BallouD., & PodgurskyM. (1999). Teacher training and licensure: A layman's guide. In KanstoroomM., & FinnC. (Eds.), Better teachers, better schools (pp. 31–82). Washington, DC: Thomas P. Fordham Foundation.
2.
BallouD., & PodgurskyM. (2000). Reforming teacher education and licensing: What is the evidence?Teachers College Record, 102(1), 5–27.
3.
BerggrenK. (1999). Professionalism in Minneapolis: A new view. In PetersonB., & CharneyM. (Eds.), Transforming teacher unions: Fighting for better schools and social justice (pp. 40–44). Milwaukee, WI: Rethinking Schools.
4.
BlairJ. (2000, Sept. 27). Cincinnati teachers to be judged, paid on performance. Education Week, 1.
5.
BlairJ. (2002a, January 30). Gen-Xers apathetic about union label. Education Week, 1.
6.
BlairJ. (2002b, January 30). Minneapolis labor leaders mold a different kind of union. Education Week, 17.
7.
BooK. (1992, October). Reform school confidential. The Washington Monthly, 17–24.
8.
BoydW.L., PlankD.N., & SykesG. (2000). Teachers unions in hard times. In LovelessT. (Ed.), Conflicting missions? Teachers unions and educational reform (pp. 174–210). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
9.
BridgesE. (1986). The incompetent teacher.Philadelphia and London: Falmer Press.
ChaseB. (1999). Lead, follow, and get out of the way.Washington, DC: National Education Association.
12.
CobbleD.S. (1991). Organizing the postindustrial work force: Lessons from the history of waitress unionism. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 44(3), 419–436.
13.
Cochran-SmithM., & FriesM.K. (2001). Sticks, stones, and ideology: The discourse of reform in teacher education. Educational Researcher, 30(8), 3–15.
14.
Community Assistance and Training Center. (2001). Pathway to results: Pay for performance in Denver.Boston: Author.
15.
CooperB.S. (1982). Collective bargaining, strikes and related costs in education.Eugene, OR: ERIC Center for Educational Management.
16.
CooperB.S. (1998, March 11). Commentary: Merging the teachers’ unions: Opportunity amid complexity. Education Week, 52, 34.
Editorial. (2000, July 10). Without merit. Wall Street Journal, A34.
23.
ElmoreR.F., & BurneyD. (1997). School variation and systemic instructional improvement in Community School District #2, New York City.New York: National Commission on Teaching and America's Future and the Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
24.
EriksonE.H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis.New York: Norton.
25.
EtzioniA. (Ed.). (1969). The semi-professions and their organization.New York: The Free Press.
26.
FinnC.E. (2001). Getting better teachers—and treating them right. In MoeT.M. (Ed.), A primer on America's schools (pp. 127–150). Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press.
27.
FullerH.L., MitchellG.A., & HartmannM.E. (2000). Collective bargaining in Milwaukee public schools. In LovelessT. (Ed.), Conflicting missions: Teachers unions and educational reform (pp. 110–149). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
28.
GeogheganT. (1991). Which side are you on: Trying to be for labor when it's flat on its back.New York: Farrar, Strauss & Giroux.
29.
GoodladJ.I. (1990). Teachers for our nation's schools.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
JanofskyM. (1999, Sept. 10). For Denver teachers, a pay-for-performance plan. The New York Times, A19.
32.
JohnsonS.M., & KardosS.M. (2001). Reform bargaining and its promises for school improvement. In LovelessT. (Ed.), Conflicting missions? Teachers unions and educational reform (pp. 17–46). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
33.
KaufmanB. (1964). Up the down staircase.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
34.
KerchnerC.T., & AbbottJ. (1999). The implications of the health care revolution for the organization of school teachers. Paper presented at the NEA Conference on Frontiers of Unionism.
35.
KerchnerC.T., & AbbottJ. (2001). The implications of the health care revolution for the organization of public education. Unpublished manuscript.
36.
KerchnerC.T., & KoppichJ.E. (2000). Organizing around quality: The frontiers of teacher unionism. In LovelessT. (Ed.), Conflicting missions? Teachers unions and educational reform (pp. 281–316). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
37.
KerchnerC.T., KoppichJ.E., & WeeresJ.G. (1997). United mind workers: Unions and teaching in the knowledge society.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
38.
KerchnerC.T., & MitchellD.E. (1988). The changing idea of a teachers’ union.New York and London: Falmer Press.
KoppichJ.E. (2002a). Focusing on low-performing schools: The chancellor's district in New York City. Unpublished manuscript.
41.
