BallS.J. (1990). Politics and policy making in education: Explorations in policy sociology.London: Routledge.
2.
BerlinerD.C., & BiddleB.J. (1995). The manufactured crisis: Myths, fraud, and the attack on America's public schools.Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
3.
BoydW.L. (1992). The power of paradigms: Reconceptualizing educational policy and management. Educational Administration Quarterly, 28(4), 504–528.
4.
BoydW.L. (2000, September). The ‘R's of school reform’ and the politics of reforming or replacing public schools. Journal of Educational Change, 1(3), 225–252.
5.
BoydW.L., & CrowsonR.L. (1981). The changing conception and practice of public school administration. In BerlinerD. (Ed.), Review of Research in Education, (Vol. 9, pp. 311–373). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
6.
BoydW.L., & ImmegartG.L. (1979). Education's turbulent environment and problem-finding: Lines of convergence. In BoydW. L., & ImmegartG.L. (Eds.), Problem-finding in educational administration: Trends in research and theory (pp. 275–289). Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.
7.
BoydW.L., & KerchnerC.T. (1988). Introduction and overview: Education and the politics of excellence and choice. In BoydW. L., and KerchnerC.T. (Eds.), The politics of excellence and choice in education (pp. 1–11). New York and London: The Falmer Press.
8.
BrabeckM.M., WalshM.E., & LattaR. (Eds.). (2003). Meeting at the hyphen: Schools-universities-communities-professions in collaboration for student achievement and well being. The 102nd yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II. Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
9.
BraceyG.W. (1997a). Setting the record straight: Responses to misconceptions about public education in the United States.Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
10.
BraceyG.W. (1997b). The truth about America's schools: The Bracey reports, 1991–97.Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation.
11.
BraceyG.W. (2002). The war against America's public schools: Privatizing schools, commercializing education.Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
12.
CallahanR. (1962). Education and the cult of efficiency: A study of the social forces that have shaped the administration of the public schools.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13.
Center for Reinventing Public Education (2002, October 25). Structured to fail? The “impossible” job of the urban school superintendent.Draft of report to the Wallace-Reader's Digest Funds. Seattle, WA: Evans School of Public Affairs, University of Washington.
CibulkaJ.G. (1995). The reform and survival of American public schools: An institutional perspective. In CrowsonR.L., BoydW.L., & MawhinneyH.B. (Eds.), The politics of education and the new institutionalism (pp. 7–22). Washington, DC: Falmer Press.
16.
CoonsJ.E., & SugarmanS.D. (1978). Education by choice: The case for family control.Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
17.
CubanL. (1979). Determinants of curriculum change and stability, 1870–1970. In ShaffarzickJ., & SykesG. (Eds.), Value conflicts and curriculum issues (pp. 139–196). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
DraperN. (2002, December 15). Lofty goals may leave schools far behind; some educators say the “No Child Left Behind” federal law will punish the state's public schools. Minneapolis Star-Tribune, p. A1.
20.
EasterbrookG. (1986, January). Ideas move nations: How conservative think tanks have helped to transform the terms of political debate. The Atlantic Monthly, 25(1), 66–80. Available: http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/polibig/eastidea.htm
FletcherM.A. (2003, January 2). States worry new law sets schools up to fail. Washington Post, p. A1.
23.
GoodmanR.H., & ZimmermanW.G.Jr. (2000). Thinking differently: Recommendations for 21st century school board/superintendent leadership, governance, and teamwork for high student achievement.Arlington, VA: Educational Research Service and New England School Development Council. Available: http://www.nesdec.org/Thinking_Differently.htm
24.
GreeneJay P. (2002, April). High school graduation rates in the United States.New York: Center for Civic Innovation, Manhattan Institute [November 2001, revised April 2002]. Retrieved February 17, 2003, from http://www.manhattan-institute.org/html/cr_baeo.htm
HillP.T., PierceL.C., & GuthrieJ.W. (1997). Reinventing public education: How contracting can transform America's schools.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
29.
KellerB. (2000, September 20). ECS center to sort through new governance structures. Education Week, 20(3) 21.
30.
KirstM., & WalkerD. (1971). An analysis of curriculum policy-making. Review of Educational Research, 41(5), 479–509.
KristolI. (1996, September 9). The feminization of the Democrats. Wall Street Journal, A16.
33.
KronholzJ. (2000, October 13). Reconstitution is heavy artillery in Gore's education reform plan. Wall Street Journal, p. A20.
34.
KymlickaW. (1995). Multicultural citizenship: A liberal theory of minority rights.New York: Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press.
35.
MetzM.H. (1989). Real School: A universal drama amid disparate experience. In MitchellD. E., & GoertzM.E. (Eds.), Education politics for the new century (pp. 75–91). New York: Falmer Press.
36.
MintromM., & VergariS. (2002, September 20). Foundation engagement in education policymaking. Paper presented at conference on “Advancing the Institutional Research Agenda in Education.” Albany, NY: University at Albany, SUNY.
37.
NathanJ. (1989). (Ed.). Public schools by choice: Expanding opportunities for parents, students, and teachers.St. Paul, MN: Institute for Learning and Teaching.
38.
National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform.Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
39.
National Commission on Governing America's Schools. (1999). Governing America's schools: Changing the rules.Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States.
PetersonP.E., & CampbellD.E. (Eds.). (2001). Charters, vouchers, and public education.Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
42.
PowellW.W.Jr., & DiMaggioP. (Eds.). (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
43.
SalisburyR. (1967). Schools and politics in the big city. Harvard Educational Review, 37(3), 408–424.
44.
SchonD.A., & ReinM. (1994). Frame reflection: Towards the resolution of intractable policy controversies.New York: Basic Books.
45.
StringfieldS., & LandD. (Eds.). (2002). Educating at-risk students. The one hundred and first yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II. Chicago: The National Society for the Study of Education.
46.
TyackD. (1974). The one best system: A history of American urban education.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
47.
TyackD., & TobinW. (1994). The “grammar” of schooling: Why has it been so hard to change?American Educational Research Journal, 31(3), 453–479.
48.
TyeB.B. (2000). Hard truths: Uncovering the deep structure of schooling.New York: Teachers College Press.
49.
TyeB.B. (2002, September 20). Deep structure analysis: A tool for policy and practice. Paper presented at conference on “Advancing the Institutional Research Agenda in Education.” Albany, NY: University at Albany, SUNY.
50.
WangM., & WalbergH.J. (Eds). (2001). School choice or best systems: What improves education?Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
51.
WilgorenJ. (2000, October 9). Young blacks turn to school vouchers as civil rights issue. The New York Times, p. A1.
52.
WolfeA. (2000, March 29). Uncle Sam doesn't always know best. Wall Street Journal, A22.