American Educational Research Association (AERA), American Psychological Association (APA), & National Council for Measurement in Education (NCME). (1999). Standards for psychological and educational testing.Washington, DC: Authors.
2.
BiggsJ., & CollisK. (1982). Evaluating the quality of learning: The SOLO taxonomy.New York: Academic Press.
3.
Department of Employment, Education, and Youth Affairs (DEETYA). (1997). National school English literacy survey.Canberra, Australia: Author.
4.
EngelhardG., & WilsonM. (Eds.). (1996). Objective measurement III: Theory into practice.Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
5.
LandR. (1997). Moving up to complex assessment systems. Evaluation Comment, 7(1), 1–21.
6.
MastersG.N., AdamsR.A., & WilsonM. (1990). Charting student progress. In HusenT., & PostlethwaiteT.N. (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education: Research and studies (Supplementary Volume 2, pp. 628–634). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
7.
MinstrellJ. (1998, October). Student thinking and related instruction: Creating a facet-based learning environment. Paper presented at the meeting of the Committee on Foundations of Assessment, Woods Hole, MA.
8.
PellegrinoJ., ChudowskyN., & GlaserR. (Eds.). (2001). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment.Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
9.
ResnickL.B., & ResnickD.P. (1992). Assessing the thinking curriculum: New tools for educational reform. In GiffordB. R., & O'ConnorM.C. (Eds.), Changing assessments (pp. 37–76). Boston: Kluwer Academic.
10.
Science Education for Public Understanding Program (SEPUP). (1995). Issues, evidence and you: Teacher's guide.Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley, Lawrence Hall of Science [Distributed by Sargent-Welch Inc.].
11.
TuckerM. (1991). Why assessment is now issue number one. In KulmG., & MalcomS. (Eds.), Science assessment in the service of reform (pp. 3–16). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
12.
WilsonM. (1990). Measurement of developmental levels. In HusenT., & PostlethwaiteT.N. (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education: Research and studies (Supplementary Volume 2, pp. 152–158). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
13.
WilsonM. (Ed.). (1992). Objective measurement: Theory into practice.Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
14.
WilsonM. (Ed.). (1994a). Objective measurement II: Theory into practice.Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
15.
WilsonM. (1994b). Community of judgment: A teacher-centered approach to educational accountability. In Office of Technology Assessment (Ed.), Issues in educational accountability.Washington, DC: Office of Technology Assessment, United States Congress.
16.
WilsonM., & AdamsR.J. (1996). Evaluating progress with alternative assessments: A model for Title 1. In KaneM.B. (Ed.), Implementing performance assessment: Promise, problems and challenges.Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
17.
WilsonM., & EngelhardG. (2000). Objective measurement V: Theory into practice.Stanford, CT: Ablex.
18.
WilsonM., EngelhardG., & DraneyK. (Eds.). (1997). Objective measurement IV: Theory into practice.Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
19.
WilsonM., & ScaliseK. (2003). Reporting progress to parents and others: Beyond grades. In AtkinJ. M., & CoffeyJ.E. (Eds.), Everyday assessment in the science classroom (pp. 89–108). Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association Press.
20.
WilsonM., & SloaneK. (2000). From principles to practice: An embedded assessment system. Applied Measurement in Education, 13(2), 181–208.
21.
WilsonM., & WangW. (1995). Complex composites: Issues that arise in combining different modes of assessment. Applied Psychological Measurement, 19(1), 51–72.
22.
WolfD., BixbyJ., GlennJ.III, & GardnerH. (1991). To use their minds well: Investigating new forms of student assessment. Review of Research in Education, 17, 31–74.