In this article I seek to answer the question, “When are racial disparities in education the result of racial discrimination?” To answer it I synthesize the social science research on racially correlated disparities in education. My review draws from the sociology, anthropology, political science, psychology, history, and education literatures. I organize explanations into six categories: biological determinism, social structure, school organization and opportunities to learn, family background, culture, and the state. I arrive at three answers. The first is a definition: Racial discrimination in education arises from actions of institutions or individual state actors, their attitudes and ideologies, or processes that systematically treat students from different racial/ethnic groups disparately or inequitably. The second answer is that while distinguishing racial discrimination from disparities may be an interesting intellectual, legal, and statistical challenge, the conclusion probably is less meaningful than social scientists and policy makers might hope. The third answer follows from the first two. I propose the following reformulation of the original question: “When are racial disparities in education not due to discrimination?” I argue that the reformulated question is more likely to bring solutions to the race gap than the original one. Even if we conclude that discrimination does not cause racial disparities in education, we should not conclude that schools have no role in addressing them. If public schools do not address educational disparities, then who or what institution will?
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ainsworth-DarnellJ. W., & DowneyD. B. (1998). Assessing racial/ethnic differences in school performance. American Sociological Review, 63, 536–553.
2.
AlexanderK. (2001). The clouded crystal ball: Trends in educational stratification. Sociology of Education, 34, 169–177.
3.
AlexanderK., EntwisleD., & LettgersN. (1998, August). On the multiple faces of first grade tracking. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, San Francisco, CA.
4.
AndersonJ. D. (1988). The education of Blacks in the South, 1960–1935.Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
5.
AnyonJ. (1997). Ghetto schooling: A political economy of school reform.New York: Teachers College Press.
6.
ArmorD. (1995). Forced justice.London: Cambridge University Press.
7.
BakerD., & StevensonD. (1986). Mothers’ strategies for children's school achievement: Managing the transition to high school. Sociology of Education, 59, 171–182.
8.
BanksJ. in press. Handbook of research on multicultural education (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
9.
BankstonC., & CaldasS. (1996). Majority African American schools and social injustice: The influence of de facto segregation on academic achievement. Social Forces, 75, 535–556.
10.
BarnettW. S. (1996). Lives in the balance: Age-27 benefit-cost analysis of the High/Scope Perry Preschool Program.Ypsilanti, MI: High/Scope Press.
11.
BernsteinB. (1977). Class, codes, and control (Vol. 1).London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
12.
BialystokA., & HakutaK. (1994). In other words.New York: Basic Books.
BraddockJ., & DawkinsM. (1993). Ability grouping, aspirations, and attainments. Journal of Negro Education, 62, 324–336.
19.
BraddockJ., & McPartlandJ. M. (1988). The social and academic consequences of school desegregation. Equity and Choice, 4(2), 50–73.
20.
Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954).
21.
BrownS. (1999, August). High school racial composition: Balancing excellence and equity. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Sociological Association, Washington, DC.
22.
BrykA., LeeV., & HollandP. (1993). Catholic schools and the common good.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
23.
CampbellJ. R., HomboC. M., & MazzeoJ. (2000). NAEP 1999 trends in academic progress: Three decades of student performance (NCES 2000–469). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
24.
Capacchione et al. v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools, 57 F. Supp.2d 228 (W.D.N.C. 1999).
25.
CaplanN., ChoyM., & WhitmoreJ. (1991). Children of the Boat People.Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
26.
CarbonaroW. (1998). A little help from my friend's parents. Intergenerational closure and educational outcomes. Sociology of Education, 64, 199–215.
27.
CarterP. (2002). Low-income Black and Latino youths’ mobility orientations: Aspirations, culture, and resistance to ‘acting White’. Unpublished manuscript, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
ClodfelterC., LaddH., & VigdorJ. (2002, August). Within school segregation: The case of North Carolina. Paper presented at the Resegregation of Southern Schools Conference, Chapel Hill, NC.
30.
ColemanJ. (1994). A vision for sociology. Society, 32, 29–34.
31.
