Abdal-HaqqI. (1995). Making time for teacher professional development.Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Teaching and Teacher Education (ERIC Digest 95–4).
2.
AlspachJ.G. (1995). The educational process in nursing staff development.St. Louis: Mosby.
3.
BallD., & CohenD. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice-based theory of professional education. In Darling-HammondL., & SykesG. (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 1–32). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
4.
BillettS. (2002). Toward a workplace pedagogy: Guidance, participation, and engagement. Adult Education Quarterly, 53(1), 27–43.
5.
BorkoH., ElliottR., & UchiyamaK. (2002). Professional development: A key to Kentucky's educational reform effort. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 969–987.
6.
BorkoH., & PutnamR. (1995). Expanding a teacher's knowledge base: A cognitive psychological perspective on professional development. In GuskeyT., & HubermanM. (Eds.), Professional development in education: New paradigms and practices (pp. 35–65). New York: Teachers College Press.
7.
BrookfieldS. (1986). Understanding and facilitating adult learning: A comprehensive analysis of principles and effective practices.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
8.
BrownS., & LeighT. (1996). A new look at psychological climate and its relationship to job involvement, effort, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 358–368.
9.
CalhounE. (1994). How to use action research in a self-renewing school.Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
10.
CarpenterT., FennemaE., & FrankeM.L. (1996). Cognitively guided instruction: A knowledge base for reform in primary mathematics instruction. Elementary School Journal, 97(1), 3–20.
11.
ChoyS.P., & RossM. (1998). Toward better teaching: Professional development in 1993–94 (NCES No.98–230). Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics.
12.
ClayM. (1991). Becoming literate: The construction of inner control.Auckland, New Zealand: Heinemann.
13.
Cochran-SmithM. (1994). The power of teacher research in teacher education. In HollingsworthS., & SockettH. (Eds.), Teacher research and educational reform. The Ninety-third yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part I (pp. 142–165). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
14.
Cochran-SmithM., & LytleS. (1999). Relationships of knowledge and practice: Teacher learning in communities. In Iran-NejadA., & PearsonP.D. (Eds.), Review of Research in Education (Vol. 24, pp. 249–306).
15.
CohenD.K., & HillH.C. (2000). Instructional policy and classroom performance: The mathematics reform in California. Teachers College Record, 102, 294–343.
16.
CorcoranT.B. (June 1995). Helping teachers teach well: Transforming professional development.CPRE Policy Briefs. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.
17.
CoreyS. (1957). Introduction. In HenryN.B. (Ed.), Inservice teacher education for teachers, supervisors and administrators. The Fifty-sixth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part I (pp. pp. 1–10). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
18.
CornoL. (in press). Work habits and work styles: Volition in education. (Introduction to the special issue). Teachers College Record.
19.
DaleyB.J. (1999). Novice to expert: An exploration of how professionals learn. Adult Education Quarterly, 49(4), 133–148.
20.
DaleyB.J. (2002). Context: Implications for learning in professional practice. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 96, 79–88.
21.
Darling-HammondL. (1997). Doing what matters most: Investing in quality teaching.New York: National Commission on Teaching and America's Future.
22.
Darling-HammondL. (2000, January). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1). Retrieved December 1, 2003, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v8n1
23.
Darling-HammondL., & McLaughlinM.W. (1995). Policies that support professional development in an era of reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 76(8), 597–604.
24.
Darling-HammondL., & SykesG. (Eds.). (1999). Teaching as the learning profession.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
25.
DesimoneL.M., PorterA., BirmanB., GaretM.S., & YoonK. (2002). How do district management and implementation strategies relate to the quality of professional development that districts provide to teachers?Teachers College Record, 104(7), 1265–1312.
26.
DesimoneL.M., PorterA., GaretM.S., YoonK., & BirmanB. (2002). Effects of professional development on teachers’ instruction: Results from a three-year longitudinal study. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(2), 81–112.
27.
DeweyJ. (1904). The relation of theory to practice in education. In McMurryF.M. (Ed.), The relation of theory to practice in the education of teachers. The third yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part I (pp. 9–30). Bloomington, IL: Public School Publishing Company.
28.
DuffyG.G. (1993). Rethinking strategy instruction: Four teachers’ development and their low achievers’ understandings. Elementary School Journal, 93(3), 231–247.
29.
Education Commission of the States. (1999). Teacher preparation and professional development: A view from the corporate sector (Policy Brief: Teacher Education).
30.
ElliottJ. (1991). Action research for educational change.Philadelphia: Open University Press.
31.
ElmoreR.F. (2002). Bridging the gap between standards and achievement.Washington, DC: Albert Shanker Institute.
32.
ErautM. (1994). Developing professional knowledge and competence.Washington, DC: Falmer Press.
