AP (Associated Press). (2003, September 23). Expert says poor districts are being forced to hire inexperienced teachers.Associated Press Newswire.
5.
BallouD., & PodgurskyM. (1998). The case against teacher certification. Public Interest, 132, 17–29.
6.
BeckerH.S. (1952). The career of the Chicago public schoolteacher. American Journal of Sociology, 57, 470–477.
7.
BieremaL.L. (2001). Women, work, and learning. In FenwickT. (Ed.), Sociocultural perspectives on learning through work (Vol. 92, pp. 53–72). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
8.
BoeE.E. (1997). Whither didst thou go? Retention reassignment, migration, and attrition of special and general education teachers from a national perspective. The Journal of Special Education, 30, 371–389.
9.
BoskC.L. (1979). Forgive and remember: Managing medical failure.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10.
BreauxA.L., & WongH.K. (2003). New teacher induction: How to train, support, and retain new teachers.Mountain View, CA: Harry Wong Publications.
11.
BrewerD. (1996). Career paths and quit decisions: Evidence from teaching. Journal of Labor Economics, 14, 313–339.
12.
BreyerC. (2000). The close: A young woman's first year at seminary.New York: Basic Books.
13.
BrittonE., PaineL., PimmD., & RaizenS. (2003). Comprehensive teacher induction: Systems for early career learning.Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
14.
BrykA. (1988). Musings on the moral life of schools. American Journal of Education, 96, 256–290.
15.
CarrollJ.W., WheelerB.G., AleshireD.O., & MarlerP.L. (1997). Being there: Culture and formation in two theological schools.New York: Oxford University Press.
16.
CaseyK. (1993). I answer with my life: Life histories of women teachers working for social change.New York: Routledge.
17.
ClaycombC. (2000). High-quality urban school teachers: What they need to enter and to remain in hard-to-staff schools. State Education Standard, Winter, 17–20.
18.
ClaycombC., & HawleyW.D. (2000). Recruiting and retaining effective teachers for urban schools: Developing a strategic plan for action.Washington, DC: National Partnership for Excellence and Accountability in Teaching.
19.
ClewellB., DarkeK., Davis-GoogeT., ForcierL., & ManesS. (2000). Literature review on teacher recruitment programs.Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education Planning and Evaluation Service.
20.
CohenD.K., & SpillaneJ. (1993). Policy and practice: The relations between governance and instruction. In FuhrmanS. (Ed.), Designing coherent education policy (pp. 35–95). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
21.
CorcoranR., WalkerL.J., & WhiteJ.L. (1988). Working in urban schools.Washington, DC: The Institute for Educational Leadership.
22.
CusickP.A. (1992). The educational system: Its nature and logic.New York: McGraw-Hill.
23.
DanielsonC. (1996). Enhancing professional practice: A framework for teaching.Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
24.
Darling-HammondL., & SykesG. (2003). Wanted: A national teacher supply policy for education: The right way to meet the “Highly Qualified Teacher” challenge. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 11(33). Retrieved September 16, 2003, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v11n33
25.
Education Commission of the States. (1999). Teacher recruitment, preparation and retention for hard-to-staff schools. Retrieved October 23, 2003, from http://www.ecs.org
26.
Education Week. (2003). If I can't learn from you: Ensuring a highly qualified teacher for every classroom. Retrieved February 1, 2003, from http://www.edweek.org/sreports/QC03/
27.
EgglestonE. (1871/1984). The Hoosier school-master.Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Feiman-NemserS. (2001). From preparation to practice: Designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching. Teachers College Record, 103, 1013–1055.
30.
Feiman-NemserS., SchwilleS., CarverC., & YuskoB. (1999). A conceptual review of literature on new teacher induction.Washington, DC: National Partnership for Excellence and Accountability in Teaching.
31.
FirestoneW.A. (1994). Incentives for teachers: Mixing the intrinsic with the financial. In JonesB. A., & BormanK.M. (Eds.), Investing in U.S. schools: Directions for educational policy (pp. 53–67). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
32.
FidelerE.F., & HaselkornD. (1999). Learning the ropes: Urban teacher induction programs and practices in the United States.Belmont, MA: Recruiting New Teachers.
33.
GawandeA. (2002). Complications: A surgeon's notes on an imperfect science.New York: Picador.
34.
GoldhaberD.D., & BrewerD.J. (1997). Why don't schools and teachers seem to matter? Assessing the impact of unobservables on educational productivity. Journal of Human Resources, 32, 505–523.
35.
GreenT. (1971). The activities of teaching.New York: McGraw-Hill.
36.
GreenwaldR., HedgesL., & LaineR.D. (1996). The effect of school resources on student achievement. Review of Educational Research, 66, 361–396.
37.
HallD. (1993). Life work.Boston: Beacon Press.
38.
HansenD.T. (1995). The call to teach.New York: Teachers College Press.
39.
HanushekE.A., KainJ.F., & RivkinS.G. (1998). Teachers, schools, and academic achievement (Working Paper No. 6691). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
40.
