AACTE (American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education). (2002, December). Report calls for rigorous evidence, randomized trials in education. AACTE Briefs, 23(17), 1, 7.
AACTE (American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education). (2003b, May). President's comments. AACTE Briefs, 24(6), 2, 3.
4.
AndersP., HoffmanJ., & DuffyG. (2000). Teaching teachers to teach reading: Paradigm shifts, persistent problems, and challenges. In KamilM., MosenthalP., PearsonP.D., & BarrR. (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 719–742). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
5.
BainR.B. (2001). Characterizing and developing subject matter and pedagogical reasoning in history methods class. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA.
6.
BallD.L. (1993). With an eye on the mathematical horizon: Dilemmas of teaching elementary school mathematics. Elementary School Journal, 93(4), 373–397.
7.
BallD.L. (1995). Transforming pedagogy—Classrooms as mathematical communities: A response to Lensmire and Pryor. Harvard Educational Review, 65(4), 670–677.
8.
BallD.L., & BassH. (2000). Interweaving content and pedagogy in teaching and learning to teach: Knowing and using mathematics. In Multiple perspectives on the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 83–104). Westport, CT: Ablex.
9.
BallengerC. (1999). Teaching other people's children: Literacy and learning in a bilingual classroom.New York: Teachers College Press.
10.
BellamyC. (2002). Teacher resigns in plagiarism case. Associated Press Online. Retrieved November 19, 2003, from LexisNexis database.
11.
BolinF. (1990). Helping student teachers think about teaching: Another look at Lou. Journal of Teacher Education, 41(1), 10–19.
12.
BraceyG.W., & MolnarA. (2003). Recruiting, preparing and retaining high quality teachers: An empirical synthesis.Tempe, AZ: Educational Policy Studies Laboratory, College of Education, Arizona State University. Retrieved December 15, 2003, from http://edpolicylab.org
13.
BritzmanD. (1991). Practice makes practice: A critical study of learning to teach.Albany: SUNY Press.
14.
BrophyJ. (1976). Reflections on research in elementary schools. Journal of Teacher Education, 27, 31–34.
15.
BroudyH.S. (1977). Types of knowledge and purposes of education. In AndersonR.C., SpiroR.J., & MontagueW.E. (Eds.), Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge (pp. 1–17). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
16.
BrunerJ. (1960/1977). The process of education.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
17.
Cochran-SmithM., & FriesM.K. (2001). Sticks, stones, and ideology: The discourse of reform in teacher education. Educational Researcher, 30(8), 3–15.
18.
CohenD.K. (1988). Teaching practice: Plus ça change (Issue Paper 88–3) East Lansing: Michigan State University, National Center for Research on Teacher Education.
19.
CohenD.K., & GarrettM. (1975). Reforming educational policy with applied social research. Harvard Educational Review, 45(1), 17–43.
20.
CubberleyE.P. (1906). The certification of teachers: A consideration of present conditions with suggestions to future improvement. In HolmesM.J. (Ed.), The 5th yearbook of the National Society for the Scientific Study of Education, Part II (pp. 47–88). Bloomington, IL: Public School Publishing Company.
21.
Darling-HammondL. (Ed.). (2000). Studies of excellence in teacher education.New York: American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education.
22.
Darling-HammondL. (2001). Standard setting in teaching: Changes in licensing, certification, and assessment. In Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 751–776). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
23.
Darling-HammondL., BerryB., & ThoresonA. (2001). Does teacher certification matter? Evaluating the evidence. Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(1), 57–77.
24.
Darling-HammondL., & SykesG. (2003, September 17). Wanted: A national teacher supply policy for education: The right way to meet the “highly qualified teacher” challenge. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 11(33). Retrieved September 16, 2003, from http://epaa.asu.edu.epaa/v11n33
25.
Darling-HammondL., & YoungsP. (2002). Defining “highly qualified teachers”: What does “scientifically-based research” actually tell us?Educational Researcher, 31(9), 13–25.
26.
DavisB. (2002). Scaffolding prospective elementary teachers in critiquing and refining instructional materials for science. In PellP., StevensR., & SatwiczT. (Eds.), Proceedings of the fifth international conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS).Seattle, WA: Lawrence Erlbaum.
27.
DelpitL.D. (1988). The silenced dialogue: Power and pedagogy in educating other people's children. Harvard Educational Review, 58(3), 280–298.
28.
DelpitL.D. (1992). Acquisition of literate discourse: Bowing before the master?Theory Into Practice, 31(4), 296–302.
29.
DeweyJ. (1902/1956). The child and the curriculum.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
30.
DeweyJ. (1916/1966). Democracy and education.New York: Macmillan.
