AFT K–16 Teacher Education Task Force. (2000). Building a profession: Strengthening teacher preparation and induction.Washington, DC: American Federation of Teachers.
AregladoR.J. (1998). Supervision in elementary schools. In FirthG. R., & PajakE.F. (Eds.), Handbook of research on school supervision (pp. 591–600). New York: Macmillan.
5.
ArcherJ. (2001). New roles tap expertise of teachers. Education Week, 20(38), 1, 16–19.
6.
Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. (1960). Leadership for improving instruction (1960 Yearbook). Washington, DC: Author.
7.
AyerF.C., & BarrA.S. (1928). The organization of supervision: An analysis of the organization and administration of supervision in city school systems.New York: Appleton.
8.
BarrA.S., & BurtonW.H. (1926). The supervision of instruction.New York: D. Appleton.
9.
BarrA.S., BurtonW.H., & BruecknerL.J. (1938). Supervision: Principles and practices in the improvement of instruction.New York: Appleton-Century.
10.
BasciaN. (2004). Teacher unions and the teaching workforce: Mismatch or vital contribution? In this volume— SmylieM.A., & MiretzkyD. (Eds.), Developing the teacher workforce. The 103rd yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part I (pp. 326–347). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
11.
BobbittF. (1913). The supervision of city schools. The twelfth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part 1. Bloomington, IL: Public School Publishing Company.
12.
BoyceA.C. (1915). Methods for measuring teachers’ efficiency. The fourteenth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II. Bloomington, IL: Public School Publishing Company.
13.
BoydW.L., & KerchnerC.T. (1987). The politics of excellence and choice in education (1987 yearbook of the Politics of Education Association) New York: Falmer.
14.
BurtonW.H. (1927). Supervision and the improvement of teaching.New York: Appleton-Century.
15.
CallahanR.E. (1962). Education and the cult of efficiency.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16.
CallahanR.E., & ButtonH.W. (1964). Historical change of the role of the man in the organization, 1865–1950. In GriffithsD.E. (Ed.) Behavioral science and educational administration. The sixty-third yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II (pp. 73–94). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
CunninghamL.L. (1963). Effecting change through leadership. Educational Leadership, 21(2), 75–79.
19.
DanielsonC. (1996). Enhancing professional practice: A framework for teaching.Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
20.
Darling-HammondL. (2000a). New standards and old inequalities: School reform and the education of African American students. Journal of Negro Education, 69(4), 263–287.
21.
Darling-HammondL. (2000b). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1). Retrieved January 14, 2004, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v8n1/
22.
Darling-HammondL. (2003). Keeping good teachers: Why it matters, what leaders can do. Educational Leadership, 60(8), 6–13.
23.
Darling-HammondL., & SykesG. (2003, September 17). Wanted: A national teacher supply policy for education: The right way to meet the “highly qualified teacher” challenge. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 11(33). Retrieved September 29, 2003, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v11n33/
24.
DeweyJ. (1929). The sources of a science of education.New York: Horace Liveright.
25.
Department of Supervisors and Directors of Instruction. (1934). Scientific method in supervisory programs.Seventh Yearbook of the Department of Supervisors and Directors of Instruction. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
26.
Department of Supervisors and Directors of Instruction. (1943). Leadership at work.Washington, DC: Author.
27.
ElliottE.C. (1914). City school supervision.New York: World Book.
28.
ElmoreR.F. (2003). A plea for strong practice. Educational Leadership, 61(3), 6–10.
29.
FischerL., SchimmelD., & StellmanL.R. (2003). Teachers and the law (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
30.
FlindersD.J. (1998). Industrial dimensions of supervision. In FirthG. R., and PajakE.F. (Eds.) Handbook of research on school supervision (pp. 1123–1138). New York: Macmillan.
31.
FransethJ. (1955). Supervision in rural schools (Bulletin 1955 No. 11). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health Education and Welfare, Office of Education.
GarmanN. (1986). Clinical supervision: Quackery or remedy for professional development, Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 1(2), 148–157.
34.
GlanzJ. (1992). Curriculum development and supervision: Antecedents for collaboration and future possibilities. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 7(3), 226–244.
35.
GlanzJ. (1998). Histories, antecedents, and legacies of school supervision. In FirthG. R., & PajakE.F. (Eds.), Handbook of research on school supervision (pp. 39–79). New York: Macmillan.
36.
GoldbergM.F. (2004). The test mess. Phi Delta Kappan, 85(5), 361–366.
37.
GoldhammerR. (1969). Clinical supervision: Special methods for the supervision of teachers.New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
38.
GreenR.L. (2001). New paradigms in school relationships: Collaborating to enhance student achievement. Education, 121(4), p. 737.
39.
