AikinW. M. (1942). The story of The Eight Year Study.New York: Harper.
2.
BakhtinM. (1981). The dialogic imagination.Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
3.
BormanG., HewesG., RachubaL., & BrownS. (in press). A meta-analysis of the effects of diverse whole-school reform designs.Baltimore: Center for Social Organization of Schools.
4.
BormanG., & RachubaL. (1999). Qualifications and professional growth opportunities of teachers in high and low poverty elementary schools. Journal of Negro Education, 68(3), 366–381.
5.
CampbellJ. R., HomboC. M., & MazzeoJ. (2000). NAEP 1999 trends in academic progress: Three decades of student performance.Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics.
6.
CaplowT., HicksL., & WattenbergB. (2001). The first measured century.Washington, DC: AEI Press.
ColemanJ., CampbellE., HobsonC., McPartlandJ., MoodA., WeinfeldF., & YorkR. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity.Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.
9.
CreemersB. P. M., & ScheerensJ. (1994). Developments in the educational effectiveness research programme. International Journal of Educational Research, 21(2), 125–140.
10.
CubanL. (2001, July). Improving urban schools in the 21st century: Do's and don'ts, or advice to true believers and skeptics of whole-school reform. Keynote presentation at the OERI Symposium on Comprehensive School Reform Research and Evaluation, Denver, CO.
11.
DatnowA., HubbardL., & MehanH. (1998). Educational reform implementation: A co-constructed process (Research Report 5) Santa Cruz, CA: Center for Research on Education, Diversity, and Excellence.
12.
DatnowA., HubbardL., & MehanH. (in press). Extending educational reform: From one school to many.London: Routledge Falmer.
13.
DatnowA., & StringfieldS. (2000). Working together for reliable school reform. Journal of Education for Students Placed At Risk, 5(1 & 2), 183–204.
14.
DatnowA., StringfieldS., BormanG., RachubaL., & CastellanoM. (in press). Comprehensive school reform in culturally and linguistically diverse contexts: Implementation and outcomes from a 4-year study.Santa Cruz, CA: Center for Research on Education, Diversity, and Excellence.
15.
EricksonF., & ShultzJ. (1982). The counselor as gatekeeper.New York: Academic Press.
16.
FrechtlingJ., ButlerP., MichieJ., AlldredgeE., WangJ., McConneyA., AyresR., HansenJ., CuthbertsonL., PhelpsR., FassanellaJ., & ScheigW. (2001). Report of the final evaluation of the city-state partnership.Rockville, MD: Westat.
17.
FriedmanT. (1999). The Lexus and the olive tree.New York: Farrar, Strauss, & Giroux.
18.
FullanM. (1999). Change forces: The sequel.London: Falmer.
19.
FullanM. (2001). The new meaning of educational change (3rd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
20.
GarfinkelH. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
21.
GoodT., & BrophyJ. (1999). Looking in classrooms (8th ed.). New York: Harper & Row.
22.
HallP. M., & McGintyP. J. W. (1997). Policy as the transformation of intentions: Producing program from statutes. The Sociological Quarterly, 38, 439–467.
23.
HaxbyJ., GobbiniM., FureyM., IshaiA., SchoutenJ., & PietriniP. (2001). Distributed and overlapping representations of faces and objects in ventral temporal cortex. Science, 273, 2425–2429.
24.
HaynesN. (Ed.). (1998). Changing schools for changing times: The Comer School Development Program. Special issue of the Journal of Education for Students Placed At Risk, 3(1), 1–102.
25.
HelsbyG. (1999). Changing teachers’ work.Buckingham, U.K.: Open University Press.
26.
HermanR., AladjemD., McMahonP., MasemE., MulliganI., O'MalleyA., QuinonesS., ReeveA., & WoodruffD. (1999). An educator's guide to schoolwide reform.Washington, DC: American Institute for Research.
27.
HopfenbergW. S., & LevinH. M. (1993). The Accelerated Schools resource guide.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
28.
KemperE., StringfieldS., & TeddlieC. (2000, January). Findings from phase 5 of the Louisiana School Effectiveness Study (LSES-V): Unfolding school, district, and state-level processes and effects. Symposium presented at the annual meeting of the International Congress for School Effectiveness and Improvement, Hong Kong.
29.
LandD. (2002). Local school boards under review: Their role and effectiveness in relation to students’ academic achievement (Tech. Rep. No. 56). Baltimore: Center for Social Organization of Schools, Johns Hopkins University.
30.
MehanH. A., HertweckA., & MeihlsJ. L. (1986). Handicapping the handicapped: Decision-making in students’ educational careers.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
31.