ColemanJ., CampbellE. Q., HobsonC., McPartlandJ., MoodA., WinfieldF., & YorkR. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity.Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
32.
College, Board (2001). College Board Seniors national report.New York: Author.
33.
CookP. J., & LudwigJ. (1998). The burden of ‘acting White’: Do Black adolescents disparage academic achievement? In JencksC., & PhillipsM. (Eds.), The Black-White test score gap (pp. 375–401). Washington, DC: Brookings.
34.
CookT. (1984). School desegregation and black achievement.Washington, DC: US Department of Education.
35.
CousinsL. H. (2002). Playing between classes: Exploring class, race, and culture in a Black high school and community. Unpublished manuscript.
36.
CrainR., & MahardR. E. (1978). Desegregation and black achievement: A review of the research. Law and Contemporary Problems, 43, 17–58.
37.
DarityW., CastellinoD., & TysonK. (2001, May). Increasing opportunity to learn via access to rigorous courses and programs: One strategy for closing the achievement gap for at risk and ethnic minority students.Raleigh, NC: State Board of Education.
38.
Darling-HammondL. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8, 1–50. Retrieved January 28, 2001, from http://epaa.edu/epaa/v8nl.
39.
de GraafP. M. (1986). The impact of financial and cultural resources on educational attainment in the Netherlands. Sociology of Education, 59, 237–246.
40.
DelgadoR., & StefancicJ. (2001). Critical race theory.New York: New York University Press.
41.
DelpitL. (1996). Other people's children.New York: Free Press.
42.
DiMaggioP. (1982). Cultural capital and school success: The impact of status culture participation on grades of U.S. high school students. American Sociological Review, 47, 189–201.
43.
DowneyD. B., & Ainsworth-DarnellJ. W. (2002). Reply: The search for oppositional culture among Black students. American Sociological Review, 67, 156–164.
44.
DumaisS. A. (2002). Cultural capital, gender, and school success: The role of habitus. Sociology of Education, 75, 44–68.
45.
DuncanG., & Brooks-GunnJ. (1997). Consequences of growing up poor.New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
46.
EitleT. M. (2002). Special education or racial segregation: Understanding variation in the representation of Black students in educable mentally handicapped programs. The Sociological Quarterly, 43, 575–605.
47.
FarkasG. (1996). Human capital or cultural capital: Ethnicity and poverty groups in an urban school district.New York: Aldine.
48.
FarkasG., LlerasC., & MaczugaS. (2002). Comment: Does oppositional culture exist in minority and poverty peer groups?American Sociological Review, 67, 148–155.
49.
FergusonR. F. (1998a). Can schools narrow the Black-White test score gap? In JencksC., & PhillipsM. (Eds.), The Black-White test score gap (pp. 318–374). Washington, DC: Brookings.
50.
FergusonR. F. (1998b). Teachers’ perceptions and expectations and the Black-White test score gap. In JencksC., & PhillipsM. (Eds.), The Black-White test score gap (pp. 273–317). Washington, DC: Brookings.
51.
FergusonR. F. (2001). A diagnostic analysis of Black-White GPA disparities in Shaker Heights, Ohio ((Brookings Papers on Education Policy). Washington, DC: Brookings.
52.
FinleyM. (1984). Teachers and tracking in a comprehensive high school. Sociology of Education, 57, 233–243.
53.
FisherC., HoutM., JanowskiM., LucasS., SwidlerA., & VossK. (1996). Inequality by design: Cracking the Bell Curve myth.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
54.
FiskeE., & LaddH. (2000). When schools compete: A cautionary tale.Washington, DC: Brookings.
55.
FordhamS. (1996). Blacked out: Dilemmas of race, identity, and success at Capital High.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
56.
FordhamS., & OgbuJ. U. (1986). Black students’ school success: Coping with the burden of ‘acting White.'The Urban Review, 18(3), 176–206.
57.
Freeman v. Pitts, 503 U.S. 467 (1992).
58.
FullerB., & ElmoreR. (1996). Who chooses? Who loses?New York: Teachers College Press.
59.
