AlcalaA. (2000). A framework for developing an effective instructional program for limited English proficient students with limited formal schooling. Practical Assessment, Research, & Evaluation, 7(9), 1–6.
2.
AlexanderD., HeavisideS., & FarrisE. (1999). Status of education reform in public elementary and secondary schools: Teachers’ perspectives.Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
3.
Assessment Committee of the President's Advisory Commission on Educational Excellence for Hispanic Americans. (2000). Testing Hispanic students in the United States: Technical and policy issues.Washington, DC: Author.
4.
AugustD., & HakutaK. (Eds.). (1998). Educating language-minority children.Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
5.
BejaranoY. (1987). A cooperative small-group methodology in the language classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 21, 483–504.
6.
BermúdezA. B., & PalumboD. (1994). Bridging the gap between literacy and technology: Hypermedia as a learning tool for limited English proficient students. The Journal of Educational Issues of Language Minority Students, 14, 165–184.
7.
BoyerJ. B. (1993). Culturally sensitive instruction: An essential component of education for diversity. Catalyst for Change, 22(3), 5–8.
8.
BronfenbrennerU. (1979). Beyond the deficit model in child and family policy. Teachers College Press, 81, 95–104.
9.
CalderónM. (1991). Benefits of cooperative learning for Hispanic students. Texas Research Journal, 2, 39–57.
10.
ChamotA. U., & O'MalleyJ. M. (1987). The cognitive academic language learning approach: A bridge to the mainstream. TESOL Quarterly, 21, 227–249.
11.
ChristianD. (1995). Two-way bilingual education. In MontoneC. L. (Ed.), Teaching linguistically and culturally diverse learners: Effective programs and practices (pp. 8–11). Santa Cruz, CA: National Center for Research on Cultural Diversity and Second Language Learning.
12.
CumminsJ., & SayersD. (1990). Education 2001: Learning networks and educational reform. Computers in the Schools, 7(1 & 2), 1–29.
13.
Darling-HammondL. (1997). The right to learn: A blueprint for creating schools that work.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
14.
Delgado-GaitanC. (1991). Involving parents in the schools: A process of empowerment. American Journal of Education, 100, 20–46.
15.
DuránB. J., DuganT., & WefferR. E. (1997). Increasing teacher effectiveness with language minority students. The High School Journal, 84, 238–246.
16.
EscamillaK. (1994). Descubriendo La Lectura: An early intervention literacy program in Spanish. Literacy, Teaching, and Learning, 1(1), 57–70.
17.
FasholaO. S., SlavinR. E., CalderónM., & DuránR. (2001). Effective programs for Latino students in elementary and middle schools. In SlavinR. E., & CalderónM. (Eds.), Effective programs for Latino students (pp. 1–66). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
18.
FletcherT. V., & Cardona-MoralesC. (1990). Implementing effective instructional interventions for minority students. In BaronaA., & GarcíaE. E. (Eds.), Children at risk: Poverty, minority status, and other issues in educational equity (pp. 151–170). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.
19.
FullerE. J., & JohnsonJ. F.Jr. (2001). Can state accountability systems drive improvements in school performance for children of color and children from low-income homes?Education and Urban Society, 33, 260–283.
20.
GallimoreR., & GoldenbergC. N. (1992). Tracking the developmental path of teachers and learners: A Vygotskian perspective. In OserF. K., DickA., & PatryJ. L. (Eds.), Effective and responsible teaching: The new synthesis (pp. 203–221). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
21.
GallimoreR., ReeseL., BalzanoS., BensonC., & GoldenbergC. (1991, April). Ecocultural sources of early literacy experiences: Job-required literacy, home literacy environments, and school reading. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
22.
GarcíaE. E. (1994). Understanding and meeting the challenge of student cultural diversity.Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
23.
GarcíaE. E. (2001). Hispanic education in the United States: Raices y alas.Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
24.
GarcíaG. N. (2001). The factors that place Latino children and youth at risk of educational failure. In SlavinR. E., & CalderónM. (Eds.), Effective programs for Latino students (pp. 307–329). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
25.
GerstenR., & JimenezR. (1998). Modulating instruction for language minority students. In KameenuiE. J., & CarnineD. W. (Eds.), Effective teaching strategies that accommodate diverse learners (pp. 161–178). New York: Prentice Hall.
26.
GerstenR., & WoodwardJ. (1992). The quest to translate research into classroom practice: Strategies for assisting classroom teachers’ work with “at-risk” students and students with disabilities. In CarnineD., & KameenuiE. (Eds.), Higher cognitive functioning for all students (pp. 201–218). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
27.
GlickmanC. D. (1998). Educational leadership for democratic purpose! What do we mean?International Journal of Leadership in Education, 1(1), 47–53.
28.
GoldenbergC., ReeseL., & GallimoreR. (1992). Effects of literacy materials from school on Latino children's home experiences and early reading achievement. American Journal of Education, 100, 497–536.
