AbbottA. (1988). The system of professions: An essay on the division of expert labor.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2.
AllenM. (2003). Eight questions on teacher preparation: What does the research say?Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States.
3.
American Council on Education. (1999). To touch the future: Transforming the way teachers are taught.Washington, DC: Author.
4.
BallouD. (1996). Do public schools hire the best applicants?Quarterly Journal of Economics, 111(1), 97–133.
5.
BidwellC. (1965). The school as a formal organization. In MarchJ. (Ed.), Handbook of organizations (pp. 973–1002). Chicago: Rand McNally.
6.
BluedornA.C. (1982). A unified model of turnover from organizations. Human Relations, 35, 135–153.
7.
BoeE., & GilfordD. (1992). Teacher supply, demand and quality.Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
8.
BravermanH. (1974). Labor and monopoly capitalism.New York: Monthly Review Press.
9.
BurawoyM. (1979). Manufacturing consent: Changes in the labor process under monopoly capitalism.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10.
CallahanR. (1962). Education and the cult of efficiency.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11.
Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. (1990). The condition of teaching.New York: Carnegie Foundation.
12.
CohenD., RaudenbushS., & BallD. (2003). Resources, instruction and research. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(2), 119–142.
13.
CohenM., MarchJ., & OlsenJ. (1972). A garbage can theory of organizational decision making. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 1–25.
14.
ColemanJ., & HofferT. (1987). Public and private schools: The impact of communities.New York: Basic Books.
15.
Committee for Economic Development. (1996). American workers and economic change.New York: Author.
16.
ConleyS. (1991). Review of research on teacher participation in school decision making. In GrantG. (Ed.), Review of Research in Education, 17, 225–266. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
17.
Darling-HammondL. (1984). Beyond the commission reports: The coming crisis in teaching.Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
18.
Darling-HammondL. (1999). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy, University of Washington.
19.
DelanyB. (1991). Allocation, choice and stratification within high schools: How the sorting machine copes. American Journal of Education, 99(2), 181–207.
20.
DurkheimE. (1925/1961). Moral education: A study in the theory and application of the sociology of education, E.K. Wilson and H. Schnurer (Trans.). New York: Free Press.
21.
Education Week. (2000). Quality counts: A report on education in the 50 states.Washington, DC: Author.
22.
ElmoreR. (2000). Building a new structure for school leadership.New York: Albert Shanker Institute.
23.
EtzioniA. (1969). (Ed.). The semiprofessions and their organizations: Teachers, nurses and social workers.New York: Free Press.
24.
FinnC., KanstoroomM., & PetrilliM. (1999). The quest for better teachers: Grading the states.Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Foundation.
25.
FreidsonE. (1973). The professions and their prospects.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
26.
FreidsonE. (1986). Professional powers: A study in the institutionalization of formal knowledge.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27.
FullanM. (1991). The new meaning of educational change.New York: Teachers College Press.
28.
GrantG. (1988). The world we created at Hamilton High.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
29.
GreenwaldR., HedgesL., & LaineR. (1996). The effect of school resources on student achievement. Review of Educational Research, 66, 361–396.
30.
HafnerA., & OwingsJ. (1991). Careers in teaching: Following members of the high school class of 1972 in and out of teaching (NCES Report No. 91–470). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
31.
HallR. (1968). Professionalization and bureaucratization. American Sociological Review, 33, 92–104.
32.
HanushekE., & RivkinS. (2004, forthcoming). How to improve the supply of high quality teachers. In RavitchD. (Ed.), Brookings papers on education policy.Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
33.
HenkeR., ChenX., & GeisS. (2000). Progress through the pipeline: 1992–93 College graduates and elementary/secondary school teaching as of 1997.Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
34.
HirschE., KoppichJ., & KnappM. (2001). Revisiting what states are doing to improve the quality of teaching: An update on patterns and trends. Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy, University of WashingtonSeattle.
35.
HodsonR., & SullivanT. (1995). Professions and professionals. In HodsonR., & SullivanT.A. (Eds.), The social organization of work (pp. 287–314). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Huling-AustinL. (1990). Teacher induction programs and internships. In HoustonW.R. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 535–548). Reston, VA: Association of Teacher Educators.
38.
