BrunerC.C. (2002). A proposition for the reconception of the superintendency: Reconsidering traditional and nontraditional discourse. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38(3), 402–431.
3.
BrykA.S., LeeV.E., & HollandP.B. (1993). Catholic schools and the common good.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4.
BrykA.S., & SchneiderB. (2002). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement.New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
5.
BrykA.S., SebringP.B., KerbowD., RollowS., & EastonJ. (1998). Charting Chicago school reform.Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
6.
CluneW.H. (1993). The best path to systemic education policy: Standard/centralized or differentiated/decentralized?Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15(3), 233–254.
7.
CohenD.K., & HillH.C. (2000). Instructional policy and classroom performance: The mathematics reform in California. Teachers College Record, 102(2), 294–343.
8.
ConleyD.T., & GoldmanP. (1994). Ten propositions for facilitative leadership. In MurphyJ., & LouisK.S. (Eds.), Reshaping the principalship: Insights from transformational reform efforts (pp. 265–281). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
9.
CrowtherF., KaaganS.S., FergusonM., & HannL. (2002). Developing teacher leaders: How teacher leadership enhances school success.Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
10.
CubanL. (1988). The managerial imperative and the practice of leadership in schools.Albany: SUNY Press.
11.
Darling-HammondL. (1998). Teachers and teaching: Testing policy hypotheses from a national commission report. Educational Researcher, 27(1), 5–15.
12.
Darling-HammondL., & McLaughlinM.W. (1996). Policies that support professional development in an era of reform. In McLaughlinM. W., & ObermanI. (Eds.), Teacher learning: New policies, new practices (pp. 202–218). New York: Teachers College Press.
13.
DesimoneL., PorterA.C., BirmanB.F., GaretM.S., & YoonK.S. (2002). How do district management and implementation strategies relate to the quality of the professional development that districts provide to teachers?Teachers College Record, 104(7), 1265–1312.
14.
ElmoreR.F. (with Burney, D.). (1997). Investing in teacher learning: Staff development and instructional improvement in Community School District #2, New York City.New York: National Commission on Teaching and America's Future.
15.
ElmoreR.F. (2000). Building a new structure for school leadership.Washington, DC: Albert Shanker Institute.
16.
ElmoreR.F. (2002). Bridging the gap between standards and achievement: The imperative for professional development in education.Washington, DC: Albert Shanker Institute.
17.
FullanM. (2001). Leading in a culture of change.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
18.
GamoranA., AndersonC.W., QuirozP.A., SecadaW.G., WilliamsT., & AshmannS. (2003). Transforming teaching in math and science: How schools and districts can support change.New York: Teachers College Press.
19.
GoertzM.E., FlodenR.E., & O'DayJ. (1996). Systemic reform.Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
20.
GoldringE.B., & RallisS.F. (1993). Principals of dynamic schools: Taking charge of change.Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press.
21.
GoodladJ.L. (1983). The school as workplace. In GriffinG.A. (Ed.). Staff development. The Eighty-second yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II (pp. 36–61). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
22.
HallingerP., & HeckR.H. (1996). Reassessing the principal's role in school effectiveness: A review of empirical research, 1980–1995. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32(1), 5–44.
23.
HallingerP., & HeckR.H. (1998). Exploring the principal's contribution to school effectiveness: 1980–1995. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 9(2), 157–191.
24.
HargreavesA. (1995). Development and desire: A postmodern perspective. In GuskeyT. R., & HubermanM. (Eds.), Professional development in education: New paradigms & practices (pp. 9–34). New York: Teachers College Press.
25.
JohnsonS.M. (1990). Teachers at work: Achieving success in our schools.New York: Basic Books.
26.
KingM.B. (2002). Professional development to promote school wide inquiry. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 243–257, 2002.
27.
KingM.B., & NewmannF.M. (2000). Will teacher learning advance school goals?Phi Delta Kappan, 81(8), 576–580.
28.
KingM.B., NewmannF.M., & YoungsP. (1999). District initiatives to build school capacity: The role of professional development.Madison, WI: Wisconsin Center for Education Research, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
29.
KnappM.S., CoplandM.A., & TalbertJ.E. (2003). Leading for learning: Reflective tools for school and district leaders.Seattle, WA: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy, University of Washington.
30.
LadwigJ.G., & KingM.B. (2003). Education systems and school organizational capacity: A cross-national analysis. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
31.
LeeV.E., & SmithJ.B. (1996). Collective responsibility for learning and its effects on gains in achievement for early secondary students. American Journal of Education, 104(1), 103–147.
32.
LeithwoodK. (1994). Leadership for school restructuring. Educational Administration Quarterly, 30(4), 498–518.
33.
LeithwoodK.A., & LouisK.S. (Eds.). (1999). Organizational learning and school improvement: Linkages and strategies.Lisse, Netherlands: Swets and Zeitlinger.
34.
LittleJ.W. (1993). Teachers’ professional development in a climate of educational reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15(2), 129–151.
35.
LittleJ.W. (1999). Organizing schools for teacher learning. In Darling-HammondL., & SykesG. (Eds.). Teaching as a learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 376–411). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
36.
LouisK.S., KruseS.D. & Associates. (1995). Professionalism and community: Perspectives on reforming urban schools.Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
37.
LouisK.S., KruseS.D., & MarksH.M. (1996). School-wide professional community: Teachers’ work, intellectual quality, and commitment. In NewmannF.M. & Associates, Authentic achievement: Restructuring schools for intellectual quality (pp. 179–203). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
38.
LouisK.S., & MarksH.M. (1998). Does professional community affect the classroom? Teachers’ work and student experiences in restructuring schools. American Journal of Education, 106(4), 532–575.