31.
DeweyJ. (1933/1989). How we think. In BoydstonJ.A. (Ed.), The later works, 1925–1953 (Vol. 8, pp. 105–352). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
32.
DeweyJ. (1938/1963). Experience and education.New York: Collier/Macmillan.
33.
DilworthM., & BrownC. (2001). Consider the difference: Teaching and learning in culturally rich schools. In RichardsonV. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 643–667). Washington: American Educational Research Association.
34.
DoyleW. (1992). Curriculum and pedagogy. In JacksonP. (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 486–516). New York: Macmillan.
EganK. (1999). Education's three old ideas, and a better idea. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 31(3), 257–267.
37.
FeatherstoneH. (2003, April). Preparing teachers of elementary math: Evangelism or education? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
38.
Feiman-NemserS. (2001). Preparation to practice: Designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching. Teachers College Record, 103(6), 1013–1055.
39.
Feiman-NemserS., & FeatherstoneH. (Eds.). (1992). Exploring teaching: Reinventing an introductory course.New York: Teachers College Press.
40.
Feiman-NemserS., McDiarmidG.W., MelnickS.L., & ParkerM. (1989). Changing beginning teachers’ conceptions: A description of an introductory teacher education course (Research Rep. No. 89–1) East Lansing: Michigan State University, National Center for Research on Teacher Education.
41.
FenstermacherG. (1979). A philosophical consideration of recent research on teacher effectiveness. In ShulmanL.S. (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 6, pp. 157–185). Itasca, IL: Peacock.
42.
FenstermacherG. (1990a). The place of alternative certification in the education of teachers. Peabody Journal of Education, 67(3), 155–182.
43.
FenstermacherG. (1990b). Some moral considerations on teaching as a profession. In GoodladJ.L., SoderR., & SirotnikK.A. (Eds.), The moral dimensions of teaching (pp. 130–151). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
44.
FenstermacherG. (2002). Reconsidering the teacher education reform debate: A commentary on Cochran-Smith and Fries. Educational Researcher, 31(6), 20–22.
45.
FenstermacherG., & RichardsonV. (in press). Determinations of quality in teaching. Teachers College Record.
46.
FishmanB., MarxR., BestS., & TalR. (2003). Linking teacher and student learning to improve professional development in systemic reform. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 643–658.
47.
FlodenR., & BuchmannM. (1993). Between routines and anarchy: Preparing teachers for uncertainty. In Detachment and concern: Conversations in the philosophy of teaching and teacher education (pp. 211–221). New York: Teachers College Press.
48.
Florio-RuaneS. (2002). More light: An argument for complexity in studies of teaching and teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education53(3), 205–215.
49.
GaretM., PorterA., DesimoneL., BirmanB., & YoonK. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915–945.
50.
GeeJ.P. (1989). (Tech. Rep. No. 2).Newton, MA: Literacy Institute, Educational Development Center.
51.
GoldhaberD.D., & BrewerD.J. (2000). Does teacher certification matter? High school teacher certification status and student achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 22(2), 129–146.
52.
GrossmanP. (2000). Thoughts on evaluation of partnerships grants program. [Memo to United States Department of Education.] Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
53.
GreenT. (1971). The activities of teaching.New York: McGraw Hill.
54.
HansenD.T. (2001). Teaching as a moral activity. In RichardsonV. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 826–857). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
55.
HampshireS. (2000). Justice is conflict.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
56.
HareD., & HeapJ.L. (2001). Effective teacher recruitment and retention strategies in the Midwest: Who is making use of them?Chicago: North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.
57.
HawkinsD. (1967/1974). I, thou, and it. In The informed vision: Essays on learning and human nature (pp. 48–62). New York: Agathon.
58.
HawleyW., & ValliL. (1999). The essentials of effective professional development. In Darling-HammondL., & SykesG. (Eds.) Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 127–150). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
59.
HollingsworthS., DybdahlM., & MinarikL.T. (1993). By chart and chance and passion: The importance of relational knowing in learning to teach. Curriculum Inquiry, 23(1), 5–35.
60.
HolmesM.J. (Ed.). (1906). The fifth yearbook of the National Society for the Scientific Study of Education.Bloomington, IL: Public School Publishing Company.
61.
HortonM. (with Kohl, J., & Kohl, H.). (1990). The long haul.New York: Doubleday.
62.
HoustonR. (Ed.). (1990). Handbook of research on teacher education.New York: Macmillan.
63.
HoweyK., ArendsR., GalluzzoG., YargerS., & ZimpherN. (1995). RATE VIII: Teaching teachers—relationships with the world of practice.Washington, DC: American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education.