HareD., & HeapJ.L. (2001). Effective teacher recruitment and retention strategies in the Midwest: Who is making use of them? Paper prepared for the North Central Regional Laboratory. Retrieved January 15, 2003, from http://www.ncrel.org/policy/pubs/html/strategy/
41.
HarrisD., & AdamsS.J. (2003). Turning over the turnover debate: A comparison of teachers with other professionals. Unpublished manuscript.
42.
HarrisP. (2002). Survey of California teachers.Rochester, NY: Peter Harris Research Group.
43.
HaserS.G., & NasserI. (2003). Teacher job satisfaction in a year-round school. Educational Leadership, 60(8), 65–67.
44.
HayasakiE. (2003, February 10). Teacher shortage abates. Los Angeles Times, p. A1.
45.
HirschE. (2001). Teacher recruitment: Staffing classrooms with quality teachers.Denver, CO: State Higher Education Executive Officers.
46.
IngersollR.M. (2001). Teacher turnover, teacher shortages, and the organization of schools.Seattle: University of Washington, Center for the Study of Teaching Policy.
47.
IngersollR.M. (2003). Who controls teachers’ work? Power and accountability in America's schools.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
48.
JohnsonS.M., & BirkelandS.E. (2003). Pursuing “a sense of success”: New teachers explain their career decisions. American Educational Research Journal, 40, 518–618.
49.
KainJ., & SingletonK. (1996). Equality of educational opportunity revisited. New England Economic Review (May/June), 87–114.
50.
KardosS.M., JohnsonS.M., PeskeH.G., KauffmanD., & LiuE. (2001). Counting on colleagues: New teachers encounter the professional cultures of their schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 37, 250–290.
51.
KelleyC., & FinniganK. (2004). Teacher compensation and teacher workforce development. In this volume— SmylieM.A., & MiretzkyD. (Eds.), Developing the teacher workforce. The 103rd yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part I (pp. 253–273). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
52.
KrauseE.A. (1996). Death of the guilds: Professions, states, and the advance of capitalism, 1930 to the present.New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
53.
LanierJ.E., & LittleJ.W. (1986). Research on teacher education. In WittrockM.C. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 527–569). New York: Macmillan.
54.
LankfordH., LoebS., & WyckoffJ. (2002). Teacher sorting and the plight of urban schools: A descriptive analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24, 37–62.
55.
LarsenM.S. (1977). The rise of professionalism.Berkeley: University of California Press.
56.
LevinJ., & QuinnM. (2003). Missed opportunities: How we keep high-quality teachers out of urban classrooms.New York: New Teacher Project.
57.
LipskyM. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services.New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
58.
LoebS., Darling-HammondD., & LuczakJ. (forthcoming). Teacher turnover: The role of working conditions and salaries in recruiting and retaining teachers.Stanford, CA: Stanford University School of Education.
59.
LortieD. (1969). The balance of control and autonomy in elementary school teaching. In AmitaiE. (Ed.), The semi-professions and their organization (pp. 1–53). New York: Free Press.
60.
LortieD. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
61.
MilanowskiA. (2002). An exploration of the pay levels needed to attract mathematics, science and technology majors to a career in K–12 teaching. Retrieved January 1, 2003, from http://www.wcer.wisc.edu
62.
MitchellD.E., & KerchnerC.T. (1983). Labor relations and teacher policy. In ShulmanL. S., & SykesG. (Eds.), Handbook of teaching and policy (pp. 214–237). New York: Longman.
63.
MoskowitzJ., & StephensM. (1997). From students of teaching to teachers of students: Teacher induction around the Pacific Rim.Washington, DC: Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation.
64.
MurnaneR.J., & OlsenR.J. (1989). Will there be enough teachers?American Economic Review, 79, 242–246.
65.
MurnaneR.J., SingerJ.D., & WillettJ.B. (1989). The influences of salaries and opportunity costs on teachers’ career choices: Evidence from North Carolina. Harvard Educational Review, 59, 325–346.
66.
MurphyP., DeArmondM., & GuinK. (2003). A national crisis or localized problems? Getting perspective on the scope and scale of the teacher shortage. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 11(23). Retrieved August 5, 2003, from http://eppa.asu.edu/epaa/v11n23/
67.
NASBE (National Association of State Boards of Education). (1998). The numbers game: Ensuring quantity and quality in the teaching workforce.Alexandria, VA: Author.
68.
NCES (National Center for Education Statistics). (1999). Digest of Education Statistics.Washington, DC: Author.
69.
NCES (National Center for Education Statistics). (2002). Digest of Education Statistics.Washington, DC: Author.
70.
NCTAF (National Commission on Teaching and America's Future). (1996). Doing what matters most: Investing in quality teaching.New York: Author.
71.
NCTAF (National Commission on Teaching and America's Future). (2002). Unraveling the “teacher shortage” problem: Teacher retention is the key. A symposium of the National Commission on Teaching and America's Future and NCTAF State Partners, August 20–22, 2002, Washington, DC.
72.
NCTAF (National Commission on Teaching and America's Future). (2003). No dream denied: A pledge to America's children.New York: Author.