GamoranA. (2001). American schooling and educational inequality: A forecast for the 21st century. Sociology of Education, 34, 135–153.
60.
GamoranA., & MareR. (1989). Secondary school tracking and educational equity: Compensation, reinforcement, or neutrality. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 1146–1183.
61.
GarciaE. E. (2001). Hispanic education in the United States. Raíces y alas.Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
62.
GardnerH. (1993). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences.New York: Basic Books.
63.
GirouxH. (1981). Theory and resistance in education.South Hadley, MA: Bergin & Garvey.
64.
GodwinK., & KermererF. (2002). School choice tradeoffs.Austin: University of Texas Press.
65.
GoldmanV. (2003 January 12). The Baby Ivies. Preschool pedagogy for up to $15,000. The New York Times Magazine, 22–25.
66.
GouldS. J. (1981). The mismeasure of man.New York: Norton.
67.
GreenwaldR., HedgesL. V., & LaineR. D. (1994). The effect of school resources on students’ achievement. Review of Educational Research, 66, 361–396.
68.
GrissmerD. W., FlanaganA., & WilliamsonS. (1998). Why did the Black-White score gap narrow in the 1970s and 1980s? In JencksC., & PhillipsM. (Eds.), The Black-White test score gap (pp. 182–228). Washington, DC: Brookings.
69.
GrissmerD. W., KirbyS. N., BerendsM., & WilliamsonS. (1994). Student achievement and the changing American family.Washington, DC: RAND.
70.
GuoG., & VanweyL. K. (1999). Sibship size and intellectual development. American Sociological Review, 64, 169–187.
71.
HallinanM. (1994). Tracking: From theory to practice. Sociology of Education, 67, 70–91.
72.
HallinanM. T. (1998). Diversity effects on student outcomes: Social science evidence. Ohio State Law Journal, 59, 733–754.
73.
HallinanM. T. (2001). Sociological perspectives on Black-White inequalities in American schooling. Sociology of Education, 34, 50–70.
74.
HallinanM. T., & SorensenA. (1977). The dynamics of learning: A conceptual model (Discussion Paper 444–77). Madison, WI: Institute for Research on Society
75.
HaneyW. (2000). The myth of the Texas miracle in education. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8, 41. Retrieved December 27, 2000, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v8n41
76.
HanushekE. (1994). Money might matter somewhere: A response to Hedges, Laine, and Greenwald. Educational Researcher, 23, 5–8.
77.
HanushekE. (1996). A more complete picture of school resource policy. Review of Educational Research, 66, 397–409.
78.
HanushekE. (1997). Assessing the effects of school resources on student performance: An update. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19, 141–164.
79.
HauserR. M., SimmonsS. J., PagerD. I. (2000). High school dropout, race-ethnicity, and social background from 1970s to the 1990s (CDE Working Paper No. 2000–12). University of Wisconsin-Madison, Center for Demography and Ecology.
80.
HawleyW. (2002). Diversity and educational quality. Unpublished manuscript, University of Maryland, College Park.
81.
HeathS. (1983). Ways with words.Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
82.
HedgesL. V., LaineR. D., & GreenwaldR. (1994a). Does money matter? A meta-analysis of studies of the effects of differential inputs on student outcomes. Educational Researcher, 23, 5–14.
83.
HedgesL. V., LaineR. D., & GreenwaldR. (1994b). Money does matter somewhere: A reply to Hanushek. Educational Researcher, 23, 9–10.
84.
HedgesL. V., & NowellA. (1998). Black-White test score convergence since 1965. In JencksC., & PhillipsM. (Eds.), The Black-White test score gap (pp. 149–181). Washington, DC: Brookings.
85.
HedgesL. V., & NowellA. (1999). Changes in the Black-White gap in test scores. Sociology of Education, 72, 111–135.
86.
HenigJ. (1994). Rethinking school choice: Limits of the market metaphor.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
87.
HerrnsteinR., & MurrayC. (1994). The bell curve.New York: Free Press.
88.
HeubertJ. P. (2000a). High stakes.Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
89.