MishelL., BernsteinJ., & SchmittJ. (2001). The state of working America.Ithaca, NY: Cornell.
32.
MooreS., & SimonJ. (2000). It's getting better all the time: 100 greatest trends of the last 100 years.Washington, DC: Cato.
33.
National School Boards Foundation (NSBF). (1999). Leadership matters: Transforming urban school boards.Alexandria, VA: Author.
34.
NelsonH., DrownR., & GouldJ. (2001). Survey & analysis of teacher salary trends 2000.Washington, DC: American Federation of Teachers.
35.
NewmannF. M., & WehlageG. G. (1995). Successful school restructuring.Madison, WI: Center on Organization and Restructuring of Schools.
36.
NunneryJ. A. (1998). Reform ideology and the locus of development problem in educational restructuring. Education and Urban Society, 30(3), 277–295.
37.
PetersK. H., & MarchJ. K. (1999). Collaborative observation: Putting classroom instruction at the center of school reform.Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
38.
ReynoldsD., CreemersB., StringfieldS., TeddlieC., & SchafferE. (2002). World Class Schools: Longitudinal data from the International School Effectiveness Programme.London: Falmer.
39.
RobertsK. (1990). Some characteristics of high reliability organizations. Organizational Science, 1(2), 1–17.
40.
RobertsK. (1993). New challenges to understanding organizations.New York: Macmillan.
41.
RosenshineB., & StevensR. (1986). Teaching functions. In WittrockM. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 376–391). New York: Macmillan.
42.
RossS., SandersW., WrightP., StringfieldS., WangL., & AlbergM. (2001). Two-and three-year achievement results from the Memphis Restructuring Initiative. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 12(3), 323–346.
43.
ScheerensJ., & BoskerR. (1997). The foundations of school effectiveness.Oxford, U.K.: Pergamon Press.
44.
SlavinR., & FasholaO. (1998). Show me the evidence!Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
45.
SmithD. (2001, August 26). Diploma statistics indicate US education is passing and failing. Los Angeles Times, p. A34.
46.
SmithL., RossS., McNelisM., SquiresM., WassonR., MaxwellS., WeddleK., NathL., GrehanA., & BuggeyT. (1998). The Memphis Restructuring Initiative: Analysis of activities and outcomes that affect implementation success. Education and Urban Society, 30(3), 277–295.
47.
SnowC., BurnsS., & GriffinP. (Eds.). (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children.Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
48.
StringfieldS. (1998). Organizational learning and current reform efforts. In Leith-woodK., & LouisK. S. (Eds.), Schools as learning communities (pp. 255–268). Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
49.
StringfieldS. (2001). Improving urban education: The Baltimore story. Paper presented at the National School Boards Association, San Diego, CA.
50.
StringfieldS., MillsapM. A., HermanR., YoderN., BrighamN., NesselrodtP., SchafferE., KarweitN., LevinM., & StevensR. (with Gamse, B., Puma, M., Rosenblum, S., Beaumont, J., Randall, B., & Smith, L.). (1997). Urban and suburban/rural special strategies for educating disadvantaged children. Final report.Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
51.
StringfieldS., ReynoldsD., & SchafferE. (2001, January). The High Reliability Schools Project: Results from the first five years. Paper presented at the International Congress for School Effectiveness and Improvement, Hong Kong.
52.
StringfieldS., ReynoldsD., & SchafferE. (2001, January). The High Reliability Schools Project: Some preliminary results and analyses. Symposium presented at the International Congress for School Effectiveness and Improvement, Toronto, Canada.
53.
StringfieldS., RossS., & SmithL. (Eds.). (1996). Bold plans for school restructuring: The New American Schools designs.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
54.
TeddlieC., & ReynoldsD. (Eds.). (2000). The international handbook of school effectiveness research.London: Falmer.
55.
TeddlieC., & StringfieldS. (1993). Schools make a difference.New York: Teachers College Press.
56.
TeddlieC., StringfieldS., & ReynoldsD. (2000). Context issues within school effectiveness research. In TeddlieC., and ReynoldsD. (Eds.), The international handbook of school effectiveness research (pp. 160–185). London: Falmer Press.
57.
ThomasJ. (2002). The public school superintendency in the 21st century.Baltimore: Center for Social Organization of Schools, Johns Hopkins University.
58.
United States Department of Education (2001). The condition of education, 2001.Washington, DC: Author.
59.
YonezawaS., & StringfieldS. (1999). The Special Strategies Studies: Initial and six-year follow-up findings and reflections. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.