IngersollR. (1999). The problem of underqualified teachers in American secondary schools. Educational Researcher, 28, 26–37.
39.
IngersollR. (2000). The status of teaching as a profession. In BallantineJ., & SpadeJ. (Eds.), Schools and society: A sociological perspective (pp. 115–129). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Press.
40.
IngersollR. (2001). Teacher turnover and teacher shortages: An organizational analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 38(3), 499–534.
41.
IngersollR. (2003a). Who controls teachers’ work? Power and accountability in America's schools.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
42.
IngersollR. (2003b). Is there really a teacher shortage?Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy, University of Washington, Seattle. Available: http://ctpweb.org
43.
IngersollR. (2004). Why some schools have more underqualified teachers than others. In RavitchD. (Ed.), Brookings papers on education policy.Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
44.
KirstM. (1989). Who should control the schools? In SergiovanniT. J., & MooreJ. (Eds.), Schooling for tomorrow.Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
45.
KohnM., & SchoolerC. (1983). Work and personality.Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex.
46.
LortieD. (1969). The balance of control and autonomy in elementary school teaching. In EtzioniA. (Ed.), The semiprofessions and their organizations: Teachers, nurses and social workers (pp. 1–53). New York: Free Press.
47.
LortieD. (1975). School teacher.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
48.
MeyerJ., & ScottW.R. (1983). Organizational environments: Ritual and rationality.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
49.
MillsC.W. (1951). White collar.New York: Oxford.
50.
MobleyW. (1982). Employee turnover: Causes, consequences and control.Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
51.
MurnaneR., & RaizenS. (1988). Indicators of teaching quality. In MurnaneR., & SentaS. (Eds.), Improving indicators of the quality of science and mathematics education in grades K–12 (pp. 90–118). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
52.
MurnaneR., SingerJ., WillettJ., KempleJ., & OlsenR. (Eds.). (1991). Who will teach? Policies that matter.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
53.
National Academy of Sciences. (1987). Toward understanding teacher supply and demand.Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
54.
National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform.Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
55.
National Commission on Teaching and America's Future. (1996). What matters most: Teaching for America's future.New York: NCTAF.
56.
National Commission on Teaching and America's Future. (1997). Doing what matters most: Investing in quality teaching.New York: NCTAF.
57.
National Education Association.1972, 1982, 1987, 1992, 1996. Status of the American public school teacher.Washington, DC: National Education Association.
58.
ParsonsT. (1959). The school class as a social system: Some of its functions in American society. Harvard Educational Review, 29, 297–318.
59.
PascarellaE., & TerenziniP. (1991). How college affects students: Findings and insights from twenty years of research.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
60.
PerrowC. (1986). Complex organizations: A critical essay.New York: Random House.
61.
PriceJ. (1977). The study of turnover.Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.
62.
PriceJ. (1989). The impact of turnover on the organization. Work and Occupations, 16, 461–473.
63.
RaudenbushS., FotiuR., & CheongY. (1999). Synthesizing results from the trial state assessment. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 24(4), 413–438.
64.
RobinsonV. (1985). Making do in the classroom: A report on the misassignment of teachers.Washington, DC: Council for Basic Education and American Federation of Teachers.
65.
SchlectyP., & VanceV. (1981). Do academically able teachers leave education? The North Carolina case. Phi Delta Kappan, 63, 105–112.
66.
ShulmanL. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 4–14.
67.
SimpsonR. (1985). Social control of occupations and work. Annual Review of Sociology, 415–436.
68.
SmylieM.A., & WenzelS.A. (2003). The Chicago Annenberg Challenge: Successes, failures, and lessons for the future (Final Technical Report of the Chicago Annenberg Research Project).Chicago: Consortium on Chicago School Research, University of Chicago.
69.
StroberM., & TyackD. (1980). Why do women teach and men manage?Signs, 5, 499–500.
70.
Texas Center for Educational Research. (2000). The cost of teacher turnover.Austin, TX: Texas State Board for Educator Certification.
71.
TyackD. (1974). The one best system.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
72.
TylerW. (1988). School organization.New York: Croom Helm.
73.
WallerW. (1932). The sociology of teaching.New York: Wiley.
74.
WangA., ColemanA., ColeyR., & PhelpsR. (2003). Preparing teachers around the world.Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.