Section Three: Looking beyond Traditional Practices for At-Risk Students

Barnett S. (1989). Designing a Chapter 1 study: Implications from research on preschool education. In U.S. Department of Education (Ed.), Planning papers for the national longitudinal study of Chapter 1 (pp. 17–38). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

Berman P. , & McLaughlin M. W. (1977). Federal programs supporting educational change: Vol. 7. Factors affecting implementation and continuation. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.

Berman P. , & McLaughlin M. W. (1978). Federal programs supporting educational change: Vol. 8. Implementing and sustaining innovations. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.

Borman G. D. (2000). Title I: The evolving research base. Journal of Education for Students Placed At Risk, 5(1 & 2), 27–45.

Borman G. D. , & D'Agostino J. V. (1996). Title I and student achievement: A meta-analysis of federal evaluation results. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 4, 309–326.

Borman G. D. , & D'Agostino J. V. (2001). Title I and student achievement: A quantitative synthesis. In Borman G. D. , Stringfield S. , & Slavin R. E. (Eds.), Title I: Compensatory education at the crossroads (pp. 25–58). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Borman G. D. , Stringfield S. , & Slavin R. E. (Eds.). (2001). Title I: Compensatory education at the crossroads. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Borman G. D. , Wong K. K. , Hedges L. V. , & D'Agostino J. V. (2001). Coordinating categorical and regular programs: Effects on Title I students’ educational opportunities and outcomes. In Borman G. D. , Stringfield S. , & Slavin R. E. (Eds.), Title I: Compensatory education at the crossroads (pp. 79–116). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Citizens’ Commission on Civil Rights. (1999). Title I in midstream: The fight to improve schools for poor kids (ERIC Document # ED438372). Washington, DC: Author.

Cohen D. K. (1982). Policy and organization: The impact of state and federal education policy on school governance. Harvard Educational Review, 52, 474–499.

Cooper H. , Nye B. , Charlton K. , Lindsay J. , & Greathouse S. (1996). The effects of summer vacation on achievement test scores: A narrative and meta-analytic review. Review of Educational Research, 66, 227–268.

Council of the Great City Schools. (1999, March). Reform and results: An analysis of Title I in the Great City Schools 1994–95 to 1997–98. Washington, DC: Author.

Crandall D. P. , Loucks-Horsley S. , Baucher J. E. , Schmidt W. B. , Eiseman J. W. , Cox P. L. , Miles M. B. , Huberman A. M. , Taylor B. L. , Goldberg J. A. , Shive G. , Thompson C. L. , & Taylor J. A. (1982). Peoples, policies, and practices: Examining the chain of school improvement (Vols. 1–10). Andover, MA: The NETWORK.

Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, Pub. L. No. 89–10, 79 Stat. 27 (1965).

Glass G. V. , & Smith M. L. (1977). “Pullout” in compensatory education. Boulder, CO: University of Colorado, Laboratory of Educational Research.

Grissmer D. W. , Kirby S. N. , Berends M. , & Williamson S. (1994). Student achievement and the changing American family. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.

Herrington C. D. , & Orland M. E. (1992). Politics and federal aid to urban school systems: The case of Chapter 1. In Cibulka J. , Reed R. , and Wong K. (Eds.), The politics of urban education in the United States (pp. 167–179). Washington, DC: Falmer Press.

Heyns B. (1978). Summer learning and the effects of schooling. New York: Academic Press.

Jeffrey J. R. (1978). Education for children of the poor: A study of the origins and implementation of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.

Kennedy M. M. , Birman B. F. , & Demaline R. E. (1986). The effectiveness of Chapter 1 services. Second interim report from the national assessment of Chapter 1. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.

Kirst M. , & Jung R. (1982). The utility of a longitudinal approach in assessing implementation: A thirteen-year review of Title I, ESEA. In Williams W. , Elmore R. F. , Hall J. S. , Jung R. , Kirst M. , MacManus S. A. , Narver B. J. , Nathan R. P. , & Yin R. K. (Eds.), Studying implementation (pp. 119–148). Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.

Martin R. , & McClure P. (1969). Title I of ESEA: Is it helping poor children? Washington, DC: Washington Research Project and NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

McDill E. , & Natriello G. (2001). History and promise of assessment and accountability in Title I. In Borman G. D. , Stringfield S. , & Slavin R. E. (Eds.), Title I: Compensatory education at the crossroads. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

McLaughlin D. H. (1977). Title I, 1965–1975: Synthesis of the findings of federal studies. Palo Alto, CA: American Institutes for Research.

McLaughlin M. W. (1976). Implementation of ESEA Title I: A problem of compliance. Teachers College Record, 77, 397–415.

Meyer J. W. , Scott W. R. , & Strang D. (1986). Centralization, fragmentation, and school district complexity. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32, 186–201.

Millsap M. A. , Turnbull B. J. , Moss M. , Brigham N. , Gamse B. , & Marks E. (1992). The Chapter 1 implementation study, interim report. Cambridge, MA: Abt Associates.

Orland M. E. (1994). From the picket fence to the chain link fence: National goals and federal aid to the disadvantaged. In Wong K. , & Wang M. (Eds.), Rethinking policy for at-risk students (pp. 179–196). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.

Peterson P. E. (1981). City limits. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Peterson P. E. , Rabe B. G. , & Wong K. W. (1986). When federalism works. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

Piche D. M. , McClure P. P. , & Schmelz S. T. (1999). Title I in Alabama: The struggle to meet basic needs (ERIC Document # ED439193). Washington, DC: Citizens Commission on Civil Rights.

Rossi R. J. , McLaughlin D. H. , Campbell E. A. , & Everett B. E. (1977). Summaries of major Title I evaluations, 1966–1976. Palo Alto, CA: American Institutes for Research.

Smith M. S. , & O'Day J. A. (1991). Educational equality: 1966 and now. In Verstegen D. , & Ward J. (Eds.), Spheres of justice in education: The 1990 American Education Finance Association yearbook (pp. 53–100). New York: Harper Business.

Tallmadge G. K. , & Wood C. T. (1981). User's guide to the ESEA Title I evaluation and reporting system. Mountain View, CA: RMC Research Corporation.

Taylor W. L. , & Piche D. M. (1990). A report on shortchanging children: The impact of fiscal inequity on the education of students at risk (ERIC Document # ED328654). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Timpane M. (1976). Evaluating Title I again? In Abt C. (Ed.), The evaluation of social programs (pp. 415–423). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

U.S. Department of Education. (1999). Promising results, continuing challenges: The final report of the national assessment of Title I. Executive summary (prepublication copy). Washington, DC: Author.

Walberg H. J. , & Greenberg R. C. (1998, April 8). The Diogenes factor: Why it's hard to get an unbiased view of programs like “Success for All.” Education Week, p. 52.

Wargo M. J. , Tallmadge G. K. , Michaels D. D. , Lipe D. , & Morris S. J. (1972). ESEA Title I: A reanalysis and synthesis of evaluation data from fiscal year 1965 through 1970. Palo Alto, CA: American Institutes for Research.

Word E. , Johnston J. , Bain H. P. , Fulton B. D. , Zaharias J. B. , Achilles C. M. , Lintz M. N. , Folger J. , & Breda C. (1990). Student/Teacher Achievement Ratio (STAR): Tennessee's K–3 class size study: Final summary report, 1985–1990. Nashville, TN: Tennessee State Department of Education.