Mentor-novice collaborative reflection about teaching is crucial to the development of novices’ professional knowledge. However, few studies examine content and forms of mentor-novice conversations and opportunities that such interactions create for developing professional knowledge. Drawing on observation data from two U.S. and two Chinese mentor-novice pairs in induction contexts, this study analyzed the content and forms of mentor-novice conversations about novices’ lessons. We found that the U.S. and Chinese mentor-novice interactions were different in focus and form, and these differences were likely related to the curriculum structures and organization of teaching and mentoring in each country. The interactions either offered or restricted novices’ opportunities for developing professional knowledge necessary for reform-minded teaching.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AchinsteinB., & VillarA. (2002, April). The politics of the mentoring process for beginning teachers: Tensions and negotiations. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Association, New Orleans.
2.
AppleM. W. (2001). Markets, standards, teaching, and teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 52(3), 182–196.
3.
AustinJ. L. (1962). How to do things with words.Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
4.
AustinT., & Fraser-AbderP. (1995). Mentoring mathematics and science preservice teachers for urban bilingual classrooms. Education and Urban Society, 28(1), 67–89.
5.
BakhtinM. M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays.Austin: University of Texas Press.
6.
BallD. L. (2000). Bridging practices: Intertwining content and pedagogy in teaching and learning to teach. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(3), 241–247.
7.
BallD. L., & BassH. (2001). Interweaving content and pedagogy in teaching and learning to teach: Knowing and using mathematics. In BoalerJ. (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 83–104). Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing.
8.
BallD. L., & McDiarmidG. W. (1989). The subject matter preparation of teachers (Issue Paper 89–4) East Lansing: National Center of Research on Teacher Learning, Michigan State University.
9.
BeasleyK., CorbinD., Feiman-NemserS., & ShankC. (1996). “Making it happen”: Teachers mentoring one another. Theory into Practice, 35(3), 158–164.
10.
BerlinerD. C., & BiddleB. J. (1996). Standards amidst uncertainty and inequality. School Administrator, 53(5), 42–44, 46.
11.
BrownJ. S., CollinsA., & DuguidP. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Education Researcher, 18(1), 32–34.
12.
BulloughR. V.Jr. (1990). Supervision, mentoring, and self-discovery: A case study of a first-year teacher. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 5(4), 338–360.
13.
CarterK. (1990). Teachers’ knowledge and learning to teach. In HoustonW. R. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 314–338). New York, NY: MacMillan.
14.
Cochran-SmithM. (1991). Learning to teach against the grain. Harvard Educational Review, 61(3), 279–310.
15.
Cochran-SmithM., & FriesM. K. (2001). Sticks, stones, and ideology: The discourse of reform in teacher education. Educational Researcher, 30(8), 3–15.
16.
Cochran-SmithM., & LytleS. (1999). Relationship of knowledge and practice: Teacher learning in communities. Review of Research in Education, 24, 249–298.
17.
Cochran-SmithM., & ParisP. (1995). Mentor and mentoring: Did Homer have it right? In SmithJ. (Ed.), Critical discourses on teacher development (pp. 181–202). London, UK: Cassell.
18.
CohenD. K., & SpillaneJ. P. (1992). Policy and practice: The relations between governance and instruction. Review of Research in Education, 18, 3–49.
19.
CorleyE. L. (1998, October). First-year teachers: Strangers in strange lands. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwestern Educational Research Association, Chicago.
20.
Darling-HammondL., & BallD. L. (1998). Teaching for high standards: What policymakers need to know and be able to do (CPRE Joint Report Series No. JRE-04). Philadelphia: National Commission on Teaching and America's Future Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
21.
ElbazF. (1983). Teacher thinking: A study of practical knowledge.London, UK: Croom Helm.
22.
Feiman-NemserS. (2001). Helping novices learn to teach: Lessons from an experienced support teacher. Journal of Teacher Education, 52(1), 17–30.
23.
Feiman-NemserS., & FlodenR. (1986). The culture of teaching. In WittrockM. C. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 505–526). New York: Macmillan.
24.
Feiman-NemserS., & ParkerM. B. (1990). Making subject matter part of the conversation or helping beginning teachers learn to teach (Research Report 90-3) East Lansing, MI: National Center for Research on Teacher Education, Michigan State University.
25.
Feiman-NemserS., & ParkerM. B. (1993). Mentoring in context: A comparison of two U. S. programs for beginning teachers. International Journal of Educational Research, 19(8), 699–718.
26.
FlodenR. E., KlinzingH. G., LampertM., & ClarkC. (1990). Two views of the role of research on teacher thinking (Paper 90-4) East Lansing, MI: National Center for Research on Teacher Education, Michigan State University.
27.
GrimmettP., & MacKinnonA. (1992). Craft knowledge and the education of teachers. Review of Research in Education, 18, 385–456.
28.
GrossmanP. L. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education.New York: Teachers College Press.
29.
HargreavesA. (1984). Experience counts, Theory doesn't: How teachers talk about their work. Sociology of Education, 57(4), 244–254.
30.
HiebertJ., GallimoreR., & StiglerJ. W. (2002). A knowledge base for the teaching profession: What would it look like and how can we get one?Educational Researcher, 31(5), 3–15.
31.
HiebertJ., & StiglerJ. W. (2000). A proposal for improving classroom teaching: Lessons from the TIMSS video study. Elementary School Journal, 101(1), 3–20.
Huling-AustinL. (1992). Research on learning to teach. Journal of Teacher Education, 43(3), 173–180.
35.