HeubertJ. P. (2000b, November). High-stakes testing: Opportunities and risks for students of color, English-language learners, and students with disabilities. Paper presented at the Conference on Minority Issues in Special Education in Public Schools. Cambridge, MA.
90.
HidalgoN. M., McDowellC. L., & SiddleE. V. (Eds.). (1990). Facing racism in education (Reprint Series No. 21). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Educational Review.
91.
HilliardA. (1989). Reintegration for education: Black community involvement with Black students in schools. In SmithW. D. (Ed.), Black education: A quest for excellence.New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
92.
Hobson v. Hansen, 269 F. Supp. 401 (D.C. Cir. 1967).
93.
HoffD. J. (2000, September). Gap widens between Black and White students on NAEPEducation Week, 20(1), 6.
94.
IngersollR. (1999). The problem of underqualified teachers in American secondary schools. Educational Researcher, 28, 26–37.
95.
IrvineJ. J. (1990). Black students and school failure: Policies, practices, and prescriptions.New York: Greenwood Press.
96.
JencksC., & PhillipsM. (Eds.) (1998). The Black-White test score gap.Washington, DC: Brookings.
97.
JensenA. (1969). How much can we boost IQ and scholastic achievement?Harvard Educational Review, 39, 1–123.
98.
JussimL., & EcclesJ. (1992). Teacher expectations II: Construction and reflection of student achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 947–61.
99.
JussimL., EcclesJ., & MadonS. (1996). Social perception, social stereotypes, and teacher expectations: Accuracy and the quest for powerful self-fulfilling prophecy. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 28, 281–387.
100.
KahlenbergR. (2001, February 21). An unambitious legacy. Education Week, 20(23), 48.
101.
KerckhoffA. (Ed.). (1996). Generating social stratification: Toward a new research agenda.Boulder, CO: Westview.
102.
KlugerR. (1977). Simple justice.New York: Random House.
103.
KornhaberM. (1997). Seeking strengths: Equitable identification for gifted education and the theory of multiple intelligences. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard Graduate School of Education, Cambridge, MA.
104.
KozolJ. (1992). Savage inequalities.New York: Crown.
105.
KulikC., & KulikJ. (1982). Effects of ability grouping on secondary school students: A metaanalysis of evaluation findings. American Educational Research Journal, 19, 415–428.
106.
KulikC., & KulikJ. (1987). Effects of ability grouping on student achievement. Equity and Excellence, 23, 22–30.
107.
LamontM., & LareauA. (1988). Cultural capital: Allusion, gaps, and glissandos in recent theoretical developments. Sociological Theory, 6, 153–68.
108.
LankfordH., LoebS., & WyckoffJ. (2002). Teacher sorting and the plight of urban schools: A descriptive analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24, 37–62.
109.
LareauA. (1987). Home advantage.New York: Falmer.
110.
LareauA., & HorvatE. M. (1999). Moments of social inclusion and exclusion: Race, class, and cultural capital in family-school relationships. Sociology of Education, 72, 135–153.
111.
LareauA., & ShumarW. (1996). The problem of individualism in family-school policies. Sociology of Education, 29, 24–39.
112.
LeeV. E. (2002, July). Discussant remarks. National Research Council Committee on National Statistics workshop on Measuring Racial Disparities in Education, Washington, DC.
113.
LeeV. E., & BurkamD. T. (2002, April). Inequality at the starting gate: Social background and achievement at Kindergarten entry. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
114.
LeeV. E., BurkamD. T., & LoGerfoL. F. (2001, April). Who goes where? How Kindergartners’ social background maps onto the quality of the elementary schools they attend. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA.
115.
LeeV. E., SmithJ. B., & CroningerR. G. (1997). How high school organization influences the equitable distribution of learning in mathematics and science. Sociology of Education, 70, 128–150.
116.
LewisO. (1966). The culture of poverty. Scientific American, 215, 19–25.
117.
LopezD., & EspirituY. (1990). Panethnicity in the United States: A theoretical framework. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 13, 198–224.
118.