64.
HoweyK., & ZimpherN. (1989). Profiles of preservice teacher education: Inquiry of the nature of programs.Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
65.
HumphreyD., AdelmanN., EschC., RiehlL., ShieldsP., & TiffanyJ. (2000). Preparing and supporting new teachers: A literature review.Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
66.
IngersollR.M. (2001). Teacher turnover and teacher shortages: An organizational analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 38(3), 499–534.
67.
JacksonP.W. (1986). The practice of teaching.New York: Teachers College Press.
68.
KantI. (1959). Foundations of the metaphysics of morals (L.W. Beck, Trans.). Indianapolis: Library of Liberal Arts (Bobbs-Merrill). (Original work published 1785.)
69.
KellerB. (2004). Alternative teacher licensing exam has setback in Pa. Education Week, 23(20), 10.
70.
KellerB., & GalleyM. (2002, June 19). Paige uses report as a rallying cry to fix teacher education. Education Week, p. 25.
71.
KorthagenF.A.J. (1988). The influence of learning orientations on the development of reflective teaching. In CalderheadJ. (Ed.), Teachers’ professional learning (pp. 35–50). Philadelphia: Falmer.
72.
LabareeD. (1998). The peculiar problems of preparing teachers: Old hurdles to the new professionalism. Paper presented at the Professional Actions and Cultures of Teaching, Hong Kong.
73.
Laczko-KerrI., & BerlinerD.C. (2002). The effectiveness of “Teach For America” and other under-certified teachers on student academic achievement: A case of harmful public policy. Educational Policy Analysis Archives. Retrieved October 11, 2003, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v10n37.html
74.
Ladson-BillingsG. (2000). Fighting for our lives: Preparing teachers to teach African-American students. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(3), 206–214.
75.
LampertM. (1985). How do teachers manage to teach?Harvard Educational Review, 55(2), 178–194.
76.
LampertM. (2001). Teaching problems and the problems of teaching.New Haven: Yale University Press.
77.
LampertM., & BallD. (1999). Investigating teaching: New pedagogies and new technologies for teacher education.New York: Teachers College Press.
78.
LeinhardtG. (2001). Instructional explanations: A commonplace for teaching and location for contrast. In RichardsonV. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 333–357). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
79.
LevinJ., & QuinnM. (2003). Missed opportunities: How we keep high-quality teachers out of urban classrooms.New York: New Teacher Project.
80.
LittleJ. (1992). The black box of professional community. In LiebermanA. (Ed.), The changing contexts of teaching. The Ninety-first yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part I (pp. 157–178). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
81.
LoughranJ.L., HamiltonM.L., LaBoskeyV.K., & RussellT.L. (Eds.). (in press). International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices.The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
82.
McDonaldJ.P. (1992). Teaching: Making sense of an uncertain craft.New York: Teachers College Press.
83.
McLaughlinM., & TalbertJ. (2001). Professional communities and the work of high school teaching.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
84.
MeierD. (2002). In schools we trust: Creating communities of learning in an era of testing and standardization.Boston: Beacon.
85.
MillensonM.L. (1997). Demanding medical excellence: Doctors and accountability in the information age.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
86.
MurrayF. (1996a). Beyond natural teaching: The case for professional education. In MurrayF. (Ed.), The teacher educators’ handbook: Building a knowledge base for the preparation of teachers (pp. 3–13). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
87.
MurrayF. (Ed.) (1996b). The teacher educators’ handbook: Building a knowledge base for the preparation of teachers.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
88.
MurrayF. (1999). Accreditation reform and the preparation of teachers for a new century.Paper presented at the Wingspread Conference: New Teachers for a New Century, Racine, Wisconsin.
89.
National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform.Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
90.
NCES (National Center for Education Statistics). (2003, May). Statistics in brief.Washington DC: U.S. Department of Education Institute of Education Sciences. (NCLB) No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107–110 (H.R.1), 115 Stat. 1425 (2002).
91.
NCRTL (National Center for Research on Teaching Learning). (2000). Available at http://ncrtl.msu.edu/
92.
NCTAF (National Commission on Teaching and America's Future). (1996). What matters most: Teaching for America's future.New York: Author.
93.
NoddingsN. (1992). The challenge to care in schools: An alternative approach to education.New York: Teachers College Press.
94.
NulandS.B. (2002). Whoops! [Review of the book Complications: A surgeon's notes on an imperfect science.]New York Review, 49(12), 10–13.
95.
OakeshottM. (1990). A place of learning. In FullerT. (Ed.), The voice of liberal learning: Michael Oakeshott on education (pp. 17–42). New Haven: Yale University Press.
