This paper compares the theories of multiple intelligences and learning styles to suggest ways that teachers using a combination of both theories may be able to improve student learning over the range of intelligences. The author proposes a research format for the benefit of future research.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndrewsR. H. (1990). The development of a learning styles program in a low socioeconomic, underachieving North Carolina elementary school. Journal of Reading, Writing, and Learning Disabilities International, 6, 307–314.
2.
ArmstrongT. (2003). The multiple intelligences of reading and writing: Making the words come alive.Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
3.
BinetA., & SimonT. (1905). Méthodes nouvelles pour le diagnostique du niveaux intellectuel des anormaux [New methods for the diagnosis of the intellectual level of the abnormal]. L'anneé psychologique, 11, 236–245.
4.
BrennanP. K. (1984). An analysis of the relationships among hemispheric preference and analytic/global cognitive style, two elements of learning style, method of instruction, gender, and mathematics achievement of tenth-grade geometry students (Doctoral dissertation, St. John's University, 1985). Dissertation Abstracts International, 45(11), 3271A.
5.
BrunnerC. E., & MajewskiW. S. (1990). Mildly handicapped students can succeed with learning styles. Educational Leadership, 48(2), 21–23.
6.
CornoL., CronbackL. J., KupermintzH., LohmanD. F., MandinachE. B., PorteusA. W., & TalbertJ. (2002). Remaking the concept of aptitude: Extending the legacy of Richard E Snow.Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
7.
DunnR., BrunoJ., SklarR. I., & BeaudryJ. S. (1990). Effects of matching and mismatching minority developmental college students’ hemispheric preferences on mathematics scores. Journal of Educational Research, 83, 283–288.
8.
DunnR., CavanaughD., EberleB., & ZenhausernR. (1982). Hemispheric preference: The newest element of learning style. The American Biology Teacher, 44, 291–294.
9.
DunnR., & DeBelloT. C. (Eds.). (1999). Improved test scores, attitudes, and behaviors in America's schools: Supervisors’ success stories.Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
10.
DunnR., DenigS., & LovelaceM. (2001). Multiple intelligences and learning styles: Two sides of the same coin or different strokes for different folks. Teacher Librarian: The Journal for School Library Professionals, 28(3), 9–15.
11.
DunnR., & DunnK. (1993). Teaching secondary students through their individual learning styles.Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
12.
DunnR., & DunnK. (1999). The complete guide to the learning styles inservice system.Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
13.
DunnR., & GriggsS. A. (2003). Synthesis of the Dunn and Dunn learning-style model research: Who, what, when, where, and so what?New York: St. John's University's Center for the Study of Learning and Teaching Styles.
14.
DunnR., GriggsS. A., OlsonJ., GormanB., & BeasleyM. (1995). A meta-analytic validation of the Dunn and Dunn model of learning-style preferences. Journal of Educational Research, 88, 353–361.
15.
ElliotI. (1991). The reading place. Teaching K-8, 21(3), 30–34.
16.
GadwaK., & GriggsS. A. (1985). The school dropout: Implications for counselors. School Counselor, 33(1), 9–17.
17.
GardnerH. (1983). Frames of Mind: The theory of multiple intelligences.New York: Basic Books.
18.
GardnerH. (1993). Multiple intelligences: The theory into practice.New York: Basic Books.
19.
GardnerH. (1999). Intelligence refrained: Multiple intelligences for the 21st century.New York: Basic Books.
20.
GeiserW. F., DunnR, DeckingerE. L., DenigS., SklarR., & BeasleyM. (2000). Effects of learning-style awareness and responsive study strategies on achievement, incidence of study, and attitudes of suburban eighth-grade students. National Forum of Applied Educational Research, 13(2), 37–49.
21.
HurleyE. K. (2000). Comparative reliability and validity of two text-oriented learning-style diagnostic instruments and the CD-ROM version of Our Wonderful Learning Styles (Doctoral dissertation, St. John's University). Dissertation Abstract International, 61(09), 3530A.
22.
KlavasA. (1994). In Greensboro, North Carolina: Learning style program boosts achievement and test scores. The Clearing House, 67, 149–151.
23.
KoshutaV., & KoshutaP. (1993). Learning styles in a one-room school. Educational Leadership, 50(7), 87.
24.
KreitnerK. R. (1981). Modality strengths and learning styles of musically talented high-school students (Unpublished master's thesis, Ohio State UniversityColumbus.
25.
LemmonP. (1985). A school where learning styles make a difference. Principal, 64(4), 26–28.
26.
LovelaceM. A. K. (2002). A meta-analysis of the Dunns’ model of learning styles. (Doctoral dissertation, St. John's University). Dissertation Abstract International, 63(06), 2114A.
27.
MicklerM. L., & ZippertC. P. (1987). Teaching strategies based on learning styles of adult students. Community/Junior College Quarterly of Research and Practice, 11(1), 33–37.
28.
MilgramR., DunnR., & PriceG. E. (Eds.). (1993). Teaching and counseling gifted and talented adolescents: An international learning style perspective.New York: Praeger.
29.
NeelyR., & AlmD. (1992). Meeting individual needs: A learning styles success story. The Clearing House, 66, 109–113.
30.
NeelyR., & AlmD. (1993). Empowering students with style. Principal, 72(4), 32–35.
31.
NelsonB., DunnR., GriggsS. A., PrimaveraL., FitzpatrickM., BaciliousZ., & MillerR. (1993). Effects of learning style intervention on students’ retention and achievement. Journal of College Student Development, 34, 364–369.
O'HareL. (2002). Effects of traditional versus learning-style presentations of course content in adult health nursing on the achievement and attitudes of baccalaureate nursing students (Doctoral dissertation, St. John's University.
34.
OrsakL. (1990). Learning styles versus the Rip Van Winkle syndrome. Educational Leadership, 48(2), 19–20.
35.
QuinnR. (1993). The New York State compact for learning and learning styles. Learning Styles Network Newsletter, 15(1), 1–2.
36.
Research on the Dunn and Dunn Model. (2000). New York: St. John's University's Center for the Study of Learning and Teaching Styles.
37.
RowanK. S. (1988). Learning styles and teacher in-service education (Doctoral dissertation, University of Tennessee, 1984). Dissertation Abstracts International, 50(02), 418A.
38.
RussoK. (2002). Teaching law students: An innovative approach. Academic Exchange Quarterly., 6(4), 151–159.
39.
SnowR. E., CornoL., & JacksonD. (1996). Individual differences in affective and conative functions. In BerlinerD. C., & CalfeeR. C. (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 243–310). New York: Simon & Schuster.
40.
SternbergR. J. (1998). Applying the triarchic theory of human intelligence in the classroom. In SternbergR. J., & WilliamsW. M. (Eds.), Intelligence, instruction, and assessment. (pp. 167–181). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
41.
StoneP. (1992). How we turned around a problem school. Principal, 71(2), 34–36.