LouryG. (1985). The moral quandary of the Black community. The Public Interest, 75, 19–31.
119.
LucasS. R. (1999). Tracking inequality.New York: Teachers College Press.
120.
LucasS. R. (2001). Effectively maintained inequality: Education transitions, track mobility, and social background effects. American Journal of Sociology, 106, 1642–1690.
121.
LucasS. R., & BerendsM. (2002). Sociodemographic diversity, correlated achievement, and de facto tracking. Unpublished manuscript, University of California at Berkeley.
122.
MaX. (1999). Dropping out of advanced placement mathematics: The effects of parental involvement. Teachers College Record, 101, 60–81.
123.
MacFarlandD. (2000). Student resistance: How formal and informal organization of classrooms facilitate everyday forms of student defiance. American Journal of Sociology, 107, 612–678.
124.
MacLeodJ. (1986). Ain't no makin’ it.Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
125.
MarksJ. (2002a). Folk heredity. In FishJ. (Ed.), Race and intelligence: Separating science from myth (pp. 95–116). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
126.
MarksJ. (2002b). Anthropology and the Bell Curve. In GustersonH., & BestemanC. (Eds.), On deeper reflection: Why America's top pundits are wrong about the world.Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
127.
MarksJ. (2002c). What it means to be 98% chimpanzee.Berkeley: University of California Press.
128.
MasseyD., & DentonM. (1993). American apartheid.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
129.
McCarthyC., & CrichlowW. (1993). Race identity and representation in education.New York: Routledge.
130.
McEwanP., & CarnoyM. (2000). The effectiveness and efficiency of private schools in Chile's voucher system. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 22, 213–240.
131.
McNeilL. (2000). Contradictions of school reform: Educational costs of standardized testing.New York: Routledge.
132.
MehanH., VillanuevaI., HubbardL., & LintzA. (1996). Constructing school success: The consequences of untracking low achieving students.New York: Cambridge University Press.
133.
MeierK. J., StewertJ. J., & EnglandR. E. (1989). Race, class, and education: The politics of second-generation discrimination.Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
134.
MertonR. K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science. Science, 159, 56–63.
135.
MickelsonR. A. (1989). Why does Jane read and write so well? The anomaly of women's achievement. Sociology of Education, 62, 43–67.
136.
MickelsonR. A. (1990). The attitude-achievement paradox among Black adolescents. Sociology of Education, 63, 44–61.
137.
MickelsonR. A. (Ed.). (2000). Children on the streets of the Americas: Globalization, homelessness, and education in the United States, Brazil, and Cuba.New York: Routledge.
138.
MickelsonR. A. (2001). Subverting Swann: First- and second- generation segregation in the Charlotte-Mecklenburg schools. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 215–252.
139.
MickelsonR. A. (2002a). Segregation and the SAT. Unpublished manuscript, University of North Carolina at Charlotte.
140.
MickelsonR. A. (2002b, August). The role of abstract, concrete, and oppositional attitudes of adolescents’ academic achievement. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Sociological Association, Chicago.
141.
MullerC. (1998). Gender differences in parental involvement and adolescents’ math achievement. Sociology of Education, 71, 336–356.
142.
MyersonJ., FrankM., RainsF., & SchnitzlerM. (1998). Race and general cognitive ability: The myth of diminishing returns to education. Psychological Science, 9, 61–64.
143.
NatrielloG., McDillE., & PallasA. (1990). Schooling disadvantaged children: Racing against catastrophe.New York: Teachers College Press.
144.
OakesJ. (1985). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality.New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
145.
OakesJ. (1990). Multiplying inequalities: The effects of race, social class, and tracking on opportunities to learn mathematics and science.Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
146.
OakesJ. (1993). Ability grouping, tracking and within-school segregation in the San Jose Unified School District. Diaz v. San Jose Unified School District, 633 F. Supp. 809 (N.D. Cal. 1985). Expert Report to the Court.
147.
OakesJ. (1994a). Ability grouping, tracking and within-school segregation in the New Castle County Schools. Coalition to Save Our Children v. State Board of Educ. et al., 901 F. Supp. 784 (D. Del. 1995). Expert Report to the Court.
