BalfanzR. (2000). Why do so many urban public school students demonstrate so little academic achievement? In SandersM. G. (Ed.), Schooling students placed at risk: Research, policy, and practice in the education of poor and minority adolescents (pp. 37–62). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
2.
BalfanzR., & Mac IverD. J. (2000). Transforming high-poverty urban middle schools into strong learning institutions: Lessons from the first 5 years of the Talent Development Middle School. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 5(1 & 2), 137–158.
3.
BalfanzR., Mac IverD. J., & RyanD. (1999, April). Achieving algebra for all with a facilitated instructional program: First year results of the Talent Development Middle School Mathematics Program. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
4.
BoeE., BobbitS., CookL., WhitenerS., & WeberA. (1997). Why didst thou go? Predictors of retention, transfer, and attrition of special and general education teachers from a national perspective. Journal of Special Education, 30(4), 390–411.
5.
Brooks-GunnJ., & DuncanG. J. (1997). The effects of poverty on children. The Future of Children, 7(2), 55–71.
6.
CooneyS. (1998). Education's weak link: Student performance in the middle grades.Atlanta, GA: Southern Regional Education Board.
7.
CorbettH. D., & WilsonB. L. (1997). Cracks in the classroom floor: The seventh grade year in five Philadelphia middle schools.Philadelphia: Philadelphia Education Fund.
8.
Darling-HammondL. (1997). The right to learn: A blueprint for creating schools that work.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
9.
DickinsonT. S. (2001). Reinventing the middle school: A proposal to counter arrested development. In DickinsonT. S. (Ed.), Reinventing the middle school (pp. 1–20). New York: Routledge Falmer.
10.
IngersollR. M. (2001). Teacher turnover and teacher shortages: An organizational analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 38(3), 499–534.
11.
JacksonA. W., & DavisG. A. (2000). Turning Points 2000: Educating adolescents in the 21st century.New York: Teachers College Press.
12.
LipsitzJ., & WestT. (2000). A construct for identifying excellence in schools from the National Forum to Accelerate Middle-Grades Reform (National Forum Issue Paper #19, on-line). Available: www.mgforum.org
13.
Mac IverD. J., & BalfanzR. (2001). No excuses: Committing to high performance. Principal Leadership, 1(8), 36–40.
14.
Mac IverD. J., BalfanzR., & PlankS. B. (1998). An “elective replacement” approach to providing extra help in math: The Talent Development Middle Schools’ Computer- and Team-Assisted Mathematics Acceleration (CATAMA) Program. Research in Middle Level Education Quarterly, 22(2), 1–23.
15.
Mac IverD. J., Mac IverM. A., BalfanzR., PlankS., & RubyA. (2000). Talent Development Middle Schools: Blueprint and results for a comprehensive whole-school reform model. In SandersM. G. (Ed.), Schooling students placed at risk: Research, policy, and practice in the education of poor and minority adolescents (pp. 292–319). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
16.
Mac IverD. J., & PlankS. B. (1996). Creating a motivational climate conducive to talent development in middle schools: Implementation and effects of Student Team Reading (Report 4). Washington, DC: Center for Research on Students Placed at Risk.
17.
Mac IverD. J., & PrioleauA. D. (1999, April). Looping: Helping middle school teachers to be caring, daring, and effective. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
18.
Mac IverD. J., YoungE., BalfanzR., ShawA., GarriottM., & CohenA. (2001). High-quality learning opportunities in high poverty middle schools: Moving from rhetoric to reality. In DickinsonT. S. (Ed.), Reinventing the middle school (pp. 155–175). New York: Routledge Falmer.
19.
Mac IverD. J., YoungE. A., & WashburnB. (2002). Instructional practices and motivation during middle school (with special attention to science). In WigfieldA., & EcclesJ. (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 333–351). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
McEwinC. K., & DickinsonT. S. (1997). Middle level teacher preparation and licensure. In IrvinJ. L. (Ed.), What research says to the middle level practitioner (pp. 223–229). Columbus, OH: National Middle School Association.
22.
McEwinC. K., DickinsonT. S., & JenkinsD. M. (1996). America's middle schools: Practices and progress—a 25 year perspective.Columbus, OH: National Middle School Association.
23.
OddenA., & BuschC. (1998). Financing schools for high performance: Strategies for improving the use of educational resources.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
24.
PlankS., & YoungE. (1999, April). In the long run: Longitudinal assessments of the Student Team Literature Program. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
25.
RubyA. (1999). Teacher turnover and professional development.Baltimore: Center for the Social Organization of Schools, Johns Hopkins University.
26.
SampsonR. J., & MorenoffJ. D. (1997). Ecological perspectives on the neighborhood context of urban poverty: Past and present. In Brooks-GunnJ., DuncanG. J., & AberL. (Eds.), Neighborhood poverty: Vol. 2, Policy implications in studying neighborhoods (pp. 1–43). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
27.
SandersM. G., & EpsteinJ. L. (2000). Building school-family-community partnerships in middle and high schools. In SandersM. G. (Ed.), Schooling students placed at risk: Research, policy, and practice in the education of poor and minority adolescents (pp. 339–361). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
28.
SorrellA. C. (2001). The Talent Development Climate Program: Helping middle schools create atmospheres that are safe, nurturing, and positive [Video and Flyer]. Baltimore: Center for the Social Organization of Schools, Johns Hopkins University.
29.
UseemE. (2000). New teachers’ appraisals of the Talent Development Middle School training and curriculum.Philadelphia: Philadelphia Education Fund.
30.
UseemE. (2001). New teacher staffing and comprehensive middle school reform: Philadelphia's experience. In AnfaraV. A.Jr. (Ed.), The handbook of research in middle level education.Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
31.
UseemE., & NeildR. C. (2001). Teacher staffing in the school district of Philadelphia: A report to the community.Philadelphia: Philadelphia Education Fund.
32.
WheelockA. (1998). Safe to be smart: Building a culture for standards-based reform in the middle grades.Columbus, OH: National Middle School Association.
33.
WilsonB. L., & CorbettH. D. (2001). Listening to urban kids: School reform and the teachers they want.Albany, NY: SUNY Press.