BaronJ., ForgioneP., RindoneD., KruglanskiH., & DaveyB. (1989). Toward a new generation of student outcome measures: Connecticut's Common Core of Learning Assessment. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
5.
BellA., BurkhardtH., & SwanM. (1991). Balanced assessment and the mathematics curriculum.Nottingham, UK: Shell Centre for Mathematical Education.
6.
BrennanR. (Ed.). (in press). Educational measurement (4th ed.). Washington, DC: National Council on Measurement in Education and Greenwood Publishing Group.
7.
BrykA.S., & RaudenbushS.W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
8.
ClarkeE. (1987). Assessment in Queensland schools: Two decades of change, 1964–1983.Brisbane, Australia: Department of Education.
9.
Department of Education and Science. (1987a). Education reform: The government's proposals for schools.London: HMSO.
10.
Department of Education and Science. (1987b). National curriculum task group on assessment and testing: A report.London: HMSO.
11.
FrechtlingJ.A. (1989). Administrative uses of school testing programs. In LinnR. (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., 475–484). New York: Macmillan.
12.
LindquistE.F. (1951). Preliminary considerations in objective test construction. In LindquistE.F. (Ed.), Educational measurement (pp. 119–184). Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
13.
McGawB. (1977). The use of rescaled teacher assessments in the admission of students to tertiary study. Australian Journal of Education, 21, 209–225.
14.
National Committee on Science Education Standards and Assessments. (1993). National Science Education Standards: An enhanced sampler.Washington, DC: National Research Council.
15.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics.Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
16.
NitkoA.J. (1989). Designing tests that are integrated with instruction. In LinnR. (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 447–474). New York: Macmillan.
17.
PellegrinoJ., ChudowskyN., & GlaserR. (Eds.). (2001). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment.National Research Council Committee on the Foundations of Assessment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
18.
ResnickL.B., & ResnickD.P. (1992). Assessing the thinking curriculum: New tools for educational reform. In GiffordB. R., & O'ConnorM.C. (Eds.), Changing assessments: Alternative views of aptitude, achievement, and instruction (pp. 37–75). Boston: Kluwer.
19.
ShepardL.A. (in press). Classroom assessment. In BrennanR. (Ed.), Educational measurement (4th ed.). Washington, DC: National Council on Measurement in Education and Greenwood Publishing Group.
20.
SmithG.A. (1978). JMB experience of the moderation of internal assessments.Manchester, UK: Joint Matriculation Board, Universities of Manchester, Leeds, Sheffield and Birmingham.
21.
StephensM. (1992). Comprehensive assessment at senior secondary level in Victoria. In StephensM., and IzardJ. (Eds.), Reshaping assessment practices: Assessment in the mathematical sciences under challenge (pp. 257–271). Hawthorn, Australia: ACER.
22.
VivianiN. (1990). The review of tertiary entrance in Queensland.Brisbane, Australia: Ministry of Education.
23.
West Australian Ministry of Education. (1992). First Steps.Perth, Western Australia: Ministry of Education.
24.
WigginsG. (1989). A true test: Toward more authentic and equitable assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 70, 703–713.
25.
WilsonM. (1994). Community of judgment: A teacher-centered approach to educational accountability. In Office of Technology Assessment (Ed.), Issues in Educational Accountability.Washington, DC: Office of Technology Assessment, United States Congress.
26.
WilsonM., & DraneyK. (2004). Some links between large-scale and classroom assessments: The case of the BEAR Assessment System. In this volume— WilsonM. (Ed.), Towards coherence between classroom assessment and accountability. The 103rd yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II. Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
27.
WilsonM., & ScaliseK. (2003). Reporting progress to parents and others: Beyond grades. In AtkinJ. M., & CoffeyJ.E. (Eds.), Everyday assessment in the science classroom (pp. 89–108). Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
28.
WilsonM., & SloaneK. (2000). From principles to practice: An embedded assessment system. Applied Measurement in Education, 13(2), 181–208.