29.
GonzalezN., MollL., Floyd-TeneryM., RiveraA., RendonP., GonzalezR., & AmantiC. (1993). Teacher research on funds of knowledge: Learning from households (Educational Practice Report No. 6) Santa Cruz, CA: National Center for Research on Cultural Diversity and Second Language Learning.
30.
HabermanM. (1991). Pedagogy of poverty versus good teaching. Phi Delta Kappan, 73, 290–294.
31.
HargreavesA., & FullanM. (1998). What's worth fighting for out there.New York: Teachers College Press.
32.
JiménezR. T., & BarreraR. (2000). How will bilingual/ESL programs in literacy change in the next millennium?Reading Research Quarterly, 35, 522–523.
33.
JohnsonD. W., & JohnsonR. T. (1991). Classroom instruction and cooperative grouping. In WaxmanH. C., & WalbergH. J. (Eds.), Effective teaching: Current research (pp. 277–293). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
34.
KaganD. M. (1990). How schools alienate students at risk: A model for examining proximal classroom variables. Educational Psychology, 25, 105–125.
35.
KoschoreckJ. W. (2001). Accountability and educational equity in the transformation of an urban district. Education and Urban Society, 33, 284–304.
36.
LewisL., ParsadB., CareyN., BartfaiN., FarrisE., & SmerdonB. (1999). Teacher quality: A report on the preparation and qualifications of public school teachers (Report No. 1999-080). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, National Center for Education Statistics.
37.
LockwoodA. T. (2001). Effective elementary, middle, and high school programs for Latino youth. In SlavinR. E., & CalderónM. (Eds.), Effective programs for Latino students (pp. 101–124). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
38.
LockwoodA. T., & SecadaW. G. (1999). Transforming education for Hispanic youth.Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
39.
McCombsB. (2001, February). Putting learner-centered principles into practice. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southwest Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
40.
McLaughlinB., & McLeodB. (1996). Educating all our students: Improving education for children from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds (vol. 1) Santa Cruz, CA: National Center for Research on Cultural Diversity and Second Language Learning.
41.
McNeilL. M. (2000). Contradictions of school reform: Educational costs of standardized testing.New York: Routledge.
42.
MeansB., & OlsonK. (1994). The link between technology and authentic learning. Educational Leadership, 51(7), 15–18.
43.
MehanH. (1991). Sociological foundations supporting the study of cultural diversity (Research Report #1) Santa Cruz, CA: National Center for Research on Cultural Diversity and Second Language Learning.
44.
MehanH. (1996). Contextual factors surrounding Hispanic dropouts.Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Hispanic Dropout Commission.
45.
MehanH., VillanuevaI., HubbardL., & LintzA. (1996). Constructing school success: The consequences of untracking low-achieving students.Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
46.
MelendezM. (1993). Bilingual education in California: A status report. Thrust for Educational Leadership, 22(6), 35–38.
NewmannF. M. (1989). Student engagement and high school reform. Educational Leadership, 46(5), 34–36.
49.
O'DonnellC. R., TharpR. G., & WilsonK. (1993). Activity settings as the unit of analysis: A theoretical basis for community intervention and development. American Journal of Community Psychology, 21, 501–520.
50.
PadrónY. N. (1992). Strategy training in reading for bilingual students. Southwest Journal of Educational Research into Practice, 4, 59–62.
51.
PadrónY. N. (1993). The effect of strategy instruction on bilingual students’ cognitive strategy use in reading. Bilingual Research Quarterly Journal, 16(3 & 4), 35–51.
52.
PadrónY. N., & KnightS. L. (1989). Linguistic and cultural influences on classroom instruction. In BaptisteH. P., AndersonJ., Walker de FelixJ., & WaxmanH. C. (Eds.), Leadership, equity, and school effectiveness (pp. 173–185). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
53.
PadrónY. N., & WaxmanH. C. (1993). Teaching and learning risks associated with limited cognitive mastery in science and mathematics for limited English proficient students. In Office of Bilingual Education, and Minority Language Affairs (Eds.), Proceedings of the Third National Research Symposium on Limited English Proficient Students: Focus on middle and high school issues (Vol. 2, pp. 511–547). Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for Bilingual Education.
54.
PadrónY. N., & WaxmanH. C. (1996). Improving the teaching and learning of English language learners through instructional technology. International Journal of Instructional Media, 23, 341–354.
55.
PadrónY. N., & WaxmanH. C. (1999). Effective instructional practices for English language learners. In WaxmanH. C., & WalbergH. J. (Eds.), New directions for teaching practice and research (pp. 171–203). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
56.
PadrónY. N., WaxmanH. C., PowersR. A., & BrownA. (In press). Evaluating the effects of the Pedagogy to Improve Resiliency Program on English language learners. In Minaya-RoweL. (Ed.), Research in bilingual education.Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
57.
PeregoyS. F., & BoyleO. F. (2000). English learners reading English: What we know, what we need to know. Theory into Practice, 39, 237–247.
