The Risks of Coherence 1

Beach K. (1999). Consequential transitions: A sociocultural expedition. In A. Iran-Nejad & P.D. Pearson (Eds.), Review of Research in Education, 24, 101–140. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

Beach K. (2003). Learning in complex social situations meets information processing and mental representation: Some consequences for educational assessment. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 1(2), 149–153.

Bourdieu P. (1988). Homo academicus. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

Bourdieu P. (1991). The peculiar history of scientific reason. Sociological Forum, 6(1), 3–26.

Burch P. , & Spillane J.P. (2003). Elementary school leadership strategies and subject matter: The case of mathematics and literacy instruction. Elementary School Journal, 103(5), 519–536.

Bryk A.S. , & Hermanson K.M. (1993). Educational indicator systems: Observations on their structure, interpretation, and use. In Review of Research in Education, 19, 451–484.

Chaiklin S. , & Lave J. (Eds.). (1993). Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Calhoun C. (1995). Critical social theory. Oxford: Blackwell.

Cole M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, Belknap Press.

Darling-Hammond L. (2001). The right to learn: A blueprint for creating schools that work. Somerset, NJ: Jossey-Bass.

Darling-Hammond L. (1994). Performance-based assessment and educational equity. Harvard Educational Review, 64(1), 5–30.

Darling-Hammond L. , Ancess J. , & Falk B. (1995). Authentic assessment in action: Studies of schools and students that work. New York: Teachers College Press.

Gee J.P. (1999). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. London: Rout-ledge.

Gee J.P. (2003a). Practice, participation, and tools: An alternative starting point. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 1(2), e12–e15. Available: http://bear.soe.berkeley.edu/measurement/pubs/toc12.html

Gee J.P. (2003b). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Gee J.P. , Hull G. , & Lankshear C. (1996). The new work order: Behind the language of the new capitalism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

Greeno J. , & Haertel E.H. (2003). A situative perspective: Broadening the foundations of assessment. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 1(2), 154–161.

Hoy D.C. , & McCarthy T. (1994). Critical theory. Oxford: Blackwell.

Linn R.L. (2003). Accountability: Responsibility and reasonable expectations. Educational Researcher, 32(7), 3–13.

Linn R.L. , Baker E.L. , & Betebenner D.W. (2002). Implications of requirements of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Educational Researcher, 31(6), 3–16.

McCarthy T. (1994). Philosophy and critical theory: A reprise. In Hoy D. C. , & McCarthy T. , Critical theory (pp. 5–100). Oxford: Blackwell.

McClaughlin M.W. , & Shepard L.A. (1995). Improving education through standards based reform: A report of the National Academy of Education panel on standards-based education reform. Stanford: National Academy of Education.

Mehan H. (1993). Beneath the skin and between the ears: A case study in the politics of representation. In Chaiklin S. , & Lave J. (Eds.), Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context (pp. 241–268). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mehan H. (1998). The study of social interaction in educational settings: Accomplishments and unresolved issues. Human Development, 41, 245–269.

Meier D. (1995). The power of their ideas: Lessons for America from a small school in Harlem. Boston: Beacon.

Moss P.A. (in press). Rethinking validity for classroom assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2(4).

Moss P.A. , & Schutz A.M. (2001). Educational standards, assessment, and the search for consensus. American Educational Research Journal, 38(1), 37–70.

Moss P.A. , Pullin D.P. , Gee J.P. , & Haertel E.H. (2002). The idea of testing: Expanding the foundations of educational measurement. Unpublished manuscript.

National Research Council (NRC). (2000). Reporting district-level NAEP: Summary of a workshop. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Pellegrino J.W. , Chudowsky N. , & Glaser R. (Eds.). (2001). Knowing what students know. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Popper K.R. (1944/1985). Piecemeal social engineering. In Miller D. (Ed.), Popper selections (p. 304–318). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Porter T.M. (1995). Trust in numbers: The pursuit of objectivity in science and public life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Porter T.M. (2003). Measurement, objectivity, and trust. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 1(4), 241–255.

Rogoff B. , Turkanis C.G. , & Burtlett L. (2001). Learning together: Children and adults in a school community. New York: Oxford.

Scott J.C. (1998). Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Shepard L.A. (2003). Commentary: Intermediate steps to knowing what students know. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 1(2), 171–177.

Spencer Foundation (2003). Annual report: April 1, 2002-March 31, 2003. Chicago: Author. Available: http://www.spencer.org/publications/index.htm

Spillane J. , Diamond J.B. , & Jita L. (in press). Leading instruction: The distribution of leadership for instruction. Journal of Curriculum Studies.

Warnke G. (1994). Justice and interpretation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Wenger E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wertsch J.V. , Del Rio P. , & Alverez A. (1995). Sociocultural studies: History, action, and mediation. In Wertsch J.V. , Del Rio P. , & Alverez A. (Eds.), Sociocultural studies of mind (pp. 1–36). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wilson M. (1994). Community of judgment: A teacher-centered approach to educational accountability. In Office of Technology Assessment (Ed.), Issues in educational accountability. Washington, DC: U.S. Congress Office of Technology Assessment.