ArgyrisC., & SchönD.A. (1974). Theory in practice: Increasing professional effectiveness.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
2.
AxtellC.M., & ParkerS.K. (2003). Promoting role breadth self-efficacy through involvement, work redesign and training. Human Relations, 56(1), 113–131.
3.
BensonN., & MaloneP. (1987). Teachers’ beliefs about shared decision making and work alienation. Education, 107, 244–251.
4.
BirdT., & LittleJ.W. (1983, April). Finding and founding of peer coaching: An interim report of the application of research on faculty relations to the implementation of two school improvement experiments. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal.
5.
BlountJ.M. (1999). Manliness and the gendered construction of school administration in the USA. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 2(2), 55–68.
6.
BrandtR.M. (1987, April). An ethnography of career ladder planning and implementation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC.
7.
BraverM.W., & HelmstadterG.C. (1989). Executive summary: Impact of career ladders on student achievement. Report presented to the Joint Legislative Committee on Career Ladders, Phoenix, AZ.
8.
CallahanR.E. (1962). Education and the cult of the efficiency.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9.
CampionM.A., & McClellandC.L. (1993). Follow-up and extension of the interdisciplinary costs and benefits of enlarged jobs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(3), 339–351.
10.
Center for Research on the Context of Teaching. (2000, May). Assessing results: Bay Area School Reform Collaborative—Year 4.Stanford, CA: Center for Research on the Context of Teaching, Stanford University.
11.
ChapmanJ., & BoydW.L. (1986). Decentralization, devolution, and the school principal. Australian lessons on statewide educational reform. Educational Administration Quarterly, 22(4), 28–58.
12.
ChernsA. (1964). The principles of socio-technical design. Human Relations, 29, 783–792.
13.
CluneW.H. (2001). Toward a theory of standards-based reform: The case of nine NSF statewide systemic initiatives. In FuhrmanS. (Ed.), From the capital to the classroom: Standards-based reform in the states. The one-hundredth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II (pp. 13–38). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
14.
CoburnC.E. (2001). Collective sensemaking about reading: How teachers mediate reading policy in their professional communities. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 32(2), 145–170.
15.
Cochran-SmithM., & LytleS.L. (1999). The teacher research movement: A decade later. Educational Researcher, 28(7), 15–25.
16.
ConwayJ.A. (1976). Test of linearity between teachers’ participation in decision making and their perceptions of their schools as organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(1), 130–139.
17.
ConwayJ.A. (1984). The myth, mystery, and mastery of participative decision making in education. Educational Administration Quarterly, 20(3), 11–40.
18.
ConwayJ.A., & CalziF. (1996). The dark side of shared decision making. Educational Leadership, 53(4), 45–49.
19.
CoplandM.A. (2001, April). Shared school leadership: Moving from role to function in an inquiry-based model of school reform. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA.
DavisL.E., & TristE.L. (1974). Improving the quality of work life: Sociotechnical case studies. In O'TooleJ. (Ed.), Work and the quality of life (pp. 246–284). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22.
DicksonL. (1990, April). Student achievement and career ladder status. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston.
23.
EbmeierH., & HartA.W. (1992). The effects of a career ladder program on school organizational processes. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14(3), 261–281.
24.
EvertsonC.M., WadeM.W., & SmitheyM.W. (1993, April). Learning to mentor: Redefining knowledge, roles, and self. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta, GA.
25.
Feiman-NemserS., & ParkerM.B. (1994). Mentor teachers: Local guides or educational companion?East Lansing: Michigan State University, National Center for Research on Teacher Learning.
26.
FirestoneW.A. (1977). Participation and influence in the planning of educational change. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 13, 167–183.
27.
FriedY., & FerrisG.R. (1987). The validity of the job characteristics model: A review and meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 40, 287–322.
28.
FullanM. (2001). The new meaning of educational change (3rd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
29.
GoertzM. (2001). Standards based accountability: Horse trade or horse whip? In FuhrmanS. (Ed.), From the capital to the classroom: Standards-based reform in the states. The one-hundredth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II (pp. 39–59). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
30.
GombergW. (1973, June). Job satisfaction: Sorting out the nonsense. American Federationist, 80, 14–20.
31.
HackmanJ.R. (1975). On the coming demise of job enrichment. In CassE. L., and ZimmerF.G. (Eds.), Man and work in society (pp. 97–115). New York: Nostrand, Reinhold.
32.
