This study uses data from a 10-year longitudinal study to explore how women graduates of a liberal arts college experience the gendered construction of teachers and teaching as they make life and career choices. These women respond to the expectations and pressures of families and teachers, renegotiate their own definitions of success and achievement, and reconstruct definitions of teaching and themselves as teachers. Despite their understanding of the status of other possible career choices, and their resistance of gendered frameworks of career and success, the women in this study ignore the rhetoric of teacher professionalization that might provide them with an alternative definition of teaching. Instead, they reframe teaching as a political act, one through which they can address issues of social inequality and social injustice.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AckerJ., BarryK., & EsseveldJ. (1991). Objectivity and truth: Problems in doing feminist research. In FonowM., & CookJ. (Eds.), Beyond methodology (pp. 133–153). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
2.
AndersonD. (1993). The journey toward professionalism: Accreditation, licensure, and certification. National Forum, 73(4), 11–14.
3.
BallS., & GoodsonI. (1985). Teachers’ lives and careers.London: Falmer Press.
4.
BellC., & ChaseS. (1993). The underrepresentation of women in school leadership. In MarshallC. (Ed.), The new politics of race and gender (pp. 141–154). London: Falmer Press.
5.
BiklenS. (1995). School work: Gender and the cultural construction of teaching.New York: Teachers College Press.
6.
BurawoyM. (1991). The extended case method. In BurawoyM. (Ed.), Ethnography unbound (pp. 271–290). Berkeley: University of California Press.
7.
ChaseS. (1996). Personal vulnerability and interpretive authority in narrative research. In JosselsonR. (Ed.), Ethics and process in the narrative study of lives (pp. 45–59). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8.
CrossB. (1965). The educated woman in America: Selected writings of Catharine Beecher, Margaret Fuller and M. Carey Thomas.New York: Teachers College Press.
9.
DonmoyerR. (1990). Generalizability and the single-case study. In EisnerE., & PeshkinA. (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry in education: The continuing debate.New York: Teachers College Press. 175–200.
10.
EcclesJ. (1994). Understanding women's educational and occupational choices. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 585–609.
11.
EdsonS. (1981). If they can, I can: Women aspirants to administrative positions in public schools. In SchmuckP., ChartersW., & CarlsonR. (Eds.), Educational policy and management (pp. 169–185). New York: Academic Press.
12.
EdsonS. (1988). Pushing the limits: The female administrative aspirant.Albany: SUNY Press.
13.
FineM. (1994). Working the hyphens: Reinventing self and other in qualitative research. In DenzinN., & LincolnY. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 70–82). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14.
FranzC., ColeE., CrosbyF., & StewartA. (1994). Lessons from lives. In FranzC., & StewartA. (Eds.), Women creating lives: Identities, resilience, and Resistance (pp. 325–334). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
15.
FueyoV., & KoorlandM. (1997). Teacher as researcher: A synonym for professionalism. Journal of Teacher Education, 48(5), 336–345.
16.
GrantR. (1989). Alternative model of “career”. In AckerS. (Ed.), Teachers, gender and careers (pp. 35–50). Lewes: Farmer Press.
17.
GreenJ. E., & WeaverR. A. (1992). Who aspires to teach? A descriptive study of preservice teachers. Contemporary Education, 63, 234–238.
18.
GroganM. (1996). Voices of women aspiring to the superintendancy.Albany: SUNY Press.
19.
HarrisD., & BrownR. (1992). Selecting teaching as a profession. College Student Journal, 26, 248–252.
20.
HatchJ. A., & WisniewskiR. (1995). Life history and narrative: Questions, issues and exemplary works. In HatchJ. A., & WisniewskiR. (Eds.), Life history and narrative (pp. 113–133). London: Falmer Press.
JosselsonR. (1996). On writing other people's lives. In JosselsonR. (Ed.), Ethics and process in the narrative study of lives (pp. 60–71). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23.
KaufmanR., WestlandC., & EngvallR. (1997). The dichotomy between the concept of professionalism and the reality of sexism in teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 48(2), 118–129.
24.
KellyL., BurtonS., & ReganL. (1994). Researching women's lives or studying women's oppression? Reflections on what constitutes feminist research. In MaynardM., & PurvisJ. (Eds.), Researching women's lives from a feminist perspective (pp. 27–48). London: Taylor and Francis.
25.
LacklandA., & De LisiR. (2001). Students’ choices of college majors that are gender traditional and nontraditional. Journal of College Student Development, 42(1), 39–48.
26.
