AchillesC. M., FinnJ. D., & BainH. P. (1997-1998). Using class size to reduce the equity gap. Educational Leadership, 55(4), 40–43.
2.
AdamsG. L., & EngelmannS. (1996). Research on Direct Instruction: 25 years beyond DISTAR.Seattle, WA: Educational Achievement Systems.
3.
AdamsM. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4.
Berrueta-ClementJ. R., SchweinhartL. J., BarnetteW. S., EpsteinA. S., & WeikartD. P. (1984). Changed lives.Ypsilanti, MI: High/Scope.
5.
BodillyS. J. (1998). Lessons from New American Schools’ scale-up phase.Washington, DC: RAND.
6.
BormanG., & HewesG. (2001). Long-term effects and cost effectiveness of Success for All.Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University, Center for Research on the Education of Students Placed At Risk.
7.
CarpenterT. P., FennemaE., PetersonP. L., ChiangC. P., & LoefM. (1989). Using knowledge of children's mathematics thinking in classroom teaching: An experimental study. American Educational Research Journal, 26, 499–531.
8.
ComerJ. P., Ben-AvieM., HaynesN. M., & JoynerE. T. (1999). Child by child: The Comer process for change in education.New York: Teachers College Press.
9.
EllisonD. G., HarrisP., & BarberL. (1968). A field test of programmed and directed tutoring. Reading Research Quarterly, 3, 307–367.
10.
EvertsonC. M., EmmerE. T., & WorshamM. E. (2000). Classroom management for elementary teachers (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
11.
FarrB., QuillingM., BesselR., & JohnsonW. (1987). Evaluation of PRIMETIME: 1986–87 final report.Indianapolis, IN: Advanced Technology.
12.
FarrellG., & LiebowitzM. (1998). Expeditionary Learning Outward Bound in Year 5: What the research shows.Cambridge, MA: Outward Bound.
13.
FolgerJ., & BredaC. (1990, April). Do teacher-aides improve student performance? Lessons from Project STAR. Paper presented at the annual convention of the American Educational Research Association, Boston, MA.
14.
FreibergH. J., SteinT. A., & HuangS. (1995). Effects of a classroom management intervention on student achievement in inner-city elementary schools. Educational Research and Evaluation, 1(1), 33–66.
15.
FreydP., & LytleJ. (1990). Corporate approach to the 2 R's: A critique of IBM's Writing to Read program. Educational Leadership, 47(6), 83–89.
16.
GoldbergB., & RichardsJ. (1996). The Co-nect design for school change. In StringfieldS., RossS., & SmithL. (Eds.), Bold plans for school restructuring: The New American Schools development designs (pp. 75–109). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
17.
GoodladJ. I., & AndersonR. H. (1963). The nongraded elementary school (Rev. ed.) New York: Harcourt, Brace, & World.
18.
GraueM. E., & DePernaJ. (2000). Redshirting and early retention: Who gets the “gift of time” and what are its outcomes?American Educational Research Journal, 37(2), 509–534.
19.
GutiérrezR., & SlavinR. E. (1992). Achievement effects of the nongraded elementary school: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 62, 333–376.
20.
HermanR. (1999). An educator's guide to schoolwide reform.Arlington, VA: Educational Research Service [on-line]. Retrieved December 1, 1999 from http://www.aasa.org
21.
InvernizziM., RosemaryC. A., JuelC., & RichardsH. C. (1997). At-risk readers and community volunteers: A 3-year perspective. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1(3), 277–300.
22.
JohnsonL. M., MandevilleG. K., & QuinnJ. L. (1977). South Carolina first grade pilot project 1975–1976: The effects of class size on reading and mathematics achievement.Columbia, SC: South Carolina Department of Education.
23.
KarweitN. L. (1994a). Can preschool alone prevent early reading failure? In SlavinR. E., KarweitN. L., & WasikB. A. (Eds.), Preventing early school failure (pp. 58–78). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
24.
KarweitN. L. (1994b). Issues in kindergarten organization and curriculum. In SlavinR. E., KarweitN. L., & WasikB. A. (Eds.), Preventing early school failure: Research on effective strategies (pp. 78–102). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
25.
KarweitN. L., & WasikB. A. (1994). Extra-year kindergarten programs and transitional first grades. In SlavinR. E., KarweitN. L., & WasikB. A. (Eds.), Preventing early school failure: Research on effective strategies (pp. 102–122). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
26.
KilgoreS. (2001). Comprehensive school reform: Research results for Modern Red Schoolhouse.Nashville, TN: Modern Red Schoolhouse.
27.
LloydD. N. (1978). Prediction of school failure from third-grade data. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 38, 1193–1200.
28.