HaycockK. (2000). No more settling for less. Thinking K–16, 4(1), 3–12.
40.
HaycockK. (2003). Toward a fair distribution of teacher talent. Educational Leadership, 60(4), 11–15.
41.
HaziH.M. (1998). Policy and legal considerations in supervision. In FirthG. R., & PajakE.F. (Eds.), Handbook of research on school supervision (pp. 968–986). New York: Macmillan.
42.
HendrieC. (2003, November 12). Group says “lawsuit culture” hampers schools. Education Week, 23(11), 5.
43.
HoffD.J. (2004). Debate grows on true costs of school law. Education Week, 23(21), 1, 22.
44.
Holmes Group. (1986). Tomorrow's teachers: A report of the Holmes Group.East Lansing, MI: Holmes Group.
45.
HosicJ.F. (1920). The democratization of supervision. School and Society, 11, 331–336.
46.
IngersollR. (2001). Teacher turnover and teacher shortages: An organizational analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 38(3), 499–534.
47.
IngersollR. (2003). Who controls teachers’ work?: Power and accountability in America's schools.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
48.
IngersollR. (2004). Four myths about America's teacher quality problem. In this volume— SmylieM.A., & MiretzkyD. (Eds.), Developing the teacher workforce. The 103rd yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part I (pp. 1–33). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
49.
JohnsonS.M., & MooreS.E. (2003). The schools that teachers choose. Educational Leadership, 60(8), 20–24.
KillianJ.E., & PostD.M. (1998). Scientific dimensions of supervision. In FirthG. R., & PajakE.F. (Eds.), Handbook of research on school supervision (pp. 1032–1054). New York: Macmillan.
52.
KinsellaB.W., KlopfG.J., ShaferH.T., & YoungW.T. (1969). The supervisor's role in negotiation.Washington, DC: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
53.
KozolJ. (1991). Savage inequalities.New York: Crown.
54.
McGrathM.J. (2000). The human dynamics of personnel evaluation. School Administrator, 57(9), 1–8.
55.
McLaughlinM.W. (1984). Teacher evaluation and school improvement. Teachers College Record, 86(1), 193–207.
56.
MCEA-MCPS Labor Management Collaboration Project (2002). Status report: TURN-Broad Foundation initiative.Rockville, MD: Montgomery County Public Schools and Montgomery County Education Association.
57.
Montgomery County Public Schools. (2001). Workforce excellence in the Montgomery County Public Schools.Rockville, MD: Montgomery County Public Schools.
NCEST (National Council on Education Standards and Testing). (1992). Raising standards for American education.Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
60.
NCTAF (National Commission on Teaching and America's Future). (1996). What matters most: Teaching for America's future.New York: Author.
61.
NCTAF (National Commission on Teaching and America's Future). (2003). No dream denied: A pledge to America's children.Washington, DC: Author.
62.
NeillM. (2003). Leaving children behind: How No Child Left Behind will fail our children. Phi Delta Kappan, 85(3), 225–228.
63.
O'DayJ.A., & SmithM.S. (1993). Systemic reform and educational opportunity. In FuhrmanS.H. (Ed.), Designing coherent education policy: Improving the system (pp. 250–312). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
64.
OddenA. (2001). The new school finance. Phi Delta Kappan, 83(1), 85–91.
65.
OgletreeJ.R. (1972). Changing supervision in a changing era. Educational Leadership, 29(6), 507–510.
66.
PainterS. (2000). Easing dismissals and non-renewals. School Administrator, 57(9), 40–43.
PajakE. (2003). Honoring diverse teaching styles: A guide for supervisors.Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
69.
PedullaJ.J. (2003). State-mandated testing: What do teachers think?Educational Leadership, 61(3), 42–46.
70.
ScrivenM. (1967). The methodology of evaluation. In TylerR.W. (Ed.), Perspectives in curriculum evaluation (pp. 39–83). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
71.
ShulmanL.S. (1987a). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1–22.
72.
ShulmanL.S. (1987b). The wisdom of practice: Managing complexity in medicine and teaching. In BerlinerD. C., & RosenshineB.V. (Eds.), Talks to teachers: A Festshrift for N. L. Gage (pp. 369–386). New York: Random House.
73.
ShulmanL.S. (1998). Theory, practice, and the education of professionals. The Elementary School Journal, 98(5), 511–526.
74.
StoneC.R. (1929). Supervision of the elementary school.Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
75.
TaylorF.W. (1911). Principles of scientific management.New York: Harper & Row.
TyackD.B. (1974). The one best system: A history of American urban education.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
78.
WhippleG.M. (Ed.). (1916). Standards and tests or the measurement of the efficiency of schools and school systems. The fifteenth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part I. Bloomington, IL: Public School Publishing Company.