Technology,Education,and At-Risk Students

Becker H. , & Riel M. (2000). Teacher professional engagement and constructivist-compatible computer use. Teaching, learning, and computing: 1998 national survey (report #7). Irvine, CA & Minneapolis, MN: Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations.

Blanton W. E. , Moorman G. B. , Hayes B. A. , & Warner M. L. (1997). Effects of participation in the Fifth Dimension on far transfer. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 16(4), 1–8.

Bronfenbrenner U. , & Morris P. (1998). The ecology of developmental processes. In Lemer R. (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (5th ed., pp. 993–1028). New York: Wiley.

Bruner J. (1996). The culture of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

California Academic Standards Commission (1997, October 1). Language arts: Reading, writing, listening, speaking standards. Retrieved October 30, 2001 from http://www.cde.ca.gov/search/query.asp

Castells M. (1997). The information age: Economy, society, and culture. Vol. II: The power of identity. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

Cole M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Cummins J. , & Sayers D. (1995). Brave new schools: Challenging cultural illiteracy through global learning networks. New York: St. Martin's Press.

Dede C. (Ed.). (1998). ASCD yearbook 1998: Learning with technology. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Durán R. P. (1999). Learning and technology: Implications for culturally responsive instructional activity and models of achievement. The Journal of Negro Education, 67(3), 220–227.

Hedges L. , Konstantopoulos S. , & Thoreson A. (2000, November). Computer use and its relation to academic achievement in mathematics, reading, and writing. Report commissioned by the NAEP Validity Studies Panel. Palo Alto, CA: American Institutes for Research.

Kliman M. (1998). Choosing mathematical game software for girls and boys through the Glass Wall Website. Cambridge, MA: TERC. Available: http://www.terc.edu/mathequity/gw/html/ChoosingSoftwarepaper.html

Lave J. , & Wenger E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Manzo K. K. (2001). Academic record. Education Week, 20(35), 22–23.

Mayer R. E. , Durán R. , Quilici J. , Moreno R. , Woodbridge S. , Simon R. , Sanchez D. , & Lavezzo A. (1997). Cognitive consequences of participation in a “Fifth Dimension” after-school computer club. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 16(4), 353–370.

Meyer L. (2001, May 10). New challenges. Education Week, 20(35) [online]. Available: http://www.edweek.org/ew/browse_ew_20.htm

National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). (2000). Teachers’ tools for the 21st century: A report on teachers’ use of technology (NCES 2000–102). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIAA). (2000). Falling through the net: Toward digital inclusion. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.

Ravitz J. , Becker H. , & Wong Y. T. (2000). Constructivist-compatible beliefs and practices among U.S. teachers: 1998 National Survey (report #4). Irvine, CA & Minneapolis, MN: Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations.

Rogoff B. (1995). Observing sociocultural activity on three planes: Participatory appropriation, guided participation, and apprenticeship. In Wertsch J. , del Rio P. , and Alvarez A. (Eds.), Sociocultural studies of mind (pp. 139–164). Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.

Ross S. , & Lowther D. Impacts of the Co-nect school reform design on classroom instruction, school climate, and student achievement in inner-city schools. Manuscript in preparation.

Rumberger R. (2000, February). A multilevel longitudinal approach to evaluating the effectiveness of educational technology. Paper presented at the Design Meeting on Effectiveness of Technology, SRI International, Menlo Park, CA.

Sivin-Kachala J. , & Bialo E. R. (2000). Research report on the effectiveness of technology in schools (7th ed.). Washington, DC: Software and Information Industry Association.

Tharp R. G. , & Gallimore R. (1988). Rousing minds to life: Teaching, learning, schooling in a social context. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Vasquez O. , & Durán R. (2000). La Clase Mágica and Club Proteo: Multiple literacies in new community institutions. In Gallego M. , & Hollingsworth S. (Eds.), What counts as literacy: Challenging the school standard (pp. 173–189). New York: Teachers College Press.

Warschauer M. (1999). Electronic literacies: Language, culture, and power in online education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Williams S. , Burgess K. , Bray M. , Bransford J. , Goldman S. , & The Cognition, and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1998). Technology and learning in Schools for Thought Classrooms. In Dede C. (Ed.), ASCD yearbook 1998: Learning with technology. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Winglensky H. (1998). Does it compute? The relationship between educational technology and student achievement in mathematics. Princeton, NJ: Policy Information Center, Educational Testing Service.