MaddenN. A., SlavinR. E., KarweitN. L., DolanL. J., & WasikB. A. (1993). Success for All: Longitudinal effects of a restructuring program for inner-city elementary schools. American Educational Research Journal, 30, 123–148.
29.
McKeyR., CondelliL., GansonH., BarrettB., McConkeyC., & PlantzM. (1985). The impact of Head Start on children, families, and communities.Washington, DC: CSR, Inc.
30.
MorrisD., ShawB., & PerneyJ. (1990). Helping low readers in Grades 2 and 3: An after-school volunteer tutoring program. Elementary School Journal, 91(2), 132–150.
31.
MorrisD., TynerB., & PerneyJ. (2000). Early steps: Replicating the effects of a first-grade reading intervention program. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(4), 681–683.
NyeB. A., ZahariasJ. B., FultonB. D., AchillesC. M., & HooperR. (1991). The lasting benefits study: A continuing analysis of the effect of small class size in kindergarten through third grade on student achievement test scores in subsequent grade levels.Nashville: Tennessee State University.
34.
PalincsarA. S., BrownA. L., & MartinS. M. (1987). Peer interaction in reading comprehension instruction. Educational Psychologist, 22, 231–253.
35.
PinnellG. S., DeFordD. E., & LyonsC. A. (1988). Reading Recovery: Early intervention for at-risk first graders.Arlington, VA: Educational Research Service.
36.
ReynoldsA. J. (1998). The Chicago child-parent center and expansion program: A study of extended early childhood intervention. In CraneJ. (Ed.), Social programs that work (pp. 110–147). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
37.
RosenshineB., & MeisterC. (1994). Reciprocal teaching: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 64, 479–530.
38.
RoukU. (1997). Different ways of knowing: Effects on elementary teaching and learning in Kentucky.Washington, DC: Policy Studies Associates.
39.
SchuetzP. (1980). The instructional effectiveness of classroom aides.Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh, Learning Research and Development Center.
40.
SchweinhartL. J., BarnesH. V., & WeikartD. P. (1993). Significant benefits: The High/ Scope Perry Preschool Study through age 27.Ypsilanti, MI: High/Scope.
41.
ShepardL. A., & SmithM. L. (Eds.). (1989). Flunking grades: Research and policies on retention.New York: Falmer Press.
42.
SilverA. A., & HaginR. A. (1990). Disorders of learning in childhood.New York: Wiley.
43.
SlavinR. E. (1991). Reading effects of IBM's “Writing to Read” program: A review of evaluations. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 13, 1–12.
44.
SlavinR. E. (1994). School and classroom organization in beginning reading: Class size, aides, and instructional grouping. In SlavinR. E., KarweitN. L., & WasikB. A. (Eds.), Preventing early school failure: Research on effective strategies (pp. 122–143). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
45.
SlavinR. E. (1995). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
46.
SlavinR. E. (1999). The pendulum revisited: Faddism in education and its alternatives. In SizerG. J. (Ed.), Handbook of educational policy (373–385). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
47.
SlavinR. E., & FasholaO. S. (1998). Show me the evidence: Proven and promising programs for America's schools.Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
48.
SlavinR. E., & MaddenN. A. (1999). Effects of bilingual and English as a second language adaptations of Success for All on the reading achievement of students acquiring English. Journal of Education for Students Placed At Risk, 4(4), 393–416.
49.
SlavinR. E., & MaddenN. A. (Eds.). (2001). One million children: Success for All.Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
50.
SlavinR. E., MaddenN. A., DolanL. J., & WasikB. A. (1996). Every child, every school: Success for All.Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
51.
StringfieldS. (1998). Organizational learning and current reform efforts. In Leith-woodK., & LouisK. S. (Eds.), Schools as learning communities (pp. 255–268). Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
52.
SupovitzJ. A., PoglincoS. M., & SnyderB. A. (2001). Moving mountains: Successes and challenges of the America's Choice comprehensive school reform design.Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
53.
TraubJ. (1999). Better by design? A consumer's guide to schoolwide reform.Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Foundation.
54.
WallachM. A., & WallachL. (1976). Teaching all children to read.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
55.
WasikB. A., & SlavinR. E. (1993). Preventing early reading failure with one-to-one tutoring: A best-evidence synthesis. Reading Research Quarterly, 28, 178–200.
56.
WhitehurstG., CroneD., ZevenborgenA., SchultzM., VeltingO., & FischelJ. (1999). Outcomes of an emergent literacy intervention from Head Start through second grade. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(3), 404–414.
57.
WordE., JohnstonJ., BainH. P., FultonB. D., ZahariasJ. B., LintzM. N., AchillesC. M., FolgerJ., & BredaC. (1990). Student/Teacher Achievement Ratio (STAR): Tennessee's K–3 class size study, final report.Nashville, TN: Tennessee State Department of Education.