Multiple Intelligences,Learning for Understanding,and Creative Assessment: Some Pieces to the Puzzle of Learning

Abstract

Too many of our brightest and most capable students are sometimes caught in a system that places too much emphasis on linguistic, word smart intelligence or mathematical, number smart intelligence. Students at all levels of academic readiness—from developmental to honors—are affected by the rigidity of this way of thinking. Focusing solely on these types of learning strategies has in some cases encouraged rote memory teaching strategies that may foster little or no connection to material, low motivation, and poor performance. Memorization-regurgitation is the name of the game for many students; not much value is placed on learning or remembering the material, let alone understanding it. The Multiple Intelligences/Learning for Understanding (MI/LfU) initiative at Glendale Community College is one approach to learning and creative assessment a dedicated group of faculty, administrators, and students have been involved in for the past 9 years. Incorporating MI theory across the curriculum, provided students with a variety of creative, imaginative learning options. Students became miniexperts and cofacilitators of learning as they gave “performances of understanding” of the academic content studied. Assessment for understanding was completed using a creative grading/diagnostic rubric. Reflective student and faculty evaluation provided invaluable insight into the learning and teaching process. Providing a forum for the exchange and dialogue of ideas, innovations, perceptions, and pedagogies is essential in the transformation of education and crucial in the dynamics and evolution of change.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alfred

, Ewell

, Hudgins

, & McClenney

(1999). Core effectiveness for community colleges (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Community College Press.

Díaz-Lefebvre

(1997). Unlocking the motivation, the desire, and the joy to learn! Innovation Abstracts, 17(12).

Díaz-Lefebvre

(1999). Coloring outside the lines: Applying multiple intelligences and creativity in learning. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Díaz-Lefebvre

(2000). Just tell me what I have to do to get an “A” in your class! The Forum. Assidere: Sharing Information on Assessment, 8(2), 9–11.

Díaz-Lefebvre

, & Finnegan

(1997). Coloring outside the lines: Applying the theory of multiple intelligences to the community college setting. Community College Journal, 28–31.

Gardner

(1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.

Gardner

(1999). The disciplined mind: What all students should understand. New York: Simon & Shuster.

Lam

T. C. M.

(1995). Fairness in performance assessment. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 391 982)

Merrefield

G. E.

(1997). Three Billy goats and Gardner. Educational Leadership, 55(1), 58–61.

10.

O'Banion

(1995). A learning college for the 21st century. Community College Journal, 66(3), 18–23.

11.

O'Banion

(1997). A learning college for the 21st century. Phoenix, AZ: American Council on Education and the Oryx Press.

12.

Reynolds

, & Werner

(1998). A transition for community colleges: Teaching institutions to learning institutions. Inquiry, 3(1), 9–18.

13.

Suskie

(2000, May). Fair assessment practices. AAHE Bulletin.

14.

Taylor-King

(1997, July 19). Using multiple intelligences and multisensory reinforcement approaches to enhance literacy skills among the homeless. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Congress on Challenges to Education, Kihei, HI.