148.
OakesJ. (1994b). More than misapplied technology: A normative and political response to Hallinan on tracking. Sociology of Education, 67, 84–88.
149.
OakesJ. (2002). Center X mission statement. Institute for Democracy Education, and Access (UCLA/IDEA). Retrieved Nay 3, 2003, from http://www.idea.gseis.ucla.edu/
150.
OakesJ., MuirK., & JosephR. (2000, May). Course taking and achievement in math and science: Inequalities that endure. Paper presented at the National Institute for Science Education Conference, Detroit, MI.
151.
O'ConnorC. (2001). Making sense of the complexity of social identity in relation to achievement: A sociological challenge in the new millennium. Sociology of Education, 34, 159–168.
152.
OgbuJ. U. (1978). Minority education and caste.New York: Academic Press.
153.
OgbuJ. U. (1991). Immigrant and nonimmigrant minorities in comparative perspective. In GibsonM., & OgbuJ. (Eds.), Minority status and schooling: A comparative perspective (pp. 3–36). New York: Garland.
154.
OgbuJ. U., & SimonsH. D. (1998). Voluntary and involuntary minorities: A cultural-ecological theory of school performance with some implications for education. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 29(2), 155–188.
155.
OliverM., & ShapiroT. (1995). Black wealth/White wealth.New York: Routledge.
156.
OmiM., & WinantH. (1986). Racial formation in the United States: From the 1960s to the 1980s.New York: Routledge.
OrfieldG., & GordonN. (2001). Schools more separate: Consequences of a decade of resegregation. New research findings.Cambridge, MA: Harvard Civil Rights Project.
159.
OrfieldG., & YunJ. (1999). Resegregation in American schools.Cambridge, MA: Harvard Civil Rights Project.
160.
OswaldD. P., CoutinhoM. J., & BestA. M. (2000, November). Community and school predictors of over representation of minority children in special education. Paper presented at the Conference on Minority Issues in Special Education in Public Schools, Cambridge, MA.
161.
PachónH., FedermanM., & CastilloL. (in press). High school race and class composition and advanced placement course availability. In WellsA., & PetrovichJ. (Eds.), Putting equity back in school reform.New York: Teachers College Press.
162.
PayneK. J., & BiddleB. J. (1999). Poor school funding, child poverty, and mathematics achievement. Educational Researcher, 28, 4–13.
163.
People Who Care v. Rockford Board of Education School District No. 205, 851 F. Supp. 905 (N.D. Ill. 1994).
164.
PetersonP., & HassellB. (1998). Learning from school choice.Washington, DC: Brookings.
165.
PhillipsM., CrouseJ., & RalphJ. (1998). Family background, parenting practices, and the Black-White test score gap. In JencksC., & PhillipsM. (Eds.). The Black-White Test Score Gap. (pp. 103–148). Washington, DC: Brookings.
166.
PowellJ. A., KearneyG., & KayV. (2001). In pursuit of a dream deferred: Linking housing and education policy.New York: Peter Lang.
167.
RafteryA., & HoutM. (1993). Maximally maintained inequality: Expansion, reform, and opportunity in Irish education, 1921–75. Sociology of Education, 66, 41–62.
168.
RhielC., PallasA., & NatrielloG. (1999). Rites and wrongs: Institutional explanations for the student course-scheduling process in urban high schools. American Journal of Education, 107, 116–154.
169.
RoscignoV. J. (1998). Race and reproduction of educational disadvantage. Social Forces, 3, 1033–1061.
170.
RoscignoV. J. (2000). Family/school inequality and African American/Hispanic achievement. Social Problems, 47, 266–290.
171.
RyanJ. (2002. July). What constitutes discrimination in education? A legal perspective. Paper presented at the National Research Council Committee on National Statistics workshop on Measuring Racial Disparities in Education, Washington, DC.
172.
SchmidtC. L. (2001). Educational achievement, language-minority students, and the new second generation. Sociology of Education, 34, 71–87.