33.
FermanichM.L. (2002). School spending for professional development: A cross-case analysis of seven schools in one urban district. Elementary School Journal, 103(1), 27–50.
34.
FernandezC. (2002). Learning from Japanese approaches to professional development: The case of lesson study. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(5), 393–405.
35.
FishmanS. (2000). Charter conceptions of teacher research. In FishmanS., & McCarthyL., Unplayed tapes: A personal history of collaborative teacher research (pp. 13–32). New York: Teachers College Press.
36.
FreedmanS. (2001). Teacher research and professional development: Purposeful planning or serendipity? In LiebermanA., & MillerL. (Eds.), Teachers caught in the action: Professional development that matters (pp. 188–208). New York: Teachers College Press.
37.
FreedmanS., SimonsE., KalninJ., CasarenoA., & the M-Class team. (1999). Inside city schools: Investigating literacy in multicultural classrooms.New York: Teachers College Press.
38.
FullanM. (2000). The return of large-scale reform. Journal of Educational Change, 1, 1–25.
39.
FullanM., & SteigelbauerS. (1990). The new meaning of educational change.New York: Teachers College Press.
40.
GallasK. (1998). Sometimes I can be anything: Power, gender, and identity in a primary grade classroom.New York: Teachers College Press.
41.
GallucciC. (2003). Theorizing about responses to reform: The role of communities of practice in teacher learning.Seattle: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy.
42.
GaretM., PorterA., DesimoneL., BirmanB., & YoonK.S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915–946.
43.
GoertzM.E., & DuffyM. (2001). Assessment and accountability systems in the 50 states: 1999–2000 (Research Rep. No. RR-046). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
44.
GoodnoughA. (2003a, January 19). A strict curriculum, but only for failing schools, mostly in poor areas of New York. New York Times.
45.
GoodnoughA. (2003b, January 22). City is converting reading and math to uniform course. New York Times.
46.
GriffinG. (1999). Changes in teacher education: Looking to the future. In GriffinG. (Ed.), The education of teachers. The Ninety-eighth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (pp. 1–17). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
47.
GrossmanP., WineburgS., & WoolworthS. (2001). Toward a theory of teacher community. Teachers College Record, 103(6), 942–1012.
48.
GuskeyT.R. (2003). What makes professional development effective?Phi Delta Kappan, 84(10), 748–756.
49.
HargreavesD. (1994). The new professionalism: The synthesis of professional and institutional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 10(4), 423–438.
50.
HawleyW.D., & ValliL. (1999). The essentials of effective professional development. In Darling-HammondL., & SykesG. (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
51.
HiebertJ., GallimoreR., & StiglerJ.W. (2002). A knowledge base for the teaching profession: What would it look like and how can we get one?Educational Researcher, 31(5), 3–15.
52.
Holmes Group. (1986). Tomorrow's teachers: A report of the Holmes Group.East Lansing, MI: The Holmes Group.
53.
HongL.K. (1996). Surviving school reform: A year in the life of one school.New York: Teachers College Press.
54.
IngersollR.M. (2001). Teacher turnover, teacher shortages, and the organization of schools.Seattle, WA: University of Washington, Center for the Study of Teaching Policy.
55.
IngersollR.M. (2004). Four myths about America's teacher quality problem. In this volume— SmylieM.A., & MiretzkyD. (Eds.), Developing the teacher workforce. The 103rd yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part I (pp. 1–33). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
56.
JohnsonS.M., & BirkelandS.E. (2003). The schools that teachers choose. Educational Leadership, 60(8), 20–24.
57.
JoyceB., & ShowersB. (1980). Improving inservice training: The messages of research. Educational Leadership, 37, 379–385.
KilleenK.M., MonkD.H., & PleckiM.L. (2002). School district spending on professional development: Insights available from national data (1992–1998). Journal of Education Finance, 28(1), 25–50.
60.
KoretzD.M., BarronS.I., MitchellK., & StecherB. (1996). The perceived effects of the Kentucky Instructional Results Information System (KIRIS). MR–792-PCT/FF. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
Le FevreD., & RichardsonV. (2002). Staff development in early reading intervention programs: The facilitator. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(4), 483–500.
63.
LewisC. (2002). Everywhere I looked: Levers and pendulums. Journal of Staff Development, 23(3), 59–65.
64.
LiebermanA. (Ed.). (1990). Schools as collaborative cultures: Creating the future now.New York: Falmer Press.
65.
LiebermanA. (1996). Practices that support teacher development. In McLaughlinM. W., & ObermanI. (Eds.), Teacher learning: New policies, new practices (pp. 185–201). NY: Teachers College Press.
66.