HackmanJ.R. (1977). Work redesign. In HackmanJ. R., & SuttleJ.L. (Eds.), Improving life at work: Behavioral science approaches to organizational change (pp. 98–162). Santa Monica, CA: Goodyear.
33.
HackmanJ.R. (1998). Why teams don't work. In TinsdaleR.S. (Eds.), Theory and research on small groups (pp. 245–267). New York: Plenum.
34.
HackmanJ.R., & OldhamG.R. (1980). Work redesign.Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
35.
HannawayJ. (1993). Decentralization in two school districts: Challenging the standard paradigm. In HannawayJ., & CarnoyM. (Eds.), Decentralization and school improvement (pp. 135–162). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
36.
HartA.W. (1985, April). Formal teacher supervision by teachers in a career ladder. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
37.
HartA.W. (1990). Impacts of the school social unit on teacher authority during work redesign. American Educational Research Journal, 27(3), 503–532.
38.
HartA.W. (1994). Work feature values of today's and tomorrow's teachers: Work redesign as an incentive and school improvement policy. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 16(4), 458–473.
39.
HellerM.F., & FirestoneW.A. (1995). Who's in charge here? Sources of leadership for change in eight schools. Elementary School Journal, 96(1), 65–86.
40.
HensonK.T. (1996). Teachers as researchers. In SikulaJ., ButteryT.J., & GuytonE. (Eds.). Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 53–64). New York: Macmillan.
41.
HerriottR.E., & FirestoneW.A. (1984). Two images of schools as organizations: A refinement and elaboration. Educational Administration Quarterly, 20(4), 41–57.
42.
JohnsG., XieJ.L., & FangY. (1992). Mediating and moderating effects in job design. Journal of Management, 18(4), 657–676.
43.
KellyJ.E. (1982). Scientific management, job redesign, and work performance.New York: Academic Press.
44.
KruseS.D., & LouisK.S. (1997). Teacher teaming in middle schools: Dilemmas for the school-wide community. Educational Administration Quarterly, 33(3), 261–289.
LawlerE.E. (1988). Substitutes for hierarchy. Organizational Dynamics, 17(1), 5–15.
47.
LeeV.E., DedrickR.F., & SmithJ.B. (1991). The effect of the social organization of schools on teachers’ efficacy and satisfaction. Sociology of Education, 64(3), 190–208.
48.
LittleJ.W. (2003). Inside teacher community: Representations of classroom practice. Teachers College Record, 105(6), 913–945.
49.
LittlerC.R. (1978). Understanding Taylorism. British Journal of Sociology, 29(2), 185–202.
50.
MalenB. (1986, April). Career ladder policymaking in Utah: State perspective. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
51.
MayrowetzD., & WeinsteinC.S. (1999). Sources of leadership for inclusive education: Creating schools for all children. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35(3), 423–449.
52.
McLaughlinM.W., & MitraD. (2001). Theory-based change and change-based theory: Going deeper, going broader. Journal of Educational Change, 2, 301–323.
53.
MurphyM., & PrestineN.A. (2001, October). A slow, painless death: A study of an urban high school's five-year effort to create professional learning communities. Paper presented at the Fall Conference of the University Council for Educational Administration, Cincinnati, OH.
54.
MurphyM.J., HartA.W., & WaltersL.C. (1989, April). Satisfaction and intent to leave of new teachers in target populations under redesigned work. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
55.
NCEE (National Commission on Excellence in Education). (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform.Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved February 22, 2004, from http://www.ed.gov/pubs/NatAtRisk/risk.html
56.
NCTM (National Council of Teachers of Mathematics). (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics.Reston, VA: Author.
57.
NCTM (National Council of Teachers of Mathematics). (1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics.Reston, VA: Author.
58.
OgawaR.T., & BossertS.T. (1995). Leadership as an organizational quality. Educational Administration Quarterly, 31(2), 224–243.
59.
PackardR.D., & BierleinL. (1986). Arizona career ladder research and evaluation project: Research and development for effective educational change and reform.Flagstaff, AZ: Northern Arizona University.
60.
ParkerS.K. (1998). Enhancing role breadth self-efficacy: The roles of job enrichment and other organizational interventions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(6), 835–852.
61.
ParkerS., & HallT. (1998). Job and work redesign: Organizing work to promote well-being and effectiveness.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
62.
PennellJ.R., & FirestoneW.A. (1996). Changing classroom practices through teacher networks: Matching program features with teacher characteristics and circumstances. Teachers College Record, 98(1), 46–76.