96.
PaleyV. (1990). The boy who would be a helicopter.Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
97.
PendelburyS. (1990). Community, liberty and the practice of teaching. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 10, 263–279.
98.
PhillipsD. (Ed.). (2000). Constructivism in education. The Ninety-ninth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part I. Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
99.
PutnamR.T., & BorkoH. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning?Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4–15.
100.
RaymondM., FletcherS., & LuqueJ. (2002). Teach for America: An evaluation of teacher differences and student outcomes in Houston, Texas.Palo Alto, CA: Hoover Institute, Stanford University, Center for Research on Education Outcomes.
101.
RichardsonV. (in press). Preservice teachers’ beliefs. In RathsJ., & McAnenchA. (Eds.), Advances in teacher education (Vol. 6). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishers.
102.
RichardsonV. (2003). Constructivist pedagogy. Teachers College Record, 105(9), 1623–1640.
103.
RichardsonV., & AndersP. (in press). Professional preparation and development of teachers in literacy instruction for urban settings. In Literacy in urban settings.Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
104.
RichardsonV., & KileR.S. (1999). The use of videocases in teacher education. In LundbergM., LevinB., & HarringtonH. (Eds.), Who learns from cases and how? The research base for teaching with cases (pp. 121–136). New Jersey: Erlbaum.
105.
RothR.A. (1996). Standards for certification, licensing, and accreditation. In SikulaJ. (Ed.) Handbook of research on teacher education (2nd ed., pp. 242–278). New York: Macmillan.
106.
RooseveltD. (1998). “Unsuspected literatures”: Public school classrooms as laboratories for the creation of democratic culture. Theory into Practice, 37(4), 271–279.
107.
RooseveltD. (2003, April). “What gives you the right?”: Searching for intrinsic authority to teach as a task for beginning teachers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
108.
SchönD.A. (1988). Educating the reflective practitioner.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
109.
SchwabJ.J. (1978). Education and the structure of the disciplines. In WestburyI., & WilkofN.J. (Eds.), Science, curriculum, and liberal education (pp. 229–272). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
110.
ShulmanL. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
111.
ShulmanL. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.
112.
SikulaJ. (Ed.). (1996). Handbook of research on teacher education (2nd ed.). New York: Macmillan.
113.
SmithR. (1991). Where is the wisdom? The poverty of medical evidence. British Medical Journal, 303, 798–9.
114.
SockettH. (1993). The moral base for teacher professionalism.New York: Teachers College.
115.
StephensJ.M. (1967). The process of schooling: A psychological examination.Austin, TX: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
116.
TomA.R. (1984). Teaching as a moral craft.New York: Longman.
117.
U.S. Department of Education. (2002). Meeting the highly qualified teachers challenge: The Secretary's annual report on teacher quality.Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Postsecondary Education, Office of Policy, Planning, and Innovation.
118.
U.S. Department of Education. (2003). Meeting the highly qualified teachers challenge: The Secretary's second annual report on teacher quality.Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Postsecondary Education, Office of Policy, Planning and Innovation.
119.
Van ManenM. (1991). The tact of teaching: The meaning of pedagogical thoughtfulness.Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
120.
WalshK. (2001). Teacher certification revisited: Stumbling for quality.Baltimore: Abell Foundation. Retrieved December 22, 2003, from http://www.abell.org
121.
WattH.M.G., & RichardsonP.W. (2003, April). Motivational factors leading to teaching as a career choice: Development and validation of the FIT-Choice scale. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
122.
WengerE. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
123.
WideenM., Mayer-SmithJ., & MoonB. (1998). A critical analysis of the research on learning to teach: Making the case for an ecological perspective on inquiry. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 130–178.
124.
WilsonS., FlodenR.E., & Ferrini-MundyJ. (2001). Teacher preparation research: Current knowledge, gaps, and recommendations (Research report prepared for the U.S. Department of Education). Seattle, WA: University of Washington, Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy. Retrieved December 18, 2003, from http://www.ctpweb.org
125.
WilsonS., FlodenR.E., & Ferrini-MundyJ. (2002). Teacher preparation research: An insider's view from the outside. Journal of Teacher Education53(3), 205–215.
126.
WoodC. (1999). How can new teachers become the best? In SchererM. (Ed.) A better beginning: Supporting and mentoring new teachers (pp. 120–123). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
127.
ZeichnerK., TabacknickR., & DensmoreK. (1987). Individual, institutional, and cultural influences on the development of teachers’ craft knowledge. In CalderheadJ. (Ed.), Exploring teachers’ thinking (pp. 21–59). London: Cassell.