BoydW.L., & ChristmanJ.B. (2003). A tall order for Philadelphia's new approach to school governance: Heal the political rifts, close the budget gap, and improve the schools. In CubanL., & UsdanM. (Eds.), Powerful reforms with shallow roots.New York: Teachers College Press.
CibulkaJ.G. (1999). Moving toward an accountable system of K-12 education: Alternative approaches and challenges. In CizekG. (Ed.), Handbook of educational policy (pp. 184–210). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
5.
CibulkaJ.G. (2003). External intervention to improve Baltimore and Washington, D.C.'s public schools. In CibulkaJ. G., & BoydW.L. (Eds.), A race against time: Responses to the crisis in urban schooling.Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group.
6.
CibulkaJ.G., & BoydW.L. (2003). Urban education reform strategies: Comparative analysis and conclusions. In CibulkaJ. G., & BoydW.L. (Eds.), A race against time: Responses to the crisis in urban schooling.Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group.
7.
CowanK.T., ManasevitL.M., EdwardsC.J., & SattlerC.L. (2002). The new Title I: Balancing flexibility with accountability.Washington, DC: Thompson Publishing Group, Inc.
8.
Darling-HammondL. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Education Policy Analysis Archives8(1). Available: http://olam.ed.asu.edu/epaa/v8n1/
9.
EdelmanM. (1967). The symbolic uses of politics.Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
10.
Financial Crisis, and Management Assistance Team. (2002). Compton Unified School District, Serna v. Easton Consent Decree. Six-month progress report (February). Available: http://www.fcmat.org
11.
FrahmR.A. (2002, June 3). Across nation, mixed results. The Hartford Courant, A1.
12.
HaycockK. (2000). No more settling for less. Thinking K-16, 4(1): 3–8, 4–12.
HoffD.J. (1996, September 18). West Virginia leaves district better than it found it. Education Week on the Web. Retrieved March 1, 2002 from http://www.edweek.org/ew/1996/03wva.h16
15.
JonesR.L. (2002, June 19). Education chief urges restoring local school control in Newark, Paterson, and Jersey City. The New York Times. Retrieved July 3, 2002 from www.nytimes.com. Document 143.
16.
KirstM.W. (2003). Mayoral influence, new regimes, and public school governance. In this volume— BoydW.L., & MiretzkyD. (Eds.), American educational governance on trial: Change and challenges. The 102nd yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part I (pp. 196–218). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
17.
KirstM.W., & BulkleyK. (in press). Mayoral takeover: The different direction taken in different cities. In CibulkaJ. G., & BoydW.L. (Eds.), A race against time: Responses to the crisis in urban schooling.Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group.
18.
LusiS.F., & GoldbergP.D. (2000). A new mission for the Department of Education. In PancratzR. S., & PetroskoJ.M. (Eds.), All children can learn: Lessons from the Kentucky reform experience (pp. 225–243). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
19.
MintropH., CurtisK., KingB., Plut-PregeljL., & QuinteroM. (2001, April). The effect of probation on school improvement, Part II: Organizational responses to probation in high-stakes accountability systems. Paper delivered at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA.
20.
New Jersey Department of Education. (2002). Developing a plan for reestablishing local control in the state-operated school districts: A final report to the New Jersey Department of Education. Available: http://www.state.nj.us/njded/schools/sosd/local2.pdf
21.
PetersonP.E. (1981). City limits.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22.
PowellM. (2002, April 21). Separate and unequal in Roosevelt, Long Island: A New York town's struggle against the toll of segregation. The Washington Post, A3, A13.
23.
Random House. (1968). College dictionary: Revised edition.New York: Random House, Inc.
24.
ReidK.S. (2001, September 19). California returns Compton district to local control. Education Week (21)3, 3.
25.
RoseL.C., & GallupA.M. (2000, September). The 32nd annual Phi Delta Kappa/ Gallup poll of the public's attitudes toward the public schools. Phi Delta Kappan82, 41–56.
26.
RoseL.C., & GallupA.M. (2001, September). The 33rd annual Phi Delta Kappa/ Gallup poll of the public's attitudes toward the public schools. Phi Delta Kappan83, 41–58.
SandersW.L., & RiversJ.C. (1996). Cumulative and residual effects of teachers on future student academic achievement. Knoxville: University of Tennessee, Tennessee Value Added Assessment System.
29.
SederR.C. (2000). Balancing accountability and local control: State intervention for financial and academic stability. Policy Study No. 268. Los Angeles: Reason Public Policy Institute.
30.
StoneC.N. (1999). Civic capacity and urban school reform. In StoneC. (Ed.), Changing urban education (pp. 250–276). Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas Press.
WenglinskyH. (2000). How teaching matters. Bringing the classroom back into discussions of teacher quality. A policy information center report. Princeton, NJ: The Milken Family Foundation and Educational Testing Service.
WongK.K., & ShenF.X. (2001). Does school district takeover work? Assessing the effectiveness of city and state takeover as a school reform strategy. Paper prepared for delivery at the 2001 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.
35.
WongK.K., ShenF.X., JainP., & NovacekG. (2000). City and state takeover as a school reform strategy. Paper prepared for delivery at the 2000 research conference of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management.
36.
YeeG. (2003). From Court Street to city hall: Governance change in the Boston Public Schools. In CibulkaJ. G., & BoydW.L. (Eds.), A race against time: Responses to the crisis in urban schooling.Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group.
37.
ZiebarthT. (2002). State takeovers and reconstitutions. Policy brief: Accountability— Rewards and sanctions.Denver: Author.