LiebermanA., & GrolnickM. (1996). Networks and reform in American education. Teachers College Record, 98(1), 7–45.
67.
LiebermanA., & McLaughlinM.W. (1992). Networks for educational change: Powerful and problematic. Phi Delta Kappan, 73(9), 673–677.
68.
LiebermanA., & MillerL. (1991). Revisiting the social realities of teaching. In LiebermanA., & MillerL. (Eds.), Staff development for education in the ‘90s (pp. 92–112). New York: Teachers College Press.
69.
LiebermanA., & MillerL. (1992). The professional development of teachers. In AlkinM. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of educational research (6th ed., vol. 3, pp. 1045–1053). New York: Macmillan.
70.
LiebermanA., & WoodD. (2001). When teachers write: Of networks and learning. In LiebermanA. (Ed.), Teachers caught in the action: Professional development that matters (pp. 175–187). New York: Teachers College Press.
71.
LiebermanA., & WoodD.R. (2002). The National Writing Project. Educational Leadership, 59(6), 40–43.
72.
LittleJ.W. (1989). District policy choices and teachers’ professional development opportunities. American Educational Research Journal, 11(2), 165–179.
73.
LittleJ.W. (1993). Teachers’ professional development in a climate of educational reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15(2), 129–151.
74.
LittleJ.W. (2002). Locating learning in teachers’ communities of practice: Opening up problems of analysis in records of everyday work. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(8), 917–946.
75.
LittleJ.W. (2003). Inside teacher community: Representations of classroom practice. Teachers College Record, 105, 913–945.
76.
LortieD. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
77.
Loucks-HorsleyS., LoveN., StilesK., MundryS., & HewsonP. (2003). Designing professional development for teachers of mathematics and science.Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
78.
Loucks-HorsleyS., & MatsumotoC. (1999). Research on professional development for teachers of mathematics and science: The state of the scene. School Science and Mathematics, 99(5), 258–271.
79.
ManningP.R., & DeBakeyL. (2002). Continuing medical education: The paradigm is changing. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 21(1), 46–54.
80.
McDiarmidG.W., & KellyP. P. (1997). Teachers planning professional development in a reform context: The case of Kentucky. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
81.
McLaughlinM.W. (1991). Enabling professional development: What have we learned? In LiebermanA., & MillerL. (Eds.), Staff development for education in the ‘90s (p. 61–82). New York: Teachers College Press.
82.
McLaughlinM.W., & MarshD. (1978). Staff development and school change. Teachers College Record, 80(1), 69–94.
83.
McLaughlinM.W., & TalbertJ.E. (1993). Contexts that matter for teaching and learning.Stanford: Center for Research on the Context of Secondary Teaching.
MillerL., & O'SheaC. (1996). School-university partnership: Getting broader, getting deeper. In McLaughlinM. W., & ObermanI. (Eds.), Teacher learning: New policies, new practices (pp. 161–184). New York: Teachers College Press.
86.
MiretzkyD., SmylieM.A., & KonkolP. (2004). Thinking differently about teacher workforce development. In this volume— SmylieM.A., & MiretzkyD. (Eds.), Developing the teacher workforce. The 103rd yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part I (pp. 34–69). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
87.
National Commission on Teaching and America's Future. (2003). No dream denied: A pledge to America's children.Washington, DC: National Commission on Teaching and America's Future.
88.
NatrielloG., & ZumwaltK. (1992). Challenges to an alternative route for teacher education. In LiebermanA. (Ed.), The changing contexts of teaching. The Ninety-first yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (pp. 59–78). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
89.
NewmannF.M., KingM.B., & YoungsP. (2000). Professional development that addresses school capacity: Lessons from urban elementary schools. American Journal of Education, 108(4): 259–299.
90.
OrnsteinA.C. (1995). Teaching: Theory into practice.Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
91.
ParkerA. (1977). Networks for innovation and problem solving and their use for improving education: A comparative overview.Washington, DC: School Capacity for Problem Solving Group, National Institute of Education.
92.
RandiJ. (in press[a]). Teachers as self-regulated learners. Teachers College Record.
93.
RandiJ. (in press[b]). Final choices: Surveying career options. In ZumwaltK., & NatrielloG. (Eds.), The New Jersey Teacher Education Study [tentative].New York: Teachers College Press.
94.
RandiJ., & CornoL. (1997). Teachers as innovators. In BiddleB.J., GoodT., & GoodsonI. (Eds.), International handbook of teachers and teaching (pp. 1163–1221). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
95.
RandiJ., & CornoL. (2000). Teacher innovations in self-regulated learning. In PintrichP., BoekaertsM., & ZeidnerM. (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 651–685). San Diego: Academic Press.
96.
