BenardB. (1991). Fostering resiliency in kids: Protective factors in the family, school and community.Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratories, Western Regional Center for Drug-Free Schools and Communities.
2.
BrickmanE. (1996). A formative evaluation of P.S. 5: A Children's Aid Society/Board of Education Community School.New York: Fordham University Graduate School of Social Services.
3.
BrickmanE., & CancelliA. (1997). Washington Heights community schools evaluation: First year findings.New York: Fordham University Graduate School of Education.
4.
BrickmanE., CancelliA., SanchezA., & RiveraG. (1998). The Children's Aid Society/ Board of Education community schools: Second-year evaluation report.New York: Ford-ham University Graduate Schools of Education and Social Services.
5.
CancelliA., BrickmanE., SanchezA., & RiveraG. (1999). The Children's Aid Society/ Board of Education community schools: Third-year evaluation report.New York: Ford-ham University Graduate School of Social Services.
6.
Carnegie Council on Adolescent Development. (1989). Turning points: Preparing American youth for the 21st century.New York: Carnegie Corporation of New York.
7.
ClarkH., & EngleR. (2000). Community schools evaluation plan: Adopting a theory of change approach.New York: The Children's Aid Society and ActKnowledge/CUNY Graduate Center.
8.
ClarkH., & EngleR. (2001). Summary of research findings, 1992–99.New York: CUNY Center for Human Environments.
9.
ClarkR.M. (1988). Critical factors in why disadvantaged children succeed or fail in school.New York: Academy for Educational Development.
10.
DryfoosJ.G. (1994). Full-service schools: A revolution in health and social services for children, youth, and families.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
11.
EcclesJ. (1999). The development of children ages 6 to 14. The Future of Children: When School Is Out, 9(2), 30–44.
12.
EpsteinJ.L. (May 1995). School, family, community partnerships: Caring for the children we share. Phi Delta Kappan, 77(9), 701–712.
13.
GarbM. (1998, December 27). Washington Heights: New hopes in a patchwork neighborhood. New York Times, archives.
14.
HendersonA.T., & BerlaN. (1995). A new generation of evidence: The family is critical to student achievement.Washington, DC: Center for Law and Education.
15.
HodgkinsonH.L. (1989). The same client: The demographics of education and service delivery systems.Washington, DC: Institute for Educational Leadership.
16.
IanniF.A.J. (1990). The search for structure.New York: The Free Press.
17.
McLaughlinM.W. (2000). Community counts: How youth organizations matter for youth development.Washington, DC: Public Education Network.
18.
New York City Department of Education. (2001). Annual School Report, District 6, I.S. 218.
19.
RobisonE. (1993). An interim evaluative report concerning a collaboration between The Children's Aid Society, New York City Board of Education, Community School District 6 and the I.S. 218 Salome Ureña de Henriquez School.New York: Fordham University Graduate School of Social Services.
20.
VandellD.L., & ShumowL. (1999). After-school child care programs. The Future of Children: When School Is Out, 9(2), 64–80.
21.
WeissC.H. (1995). Nothing as practical as good theory: Exploring theory-based evaluation for comprehensive community initiatives for children and families. In ConnellJ.P., KubischA.C., SchorrL.B., and WeissC.H. (Eds.), New approaches to evaluating community initiatives: Concepts, methods, and contexts (pp. 65–92). Washington, DC: The Aspen Institute.