Interstate New Teachers Assessment, and Support Consortium. (1992). Model standards for beginning teacher licensing and development: A resource for state dialogue:Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.
36.
KennedyM. (1991). An agenda for research on teacher learning (NCRTL Special Report) East Lansing: National Center for Research on Teacher Learning, Michigan State University.
37.
KilbournB., & RobertsG. (1991). May's first year: Conversations with a mentor. Teachers College Record, 93(2), 252–264.
38.
KlugB. J., & SalzmanS. A. (1991). Formal induction vs. informal mentoring: Comparative effects and outcomes. Teaching and Teacher Education, 7(3), 241–251.
39.
Ladson-BillingsG. (1999). Preparing teachers for diversity: Historical perspectives, current trends, and future directions. In Darling-HammondL., & SykesG. (Eds.), Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 86–124). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
40.
LampertM., & ClarkC. M. (1990). Expert knowledge and expert thinking in teaching: A response to Floden and Klinzing. Educational Researcher, 19(5), 21–23.
LeinhardtG., & GreenoJ. G. (1986). The cognitive skill of teaching. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(2), 75–95.
43.
LewisC. C. (2000). Lesson study: The core of Japanese professional development. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
44.
LewisC. C., & TsuchidaI. (1998). A lesson is like a swiftly flowing river: How research lessons improve Japanese education. American Educator, 22(4), 12–17, 50–52.
45.
LittleJ. W. (1990a). The mentoring phenomenon and the social organization of teaching. Review of Research in Education, 16, 252–279.
46.
LittleJ. W. (1990b). The persistence of privacy: autonomy and initiative in teachers’ professional relationship. Teachers College Record, 91(4), 509–536.
47.
MaL. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics.Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
48.
National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education. (1998). Program standards for elementary teacher preparation, Review and comment edition.Washington, DC: Author.
49.
National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education. (1999). Proposed NCATE 2000 unit standards.Washington, DC: Author.
50.
National Council for the Social Studies. (1994). Expectations of excellence: Curriculum standards for social studies.Washington, DC: Author.
51.
National Council of Teachers of English and the International Reading Association. (1996). Standards for the English language arts.Urbana, IL: Author.
52.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics.Reston, VA: Author.
53.
National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards.Washington, D.C: National Academy Press.
54.
OdellS. J., & FerraroD. P. (1992). Teacher mentoring and teacher retention. Journal of Teacher Education, 43(3), 200–204.
PaineL. (2001). Outside/insider talk about teaching: Supporting teacher learning in communities of practice. Paper presented at the 45th Annual Meeting of Comparative and International Education Society, Washington, DC.
57.
RichardsonV. (1996). The role of attitude and beliefs in learning to teach. In SikulaJ., ButteryT., & GuytonE. (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education (2nd ed., pp. 102–119). New York: Macmillan.
58.
RogoffB. (1984). Introduction: Thinking and learning in social contexts. In RogoffB., & LaveJ. (Eds.), Everyday cognition: Its development in social context (pp. 1–8). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
59.
SchmidtM., & KnowlesJ. G. (1994, April). Four women's stories of “failure” as beginning teachers. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
60.
ShulmanL. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.
61.
StiglerJ. W., FermandezC., & YoshidaM. (1996). Traditions of school mathematics in Japanese and American elementary classrooms. In SteffeL. P., & NesherP. (Eds.), Theories of mathematical learning (pp. 149–175). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
62.
StiglerJ. W., & HiebertJ. (1999). Teaching gap.New York: Free Press.
63.
StraussA., & CorbinJ. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques.New York: Sage.
64.
StrongM., & BaronW. (in press). An analysis of mentoring conversations with beginning teachers: Suggestions and responses. Teaching and Teacher Education.
65.
StrongM., & St. JohnL. (2001). A study of teacher retention: The effects of mentoring for beginning teachers (Research Working Paper #3) Santa Cruz: New Teacher Center, University of California, Santa Cruz.
66.
SweenyB., & DeBoltG. (2000). A survey of the 50 states: Mandated teacher induction programs. In OdellS., & HulingL. (Eds.), Quality mentoring for novice teachers (pp. 97–106). Indianapolis, IN: Kappa Delta Pi.
67.
TharpG., & GallimoreR. (1988). The intra psychological plane of teacher training: Internalization of high order teaching skills. In Tharp, & Gallimore (Eds.), Rousing mind to life: Teaching, learning, and schooling in social context (pp. 217–248). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
68.
VygotskyL. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
69.
VygotskyL. S. (1994). The problem of the environment. In van der VeerRene, & ValsinerJ. (Eds.), The Vygotsky reader (pp. 338–354). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
70.
WangJ. (2001). Contexts of mentoring and opportunities for learning to teach: A comparative study of mentoring practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(1), 51–73.
71.
WangJ., & OdellS. J. (2002). Mentored learning to teach and standards-based teaching reform: A critical review. Review of Educational Research, 7(3), 481–546.
72.
WangJ., & PaineW. L. (2001). Mentoring as assisted performance: A pair of Chinese teachers working together. The Elementary School Journal, 102(2), 157–181.
73.
WangJ., & PaineL. (2002, April). Forms and substances of mentor-novice interactions on novices’ teaching: Lessons from Chinese readers. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Association, New Orleans.
74.
WangJ., & PaineL. W. (2003). Learning to teach with mandated curriculum and public examination of teaching as contexts. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19(1), 75–94.
75.
WilsonS. M., & BerneJ. (1999). Teacher learning and the acquisition of professional knowledge: An examination of research on contemporary professional development. Review of Research in Education, 24, 173–209.
