Using five different data sets, this study explores the bidirectional relationship between standardized tests and various indicators of success. Examining student success on a variety of indicators such as cumulative grade point average and graduation rates, the study demonstrates the limited usefulness of such tests, particularly when the data are disaggregated by gender or race and ethnicity. Overall, if tests are overemphasized in the admissions context, they can contribute to a significant loss of talent.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BeattyA., GreenwoodM. R. C., and LinnR. L. (Eds.). (1999). Myths and tradeoffs. The role of tests in undergraduate admissions. Washington, DC: National Research Council.
2.
BowenW. G., and BokD. (1998). The shape of the river: Long term consequences of considering race in college and university admissions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
3.
CarverM. R., and KingT. E. (1994). An empirical investigation of the MBA admission criteria for nontraditional programs. Journal of Education for Business, 70(2), 95—98.
4.
Common sense about SAT score differentials & test validity. (1997, June). Research Notes, RN-01.
5.
CrouseJ., and TrusheimD. (1998). The case against the SAT. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
6.
DaltonS. (1976). A decline in the predictive validity of the SAT and high school achievement. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 36, 445—448.
7.
DuranR. P. (1986). Prediction of Hispanics’ college achievement. In and and OlivasM. (Ed.), Latino college students (pp. 221—245). New York: Teachers College Press.
8.
FlemingJ., and ManningC. (1998). Correlates of the SAT in minority engineering students: An exploratory study. Journal of Higher Education, 69(1), 91—108.
9.
GoldbergE. L., and AlligerG. M. (1992). Assessing the validity of the GRE for students in psychology: A validity generalization approach. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 1019—1027.
10.
GoughH. G., and HallW. B. (1975). The prediction of academic and clinical performance in medical school. Research in Higher Education, 3, 301—314.
11.
GuinierL., FineM., and BalinJ. (1997). Becoming gentlemen: Women, law and institutional change. Boston: Beacon Press.
12.
HathawayJ. G. (1984). The mythical meritocracy of law school admissions. Journal of Legal Education, 34, 86—96.
13.
HouseJ. D. (1989). Age bias in prediction of graduate grade point average from Graduate Record Examination scores. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 49, 663—666.
14.
HurtadoS., MilemJ. F., Clayton-PedersonA. R., and AllenW. R. (2000). Enacting diverse learning environments: Improving the climate for racial/ethnic diversity in higher education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
15.
KlitgaardR. (1985). Academic performance and later life contributors. In and and KlitgaardR. (Ed.), Choosing elites (pp. 116—131). New York: Basic Books.
16.
LowmanR. P., and SpuckD. W. (1975). Predictors of college success for the disadvantaged Mexican-American. Journal of College Student Personnel, 16(1), 40—48.
17.
ManganK. S. (2002). Law-school council considers plan to de-emphasize test scores and rankings that use them. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://chonicle.com/daily/2002/12/2002121901n.htm
18.
MarguliesJ. (2002). Lead plaintiff against Michigan still hopes for a spot at its law school. Chronicle of Higher Education, 49(16), A23.
19.
MoffattG. K. (1993, February). The validity of the SAT as a predictor of grade point average for nontraditional college students. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Easter Educational Research Association, Clearwater Beach, FL. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 356252)
20.
MorrisonT., and MorrisonM. (1995). A meta-analytic assessment of the predictive validity of the quantitative and verbal components of the Graduate Record Examination with graduate grade point average representing the criterion of graduate success. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55(2), 309—317.
21.
OlivasM. (1999). Higher education admissions and the search for one important thing. University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review, 12, 993—1024.
22.
RosserP. (1992). Sex bias in college admissions tests: Why women lose out (14th ed.) Cambridge, MA: National Center for Fair and Open Testing.
23.
SchraderW. B. (1978). Admissions test scores as predictors of career achievement in psychology. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 241563).
24.
SchwanE. S. (1988). MBA admissions criteria: An empirical investigation and validation study. Journal of Education for Business, 63, 158—162.
25.
SedlacekW. (1998). Admissions in higher education: Measuring cognitive and noncognitive variables. In WildsD., and WilsonR. (Eds.), Minorities in higher education (pp. 47—71). Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
26.
SobolM. G. (1984). GPA, GMAT, and scale: A method for quantification of admissions criteria. Research in Higher Education, 20(1), 77—88.
27.
SmithL. D., BestL. A., StubbsD. A., ArchibaldA. B., and Roberson-NayR. (2002). Constructing knowledge: The role of graphs and tables in hard and soft psychology. American Psychologist, 57(10), 749—761.
28.
SteeleC. M., and AronsonJ. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 797—811.
29.
SternbergR. J., and GrigorenkoE. L. (2002). Dynamic testing: The nature and measurement of learning potential. New York: Cambridge University Press.
30.
SternbergR. J., and WilliamsW. M. (1997). Does the Graduate Record Examination predict meaningful success in the graduate training of psychologists?American Psychologist, 52(6), 630—641.
31.
SwintonS. S. (1987). The predictive validity of the restructured GRE with particular attention to older students. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
32.
ThackerA. J., and WilliamsR. E. (1974). The relationship of the Graduate Record Examination to grade point average and success in graduate school. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 34, 939—944.
33.
WainerH., and SteinbergL. (1992). Sex differences in performance on the mathematics section of the Scholastic Aptitude Test: A biredectional validity study. Harvard Educational Rreview, 62, 323—336.
34.
WallachM. A. (1976). Tests tell us little about talent. American Scientist, 64, 57—63.
35.
WightmanL. (2000). Standardized testing and equal access: A tutorial. In ChangM., WittD., JonesJ., and HakutaK. (Eds.), Compelling interest: Examining the evidence on racial dynamics in higher education (pp. 84—125). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
36.
YoungJ. W. (1994). Differential prediction of college grades by gender and by ethnicity: A replications study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54(4), 1022—1029.