173.
School desegregation: A social science statement: Amicus curiae brief of the NAACP et al., Freeman v. Pitts, U.S. Supreme Court on writ of certiorari to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit (1991).
174.
SchweinhartL. J., BarnesH. V., & WeikartP. (1993). Significant benefits: Age-27 benefits of the High/Scope Perry Preschool Program.Ypsilanti, MI: High/Scope Press.
175.
ScottJ. (Ed.). (in press). School choice and student diversity: Examining the evidence.New York: Teachers College Press.
176.
SlavinR. (1990). Achievement effects of ability groups in secondary schools: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 60, 471–499.
177.
SmithS. S., & KulynychJ. (2002). It may be social, but why is it capital? The social construction of social capital and the politics of language. Politics and Society, 30, 149–186.
178.
SorensenA. B., & HallinanM. (1986). Effects of ability grouping on growth in academic achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 529–542.
179.
SteeleC. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52, 613–629.
180.
SteeleC., & AronsonJ. (1998). Stereotype threat and the test performance of academically successful African Americans. In JencksC., & PhillipsM. (Eds.), The Black-White test score gap (pp. 401–430). Washington, DC: Brookings.
181.
SteinbergL., BrownB. B., & DornbuschS. (1992). Ethnic differences in adolescent achievement: An ecological perspective. American Psychologist, 47, 723–29.
182.
St. JohnN. (1975). School desegregation: Outcomes for children.New York: Wiley.
183.
SuterL. E. (2000). Is student achievement immutable? Evidence from international studies on schooling and student achievement. Review of Educational Research, 70, 529–545.
184.
Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools, 402 U.S. 1, 15 (1971).
185.
TermanL. (1923). Intelligence tests and school reorganization.New York: World Book Company.
186.
TysonK. (2002). Weighing in: Elementary-age students and the debate on attitudes toward school among Black students. Social Problems, 80, 1157–1189.
187.
UseemE. (1992). Middle schools and math groups: Parents involvement in children's placement. Sociology of Education, 65, 263–279.
188.
ValentineC. (1969). Culture and Poverty.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
189.
Van HookJ. (2002). Immigration and African American educational opportunity: The transformation of minority schools. Sociology of Education, 75, 169–189.
WalkerV S. (1999). Their highest potential.Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
192.
WaltersP. B. (2001). Educational access and the state: Historical continuities and discontinuities in racial inequality in American education. Sociology of Education, 34, 35–149.
193.
WatersM. (1990). Ethnic options: Choosing identities in America.Berkeley: University of California Press.
194.
WatkinsW. H. (2001). The White architects of Black education: Ideology and power in America, 1865–1954.New York: Teachers College Press.
195.
WeglinskyH. (1997). How money matters: The effects of school district spending on academic achievement. Sociology of Education, 70, 221–256.
196.
WellsA. S., & CrainR. L. (1994). Perpetuation theory and the long-term effects of school desegregation. Review of Educational Research, 64, 531–556.
197.
WellsA. S., & SernaI. (1996). The politics of culture: Understanding the local political resistance to detracking in racially mixed schools. Harvard Education Review, 66, 93–118.
198.
WelnerK. G. (2001). Legal rights, local wrongs: When community control collides with educational equity.Albany: State University of New York Press.
199.
WelnerK. G., & OakesJ. (1996). A(Li) Ability grouping: The new susceptibility of school tracking systems to legal challenges. Harvard Educational Review, 66, 451–470.
200.
WheelockA. (1992). Crossing the tracks: How untracking can save America's schools.New York: New Press.
201.
WillisP. (1977). Learning to labor.New York: Columbia University Press.
202.
WilsonW. J. (1987). The truly disadvantaged.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
203.
YonazawaS. (1997). Making decisions about students’ lives: An interactive study of secondary school students’ academic program selection. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of CaliforniaLos Angeles
204.
YunJ., & ReardonS. (2002, August). Demographic overview: Trends in school segregation in the South, 1987–2000. Paper presented at the conference on Resegregation of Southern Schools, Chapel Hill, NC