RenyiJ. (1996). Teachers taking charge of their own learning: Transforming professional development for student success.Washington, DC: National Foundation for the Improvement of Education.
97.
RichardsonV. (1994a). Teacher inquiry as professional staff development. In HollingsworthS., & SockettH. (Eds.), Teacher research and educational reform. The Ninety-third yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part I (pp. 186–203). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
98.
RichardsonV. (1994b). Teacher change and the staff development process: A case in reading instruction (135–159) New York: Teachers College Press.
99.
RichardsonV. (1994c). Conducting research on practice. Educational Research, 23(5), 5–10.
100.
RichardsonV. (Ed.). (2001). Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
101.
SchaubleL., BeaneD.A., CoatesG.D., MartinL.M., & SterlingP. (1996). Outside classroom walls: Learning in informal environments. In SchaubleL., & GlaserR. (Eds.), Innovations in learning: New environments for education (pp. 5–24). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
102.
SchönD.A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action.New York: Basic Books.
103.
SheldonK., & BiddleB. (1998). Standards, accountability, and school reform: Perils and pitfalls. Teachers College Record, 100(1), 164–180.
104.
ShulmanL.S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1–22.
105.
SlavinR.E., MaddenN.A., DolanL., WasikB.A., RossS.M., & SmithL.J. (1994). Whenever and wherever we choose: The replication of “Success for All.” Phi Delta Kappan, 75(8), 639–647.
106.
SmagorinskyP., LaklyA., & JohnsonT. (2002). Acquiescence, accommodation, and resistance in learning to teach within a prescribed curriculum. English Education, 34(3), 187–213.
SparksD. (2002). Designing powerful professional development for teachers and principals.National Staff Development Council. Retrieved March 1, 2003, from http://www.nsdc.org/library/leaders/sparksbook.cfm
109.
StecherB., & BarronS. (2001). Unintended consequences of test-based accountability when testing in “milepost” grades. Educational Assessment, 7, 259–281.
110.
StecherB., BarronS., KaganoffT., & GoodwinJ. (1998). The effects of standards-based assessment on classroom practices: Results of the 1996–97 RAND survey of Kentucky teachers of mathematics and writing (No. CSE Tech Report No. 482) Los Angeles: UCLA Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
111.
StrongM., & St. JohnL. (2001). A study of teacher retention: The effects of mentoring on beginning teachers. (Research Working Paper No. 3) Santa Cruz, CA: University of California.
112.
SykesG. (1996). Reform of and as professional development. Phi Delta Kappan, 77(7), 468–476.
113.
ThompsonC., & ZeuliJ.S. (1999). The frame and the tapestry: Standards-based reform and professional development. In Darling-HammondL., & SykesG. (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession (pp. 341–375). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
114.
U.S. Department of Education. (1998). Promising practices: New ways to improve teacher quality. Retrieved December 1, 2003, from http://www.ed.gov/pubs/PromPractice
115.
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2001). Teacher preparation and professional development: 2000.Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Development.
116.
VancouverJ.B. (2000). Self-regulation in organizational settings: A tale of two paradigms. In PintrichP., BoekaertsM., & ZeidnerM. (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 303–342). San Diego: Academic Press.
117.
WilsonS. (2004). “Them that's got shall get”: Understanding teacher recruitment, induction, and retention. In this volume— SmylieM. A., & MiretzkyD., Developing the teacher workforce. The 103rd yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part I (pp. 145–179). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
118.
WilsonS.M., & BerneJ. (1999). Teacher learning and acquisition of professional knowledge: An examination of research on contemporary professional development. In Iran-NejadD.P.A. (Ed.), Review of Research in Education (Vol. 24, pp. 173–209).
119.
YoungsP. (2000, April). Connections between district policy related to professional development and school capacity in urban elementary schools. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
120.
YoungsP. (2001). District and state policy influences on professional development and school capacity. Educational Policy, 15(2), 278–301.
121.
ZeichnerK. (1991). Contradictions and tensions in the professionalization of teaching and the democratization of schools. Teachers College Record, 92(3), 363–560.
122.
ZeichnerK. (1994). Personal renewal and social construction through teacher research. In HollingsworthS., & SockettH. (Eds.), Teacher research and educational reform. The Ninety-third yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part I (pp. 66–85). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
123.
ZeichnerK. (1995). Beyond the divide of teacher research and academic research. Teachers and Teaching, 1(2), 153–172.
124.
ZeichnerK. (2003). Teacher research as professional development for P–12 educators in the U.S. Educational Action Research, 11(2), 301–325.
125.
ZeichnerK., & KlehrM. (1999). The nature and impact of action research in one urban school district. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal.
126.
ZeichnerK., & NoffkeS. (2001). Practitioner research. In RichardsonV. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 298–332). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.