39.
LouisK.S., & MarksH.M. (1999). Teacher empowerment and the capacity for organizational learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 3(5), 707–750.
40.
LowryC. (Ed.). (1908). The relation of superintendents and principals to the training and professional improvement of their teachers. The seventh yearbook of the National Society for the Scientific Study of Education (pp. 11–66). Bloomington, IL: Public School Publishing Company.
41.
LytleS.J., & Cochran-SmithM. (1994). Inquiry, knowledge, and practice. In HollingsworthS., & SockettH. (Eds.), Teacher research and educational reform. The Ninety-third yearbook of the National Society of Education, Part I (pp. 22–51). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
42.
MassellD., & GoertzM.E. (2002). District strategies for building instructional capacity. In HightowerA., KnappM.S., MarshJ.A., & McLaughlinM.W. (Eds.), School districts and instructional renewal (pp. 43–60). New York: Teachers College Press.
43.
McDonaldJ.P. (2001). Students’ work and teachers’ learning. In LiebermanA., & MillerL. (Eds.). Teachers caught in the action: Professional development that matters (pp. 209–235). New York: Teachers College Press.
44.
McLaughlinM.W., & TalbertJ.E. (2001). Professional communities and the work of high school teaching.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
45.
McLaughlinM.W., & TalbertJ.E. (2002). Reforming districts. In HightowerA., KnappM.S., MarshJ.A., & McLaughlinM.W. (Eds.). School districts and instructional renewal (pp. 173–192). New York: Teachers College Press.
46.
McNeilL. (2000). Contradictions of school reform: Educational costs of standardized testing.New York: Routledge.
47.
NewmannF.M. (1993). Beyond common sense in educational restructuring: The issues of content and linkage. Educational Researcher, 22(2), 4–13, 22.
48.
NewmannF.M., KingM.B., & YoungsP. (2000). Professional development that addresses school capacity: Lessons from urban elementary schools. American Journal of Education, 108(4), 259–299.
49.
NewmannF.M., SmithB., AllensworthE., & BrykA.S. (2001). Instructional program coherence: What it is and why it should guide school improvement policy. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(4), 297–321.
50.
OgawaR.T., & BossertS.T. (2000). Leadership as an organizational quality. In The Jossey-Bass reader on educational leadership (pp. 38–58). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
51.
RenyiJ. (1996). Teachers take charge of their learning: Transforming professional development for student success.Washington, DC: National Foundation for the Improvement of Education.
52.
RichardsonV. (Ed.). (1994). Teacher change and the staff development process: A case in reading instruction.New York: Teachers College Press.
53.
SlavinR.E. (1997). Sand, bricks, and seeds: School change strategies and readiness for reform.Baltimore: Center for Research on the Education of Students Placed at Risk, Johns Hopkins University.
54.
SlavinR.E., MaddenN.A., DolanL.J., & WasikB.A. (1996). Every child, every school: Success for all.Newbury Park, CA: Corwin.
55.
SmylieM.A. (1996). From bureaucratic control to building human capital: The importance of teacher learning in educational reform. Educational Researcher, 25(9), 9–11.
56.
SmylieM.A., AllensworthE., GreenbergR.C., HarrisR., & LuppescuS. (2001). Teacher professional development in Chicago: Supporting effective practice.Chicago: Consortium on Chicago School Research.
57.
SmylieM.A., & HartA.W. (1999). School leadership for teacher learning and change: A human and social capital development perspective. In MurphyJ., & LouisK.S. (Eds.). Handbook of research on educational administration (2nd ed., pp. 421–441). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
58.
SpillaneJ.P. (1996). School districts matter: Local educational authorities and state instructional policy. Educational Policy, 10(1), 63–87.
59.
SpillaneJ.P., HalversonR., & DiamondJ.B. (2001). Distributed leadership: Toward a theory of school leadership practice. Educational Researcher, 30(3), 23–28.
60.
SpillaneJ.P., & JenningsN.E. (1997). Aligned instructional policy and ambitious pedagogy: Exploring instructional reform from the classroom perspective. Teachers College Record, 98(3), 449–481.
61.
SpillaneJ.P., & ThompsonC.L. (1997). Reconstructing conceptions of local capacity: The local education agency's capacity for ambitious educational reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19(2), 185–203.
62.
SteinM.K., & D'AmicoL. (1998). Content-driven instructional reform in Community School District #2.Pittsburgh, PA: Learning Research and Development Center, University of Pittsburgh.
63.
TogneriW. (2003). Beyond islands of excellence: What districts can do to improve instruction and achievement in all schools—A leadership brief.Washington, DC: Learning First Alliance.
64.
TogneriW., & AndersonS.E. (2003). Beyond islands of excellence: What districts can do to improve instruction and achievement in all schools.Washington, DC: Learning First Alliance.
65.
TyackD. (2002). Forgotten players: How local school districts shaped American education. In HightowerA., KnappM.S., MarshJ.A., & McLaughlinM.W. (Eds.). School districts and instructional renewal (pp. 9–24). New York: Teachers College Press.
66.
UseemE.L., ChristmanJ.B., GoldE., & SimonE. (1997). Reforming alone: Barriers to organizational learning in urban school change initiatives. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 2, 55–78.
67.
WeinerE.J. (2003). Secretary Paulo Freire and the democratization of power: Toward a theory of transformative leadership. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 35(1), 89–106.
68.
YoungsP. (2000). Connections between district policy related to professional development and school capacity in urban elementary schools.Madison, WI: Wisconsin Center for Education Research, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
69.
YoungsP., & KingM.B. (2002). Principal leadership for professional development to build school capacity. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38(5), 643–670.