KoppichJ.E. (2002b). Distributing the pie: Allocating resources through labor-management agreements. Unpublished manuscript.
42.
KoppichJ., AsherC., & KerchnerC.T. (2002). Developing careers, building a profession: The Rochester career in teaching plan.New York: National Commission on Teaching and America's Future.
43.
KoppichJ.E., HolmesP., & PleckiM. (1998). New rules, new roles? The professional work lives of charter school teachers.Washington, DC: National Education Association.
44.
LichtensteinN. (2002). State of the union: A century of American labor.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
45.
LiebermanM. (1997). The teacher unions: How the NEA and AFT sabotage reform and hold students, parents, teachers, and taxpayers hostage to reform.New York: Free Press.
46.
LiebermanM. (1998). Teachers evaluating teachers: Peer review and the new unionism.New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
47.
LiebermanM., & MoskowM. (1996). Collective negotiations for teachers: An approach to school administration.Chicago: Rand McNally.
48.
LiottaM.E. (2002). The four great strikes of Yonkers teachers: Historical analysis of conflict and change in urban education. Unpublished dissertation, Fordham University, New York.
49.
LortieD.C. (1969). The balance of control and autonomy in elementary school teaching. In EtzioniA. (Ed.), The semiprofessions and their organization (pp. 1–53). New York: Free Press.
50.
LortieD.C. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
51.
LovelessT. (2000). Introduction. In LovelessT. (Ed.), Conflicting missions? Teachers unions and educational reform (pp. 1–6). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
52.
MassPartners for Public Schools (2002). Teaching matters: Strengthening teacher evaluation in Massachusetts.Monson, MA: Author.
53.
Minneapolis Public Schools and Minneapolis Federation of Teachers. (1997). Teacher contract, agreements and policies, June 1997–June 30, 1999.Minneapolis, MN: Minneapolis Public Schools.
54.
Minneapolis Public Schools and Minneapolis Federation of Teachers Local 59. (1996). Assuring professional excellence: Professional development process for increased student achievement (Career in Teaching handbook for teachers). Minneapolis Public Schools.
55.
MoeT.M. (2001). A union by any other name. Education Next, 1(3), 40–45.
56.
MurphyM. (1990). Blackboard unions: The AFT and the NEA, 1900–1980.Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
57.
MurrayC.E. (1999). Rochester teachers struggle to take charge. In PetersonB., & CharneyM. (Eds.), Transforming teacher unions: Fighting for better schools and social justice (pp. 46–49). Milwaukee, WI: Rethinking Schools.
58.
NordgrenL., & SmithB. (1997). Professional development process (Progress Report).Minneapolis, MN: Minneapolis Public Schools.
59.
OddenA., & KelleyC. (1997). Paying teachers for what they know and do: New and smarter compensation strategies to improve schools.Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
60.
PeskeH.G., LiuE., KardosS.M., KauffmanD., & JohnsonS.M. (2000, April). Envisioning “something different”: New teachers’ conceptions of a career in teaching. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association annual meeting, New Orleans.
61.
PetersonB. (1999). Survival and justice: Rethinking teacher union strategy. In PetersonB., & CharneyM. (Eds.), Transforming teacher unions: Fighting for better schools and social justice (pp. 11–19). Milwaukee, WI: Rethinking Schools.
62.
PhillipsL. (1993). Miami: After the hype. In KerchnerC. T., & KoppichJ.E. (Eds.), A union of professionals: Labor relations and educational reform (pp. 116–135). New York: Teachers College Press.
63.
RavitchD. (1974). The great school wars.New York: Basic Books.
64.
RossiR. (2002, March 29). Teachers union launches unique graduate school. Chicago Sun-Times [Electronic Edition]. Retrieved April 4, 2002 from www.suntimes.com/output/news/cst-nws-ctu29.html
65.
Thomas B. Fordham Foundation (1999). The teachers we need and how to get more of them: Manifesto. In KanstoroomM., & FinnC. (Eds.), Better teachers, better schools (pp. 1–18). Washington, DC: Author.
66.
TyackD.B. (1974). The one best system: A history of American urban education.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
67.
TyackD., & HansotE. (1982). Managers of virtue: Public school leadership in America, 1820–1980.New York: Basic Books, Inc.
68.
UrbanW. (1982). Why teachers organize.Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.
69.
van GeelT. (2003). Vouchers, the Supreme Court, and the next political rounds. In this volume— BoydW.L., & MiretzkyD. (Eds.), American educational governance on trial: Change and challenges. The 102nd yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part I (pp. 136–154). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.