excellence. Gaithersburg, MD: Author.
8.
BallS. J. (1994). Education reform: A critical and post-structural approach. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
9.
BogdanR. C., and BiklenS. K. (1998). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods (3rd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
10.
BrehonyK. J. (2001). Using and abusing the past: The use of history in the performance related pay debate. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED452600)
11.
The Business Roundtable. (2003). Essential components of a successful education system. Retrieved March 1, 2003, from http://www.brtable.org.document.cfm/467
12.
CarnoyM., and RhotenD. (2002). What does globalization mean for educational change?A comparative approach. Comparative Education Review, 46(1), 1—9.
13.
CreswellJ. W. (2002). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill and Prentice Hall.
14.
CubanL. (1998). How schools change reforms: Redefining reform success and failure. Teachers College Record, 99(3), 453—477.
15.
DaleR., and RobertsonS. L. (2002). The varying effects of regional organizations as subjects of globalization of education. Comparative Education Review, 46(1), 10—36.
16.
DarnellF., and HoemA. (1996). Taken to extremes: Education in the far north. Oslo, Norway: Scandinavian University Press.
17.
DesimoneL. (2002). How can comprehensive school reform models be successfully implemented?Review of Educational Research, 72(3), 433—479.
18.
ElmoreR. F., AbelmannC. H., and FuhrmanS. H. (1996). The new accountability in state educational reform: From process to performance. In and and LaddH.F. (Ed.), Holding schools accountable: Performance-based reform in education (pp. 65—98). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
19.
FoucaultM. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (A. Sheridan, Trans.). New York: Vintage Books. (Original work published 1975)
20.
FullanM. G., and MilesM. B. (1992). Getting reform right: What works and what doesn't. Phi Delta Kappan, 73(10), 745—752.
21.
GubriumJ. F., and HolsteinJ. A. (2000). Analyzing interpretive practices. In DenzinN.K., and LincolnY.S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 487—508). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22.
HalpinD., and TroynaB. (1995). The politics of educational borrowing. Comparative Education, 31(3), 303—310.
23.
Hickling-HusdonA., and AhlquistR. (2003). Contesting the curriculum in the schooling of indigenous children in Australia and the United States: From Eurocentrism to culturally powerful pedagogies. Comparative Education Review, 47(1), 64—89.
24.
HoltM. (2001). Performance pay for teachers: The standards movement's last stand?Phi Delta Kappan, 83(4), 312—317.
25.
JesterT. E. (2002). Healing the “unhealthy native”: Encounters with standards-based education in rural Alaska. Journal of American Indian Education, 41(3), 1—21.
26.
JoyceB., and WeilM. (1996). Models of teaching (5th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
27.
KawagleyO. A. (1995). A Yupiaq worldview: A pathway to ecology and spirit. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
28.
KliebardH. M. (1995). The struggle for the American curriculum: 1893–1958 (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
29.
MotamediV., and SumrallW. J. (2000). Mastery learning and contemporary issues in education. Action in Teacher Education, 22(1), 32—42.
30.
National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. A report to the nation and the Secretary of Education, United States Department of Education. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
31.
PavelM., CurtinT., and WhitenerS. (1998). Characteristics of American Indian and Alaska Native education: Results from the 1990–91 and 1993–94 schools and staffing surveys. Equity & Excellence in Education, 31(1), 48—54.
32.
PhillipsD. (1993). Borrowing educational policy. In FinegoldD., McFarlandL., and RichardsonW. (Eds.), Something borrowed, something learned: The Transatlantic market in education and training reform (pp. 13—19). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
33.
PhillipsD. (2000). Learning from elsewhere in education: Some perennial problems revisited with references to British interests in Germany. Comparative Education, 36(2), 297—307.
34.
PopkewitzT. S. (2000). Globalization/regionalization, knowledge, and educational practices: Some notes on comparative strategies for educational research. In and and PopkewitzT.S. (Ed.), Educational knowledge: Changing relationships between the state, civil society, and the educational community (pp. 3—27). Albany: State University of New York Press.
35.
PopkewitzT. S., TabachnickB. R., and WehlageG. (1982). The myth of educational reform: A study of school responses to a program of change. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
RobertsonD. B., and WaltmanJ. L. (1993). The politics of policy borrowing. In FinegoldD., McFarlandL., and RichardsonW. (Eds.), Something borrowed, something learned? The Transatlantic market in education and training reform (pp. 21—44). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
38.
SchriewerJ. (1990). Theories and methods in comparative education (2nd ed.). New York: Lang.
39.
SchriewerJ. (2000). World system and interrelationship networks: The internationalization of education and the role of comparative inquiry. In and and PopkewitzT.S. (Ed.), Educational knowledge: Changing relationship between the state, civil society, and the educational community (pp. 305—343). Albany: State University of New York Press.
40.
SmithM. L., HeineckeW., and NobleA. J. (1999). Assessment policy and political spectacle. Teachers College Record, 101(2), 157—191.
41.
SpillaneJ. P. (2002). Local theories of teacher change: The pedagogy of district policies and programs. Teachers College Record, 104(3), 377—420.
42.
StakeR. E. (2000). Case studies. In DenzinN.K., and LincolnY.S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 435—454). Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage.
43.
Steiner-KhamsiG. (2000). Transferring education, displacing reform. In and and SchriewerJ. (Ed.), Discourse formation in comparative education (pp. 155—187). New York: Lang.
44.
Steiner-KhamsiG., and QuistH. O. (2000). The politics of educational borrowing: Reopening the case of Achimota in British Ghana. Comparative Education Review, 44(3), 272—299.
45.
[Tikishla School District] [pseudonym] (2001). [Tikishla School District]: Performance pay 2001. [Tikishla School District], AK: Author.
46.
TyackD., and CubanL. (1995). Tinkering toward Utopia: A century of public school reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
47.
WelmondM. (2002). Globalization viewed from the periphery: The dynamics of teacher identity in the Republic of Benin. Comparative Education Review, 46(1), 37—65.
48.
WiseA. (1977). Why educational policies often fail: The hyperrationalization hypothesis. Curriculum Studies, 9(1), 43—57.