73.
NEA (National Education Association). (2001). National directory of successful strategies for the recruitment and retention of minority teachers.Washington, DC: Author.
74.
NEA (National Education Association). (2003). Status of the American public school teacher 2000–2001 (Research report). Washington, DC: Author.
75.
New York City Department of Education. (2003). School Chancellor Joel L. Levin announces two new programs to recruit teachers for New York City Public Schools. Retrieved November 17, 2003 from http://www.nycenet.edu/press/02-03/n61_03.htm
76.
NietoS.M. (2003). What keeps teachers going?Educational Leadership, 60(8), 14–18.
77.
NoddingsN. (1988). An ethic of caring and its arrangements for instructional arrangements. American Journal of Education, 96(2), 215–230.
78.
PalmerP.J. (1998). The courage to teach: Exploring the inner landscape of a teacher's life.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
79.
PEF (Philadelphia Education Fund). (2002). Teacher staffing in the school district of Philadelphia: A report to the community.Philadelphia: Author.
SchlechtyP.C., & VanceV. (1983). Recruitment, selection and retention: The shape of the teaching force. Elementary School Journal, 83, 469–487.
84.
SchwabJ.J. (1978). Eros and education: A discussion of one aspect of discussion. In WestburyI., and WilkofN.J. (Eds.), Science, curriculum, and liberal education: Selected essays (pp. 105–132). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
85.
SchwilleS.A., & Feiman-NemserS. (2001, April). The impact of induction on new teachers’ practice: Observations of novices and their mentors. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA.
86.
SedlakM.W. (1989). Let us go and buy a schoolmaster. In WarrenD. (Ed.), American teachers: Histories of a profession at work (pp. 257–290). New York: Macmillan.
87.
SedlakM., & SchlossmanS. (1986). Who will teach? Historical perspectives on the changing appeal of teaching as a profession.Washington, DC: RAND.
88.
ShouseA.W., GalosyJ.A., & WilsonS.M. (2003). The Exploratorium's Teacher Induction Program: Annual evaluation report. Unpublished document, Michigan State University College of Education.
89.
ShulmanL.S. (1983). Autonomy and obligation: The remote control of teaching. In ShulmanL. S., & SykesG. (Eds.), Handbook of teaching and policy (pp. 484–504). New York: Longman.
90.
ShulmanL.S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
91.
ShulmanL.S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1–22.
92.
SmithM.S., & O'DayJ. (1991). Putting the pieces together: Systemic school reform. (Consortium for Policy Research in Education Policy Brief No. RB-06). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Graduate School of Education.
93.
SmithT.M., & IngersollR.M. (2003, April). Reducing teacher turnover: What are the components of effective induction. Presentation at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
94.
SternS. (2003, September 2). One enemy is inside the tent. New York Post.
95.
SykesG. (1983). Public policy and the problem of teacher quality: The need for screens and magnets. In ShulmanL. S., & SykesG. (Eds.), Handbook of teaching and policy (pp. 97–125). New York: Longman.
96.
TickleL. (2000). Teacher induction: The way ahead.Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
97.
TomA. (1984). Teaching as moral craft.New York: Longman.
98.
TraubJ. (2003, August 3). New York's new approach. New York Times, 4A, 20.
99.
TurowS. (1977). One L.New York: G.P. Putnam's Sons.
UPI (United Press International). (2001, August 15). Is the teacher shortage real?United Press International.
102.
United States Government. (2001). Pay for duty involving physical hardship or hazard. Retrieved January 27, 2003, from http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov
103.
Urban Teacher Collaborative. (2000). The urban teacher challenge: Teacher demand and supply in the Great City Schools. Retrieved on October 23, 2003, from http://www.rnt.org
104.
VillaniS. (2001). Mentoring programs for new teachers: Models of induction and support.Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
105.
WallerW. (1932/1967). The sociology of teaching.New York: John Wiley & Sons.
106.
WilliamsJ. (2003, October 10). Teachers getting out of their rockers to rally. New York Daily News.
107.
WilsonS.M., BellC.A., GalosyJ.A., HarrisD., & ShouseA. (2002). Keeping teachers teaching. A proposal to the Education Policy Center at Michigan State University. Unpublished document, Michigan State University College of Education.
108.
WilsonS.M., Darling-HammondL.D., & BerryB. (2001). Steady work: The story of Connecticut's reform. American Educator, 25(3), 34–39, 48.
109.
WilsonS.M., & FlodenR.F. (2002). Creating effective teachers: Concise answers for hard questions.Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Teaching and Teacher Education.
110.
WongH.K., & WongR.T. (2001). The first days of school: How to be an effective teacher.Mountain View, CA: Harry Wong Publications.
111.
YasinS., & AlbertB. (1999). Minority teacher recruitment and retention: A national imperative.Washington, DC: American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education.
112.
YoungsP. (2002, November). State and district policy related to mentoring and new teacher induction in Connecticut. Paper prepared for the National Commission on Teaching and America's Future (NCTAF). New York: NCTAF.