58.
PinnellG. S. (1989). Reading Recovery: Helping at-risk children learn to read. Elementary School Journal, 90, 161–182.
59.
Presidential Task Force on Psychology in Education (1993). Learner-centered psychological principles: Guidelines for school redesign and reform.Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
60.
RichardsonV. (1990). Significant and worthwhile change in teacher practice. Educational Researcher, 19(7), 10–18.
61.
RiveraC., & ZehlerA. M. (1991). Assuring the academic success of language minority students: Collaboration in teaching and learning. Journal of Education, 173(2), 52–77.
62.
SchneiderB., & LeeY. (1990). A model for academic success: The school and home environment of East Asian students. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 21, 358–377.
63.
SchubertW. H. (1980). Recalibrating educational research: Toward a focus on practice. Educational Researcher, 9(1), 17–24.
64.
SinclairR. L., & GhoryW. J. (1987). Reaching marginal students: A primary concern for school renewal.Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
65.
SlavinR. E., & CalderónM. (Eds.). (2001). Effective programs for Latino students.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
66.
SlavinR. E., & MaddenN. (2001). Effects of bilingual and English as a second language adaptations of Success for All on the reading achievement of students acquiring English. In SlavinR. E., & CalderónM. (Eds.), Effective programs for Latino students (pp. 207–230). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
67.
SmolkinL. (2000). How will diversity affect literacy in the next millennium?Reading Research Quarterly, 35, 549–550.
68.
SmylieM. A. (1988). The enhancement function of staff development: Organization and psychological antecedents to individual teacher change. American Educational Research Journal, 25, 1–30.
69.
StephenV. P., VarbleM. E., & TaittH. (1993). Instructional strategies for minority youth. The Clearing House, 67, 116–120.
70.
TharpR. G. (1995). Instructional conversations in Zuni classrooms. In MontoneC. L. (Ed.), Teaching linguistically and culturally diverse learners: Effective programs and practices (pp. 12–13). Santa Cruz, CA: National Center for Research on Cultural Diversity and Second Language Learning.
71.
TharpR. G. (1997). From at-risk to excellence: Research, theory, and principles for practice.Santa Cruz, CA: Center for Research on Education, Diversity, and Excellence.
TharpR. G., & GallimoreR. (1988). Rousing minds to life: Teaching, learning, and schooling in social context.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
74.
TruebaH. T. (2001). Polar positions on the Texas Assessment of Academic Skills (TAAS): Pragmatism and the politics of neglect. Education and Urban Society, 33, 333–344.
75.
U.S. Department of Education (1998). No more excuses: The final report of the U.S. Hispanic dropout project.Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
76.
U.S. Department of Education (2000). Key indicators of Hispanic student achievement: National goals and benchmarks for the next decade [on-line]. Available: http://www.ed.gov.pubs/hispanicindicators/
77.
ValenzuelaA. (1999). Subtractive schooling: U. S. Mexican youth and the politics of caring.Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
78.
WaxmanH. C. (1992). Reversing the cycle of educational failure for students in at-risk school environments. In WaxmanH. C., Walker de FelixJ., AndersonJ., & BaptisteH. P. (Eds.), Students at risk in at-risk schools: Improving environments for learning (pp. 1–9). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
79.
WaxmanH. C., HuangS. L., & PadrónY. N. (1995). Investigating the pedagogy of poverty in inner-city middle level schools. Research in Middle Level Education, 18(2), 1–22.
80.
WaxmanH. C., & PadrónY. N. (1995). Improving the quality of classroom instruction for students at risk of failure in urban schools. Peabody Journal of Education, 70(2), 44–65.
81.
WaxmanH. C., & PadrónY. N. (In press). Research-based teaching practices that improve the education of English language learners. In Minaya-RoweL. (Ed.), Research in bilingual education.Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
82.
WaxmanH. C., PadrónY. N., & ArnoldK. A. (2001). Effective instructional practices for students placed at risk of failure. In BormanG. D., StringfieldS. C., & SlavinR. E. (Eds.), Title I: Compensatory education at the crossroads (pp. 137–170). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
83.
WaxmanH. C., PadrónY. N., & KnightS. L. (1991). Risks associated with students’ limited cognitive mastery. In WangM. C., ReynoldsM. C., & WalbergH. J. (Eds.), Handbook of special education: Emerging programs (vol. 4, pp. 235–254). Oxford, U.K.: Pergamon.
84.
WehlageG. G., RutterR. A., SmithG. A., LeskoN., & FernandezR. R. (1989). Reducing the risk: Schools as communities of support.London: Falmer.
85.
WellsG., & Chang-WellsL. (1992). Constructing knowledge together: Classrooms as centers of inquiry and literacy.Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
86.
WestS., AikenL., & ToddM. (1993). Probing the effects of individual components in multiple component prevention programs. American Journal of Community Psychology, 21, 571–605.