63.
PophamJ. (1987). The merits of measurement driven instruction, Phi Delta Kappan, 68(9), 679–82.
64.
PounderD.G. (1999). Teacher teams: Exploring job characteristics and work-related outcomes of work group enhancement. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35(3), 317–348.
65.
PounderD.G., OgawaR.T., & AdamsE.A. (1995). Leadership as an organization-wide phenomena: Its impact on school performance. Educational Administration Quarterly, 31(4), 564–588.
66.
PrestineN.A., & NelsonB.S. (2003, April). How can educational leaders support and promote teaching and learning? New conceptions of learning and leading in schools. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
67.
ReddickT.L., & PeachL.E. (1986, November). Career ladder level II and level III teachers’ perceptions of the effectiveness of the Tennessee career ladder program. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, Memphis, TN.
68.
RosenblattZ. (2001). Teachers’ multiple roles and skill flexibility: Effects on work attitudes. Educational Administration Quarterly, 37(5), 684–708.
69.
RosenblattZ., & InbalB. (1999). Skill flexibility among school teachers: Operationalization and organizational implications. Journal of Educational Administration, 37(4), 345–366.
70.
ShepardL. (1989). Why we need better assessments. Educational Leadership, 46(7), 4–9.
71.
SmithM., & O'DayJ. (1991). Systemic school reform. In FuhrmanS., & MalenB. (Eds.), The politics of curriculum and testing (pp. 233–67). Bristol, PA: Falmer Press.
72.
SmylieM.A. (1993). When teachers are school district decision makers. In AstutoT.A. (Ed.), When teachers lead (pp. 57–72). University Park, PA: University Council for Educational Administration.
73.
SmylieM.A. (1994). Redesigning teachers’ work: Connections to the classroom. In Darling-HammondL. (Ed.), Review of Research in Education: Vol. 20 (pp. 129–177). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
74.
SmylieM.A. (1997). Research on teacher leadership: Assessing the state of the art. In BiddleB.J. (Eds.), International handbook of teachers and teaching (pp. 521–592). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
75.
SmylieM.A., ConleyS., & MarksH.M. (2002). Exploring new approaches to teacher leadership for school improvement. In MurphyJ. (Ed.), The educational leadership challenge: Redefining leadership for the 21st century. The one-hundred first yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part I (pp. 162–188). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
76.
SpillaneJ.P., HalversonR., & DiamondJ.B. (2000). Towards a theory of leadership practice: A distributed perspective.Evanston, IL: Northwestern University, Institute for Policy Research.
77.
SpillaneJ.P., HalversonR., & DiamondJ.B. (2001). Investigating school leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Educational Researcher, 30(3), 23–28.
78.
SpillaneJ.P., HalletT., & DiamondJ.B. (2003). Forms of capital and the construction of leadership: Instructional leadership in elementary schools. Sociology of Education, 76(1), 1–17.
79.
SteinM.K., & SpillaneJ.P. (2003, April). Research on teaching and research on educational administration: Building a bridge. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
80.
StraussG. (1974). Job satisfaction, motivation and job redesign. In StraussG., MilesR.E., SnowC.C., & TannenbaumA.S. (Eds.), Organizational behavior: Research and issues (pp. 19–49). Madison, WI: Industrial Relations Research Association.
81.
SundstromE., De MeuseK.P., & FutrellD. (1990). Work teams: Applications and effectiveness. American Psychologist, 45(2), 120–133.
82.
TannenbaumA.S. (1962). Control in organizations: Individual adjustment and organizational performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 7(3), 236–257.
83.
TaylorB., & MadsenJ. (1989, March). Career ladder process in Missouri: A report on how districts are realizing the goals of the program. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
84.
TikunoffW.J., WardB., & GriffinG.A. (1979). Interactive research and development on teaching study: Final report.Far West Laboratory for Educational Research and Development.
85.
TyackD.B. (1974). The one best system: A history of American urban education.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
86.
WaltonR.E. (1975). The diffusion of new work structures: Explaining why success didn't take. Organizational Dynamics, 3(3), 3–22.
87.
WeissC.H., CamboneJ., & WyethA. (1992). Trouble in paradise: Teacher conflicts in shared decision making. Educational Administration Quarterly, 28(3), 350–367.
ZeichnerK.M., & NoffkeS.E. (2001). Practitioner research. In RichardsonV. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 298–330). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.