LentR., BrownS., & HackettG. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45, 79–122.
27.
LeonardL.J., & LeonardP. E. (1999). Reculturing for collaboration and leadership. Journal of Educational Research, 92(4), 237–248.
28.
LiebermanA. (Ed.) (1995). The work of restructuring schools: Building from the ground up.New York: Teachers College Press.
29.
LightbodyP., SianneG., TaitL., & WalshD. (1997). A fulfilling career? Factors which influence women's choice of profession. Educational Studies, 23(1), 25–37.
30.
MarshallC. (1984). The crisis in excellence and equity. Educational Horizons, 63(1), 24–30.
31.
MarshallC., & MitchellB. (1989). Women's careers as a critique of the administrative culture. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
32.
MiddletonS. (1989). Educating feminists: A life history study. In AckerS. (Ed.), Teachers, gender and careers (pp. 53–68). Lewes, UK: Falmer Press.
33.
MitchellJ. P., & WinnD. D. (1989). Women and school administration. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 16, 54–71.
34.
MunroeP. (1998). Subject to fiction.Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
35.
National Center for Education Statistics. (1994). Public and private school principals: Are there too few women?Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
36.
OrtizF., & MarshallC. (1988). Women in educational administration. In BoyanN. (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational administration (pp. 123–141). New York: Longman.
37.
OrumA. M., FeaginJ. R., & SjobergG. (1991). Introduction: The nature of the case study. In FeaginJ., OrumA., & SjobergG. (Eds.), A case for the case study.Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
38.
PavanB. (1991). Reflections of female school administrators regarding their careers. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
39.
PlummerK. (1983). Documents of life.London: George Allen & Unwin.
ProlmanS. (1983). Gender, career paths, and administrative behavior. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal.
42.
ReinharzS. (1992). Feminist methods in social research.New York: Oxford University Press.
43.
ReissmanC. K. (1993). Narrative analysis.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
44.
SchalockD., SchalockM., & MytonD. (1998). Effectiveness—along with quality—should be the focus. Phi Delta Kappan, 79(6), 468–471.
45.
SchofieldJ. W. (1990). Increasing the generalizability of qualitative research. In EisnerE., & PeshkinA. (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry in education: The continuing debate (pp. 201–232). New York: Teachers College Press.
46.
ShakeshaftC. (1989). Women in educational administration.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
47.
SikesP. (1985). The life cycle of the teacher. In BallS., & GoodsonI. (Eds.), Teachers’ lives and careers (pp. 27–60). Lewes, UK: Falmer Press.
48.
SmulyanL. (1990). Moving the mountain: The individual and school change. Paper presented at the Implementing Educational Change Conference, Centre for Educational Development, Appraisal and Research, University of Warwick, England.
49.
SmulyanL. (1992). The artist as INSET coordinator: A problem in design. Journal of Teacher Development, 21(2), 95–110.
50.
SmulyanL. (2000). Balancing acts: Women principals at work.Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
51.
SmulyanL. (in press). Redefining self and success: Becoming teachers and doctors. Gender and Education.
52.
SpringJ. (1986). The American school 1643–1985.New York: Longman.
53.
StakeR. (1994). Case studies. In DenzinN., & LincolnY. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 236–247). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
54.
SwansonJ. (1995). Systemic reform in the professionalism of educators. Phi Delta Kappan, 77(1), 36–40.
55.
TraversE., & SacksS. (1989). Joining teacher education and the liberal arts in the undergraduate curriculum. Phi Delta Kappan.
56.
TusinL. F. (1991). The relationship of academic and social self concepts with women's choice of teaching as a career: a longitudinal model. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 24(2), 16–27.
57.
WeilerK. (1988). Women teaching for change: Gender, class and power.South Hadley, MA: Bergin and Garvey.
58.
WheatleyM. (1981). The impact of organizational structures on issues of sex equity. In SchmuckP., ChartersW., & CarlsonR. (Eds.), Educational policy and management (pp. 255–272). New York: Academic Press.
59.
WhistonS. C. (1993). Self-efficacy of women in traditional and nontraditional occupations: Differences in working with people and things. Journal of Career Development, 19, 175–186.
60.
WolfD. (1996). Situating feminist dilemmas in fieldwork. In WolfD. (Ed.), Feminist dilemmas in fieldwork (pp. 1–55). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
61.
YeakeyC., JohnstonG., & AdkisonJ. (1986). In pursuit of equity: A review of research on minorities and women in educational administration. Educational Administration Quarterly, 22(3), 110–149.
